EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

 

GREENER JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES

 

 

Submitted: 25/10/2016                            Accepted: 31/10/2016                          Published: 08/11/2016

 

 

 

Research Article (DOI: http://doi.org/10.15580/GJLS.2016.1.102516171)

 

Age and Growth of Bluemouth Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) in the Northern Waters of Tunisia (Central Mediterranean)

 

Mili Sami1*, Ennouri Rym2, Amdouni Fatma2, Chammam Bachra2 and Missaoui Hechmi2

 

1Unité Exploitation des milieux aquatiques. Institut Supérieur de Pêche et d’Aquaculture de Bizerte, BP 15, 7080 Menzel Jemil, Tunisie.

2Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, 28 Rue 2 Mars 1934, 2025 Salammbô, Tunisie.

 

*Corresponding Author’s Email: mili.sami.ispa@ gmail .com

 

ABSTRACT

 

Data on age and growth of the bluemouth Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) from the Southern central Mediterranean Sea are provided in this paper. Ages of bluemouth rockfish (Scorpaenidae) in the northern Tunisian waters were estimated by otolith readings and verified by marginal increment analysis. A total of 513 individuals were measured, weighed and their sex was determined. The fish total length (TL) range between 8 and 30.6 cm, which corresponded to individuals between 0 to 9 years old. The otoliths showed the typical teleost fish pattern with alternated opaque and hyaline rings. Marginal increment analysis of specimens suggested that a single annulus was formed each year. The Von Bertalanffy growth function was selected as the most adequate model to fit this species' growth. Parameters of the growth curve were L =37.17cm, K=0.142year-1, t0= -1.67years. The weight-length relationship (TW= 2.2092 x10-5TL2.870) described a negative allometric growth of the species. The growth parameters obtained from the age-length relationships showed higher differences between sexes.

 

Keywords: Helicolenus dactylopterus; otoliths; age; growth; North of Tunisia

 

 

Résumé

 

L'âge et la croissance de la population de la rascasse de fond Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) a été étudié au nord de la Tunisie. Dans cette étude, 513 spécimens dont la longueur totale varie de 8 à 30,6 cm ont été examinés. Au total, 9 classes d’âges ont été déterminées par comptage des anneaux de croissance sur les otolithes. Les paramètres du modèle de Von Bertalanffy estimés sont : L∞ = 37,17 cm, k = 0,142 an-1 et t0 = -1,67 ans. Le suivi de l’allongement marginal affirme que cette espèce possède un seul cycle de croissance par an. La relation taille-poids décrie une allométrie minorante chez la rascasse de fond au nord de la Tunisie (2,2092 x10-5TL2,870). Cette étude a permis de montrer une différence significative du taux de croissance entre les deux sexes de cette espèce.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The bluemouth Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) (Pisces: Scorpaenidae), is a deep-sea scorpion fish living in the coarse and mud-sandy bottoms of the continental shelf and slope from 20 to 1000 m (Fisher et al., 1987). Consoli et al. (2010) indicates that the bluemouth H. dactylopterus occurs in the entire Mediterranean and is widely distributed in the eastern Atlantic, from Norway south to the southern tip of Africa, and in the western Atlantic from Venezuela north to Nova Scotia. The Scorpaenidae was represented in Tunisian waters mainly by six species: Scorpaena porcus (Linnaeus, 1758), Scorpaena scrofa (Linnaeus, 1758), Scorpaena notata (Rafinesque, 1810), Scorpaena elongata (Cadenat, 1943), Scorpaena loppei (Cadenat, 1734), and H. dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809). This teleost fish had an important economic value in Tunisia. In Tunisian waters, this species is exploited in deep-sea fisheries and it is captured especially with gillnets and it appears in the catch of bottom trawl. The study of H. dactylopterus population dynamics is important because the depletion of this large-size sedentary and slow-growing fish can be an index of the overexploitation of fishing grounds (Pirrera et al., 2009). Besides, the investigation made on Atlantic Ocean and in many region of the Mediterranean Sea, several authors studied age and growth of H. dactylopterus by mean of model progression analyses and otolith reading (D’Onghia et al., 1996; Massuti et al., 2000; Ragonese, 1989; Ragonese and Reale, 1992; Romanelly et al., 1997; Ungaro and Marano, 1995) but no age and growth data are available from the South of this area. For the Tunisian waters, there is currently no information on age and growth of bluemouth. In spite of differences in maximum age and growth parameters, all authors seem to agree that H. dactylopterus is a slow - growing  and  a long lived species (Consoli et al., 2010). Sizes of this species are larger in the Atlantic Ocean, above 40cm than in the Mediterranean Sea where it reaches a maximum total length of 36cm (Massuti et al., 2000; Morales-Nin, 1989).

