|
Greener Journal of Agricultural
Sciences Vol. 9(2), pp. 215-221, 2019 ISSN: 2276-7770 Copyright ©2019, the copyright of
this article is retained by the author(s) DOI Link: http://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2019.2.042819081 http://gjournals.org/GJAS |
|
Effect of Mycorrhiza,
Fertilizer and Watering Regime on the Growth and Development of Mansonia altissima A CHEV. Seedlings
Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Jericho,
Ibadan, P M B 5054 Ibadan, Oyo state Nigeria.
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article
No.:042819081 Type: Research DOI:
10.15580/GJAS.2019.2.042819081 |
A greenhouse
investigation was conducted to determine the effect of Arbuscular
mycorrhiza, N. P. K fertilizer and moisture supply
on Mansonia altissima
seedlings. The experiment was 3x3x3 factorial experiment in completely
randomized design with each of factor has 3 levels and was replicated 5
times. Application of arbscular mycorriza
does not have significant effect on growth parameters assessed, while N. P. K fertilizer and moisture supply had
significant differences at (p<0.05) on seedling height, collar diameter
and leaf production. Seedlings treated to 1g of fertilizer had the highest
seedlings height mean value of 17.34cm, collar diameter of 3.63mm and leaf
count of 8 while control had the least value of seedlings height, collar
diameter and leaf production with 14.80cm, 3.02mm and 7 leaves respectively.
Seedlings watered at pot capacity on daily basis had the highest seedling
height and collar diameter of 16.99cm and 3.52mm respectively. Response
observed in the present investigation revealed that more research work can be
carried out to ascertain the appropriate arbuscular
mycorrhiza to be used on the species based on
compatibility. |
|
Submitted: 28/04/2019 Accepted: 01/05/2019 Published: |
|
|
*Corresponding
Author Kareem
A.A. E-mail:
kareemakeem2014@ gmail.com Phone:
+2348108918469 |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Forest and forest
products play a very important role in the development of any nation. The
utilization of forest resources range from the provision of raw materials for
the ever increasing industry to yielding poles and firewood for domestic
consumption, regulation of water regime and climate, protection from
desertification and satisfaction of recreational needs. Increase in population
and attendant increase in demand for forest and forest products have made
plantation forestry attractive to tropical foresters.
The significant
contribution of Mycorrhiza to plant is the symbiosis, which are characterized by bi-directional
movement of nutrients where carbon flows to the fungus and in-organic nutrients
move to the plant, thereby providing a critical linkage between the plant root
and soil (Garbaye, 1994). In infertile soils,
nutrients taken up by the mycorrhiza fungi can lead
to improved plant growth and reproduction, as a result mycorrhiza
plants are often more competitive and better able to tolerate environmental
stresses than non- mycorrhiza plants.
Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi belong to the order Glomales
and form highly branched structures called arbuscules,
within root cortical cells of many herbaceous and woody plant species. Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF)
can be found in almost all habitat and climates (Bareaet al., 1997) and at different depth of soil (Michelsen
and Rosendahl, 1990).Although the occurrence and
efficiency of AMF have been widely examined in most valuable undomesticated
fruit trees (Mathur and Vyas,
2000), little is known of the mycorrhizal status and
responsiveness of inherently slow growing indigenous timber tree species such
as Mansonia altissima
However, in tropical
agriculture systems where most soils are fragile with low fertility, a major
beneficial effect of AMF is their role in maintenance and improvement of soil
structure by their external hyphae and the production of a special protein
called the glomalin (Diedhiouet al 2003). The mechanisms involved are as follows, the growth of
external hyphae into the soil to create a skeletal structure that holds soil
particles together and the formation of a ‘sticky’ string bag of hyphae by the glomalin, which contributes to soil aggregate stabilization
(Elsenet al 2003).
It is therefore
necessary to carry out studies on the effect of drought stress and inoculation
of arbuscular mycorrhiza
and nutrient application on the seedling performance of Mansonia altissima in order to know its growth behaviour and ascertain the best way to establish them in
plantations, extensively both as mixed and single species stands. This will restore its pride of place in both
local and international markets.
MATERIALS
AND METHOD
Seeds of Mansonia altissima were
sown directly into poly pots filled with top soil collected from Forestry
Research Institute of Nigeria arboretum. The mycorrhiza
used was supplied by Agronomy Department, University of Ibadan. The
inoculations were carried out according to the method of Carling et al., 1978, Fagbola et al., 2005and Kareem et al., 2012. Also N:P:K fertilizer were added. Three (3) seeds each were sown
directly into the poly pot and were arranged in screen house of Forestry
Research Institute of Nigeria. After germination, thinning was carried out to
reduce the number of seedlings to one plant per poly pot. A 3 X 3 X 3factorial
experiment was used for the study. The treatments were replicated five times.
