EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

Greener Journal of Environmental Management and Public Safety

Vol. 7(3), pp. 043-052, August, 2018

ISSN: 2354-2276

Copyright ©2018, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s)

DOI Link: http://doi.org/10.15580/GJEMPS.2018.3.070318092

http://gjournals.org/ GJEMPS

 

 

 

 

 

Assessment of Benthic Macro-invertebrate Communities in Relation to Water Quality in Teltele Stream, Ambo West Showa, Ethiopia

 

 

Gurmessa Tessema and Agumassie Tesfahun*

 

Greener Journal of Environmental Management and Public Safety, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 043-052, August 2018

 

 

Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Ambo University,

P. O. Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.

 

 

 

 

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

 

Article No.: 070318092

Type: Research

DOI: 10.15580/GJEMPS.2018.3.070318092

 

 

The assessment of benthic macro-invertebrates were studied in Teltele stream based on total of 6 orders and 11 families collected through December-May, 2015. Microsoft Excel and PAST software were employed to investigate the abundance and diversity of macro-invertebrates. Ephemeroptera was dominated 137(40.53%) followed by Coleoptera 112(33.14%) in the Teletele stream. However, other groups had less distribution. Based on the study sites, Ephemeroptera, Coleoptera and Diptera were the most widely distributed organisms accounted for 69(60%) at site 1, 28(17.1%) at site 2 and 40(67.8%) at site 3 for Ephemeroptera. Coleoptera comprised 22(19.1%) at site 1 and 90(54.87%) at site 2 and Diptera consisted 34(20.7%) at site 2 and 15(25.4%) at site 3. The distributions and compositions of the benthic macro-invertebrates were unequal at the sampling sites and statistically not significant (one way ANOVA, P>0.05). The Shannon diversity indexes were different among the sampling sites and the distribution of benthic organisms strongly associated with water quality parameters. The overall Shannon diversity index was (1.37) it revealed that the abundance and diversity of macro-invertebrate communities were low and therefore showed that poor water quality. At the study sites, several human induced associated impact problems like the existence of exotic Eucalyptus trees, Agricultural lands, waste material disposal and Ambo University’s oxidation pond were identified that resulted less distribution of macro-invertebrates in Teltele stream. The stream is vital for socio-economic purposes such as drinking (cattle watering), sanitation, recreation, irrigation and others of the communities around the catchment and therefore, watershed management throughout the catchment is vital for proper utilization of the Teltele stream.

 

Submitted: 03/07/2018

Accepted:  24/07/2018

Published: 01/08/2018

 

*Corresponding Author

Agumassie Tesfahun

E-mail: agumas2012@ yahoo. com

Phone: +251916184242

 

Keywords:

Benthic macro-invertebrates, Shannon diversity index, Teltele Stream, West Showa

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                       

1.   Introduction

 

Benthic macro-invertebrates can survive in different habitats such as at the bottom of rivers, lakes and reservoirs and they are correlated with different aspects of substrates like sediments, detritus, macrophytes and filamentous algae (Tesfay et al., 2017). Macro-invertebrates are critical elements in both running and standing water systems as in the energy flow and nutrient recycling during food web interaction as well as they are also vital food items for fishes and other insectivorous aquatic animals (Ward et al., 1995). Moreover, the macro-invertebrates have been provided most reliable information as bio-indicator by assessing long term ecological changes in the quality of aquatic ecosystems (Whiles and Wallace, 1997). The abundance and diversity of benthic macro-invertebrates are vital to predict the water quality of given water bodies (Teferi et al., 2013). Moreover, they are important in the energy flow and nutrient re-cycling in lentic and lotic water bodies (Tesfay et al., 2016).