In the present paper we estimate the age and growth patterns of bluemouth H. dactylopterus by means of whole otolith reading in order to contribute to the knowledge of the population dynamics of this species in the northern waters of Tunisia (central southern of the Mediterranean Sea).

 

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 

H. dactylopterus sampling was carried out from January to December 2010 in the North of Tunisian waters. Specimens were collected during several scientific bottom trawl surveys made by the research vessel of the National Institute of Marine Sciences and Technologies “Hannibal” and also from commercial landings (Fig. 1). Fishing operations were conducted between 60 and 600 m in order to collect juvenile and adults. A total of 513 fish were sampled: 138 females and 260 males.

 

Figure 1: Map of the Tunisian coast showing study area (Central Mediterranean)

 

 

In the laboratory, each specimen (total length-TL) was measured by calliper to the nearest 0.01 cm and weighed to the nearest 0.1 g, and the sex was determined by macroscopic examination of the gonads.

Age of 509 specimens was estimated using otolith readings and interpretation of annual growth rings. Right otoliths (sagittae) were removed from the vestibular apparatus from each fish, cleaned and dried. Before observation, Sagittalotoliths were immersed in a solution of glycerine, ethanol and water for 4 hours (Consoli et al., 2010). Readings were carried out with stereomicroscope under reflected light.

For each otolith, the total radius and the radius of different marks (R1, R2, R3, R4 ... Rn) were measured using an image analysis system (OPTIMAS 5.1). To determine the periodicity in the formation of the rings, the marginal increment method was applied by using the formula (Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al., 2016):

 

MIR = (R - Rn) / (Rn - Rn-1)

 

Once the rings were considered to be annual, each specimen was assigned to a year class, taking into account the data of capture, the annuli counts, and their formation period, as suggested by Massuti et al. (2000). Age was determined separately for males, females, and combined sexes including immature specimens.

The relationship between total fish length (TL) and the radius of the otolith (R) was estimated using linear regression model. A logarithmic transformation of the variables was made to reduce the variance related to size. The Von Bertalanffy growth equation was fitted to the length-at-age data obtained from otolith readings by the Quasi NEWTON non-linear method. The growth performance index Φ’ was employed to compare growth rate (Munro & Pauly 1983). Additionally, growth parameters (L, k, t0) were estimated by fitting age and related length data into the theoretical growth model of Von Bertalanffy (1938):

 

Lt = L [1 – е-k (t – t0)]

 

Where “Lt” is the total length at age t (years), “L” is the predicted asymptotic length, “k” is the instantaneous growth coefficient, describing how rapidly this length is achieved, “t0” is the theoretical age at zero length (years).

For estimation of growth, the mean lengths of individuals assigned to each age group were used to fit the Von Bertalanffy growth model and were determined by the method of back-calculation by using the formula:

 

 

Where L is the length at capture, Li is the length of the ith mark, R is the radius of the otolith and Ri is the radius of the ith mark (Chemmam-Abdelkader, 2004). In addition the growth rate was calculated as:

 

 

Where Li is the total length of the ith annulus and Li+1 is the total length of the (i+1)th annulus.

 

The weight-length relationship was calculated using the exponential equation:

 

TW = aTLb

 

Where “TW” is the weight (g), “TL” is the total length (cm), “a” is the intercept of the regression line and represents a coefficient related to the body shape of the species, b is the regression coefficient and indicates the isometric growth when equal to 3 (Anderson and Neumann, 1996). Estimation of parameters “a” and “b” was carried out by transforming (ln) the equation by linear regression. To check the theoretical isometric (b = 3) or allometric growth (b ≠ 3) the Student's t-test was employed.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test variability between the growths rates of both sexes. The Student's t-test test was performed to compare length increases in each age group. Differences were considered significant when the α-level (risk level) was 0.05. The curves adjustment and the variance analysis were performed using Statistica software package for Windows (8.0).

 

 

RESULTS                                         

 

The total length of H. dactylopterus specimens ranged from 8 to 30.6 cm. The larger female and male measured 28.3 and 30.6 cm respectively. The sample was composed mainly by female (50.7%), while male and undefined sex with indistinguishable gonads that could not be sexed represent’s respectively 26.9 % and 22.4%. A significant differences were observed between the mean sizes of male and female (p<0.05).  Males attained a larger size (up to 30 cm TL) than females (p<0.05).