The factors were mycorrhiza, N:P:K
fertilizer and water supply. While N:P:K fertilizer and water supply had three
levels(N:P:K 0g, 1g, and 2g and the water supply was once in a week, twice in a
week and every day(1/7, 4/7 and 7/7 respectively), mycorrhiza
also had three levels (myco 0g,10g and 20g (Glomus deserticola).
The seedlings were watered regularly for six weeks to allow proper
establishment before the drought stress treatment commenced.
Data
were collected at two weeks intervals and the whole experiment terminated after
24 weeks. During the growth period, measurements of plant height and collar
diameter were taken while leaf number was counted.
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION
Effect of mycorrhiza on seedlings growth of M.altissima
The
mean seedlings height for mycorrhiza ranged between
15.51cm and 17.22cm.Seedlings without mycorrhiza (M1)
had the highest and seedlings inoculated with 20g of mycorrhiza
(M3) had the least value (Table 1). There were no significant differences in
seedlings height between M2 and M3 with 15.86cmand 15.51cm respectively (Table
1).
The mean seedling
diameter ranged from 3.26mm to 3.63mmwith the highest mean observed for
seedlings under 0g mycorrhiza (M1) while the least
collar diameter was observed from M2 which is 10g (Table 1)
The
leaf production increased with increase in age of the seedlings, mean leaf
production in seedlings inoculated with mycorrhiza
was 8 which indicates that there were no significant differences among the
three levels of mycorrhiza used (p>0.05) (Table 1
).
Table 1:
Effect of Mycorrhiza on the growth of M. altissima Seedlings
|
Mycorrhiza |
Height |
Collar Diameter |
Leaf Production |
|
M1 |
17.22 ±2.62a |
3.63 ±0.63a |
8 ± 1.42a |
|
M2 |
15.86 ±3.05b |
3.26 ±0.54b |
8 ±1.04a |
|
M3 |
15.51 ±3.16b |
3.25 ±0.44b |
8 ±1.16a |
|
Sig. |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
*significant
at (p≤0.05)ns- not significant (p>0.05)
Effect of
Fertilizers on the growth of M. altissima Seedlings
Table 2 shows that seedlings treated to 1g of NPK(F2) had the highest mean value of 17.34cm and seedlings
without fertilizer(F1) had the least value of 14.80cm.
Result shows that
seedlings treated to 1g of NPK (F2) had the highest mean value of 3.63mm while
those without fertilizer application (F1) had the least value of 3.02mm (Table
2). It also reveals that value of collar diameter were significantly different
among the three levels of fertilizer used (p< 0.05)
The
leaf number increased with increase in age of the seedlings. Leaf production
ranged between 7 and 8 with seedlings treated to 1g and 2g of NPK respectively.
It also revealed that F2 and F3 are not significantly different from each other
both having 8 leaves (Table 2). However, ANOVA for leaf production reveals that
there were significant differences (P<0.05) in all the factors and
interactions except for the interaction between mycorrhiza
and watering regimes. (Appendix 1 ).
Table 2: Effect of Fertilizers on the growth of M. altissima
Seedlings
|
Fertilizers |
Height(cm) |
Collar Diameter(mm) |
NumberofLeaves |
|
F1 |
14.80 ±2.47c |
3.02 ±0.42c |
7 ±0.79b |
|
F2 |
17.34 ±2.86a |
3.63 ±0.62a |
8 ±1.34a |
|
F3 |
16.46 ±3.05b |
3.50± 0.45b |
8 ±1.23a |
|
Sig. |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
*significant at (p≤0.05)ns- not significant (p>0.05)
Effect of
watering regimes on the growth of M. altissima Seedlings
Seedlings watered
daily to pot capacity (W3) had the highest mean value of 16.99cm and seedlings
watered every other day to pot capacity(W2) had the least
value of 15.08cm among the watering regimes (Table 3).
Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA) reveals that there were significant differences (P<0.05) in the
seedling height in watering regime and also among the interaction between mycorrhiza and fertilizer, fertilizer and watering regime
and between the three factors. (Appendix 1).
Seedlings watered daily to pot capacity(W3) had the highest mean value of 3.52mm while
those watered three times a week(W2) had the least value of 3.24mm (Table 3).