Human beings need water for various purposes apart from drinking and body functions. Fresh water is among the most used of the world's resources (Bunn et al., 1999). Rivers and streams are vital freshwater systems that are critical for the sustenance of life (Rosenberg and Resh, 1993). In Ethiopia, these freshwater resources are the most important and being used for a variety of life purposes. Ethiopia, with its different geological formations and climatic conditions endowed with considerable water resources. The total runoff from its twelve river basins is estimated at 122 billion cubic meters of water per year (Zinabu and Elias, 1989). In villages of Ethiopia, water used for human consumption, drinking, bathing, laundry, preparation of food etc, is obtained from rivers, streams, shallow wells, springs, lakes, ponds, and rainfall. However, the environment, economic growth and development of Ethiopia are highly influenced by water. Consequently, deforestation in the headwaters, erosion, siltation, domestic and industrial wastes, agricultural activities and diversions are the most important threats to degradation of surface water in general and streams and rivers in particular (Zinabu and Elias, 1989; Aschalew, 2015). These threats have numerous impacts including partial or total destruction of natural river biota, alterations to river functioning, over loading of self-cleansing mechanisms and associated drastic lowering of water quality. These alterations cause adverse affects such as impacts on human health, increased water treatment costs and reduction of fish production potential (Aschalew and Moog, 2015). The main causes for contaminants of these water sources are agricultural activities, human excreta because of open field defecation practices, animal waste, and effluent from urban or industries (Aschalew and Moog, 2015; Mulugeta, 2010).

Several studies were conducted in Ethiopian running water bodies with regard to spatial distribution of benthic macro-invertebrates and their stressors as stream health indicators (Negero et al., 2017; Getachew et al., 2012; Lakew, 2015; Tamiru et al., 2017; Teferi et al., 2013; Tesfay et al., 2016; Wolemariam et al., 2018; Worku and Ambelu, 2018).

However, there is no sufficient information on the assessment of benthic macro-invertebrate community structures in Teltele stream, which gives the general knowledge on water quality status for the socio-economic purposes in the country (Ambo Town). Therefore, the present study was conducted to fill this gap and to provide useful information for the proper management of the stream to continued socio-economic purposes.

 

 

2.    Materials and Methods

 

2.1 Description of the Study Area

 

The study area, Teltele stream is found in Ambo town, which is located about 114 km West from Addis Ababa the capital city of Ethiopia. Ambo, which is popular for its immense natural gifts including excellent climate which provides comfortable living and working environment. Teltele  stream  is  a  tributary  of  Huluka  river  and  originates  from  Wenchi  and  flows  through  the Western part of Ambo town towards Abay drainage basin. The study was conducted at three sites namely, site1 (latitude 9°04'15.8, longitude 38°08'22.4 and 2376 m.a.s.l), site 2 (latitude 9°4'49.5, longitude 38°8'15.7 and 245 m.a.s.l) and site 3 (latitude 9°3'53.9, longitude 38°07'49.8 and 2331m.a.s.l). The upstream section of Teltele stream is dominated by indigenous trees and in downstream occupied Eucalyptus trees.

Furthermore, the date of sampling depends on the objective of the study and climate conditions. For instance, variability of  discharge  volume  of  streams  caused  by  seasonal  changes  affect  the  distribution pattern of benthic macro-invertebrates and limit accessibility to sampling sites.  For this reason, it is usually  recommended  to  avoid  sampling  during  high  water  levels  and  shortly  after  flooding. With this sense, our sampling conducted in the dry season to  insure  low  water  level  and  regeneration  of  BMI (benthic macro-invertebrates index)  after  heavy  flooding  months.  A representative stream sections were selected within 100 m gaps for each stream. Substrate composition of each site was visually estimated in accordance with particle size (e.g. micro-lithal, meso-lithal, macro-lithal etc.).

 

 

 

Figure 1: Map of the study area in relation to Ambo town, land use practices and sampling sites (s1=sampling site 1, s2= sampling site 2 and s3=sampling site 3)

 

 

 

 

2.2 Macro-invertebrates sample collection

 