From the 513 specimen of H. dactylopterus sampled, 509 were used for otolith readings. The rest were either broken or difficult to interpret and were considered unreadable. The otoliths readings showed a hyaline rings that alternated with opaque rings, which can be attributed to slow and fast growth periods around an opaque nucleus (Fig. 2). The first pair of rings was wide and lay down with decreasing thickness. However, the otoliths from adult fish shows that the rings in the outer portions decreases in width, becoming very regular and equally wide. Fish total length (TL) and otolith radius (R) were closely correlated (Fig. 3). The relationship estimated for all individuals using a linear model was TL = 1.193R+1.841 (r2=0.945).

 

Figure 2: Sample of sagittal otolith of Helicolenus dactylopterus. The otoliths were estimated at age 3 and 8 years respectively (14.7 cm and 28.5 cm total length)

 

 

 

 

The monthly development of opaque and hyaline marginal rings in H. dactylopterus otoliths showed many fluctuations throughout the year (Fig. 4). Marginal zone analysis revealed that the marginal increment (MI) dropped in November and stayed low until July (ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc, P < 0.05). During this period higher percentages of otoliths with hyaline marginal zones were observed. From July, the MI increased, reaching a peak in October, and then decreased. In fact, only one clearly defined peak was observed during the annual cycle, therefore one hyaline zone was deposited per year. The opaque zone was formed during summer and autumn. It was assumed that each translucent ring represented an annulus with a year’s growth accounted by an opaque and its adjacent hyaline ring.

 

Figure 4: Monthly variation of marginal increments at the otolith of H. dactylopterus from the North of Tunisia

 

 

Analysis of 509 otoliths permitted an estimate of a maximum age of 9 years, but specimens aged more than 8 years were uncommon in this study area (Tab. 1). A large length range was recorded for each age group. Majority of samples belonged to the 2nd and 3rd class corresponding to an average of lengths between 14 cm and 20 cm. The lengths by age class are verified by marginal increment analysis. Retro-calculated total lengths at each annulus formation are presented in Table 2. The growth rate is high during the first two years and it decreases gradually with age. The parameters of the Von Bertalanffy growth curve fitted to total lengths at age estimated are summarized in table 3 (Fig. 5). The theoretical asymptotic total length (L=37.17 cm) gave results higher than the largest specimen (TL=30.6 cm) in this study. The value of the growth performance index obtained for all individuals was Φ’=2.292. The mean length at estimated age class of H. dactylopterus suggests that there is a marked difference in growth rates between sexes (Tab. 3). Males growing is slightly faster than females and they reach a larger size (p = 0.001<0.05). The analyses of estimated sizes by age groups using otolithometry and verified by marginal increment analysis are in concordance with sizes obtained by Von Bertalanffy method (Tab. 4). Additionally, we recorded that the growth of H. dactylopterus is slow and regular in time which is a characteristic of fishes that live in deep and cool water. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regarding the estimate of von Bertalanffy growth parameters a low estimate of k together with a high L, indicates that H. dactylopterus is slow-growing and long-lived. Asymptotic total weight of H. dactylopterus from the northern region of Tunisia is estimated as 855.3g while it was about 806.9g using eviscerated weight. Weight of H. dactylopterus by age group calculated is summarized in table 5.

The larger female and male measured 28.3 and 30.6 cm respectively. Significant differences between male and female average sizes (p<0.05) were observed. Length frequency distribution of H. dactylopterus indicates the presence of different cohorts (Fig. 6). The total average sample length is 16.7cm. The structure of samples showed nine modes corresponding to the nine age classes deduced by otolithometry method.

The morphometric relationship between total length (TL), fork length (FL) and standard length (SL) were determined for whole population (Tab. 6). The analysis of the equations between lengths showed a strong relationship as demonstrated by the high values of R2. The relationship between the total length and the standard length showed a positive allometry, however it was negative between the total length and fork length. The total weight-length and the eviscerated weight-length relationships estimated for H. dactylopterus in the study area are summarized in table 6. Weights did not increased isometrically with size, since the values of b have a significant difference from the value 3.0, as confirmed by the Students t-test. The allometry was negative indicating that the weights grow slowlier than the cube of the total length.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

In this study, otoliths appear to be a valid method for ageing H. dactylopterus. Similar results have been obtained by Isidro (1984) and Massuti et al. (2000). The high percentage of opaque rings in summer and autumn, attributed to a fast growth period, could be due to temporal variations in food resources and their influence on the feeding and activity patterns of the species. Presumptuous the annual periodicity of otolith growth rings, our data suggest that H. dactylopterus is a long-lived species, with numerous age-classes in the population. Additionally a high percentage of the sample studied consisted of fish between 9 and 21 cm TL, corresponding to young recruits and juveniles from 1 to 4 years of age. This abundance of small fish in the samples might be due to the method of capture. The pattern of increment deposition was similar to that described by other authors (e.g. Massuti et al., 2000; Sequeira et al., 2009.