However, ANOVA for
collar diameter revealed that there were significant differences at (P<0.05)
among the mycorrhiza, fertilizer, watering regime and
the interaction between fertilizer and watering regime, and with all the three
factors. (Appendix 1)
Mean separation result
for leaves production showed that it was the same number of leaf production for
seedlings watered once a week (W1) and those watered daily ( W3) had 8 number
of leaves while seedlings watered three times a week(W2) had 7 leaves (Table 3).
Table 3: Effect of Watering Regimes on the growth of M. altissima
Seedlings
|
Watering Regimes |
Height(cm) |
Collar Diameter |
Leaf Production |
|
W1 |
16.52± 3.03a |
3.39± 0.40b |
8.21± 1.04a |
|
W2 |
15.08± 3.66b |
3.24± 0.64c |
7.57± 1.38b |
|
W3 |
16.99± 3.35a |
3.52± 0.61a |
8.12± 1.22a |
|
LSD Value |
8.33 |
0.19 |
0.94 |
|
Sig. |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
*significant at (p≤0.05)ns- not significant (p>0.05)
Interaction
effect of Mycorrhiza, Fertilizers and Watering
Regimes on the Growth of M. altissima Seedlings
On interaction
between the three factors, it was revealed that seedlings without mycorrhiza treated with 1g of NPK and trice watering in a
week at pot capacity(M1F2W2) had the highest mean
height value of 20.95cm and the least value was observed under seedling without
mycorrhiza, fertilizer and trice watering in a week
at pot capacity(M1F1W2) with 12.09cm
(Table 4).
Interaction of mycorrhiza, fertilizer and watering regimes revealed that
the highest mean collar diameter of 4.39mm was observed for seedlings without mycorrhiza treated to 1g of NPK and trice a week watering
at pot capacity (M1F2W2) while the least value of 2.82mm was recorded in
seedlings without mycorrhiza, without fertilizer and
trice watering a week at pot capacity M1F1W2 (Table 4).
Table 4:
Mean Separation for the Interaction effect of Mycorrhiza,
Fertilizers and Watering Regimes on the Growth of M. altissima Seedlings.
|
M * F * W |
Height |
Collar Diameter |
Number of leaves |
|
M1F1W1 |
16.42 ±2.14cd |
3.52 ±0.33b |
8 ±0.77c |
|
M1F1W2 |
12.09 ±3.65a |
2.82 ±0.35a |
7 ±0.90b |
|
M1F1W3 |
14.87 ±1.61bc |
3.17 ±0.47ab |
7 ±0.70b |
|
M1F2W1 |
16.87 ±4.12d |
3.61± 0.58b |
8 ±1.44c |
|
M1F2W2 |
20.95 ±2.38f |
4.39 ±0.57c |
10 ±1.39e |
|
M1F2W3 |
20.21 ±4.43f |
3.97 ±0.69b |
9 ±1.31d |
|
M1F3W1 |
18.93 ±2.73e |
3.72 ±0.37b |
9 ±0.98d |
|
M1F3W2 |
15.90 ±2.71c |
3.47 ±0.50ab |
8 ±1.54c |
|
M1F3W3 |
18.72 ±1.01e |
4.01 ±0.22bc |
9 ±0.82d |
|
M2F1W1 |
14.83 ±1.74bc |
3.04 ±0.31ab |
7 ±0.62b |
|
M2F1W2 |
13.93 ±2.20b |
2.70± 0.48a |
7 ±0.76b |
|
M2F1W3 |
15.80 ±2.07c |
3.00± 0.54a |
7 ±0.91b |
|
M2F2W1 |
16.99 ±3.41d |
3.37 ±0.36ab |
8 ±0.48c |
|
M2F2W2 |
16.02 ±4.24cd |
3.37 ±0.58ab |
8 ±1.50c |
|
M2F2W3 |
17.22 ±3.49d |
3.65 ±0.66b |
8 ±0.75c |
|
M2F3W1 |
18.19 ±2.06de |
3.53 ±0.31b |
9 ±0.57d |
|
M2F3W2 |
15.30± 1.99c |
3.26 ±0.26ab |
8 ±0.82c |
|
M2F3W3 |
14.47 ±3.49b |
3.46 ±0.64ab |
8 ±1.53c |
|
M3F1W1 |
14.28 ±1.69b |
3.03 ±0.0.25ab |
7 ±0.71b |
|
M3F1W2 |
14.33 ±1.70b |
2.89 ±0.18a |
7 ±0.48b |
|
M3F1W3 |
16.64 ±2.13d |
3.00 ±0.30a |
8 ±0.83c |
|
M3F2W1 |
16.15 ±3.42c |
3.44 ±0.28ab |
9 ±1.01d |
|
M3F2W2 |
12.86 ±3.42a |
3.03 ±0.42ab |
6 ±0.40a |
|
M3F2W3 |
18.74 ±3.10e |
3.84 ±0.40b |
9 ±0.61d |
|
M3F3W1 |
16.01 ±3.08c |
3.22 ±0.17ab |
8 ±0.91c |
|
M3F3W2 |
14.31 ±2.56b |
3.25 ±0.48ab |
7 ±1.51b |
|
M3F3W3 |
16.30 ±3.53cd |
3.57 ±0.44b |
7± 0.68b |
Means with same superscript in each column are
not significantly different from each other (p>0.05)
Arbuscular mycorrhiza are
obligate biotrophs and the symbiosis formed between
the host plant and fungal partner is normally mutualistic (Smith and Read,
2008). However, evidences suggest that the symbiosis can range from parasitic
to mutualistic depending on the host plant and Arbuscular