Macro-invertebrates were collected by using standard hand net with frame width of 25x25 cm2 and mesh size of 500 µm. Single habitat sampling method is emphasized especially to riffle and runs as means of standardize assessment in the streams which have those habitats. This approach  is important because of, macro-invertebrates  diversity  and  abundance  are  usually  highest  in  cobble  substrate (riffle/run) habitats (Plafkin, 1989).11 family samples  were collected  from  all  habitat types with a share of at least 5% habitat coverage in selected stream section  each sample  was collected by positioning the net and disturbing the substrate in a quadratic area that equals the frame area of the net. Sampling was begun at the downstream end of the reach and preceded upstream against the current. In places where  the  current  becomes  low,  hand  stirrings  was used  to  create  local  currents  to  push  the organisms into the net. Mega-lithal stones are sampled by brushing their surfaces approximately equal to the size of the sampling net. Macro-lithal stones picked by hand and their surfaces were brushed to dislodge clingers and sessile organisms.  After every 3 sampling, the net was rinsed by running clean stream water to avoid clogging which could interfere with obtaining an appropriate sample. Before preservation, quick identification of major taxa was performed on site as a quality assurance. Samples were then preserved in (4%) formaldehyde and label was placed inside the plastic container marked with date, stream name and site identity code. The same information was labelled on the outside of the container with water proof markers.

 

 

 

2.3 Laboratory Analysis and Identification of Macro-invertebrates

 

The preserved macro-invertebrate samples were processed in the laboratory for further analysis. All  information  from  the  sample  container was carefully  copied  to  the  sample  log  sheet. A complete sample was passed through a set of sieves (5000, 3000, 2000, 1000 and 500 µm mesh size) in order to remove formalin and separate size classes of macro-invertebrate groups under tap water. Macro-invertebrates trapped in the coarse fraction of the sieve was sorted  completely  in  the  laboratory  using  naked  eyes  while  organisms  trapped  in  the smaller fraction  of  the  sieve  was  sorted  with  the  help of dissecting microscope. Sub- sampling was applied to according to Barbour et al. (1999). Identification was performed  based  on  the  South  African  aquatic  invertebrates  identification  key (Gerber  and Gabriel, 2002). All macro-invertebrates were identified to family level at Ambo University, Biology laboratory (Figure 5).

 

 

Figure 5: Some laboratory protocols in Biology laboratory at Ambo University

 

 

3. Data Analysis

 

Descriptive statistics, Shannon diversity index, Margalef index, species evenness and one way ANOVA were used to compute the diversity and abundance of macro-invertebrates in and at the sampling sites of the Teletele stream by using PAST software version 011.

 

 

4.   Results

 

The physico-chemical (mean ± SD) of (DO) mg/L, (conductivity) S/cm, (Temperature) 0C, (TDS) m/L and NO3 etc water quality parameters of Teltele stream were given at the three sites (Table 1). The distribution, abundance and diversity of benthic macro-invertebrates were positively correlated with water quality parameters such as pH, dissolved oxygen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and temperature as well as statistically significant (one way ANOVA, p<0.05).

A total of 338 macroinvertebrates classified into 6 orders and 11 families of macroinvertebrates were collected from the 3 sampling sites in Teltele stream. The most abundant orders were Ephemeroptera 137(40.53%) represented by Baetidae family, Coleoptera 112(33.13%) represented by Hydrophilidae family, Diptera 55(16.27%) represented by 4 families namely, Chironomidae 46(13.6%), Syrphidae 1(0.3%), Tipulidae 6(1.78%) and Tabanidae 2(0.6%), Odonata 13(3.84%) denoted by Coanagrionidae 9(2.7%) and Libellulidae 4(1.2%) families, Gastropoda 11(3.25%) represented by 2 families like Physidae 6(1.8%) and Planorbidae 5(1.5%) and Oligochaeta 10(2.96%) represented by 1 family (Table 2). Orders namely Ephemeroptera, 69(60%), 28(17.1%) and 40(67.8%) were mostly found at site1, 2 and 3 respectively (Figure 6). Similarly, Diptera accounted for 34(20.7%) at site 2 and 12(25.4%) at site 3. In the same way, Coleoptera comprised 22(19.1%) at site 1 and 90(54.88%) at site 2. Shannon diversity index of macro-invertebrate communities were (1.2), (1.19) and (0.79) at site 1, 2 and 3 respectively however, it was insignificant (one way ANOVA, P>0.05) (Table 3). Relatively, the highest Shannon diversity index (1.2) and (1.19) was recorded at site 1 and site 2 respectively. In similar manner, better Margalef index (1.1) and (0.78) was recorded at site 1 and site 2. In other words, site 1 and site 2 had highest species richness and however, site 3 had less species richness due to less Shannon diversity index (0.79). Species evenness values were organized in a similar pattern (0.6), (0.7) and (0.7) at site 1, site 2 and site 3 respectively (Table 4). The overall, Shannon diversity index was (1.37), species evenness value (0.7) and Margalef index value (0.86) in the stream (Table 4).