Several studies on this species suggest that the growth increment including one opaque zone with the adjacent translucent zone can be considered as equivalent to one year of life (Abecasis et al., 2006; Consoli et al., 2010; Massuti et al., 2000; Ragonese and Reale, 1992; Romanelly et al., 1997). This calcified structure was chosen because it has a good legibility and regularity of its growth mark patterns and it gives good results of observation (Chemmam-Abdelkader, 2004).

The growth parameters obtained in this study showed some differences compared with those reported from other Mediterranean areas (Tab. 7); however, the Φ’ values obtained are similar (Consoli et al., 2010: D’Onghia et al. 1996; Kelly et al., 1999; Mamie et al., 2007; Massuti et al. 2000; Peirano & Tunesi 1986; Ragonese and Reale 1992; Ungaro and Marano 1995). The variability of the growth parameters could be due to differences in the range of sizes sampled, the methodology applied and the characteristics of the study areas. As suggested by Pirrera et al. (2009), the estimation of growth parameters is strongly affected by sampling gear as well as by bias of age estimation. On the other hand, asymptotic sizes found by Abecasis et al. (2006), Sequeira et al. (2009) and Paul and Horn (2009) are higher compared to our results. It is clear that there could be some differences between growth characteristics from one area to another for reasons of food availability, hydrographical and climatic conditions, and fishing mortality rates. Additionally, the differences can be explained by the spatial and temporal variability, as well as the sampling period.

Moreover, we report differences in H. dactylopterus length between populations in the Mediterranean Sea. It could be due to the different fishing pressure in the study areas, to the maximum sampling depth, and also to the fishing gear employed. In fact, according to Massuti et al. (2001), smaller sized individuals are concentrated at shallow depths while larger ones prefer deeper areas, showing a clear preference for rocky bottoms, which are not very accessible to trawling, and thus they can escape or avoid the net. On the other hand, many authors (Abecasis et al., 2006; Allain and Lorance, 2000; Kelly et al., 1999; White et al., 19 9 8 )  estimated

 

 

 

 

higher bluemouth longevity in the Atlantic Ocean. The difference of longevity between specimens from Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea could be due to the different age reading methodologies as those authors used thin-sectioning whereas we used whole otoliths. H. dactylopterus can attain more than 30 years of age, it is a long-lived species (Massuti et al., 2000). Data related to the life span of this fish are influenced by methods used for estimation such as whole otolith readings or sliced (Abecais et al., 2006) and length-frequency distribution analysis. D’Onghia et al. (1992) indicated that the length and age of H. dactylopterus is well correlated to bathymetric distribution. The differences of maximum age estimates are very important for management because the exploitation of the species is correlated to its life history (Denney et al., 2002). According to Pirrera et al., (2009), the blue-mouth rockfish are vulnerable to overfishing because of their biological characteristics (long life, large size, late maturity, slow growth and low mortality rate) and are strongly exploited by trawling fishing. The length at age analyzed in this research suggests that the population is made up almost exclusively of juvenile individuals (0-4 years), this result was similar to that obtained by Pirrera et al., (2009). The larger animals (up to 20 cm TL) can reach up to 9 years of age. D’Onghia et al. (1996) indicated that the estimation of growth parameters through frequency distribution underestimates the growth rate of younger fish and allows only the few earlier age groups to be identified. Additionally, these authors affirms that recruit reach the edge of the continental shelf during spring and move toward bathyal grounds as they grow. The growth performance index (Φ’) values, with coefficient of variation of only 16% indicate that the growth potential in the different areas of the Mediterranean and Atlantic are quite comparable.

Additionally, the differences in the values of growth parameters obtained between sexes might indicate that sexual development and life strategy affect the growth rate of this species. Same observation was reported by Massuti et al. (2000) indicating that males grow larger than females. The reproductive effort, considering the bioenergetic constraints of the energy budget of the organisms, implies reduced growth rates of females (Gunderson, 1997). The viviparity of H. dactylopterus, in conjunction with the development of a gelatinous matrix within the ovary to cover the fertilized eggs (Washington et al., 1984), the low fecundity of this species, and the relatively large eggs Massuti et al. (2000) imply that females have a higher energetic cost during reproduction than males, and these factors could form the basis of differences in growth between sexes.