Mycorrhiza (A.M) fungal species involved (Kilronmos, 2003); soil physical, chemical and other
associated characteristics as well as environmental conditions (Diop et al.,
1994, Loth 1996, Weber and Claus 2000). Hence, an attempt to specifically
understand the contribution of introduced AMF in a controlled environment
before the prevailing conditions in the field is important. Mycorrhiza
inoculation can have positive effect (Michelsen and Rosendahl 1990, Osonubi et al., 1991, Noydet al., 1995, Fagbola et al., 2005 and Kareem et
al., 2012); negative effect (Hetricket al., 1990,
Taylor and Harrier ( 2000) or
non-significant (Manjunath and Habte,
1988) effects on the growth of plants.
In
this study, inoculation of M. altissima with G.
deserticola had no significant effect on the
growth variables assessed, which is in line with findings of (Manjunath and Habte, 1990), this
contradiction maybe due to lower physiological compatibility of G. deserticola with
Mansonia altissima since
variability in compatibility has been reported for various A.M symbiosis (Krishma et al.,
1985, Rajapakse and Miller 1987, Raoet al., 1990 and Mercy et al.,1990).
The
application of N.P.K fertilizer significantly increased the plant height,
collar diameter and number of leaves in seedlings of Mansonia altissima. This might be due to the fact
that Nitrogen is a major nutritional element required for tissue
differentiation and its role in increasing plant growth and development which
are well documented by various researchers (Shedeed et al., 1986, Aziz, 2007). Like
Nitrogen, Phosphorus is an essential constituent of the genetic material and
augments cell division (Aziz, 2007). The study clearly demonstrates the
nutritional importance of N.P.K supply to M.
altissima seedlings for better growth and
development and the results revealed application of N.P.K 1g/seedling to be
beneficial and therefore enhanced seedlings performance under tropical agroclimatic condition. The optimum level of fertilizer
requirement for a tree species like M. altissima is dynamic and changes with the age of plant.
Therefore, the fertilizer requirement studies need further long term evaluation
for different agro-ecological regions.
Water
is a significant factor in tree growth and development in the tropics (Awodola and Nwoboshi, 1993).
Water is required by plants to manufacture carbohydrate and as a means for
transportation of food and mineral elements. Various vital processes in plants
such as cell division, cell elongation stem as well as leaf enlargement and chlorophyII formation depends on plant water availability
(Price et al., 1986). The knowledge
of the response of the seedling under conditions of restricted moisture may
provide an indication of its response to increased water stress. Also, the
evaluation of the morphological and physiological growth of plants at period of
restricted moisture is useful for the isolation of plants with seedling
characteristics acceptable for afforestation in drought prone environments.
The
finding from this study revealed that watering regimes applied to the seedlings
of M. altissima
had significant effect on the seedling height, collar diameter and leaf production.
The highest value for seedling height,
collar diameter and leaf production were observed in seedlings watered everyday to pot capacity. This is in agreement with the
previous studies (Akinyele, 2007 and Ogunwande, 2014).The interaction effect of fertilizer and
watering regimes had significant effect on the growth parameters assessed.
CONCLUSION
Interaction between mycorrhiza,
fertilizer and moisture supply resulted in enhancement of growth and
development of Mansonia altissima
seedlings indicating that arbuscular mycorrhiza was not parasitic, However fertilizer was found
to exert more influence than mycorrhizain respect of
morphological characteristics of M. altissima seedlings.