 

 

Table 1: Physico-chemical parameters at each sampling sites in Teltele stream

            Parameters

 

Site I

 

Site II

 

Site III

Dissolved Oxygen

 

10.4 ± 0.214

 

9.75 ± 0.55

 

9.38 ± 0.621

NO3-N

 

0.67 ± 0.061

 

0.64 ± 0.049

 

0.58 ± 0.004

Chloride

 

5.83 ± 0.711

 

6.33 ± 0.54

 

6.50 ± 0.353

Total hardness

 

137.25 ± 2.165

 

138 ± 2.828

 

146.25 ± 4.603

Total dissolved solids

 

304.25 ± 2.278

 

315.5 ± 1.803

 

320.5 ± 1.118

Total phosphorous

 

0.121 ± 0.032

 

0.109 ± 0.014

 

0.064 ± 0.022

Temperature

 

20.275 ± 1.492

 

19.525 ± 0.942

 

19.4 ± 0.982

PH

 

7.7 ± 0.187

 

7.77 ± 0.109

 

7.92 ± 0.148

BOD

 

4 ± 0

 

8 ± 0

 

24 ± 0

 

 

 

 

Source :( Hirpa, 2012)

 

 

Table 2: Relative abundance of the main taxonomic groups of macro-invertebrates at each sampling station inTeltele Stream

Sampling sites

Order

Order in (%)

Families

Families in (%)

Site 1

Ephemeroptera

60

Baetidae

60

Site 1

Diptera

5.21

Chironomidae

3.5

Site 1

Diptera

5.21

 Syrphidae

0

Site 1

Diptera

5.21

Tipulidae

1.74

Site 1

Diptera

5.21

Tabanidae

0

Site 1

Coleoptera

19.13

Hydrophilidae

19.13

Site 1

Odonata

7.8

 Coanagrionidae

7.8

Site 1

Odonata

7.8

Libellulidae

0

Site 1

Gastropod

6.96

Physidae

4.35

Site 1

Gastropod

6.96

Planorbidae

2.68

Site 1

Oligochaeta

0.87

Tubificidae

0.87

Site 2

Ephemeroptera

17.1

Baetidae

17.1

Site 2

Diptera

20.7

Chironomidae

18.29

Site 2

Diptera

20.7

 Syrphidae

0

Site 2

Diptera

20.7

Tipulidae

1.23

Site 2

Diptera

20.7

Tabanidae

1.23

Site 2

Coleoptera

54.9

Hydrophilidae

54.9

Site 2

Odonata

0

 Coanagrionidae

0

Site 2

Odonata

0

Libellulidae

0

Site 2

Gastropod

1.83

Physidae

0.61

Site 2

Gastropod

1.83

Planorbidae

1.23

Site 2

Oligochaeta

5.5

Tubificidae

5.5

Site 3

Ephemeroptera

67.8

Baetidae

67.8

Site 3

Diptera

25.4

Chironomidae

20.34

Site 3

Diptera

25.4

 Syrphidae

1.69

Site 3

Diptera

25.4

Tipulidae

3.4

Site 3

Diptera

25.4

Tabanidae

0

Site 3

Coleoptera

0

Hydrophilidae

0

Site 3

Odonata

6.78

 Coanagrionidae

0

Site 3

Odonata

6.78

Libellulidae

6.78

Site 3

Gastropod

0

Physidae

0

Site 3

Gastropod

0

Planorbidae

0

Site 3

Oligochaeta

0

Tubificidae

0

 

 

Table 3: Shannon diversity (H), Margalef index (d), number of individual (N), species richness (S), species evenness (J) and Dominance (D) of macro-invertebrates in stream at each site

 

site_1

site_2

site_3

Taxa_S

6

5

3

Individuals

115

164

59

Dominance_D

0.4104

0.3766

0.5289

Simpson_1-D

0.5896

0.6234

0.4711

Shannon_H

1.203

1.19

0.7941

Evenness_e^H/S

0.555

0.6573

0.7375

Brillouin

1.124

1.138

0.7311

Menhinick

0.5595

0.3904

0.3906

Margalef

1.054

0.7843

0.4905

Equitability_J

0.6714

0.7393

0.7228

Fisher_alpha

1.345

0.9743

0.6678

Berger-Parker

0.6

0.5488

0.678

 