The length-weight relationship describes a negative allometric growth for H. dactylopterus in the study area, in contrast with other studies made in the Mediterranean Sea (Tab. 8) where the results reported an isometric growth (Consoli et al., 2010; Massuti et al., 2000).

 

 

 

Finally, the growth parameters obtained in this study are reasonable because the theoretical maximum length is larger than the size of the biggest fish sampled, with the correlation found between total length and otolith radius suggesting the potential use of otoliths for estimating the age and growth of H. dactylopterus. On the other hand, along the northern Tunisian waters, H. dactylopterus is mainly caught by trawlers which do not catch very small size of individuals (<8cm). Furthermore, this species seems to be overexploited. The overexploitation of H. dactylopterus in the study area was caused by low growth and absence of very large individuals.

This study provides new information on the biology of the bluemouth H. dactylopterus in the north sea of Tunisia, contributing to the knowledge required by resource management .  Nevertheless ,  more  research  effort should be done in order to study reproductive biology which may be considered for decision-making on possible ecologically based management strategies of the species’ fisheries in the study area.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 

Authors would like to acknowledge the support of Manahel AKKARI for her helpful comments and correction of the manuscript.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Abecais D., Costa A. R., Pereira J.G. & Pinho M.R. 2006. Age and growth of bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) from the Azores. Fisheries Research, 79: 148-154.

Allain V. & Lorance P. 2000. Age estimation and growth of some deep-sea fish from the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Cybium, 24: 7-16.

Anderson R. O. & Neumann, R. M. 1996. Length, weight and associated structural indices. In: Fisheries Techniques. B. R. Murphy, D. Wills (Eds). American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, 447–481.

Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida O., Ben Hadj Hamida N., Chaouch H., Jarboui O. & Missaoui H. 2016. Age, growth and reproduction of the striped sea bream Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the gulf of Gabes (Southeastern Tunisia, Central Mediterranean). Cah. Biol. Mar. 57: 113-123

Bradai M.N. & Bouain A. 1990. Les Scorpaenides dans les pêcheries Tunisiennes. Bull. Inst. Nat. Scient. Tech. Oceanogr. Pêche Salammbô. 17:47-60.

Chemmam-Abdelkader B. 2004. Les Dentés (Poissons, Sparidés) des côtes tunisiennes: Etude éco-biologique et dynamique des populations. Thèse Doctorat de la Faculté des Sciences de Tunis.309 pp.

Consoli P., Battaglia P., Castriota L., Esposito V., Romeo T. & Andaloro, F. 2010. Age, growth and feeding habits of the bluemouth rockfish, Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Delaroche 1809) in the central Mediterranean (southern Tyrrhenian Sea). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 26: 583-591.

D’Onghia G., Mastrototaro F. & Panza M. 1996. On the growth and mortality of rockfish, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche 1809), from the Ionian Sea. FAO Fisheries Report, 533:143-152.

D’Onghia G., Matarrese A. & Tursi A. 1992. Biologia di Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809): distribuzione e accrescimento sui fondi batiali del Mar Jonio. Oebalia, 17: 129-131.

Demirhan S. A. & Akbulut F. 2015. Age and Growth of the Bluemouth Rockfish, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche 1809) from the North-Eastern Mediterranean Sea, Turkey. Pakistan J. Zool., 47: 523-527.

Denney N. H., Jennings S. & Reynolds J.D. 2002. Life-history correlates of maximum population growth rates in marine fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 269: 2229-2237.

Fischer W., Schneider M. & Bauchot M.L. 1987. Fiches FAO d’identification des espèces pour les besoins de la pêche; Méditerranée et Mer Noire (zone de pêche 37) Révision 1. volume II, Vertébrés. 1530pp.

Gunderson D. R. 1997. Trade-off between reproductive effort and adult survival in oviparous and viviparous fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54: 990-998.

Isidro E. J. 1984. Age and growth of the bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (De la Roche, 1809), off the Azores. ICES Doc C.M., 1987/G, 6:63.

Kelly C. J., Connolly P. L. & Bracken J. J. 1999. Age estimation, growth, maturity and distribution of the bluemouth rockfish Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche 1809) from the Rockall Trough. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 56: 61-74.