REFERENCES
Akinyele, A. O. 2007.
Silvicultural requirements of seedlings of Buchholzia coriacea Engl.
Ph.D thesis submitted to the Forest Resources
Management, University of Ibadan. pp. 179.
Awodola, A. M., and Nwoboshi, L. C.
1993.Effect of source of potassium and frequency of moisture application on
growth and macronutrient distribution in seedlings of Parkiabiglobosa
(R. Br.ex.G.Don). Nigeria Journal of Forestry, 23 (2) 98- 108.
Aziz,
N. G. A (2007), Stimulatory effect of NPK fertilizer and benzyladenine on growth and chemical constituents of Cordiaeum variegatum L.
Plant.American. Evasion J. Agric and Environ Sci2 (6): 711-719.
Barea, J. M., Azcom–Aguilare, C. and Azcon, R.
1997.Physiological and nutritional response by Latuca
sativa L.to nitrogen sources and Mycorrhiza fungi
under drought condition. Boil fsertil soils 22:156:
161.
Carling
D.E Riehle W.G, Broom M.F and Johnson D.R. 1998.
Effect or a vesicular – arbuscular mycohhiza fungus on nitrogen reduyctase
and nitrogen activities in modulating and non-modulating soybeans.phytopathol68:1590-1596.
Diedhiou P.M. Hallman J and Oerke E.C. 2003.Effects of arbuscular
Mycorrhizal fungi and a non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporumon Meloidogyne
incognita infestation of tomato.Mycorrhiza13: 199-204. 172
Diop, T.A, Gueye
M, Dreyfus BL, Plenchatte C, Strullu
D.G. 1994. Indigenous arbuscular Mycorrhiza
fungi associated with Acadaalbida. In different areas of Senegal.Appl
Emiron microbial 60: 3433-3436.
Elsen, A. Beeterens, R., Swennen, R. and De Waele D. 2003.
Effects of an arbuscular Mycorrhizal
fungus and two plant-parasitic nematodes on Musa genotypes differing in
root morphology. Biology and fertility of Soils 38:367-376.
Fagbola, O., Oyetunji,
O.J, Osonubi, O and Mulongoy,
K. 2005. Greenhouse evaluation of two woody hedgerows as affected by arbuscular mycorrhiza fungus
(AMF), soil quality and moisture. Journal of Archives of
Agronomy and soil science Vol 51 No3 pp 335-349.
Garbaye, J. 1994. Helper bacteria:
A new dimension to the mycorrhiza symbiosis. New
Phytol128:179 – 210.
Hetrick, B.A.D, Wilson, G.T, Todd,
T.C. 1990. Differential responses of C3 and C4 grasses to mycorrhiza
symbiosis, phosphorus fertilization and soil micro-organism Can J Bot 68:461-467.
Kareem,
A.A., Akinyele, A.O., Adio,
A.F., and Iroko, O.A., 2012. Preliminary
Investigation of the effect of Arbuscular mycorrhiza and water stress on Afzelia
africana (Smith) in different soil Media, Journal
of Sustainable Environment Management Vol 4: 56 – 62.
Krishma, K.R. Shetty,
K.G. Daft, P.J and Andres, D.J. 1985. Genotype dependent
variation in mycorrhiza colonization and respond to
inoculation of pearl millet. Plant Soil 86. 113-125
Loth, C. 1996.
Abundance of arbuscular mycorrhiza
fungi spores at different native sites in dependence of sludge applications Bodenkultur 4:89-96.
Manjunath, A. and Habte, M. 1988. Development of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza infection
and the uptake of immobile nutrients in Leucaenaleucocephala.
Plant Soil 106: 97-103. Manjunath, A., and Habte, M.1990 Establishment of soil solution phosphorus for
studies involving vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. Commum. soil.
sci. plant Anal.21: 556 – 557. 177.
Mathur, M. and Vyas, A. 2000.
Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza
on biomass production, nutrient uptake and physiological changes in Ziziphus mauritiana
Lam. under water stress. J. Arid Environs, 45,191-195
Mercy,
M.A, Shivashankar, G. Bagyaraj,
D.J. 1990.Mycorrhiza colonization in cowpea is host dependent and heritable. Plant
Soil 121:292-294.
Michelsen, A. Rosendahl, S. 1990. The effect of Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi,
phosphorus and drought stress on the growth of Acacia nilotica
and Leucaena leucocephala
seedlings. Plant Soil 124: 127-134
Ogunwande,
O.A 2014. A PhD Thesis submitted to Department of Forest Resources
Management, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp178.