 

Table 4: Shannon diversity (H), Margalef index (d), number of individual (N), species richness (S), species evenness (J) and Dominance (D) of macro-invertebrates in stream (stream wise)

 

Values

Taxa_S

6

Individuals

338

Dominance_D

0.304

Simpson_1-D

0.696

Shannon_H

1.368

Evenness_e^H/S

0.6549

Brillouin

1.332

Menhinick

0.3264

Margalef

0.8587

Equitability_J

0.7637

Fisher_alpha

1.036

Berger-Parker

0.4053

 

 

Figure 6: Relative abundance of the main taxonomic groups of macro-invertebrates at each sampling station inTeltele Stream

 

 

5.   Discussion

 

In this study 6 orders and 11 families were identified. However, the macro-invertebrate communities composition were lowest when compared to related findings e.g. 10 orders and 37 families in the spring and stream sites of the upper Awash River (Negero et al., 2017), 10 orders and 34 families in Cheffa wetland from Borkena Valley (Getachew et al., 2012), 9 orders and 34 families in Wedech River in Debrezeit (Tamiru et al., 2017), 12 orders 33 families in highland stream of Northern Ethiopia (Teferi et al., 2017),7 orders and 20 families in Enda Gabr stream in Mekele Northern Ethiopia (Tesfay et al., 2016), 20 families in Northern highland of Ethiopia (Wolemariam et al., 2018) and 9 orders and 36 families in Southwestern Ethiopia (Worku and Ambelu, 2018) were documented. Moreover, the present finding not agrees with (Hirpa, 2012) in the same study area where 6 orders and 21 families of benthic macro-invertebrates were investigated. The differences of macro-invertebrates composition in the present study might be attributes that which was conducted at the downstream. The presence of less benthic macro-invertebrate communities were most probably indicates that poor water quality. This is because the Teltele stream which is exposed by land use practices such as farming, the impact of Ambo University’s oxidation pond, the disposal of the liquid and solid waste, and the plantation of Eucalyptus trees particularly at the sampling sites (Figure 2, a-d). For instance, in the Southern streams of Gilgel Gibe River the values of the total nitrogen, total phosphorus and pH were low under the streams of Eucalyptus tree. This is might be due to reducing of nutrient cycling by Eucalyptus tree due to phenolic acid released from Eucalyptus leaf as it was reported by (Worku and Ambelu, 2018; Jiregna, 2003) and this is might be true for the present study. Shannon-Wiener diversity index values among stations were different probably due to the presence of livestock grazing around and other anthropogenic activities have direct impacts on the macro-invertebrate communities in streams (Hynes, 1970; Nedeau, 2003; Azrina et al., 2006; Hamilton, 2008). Several studies pointed out that the interaction of physical and chemical of the water quality parameters (Minshall et al., 1985; Meyer, 1997), biological parameters (Dauer, 1983; Teshome et al., 2015) and the human pressure through water catchments (Mohammed and Uraguchi, 2013) can determine the survival and the fitness of macro-invertebrates in the water bodies either lotic or lentic. For instance, biological factors, such as availability of predators in the water, macro-invertebrates behavior towards the trap gear, shape, and external features, which depends on season, environment and other species, determine the composition and distribution in the catch (Petts et al., 1993; Bode, 1996; Blumenfeld et al., 2009). The environmental factors, such as water temperature (Karr, 1999; Maddock, 1999) and water salinity (Hofer et al., 2007) also influence the composition of the required data (Table 1). According to Tesfay et al. (2017), Ephemeropterans, Plecoptera and Trichopterans (EPT) are very important in assessing water quality as they show low tolerance toward water pollutants. These organisms are sensitive to environmental changes that may occur in clean and well oxygenated waters. Therefore, EPT assemblages are frequently considered as good indicators for water quality. However, in the present study Plecoptera and Tricoptera were not recorded this might be revealed that water quality changes at the study area. Many sites of Teltele stream the values are below 1.5 level of the Shannon diversity index, this indicates presence degraded macro or micro habitats that resulted less macro-invertebrate communities in terms of abundance and diversity. This is because, most values measured using the Shannon diversity index range from (1.5-3.5). Besides, values above (3.0) indicate that the habitat structure is stable and balanced and values. On other hand, values under (1.0) indicate the presence of pollution and degradation of habitat structure by human induced and natural associated impacts in or near by the catchments of the stream. Based on these criteria, at site 3, had lowest Shannon diversity index (0.79) the implication is at this site there is water quality change (pollution) resulted in less abundance and diversity of benthic macro-invertebrates. In summary, water quality, macro-invertebrates diversity, and habitat conditions of Teltele stream were impacted by anthropogenic activities at all sites activities related with urbanization such as disposal of solid and liquid wastes, animal wastes, vehicle washing and agricultural activities those activities alter the water quality this in turn resulted less aquatic community structure and it can impaired the given stream.