Khemiri S., Gaamour A., Zylberberg L., Meunier F. & Romdhane M. S. 2005. Age and growth of bogue, Boops boops, in Tunisian waters. Acta Adriat., 46: 159-175.

Mamie J. C. J., Beare D. J., Jones E. G., Kienzle M., Dobby H., Heath M. R. & Reid D. G. 2007. Aspects of the distribution and growth of bluemouth (Helicolenus dactylopterus, Delaroche 1809) since its invasion of the northern North Sea in 1991. Fisheries Oceanography, 16: 85-94.

Massuti E., Morales Nin B. & Moranta J. 2000. Age and growth of blue-mouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Osteichthyes: Scorpaenidae), in the western Mediterranean. Fisheries Research, 46: 165-176.

Massuti E., Moranta J., Gil de Sola L., Morales-Nin B. & Prats L. 2001. Distribution and population structure of the rockfish Helicolenus dactylopterus (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) in the western Mediterranean. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 81: 129-141.

Mili S., Jarboui O. & Missaoui H. 2008. Caractères biométriques de la squille  Squilla mantis dans les eaux tunisiennes. Bull. Inst. Nat. Scient. Tech. Oceanogr. Pêche Salammbô, 35: 1-14.

Monteiro L.R., Isidro E.J. & Lopes H.D. 1991. Mercury content in relation to sex, size, age and growth in two scorpion fish (Helicolenus dactylopterus and Pontinus kuhlii) from Azorean waters. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 56: 359-367.

Morales-Nin B. 1989. Edad, crecimiento y mortalidad de Helicolenus dactylopterus (Cuvier) en aguas de Namibia. Colln. Scient. Pap. Int. Commun. SE. Atl. Fish, 243-248.

Munro J. L. & Pauly D. 1983. A simple method for comparing the growth of fishes and invertebrates. Fishbyte, 1: 5-6.

Paul L. J. & Horn P. L. 2009. Age and growth of sea perch (Helicolenus percoides) from two adjacent areas off the east coast of South Island, New Zealand. Fisheries Research, 95: 169-180.

Peirano A. & Tunesi L. 1986. Preliminary notes on the biology of Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) in the Ligurian Sea. Rapport de la Commission Internationale pour l’exploration scientifique de la Mer Méditerrané, 30 : 233-238.

Pirrera L., Bottari T., Busalacchi B., Giordano D., Modica L., Perdichizzi A., Perdichizzi F., Profeta A. & Rinelli P. 2009. Distribution and population structure of the fish Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) in the Central Mediterranean (Southern Tyrrhenian Sea). Marine Ecology, 30: 161-174.

Ragonese S. & Reale B. 1992. Estimation of mortality rates and critical age of Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Pisces: Scorpaeniformes) in the Sicilian Channel (Central Mediterranean). Rapp. Commun. Int. Mer Medit. 33 :307-315.

Ragonese S. 1989. L'Applicazione dell'equazione di von Bertalanffy generale: il caso di Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delar.) (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) del Tirreno Settentrionale. Oebalia 15: 753-762.

Romanelli M., Palladino S., Tarulli E. & Ferretti M. 1997. Stima dell'accrescimento di Helicolenus dactylopetrus (Delaroche) in Adriatico Meridionale tramite esame dell sagittae di esemplari prelevati con reti a strascico e palangari di fondo. Biol. Mar. Medit. 4: 554-556.

Sequeira V., Neves A., Vieira A. R., Figueiredo I. & Gordo L. S. 2009. Age and growth of bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus, from the Portuguese continental slope. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 1-8.

Ungaro N. & Marano G. 1995. Analytical models for Mediterranean species: an application on the Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche) resource in the lower Adriatic. Rapport de la Commission Internationale pour l’exploration scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée, 34 :260-281.

Von Bertalanffy L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws II). Human Biology, 10: 181-213.

Weatherley A. H. & Gill H. S. 1987. The Biology of Fish Growth. Academic Press, New York. 443 pp.

White D. B., Wyanski D. M. & Sedberry G. R. 1998. Age, growth, and reproductive biology of the blackbelly rosefish from the Carolinas, USA. J. Fish Biol. 53: 1274-1291.

 

 

Cite this Article: Mili S, Ennouri R, Amdouni F, Chammam B and Missaoui H (2016). Age and Growth of Bluemouth Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) in the Northern Waters of Tunisia (Central Mediterranean). Greener Journal of Life Sciences, 3(1):001-012, http://doi.org/10.15580/GJLS.2016.1.102516171