Osonubi, O. Mulongoy, K. Awotoye, O.O. Atayese, M.O. and Okali, D.U.U.
1991. Effects of ectomycorrhiza and
vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza
fungi on drought tolerance of four leguminous woody seedlings. Plant
Soil 136:131-142.
Price, D.T., Black, T.A. and Kelliher,
F.M (1986).Effects of salaunderstorey Removal on
photosynthesis rate and stomata conductance of young Douglas-Fir Trees Canadian
Journal of Forest Resources. 16: 90 – 97.
Rajapakse, S. and Miller J.C. 1987.Intraspecific variability for V.A mycorrhiza sysbiosis in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L
Walp.). In:
Gabelman W.H. Loughman B.C
(eds) Genetic aspects of
plant mineral nutrition. Nijhoff. Dordrechi. Pp 523-536.
Rao, P.S.K, Tilak, K.V.B.R. and Arunachalam, V. 1990.
Genetic variation for V.A mycorrhiza formation and
root development in Medicago.in Smith J.H. Russel RS
(eds) The soil root
interface Academic Press London. PP 211-219.
Shedeed M. R., Hashim
M.E., Hagag A.A 1986. Effect of different
fertilization treatment on the growth of Ficus
elastic Var. decora plant.Annl
Agric. Sci. zl: 717 – 725.
Smith, S. E and Read, D. J. 2008.MycorrhizaSysbiosis, 3rd edn.Academic Press, London, UK.
pp156.
Taylor,
J. and Harrier, L. 2000. A comparison of nine species of arbuscular
Mycorrhiza fungi on the development and nutrition of
micro propagated Rubusidaeus L pp
240.
Weber,
G. and Claus, M. 2002. The influence of chemical soil factor
on the development of V.A mycorrhiza of ash (Fraxinos excelsior) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatamus) in pot experiment, J plt nutri soil science 163:609-616.
Appendix 1:ANOVA for the Effect of MFW on the growth of M. altissima
Seedlings
|
Variable |
SV |
Df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Sig. |
|
Height (cm) |
M |
2 |
145.76 |
72.88 |
8.75 |
0.00* |
|
F |
2 |
298.74 |
149.37 |
17.94 |
0.00* |
|
|
W |
2 |
179.52 |
89.76 |
10.78 |
0.00* |
|
|
M * F |
4 |
142.03 |
35.51 |
4.26 |
0.00* |
|
|
M * W |
4 |
71.50 |
17.87 |
2.15 |
0.08ns |
|
|
F * W |
4 |
90.74 |
22.69 |
2.72 |
0.03* |
|
|
M* F * W |
8 |
241.12 |
30.14 |
3.62 |
0.00* |
|
|
Error |
243 |
2023.37 |
8.33 |
|||
|
Total |
269 |
3192.78 |
||||
|
Collar Diameter (mm) |
M |
2 |
8.40 |
4.20 |
21.98 |
0.00* |
|
F |
2 |
18.83 |
9.41 |
49.29 |
0.00* |
|
|
W |
2 |
3.40 |
1.70 |
8.90 |
0.00* |
|
|
M * F |
4 |
1.10 |
0.28 |
1.45 |
0.22ns |
|
|
M * W |
4 |
0.66 |
0.16 |
0.86 |
0.49ns |
|
|
F * W |
4 |
2.73 |
0.68 |
3.57 |
0.01* |
|
|
M* F * W |
8 |
5.91 |
0.74 |
3.87 |
0.00* |
|
|
Error |
243 |
46.41 |
0.19 |
|||
|
Total |
269 |
87.43 |
||||
|
Leaf Production |
M |
2 |
21.80 |
10.90 |
11.65 |
0.00* |
|
F |
2 |
68.99 |
34.50 |
36.87 |
0.00* |
|
|
W |
2 |
21.28 |
10.64 |
11.37 |
0.00* |
|
|
M * F |
4 |
12.14 |
3.03 |
3.24 |
0.01* |
|
|
M * W |
4 |
5.70 |
1.43 |
1.52 |
0.20ns |
|
|
F * W |
4 |
12.15 |
3.04 |
3.25 |
0.01* |
|
|
M* F * W |
8 |
49.26 |
6.16 |
6.58 |
0.00* |
|
|
Error |
243 |
227.34 |
0.94 |
|||
|
|
Total |
269 |
418.65 |
|
|
|
*significant at (p≤0.05)ns- not significant (p>0.05)