 

 

6.   Conclusions

 

The Shannon diversity index in Teltele stream (1.37) showed that less abundance and diversity of benthic fauna. Because of typical values are generally between 1.5 and 3.5 in most ecological studies for abundance and diversity, if not the index value is less than 1.5. The lower diversity and biotic indices values indicated poor water quality. Only 338 macro-invertebrate samples were collected from this study this is due to anthropogenic impacts this in turn impaired the water quality. Land use practices along the catchment of the stream strongly affected, macro-invertebrate community structure and biodiversity. The stream is vital for socio-economic purposes such as drinking (cattle watering), sanitation, recreation, irrigation and others of the communities around the catchment and therefore, watershed management throughout the catchment is vital for proper utilization of the Teltele stream.

 

 

Acknowledgments

 

The authors would like to appreciate Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational sciences, Ambo University, for laboratory facilities.

 

 

7.   Conflict of interest

 

Authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest.

 

 

8.   References

 

1.   Aschalew L (2012). Testing bio-assessment methods in some highlands of Ethiopia. LAP-   LAMBERT Academic publishing.

2.   Aschalew L (2015). Assessing anthropogenic impacts using benthic macro-invertebrates as bio-indicators in central highland streams of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 8(1): 45-56.

3.   Aschalew L, Moog O (2015). A multimetric index based on benthic macro invertebrates for assessing the ecological status of streams and rivers in central and southeast highlands of Ethiopia”. Hydrobiologia, 751(1): 229-242.

4.   Azrina MZ, Yap CK, Ismail AR, Ismail A, Tan SG (2006). Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Eco-toxicology and Environmental Safety, (64):337-347.

5.   Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (1999). Rapid Bio-assessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wade able Rivers. EPA/841/B-99/002.US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

6.   Blumenfeld S, Lu C, Christophersen T, Coates D (2009). Water, Wetlands and Forests. “A Review of Ecological, Economic and Policy Linkages”.CBD Technical Series No. 47.Montreal/Gland, Switzerland, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Secretariat of the Ramseur Convention on wetland.

7.   Bode RW (1996). Quality assurance work plan for biological stream monitoring in New York State. NYS DEC technical report.

8.   Bunn S, Davies P, Mosisch T (1999). Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradation, Freshwater Biology, (41): 333-345.

9.   Dauer DM (1983). Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Scolelepsis squamata (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Marine Biology, (77): 279-285.

10. Gerber A, Gabriel MJM (2002).  Aquatic invertebrates of South African Rivers. Field Guide, Institute of Water Quality Studies, Pretoria, South Africa.

11. Getachew M, Ambelu A, Tiku S, Legesse W, Adugna A, Helmut Kloos (2012). Ecological assessment of Cheffa Wetland in the Borkena Valley, northeast Ethiopia: Macroinvertebrate and bird communities. Ecological Indicators, (15): 63–71.

12. Hamilton LS. Forest and Water (2008). A Thematic Study prepared in the framework Global Forest Resource Assessment.

13. Hirpa (2012). A Study on Composition and spatial distribution of macro-benthic fauna in Teltelle stream, Ambo, Ethiopia. A MSc thesis submitted to Ambo University, 72 pp.

14. Hofer ICT, Vermont S, Warren P (2007). Towards a new understanding of forests and water.

15. Hynes HBN (1970). The Ecology of Running waters. Liverpool University Press, Ontario, 555pp.

16. Jiregna G (2003). Water and nutrient relations of selected tree species of Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa, pp. 180.      

17. Karr JR (1999). Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biology, 41: 221 – 234.

18. Maddock I (1999). The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater Biology, 41:373-391.

19. Meyer JL (1997). Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. Journal of North American Benthological Society, (16): 437-447.

20. Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Petersen RC, Cushing CE, Bruns DA, Sedell JR, Vannote RL (1985). Developments in stream ecosystem theory. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42: 1045-1055.

21. Mohammed EY, Uraguchi ZB (2013). Impacts of Climate Change on Fisheries: Implications for Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa. In MA. Hanjra eds. Global Food Security, Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 114-135.

22. Mulugeta L (2010). Growing Eucalyptus by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia.

23. Nedeau EJ, Merritt RW, Kaufman MG (2003). The effect of an industrial effluent on an urban stream benthic community: water quality vs habitat quality. Environmental Pollution, Oxford, Elsevier, (123):1-13.

24. Negero, Lakew A, Prabha D and Wolfram G (2017). Macro Invertebrate Communities in the spring and Stream Sites of Upper Awash River at Chilimo, Ethiopia. Innovative Techniques in Agriculture, 1(3): 141-151.

25. Petts GE, Moller H, Roux AL (1993). Historical change in large alluvial rivers. Western Europe.

26. Plafkin JL (1989). Rapid Bio-assessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers; Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish.U.S. E.P.A., Cincinnati, OH Publ No.EPA/440/4-89/001.

27. Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (1993). Introduction to freshwater bio monitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H (eds.): Fresh water bio monitoring and benthic Macroinvertebrates.

28. Tamiru SM, Asfaw SL, Yilma SM (2017). Correlation study of some physico-chemical parameters and benthic macroinvertebrates metrics on the ecological impacts of floriculture industries along Wedecha River, Debrezeit, Ethiopia. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 5(10): 433-440.

29. Teferi M, Tsegazeabe H. Haileselasie, Asmelash T, Haile G. Selasie, Alem G, Amare S, Weldegerima K, Tesfay S, Kiros S, Gebru (2013). Influence of water quality on the diversity and distribution of macro-invertebrates in highland stream, Northern Ethiopia. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(2): 17-25.

30. Tesfay S, Teferi M, Aragaw Sh, Abrha W (2016). Assessment of Macroinvertebrate Communities in Enda Gabr Stream, in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 6(19):115:125.

31. Teshome G, Getahun A, Mengist M, Hailu B (2015). Some biological aspects of spawning migratory Labeobarbus species in some tributary rivers of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. International Journal of fisheries and aquatic studies, 3(2):136-141.

32. Ward D, Holmes N, José P (1995). The New Rivers and wildlife hand book. Bedfordshire: RSPB, NRA, the Wildlife Trusts. pp. 426.

33. Welemariam M, Kebede F, Bedadi B and Birhane E (2018). The Effect of Community-Based Soil and Water Conservation Practices on Abundance and Diversity of Soil Macro-invertebrates in the Northern Highlands of Ethiopia. Agronomy, 8(56):2-15.

34. Whiles MR, Wallace JB (1997). Leaf litter decomposition and macroinvertebrate communities in headwater streams draining pine and hardwood catchments. Hydrobiologia, 35 (31): 107-119.

35. Worku Y and Ambelu A (2018). Evaluation of the Impacts of Eucalyptus Plantation on Macro-Invertebrate Assemblage in the Aquatic Environment, South Western Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat Res, 9(1):001-012.

36. Zinabu, G. and Elias, D (1989). Water resources and fisheries management in the Ethiopian rift Valley lakes. SINET: Ethiopia. J.Sc., 12 (2): 95-109.

 

 

 

Cite this Article: Tessema G and Tesfahun A (2018). Assessment of Benthic Macro-invertebrate Communities in Relation to Water Quality in Teltele Stream, Ambo West Showa, Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Environmental Management and Public Safety, 7(3): 043-052, http://doi.org/10.15580/GJEMPS.2018.3.070318092.