|
Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol. 10(1), pp. 51-56, 2020 ISSN: 2276-7770; Copyright ©2020, the copyright of this article is
retained by the author(s) |
|
Effects of Copolymer
blends in the Production and Characterisation of Biodegradable polymer from
Agricultural Product-Using Cassava Starch (Manihort
Species) as case studies
Department of Chemical and Polymer Engineering, Lagos
State University
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article No.: 01312017 Type:
Research |
High demands and diverse
applications of plastic materials had contributed immensely to the
social-economic growth of the nations especially
in the packaging industry. However, plastics have been a major contributor
to the world's present garbage problems especially from the packaging sector
of the industry. The menace was traced to non-degradable characteristics of
LDPE and HDPP resins often used in the productions, hence, the need for
biodegradable polymer blends.;l
Co-polymer from Cassava (Manihort Species) starch
with glycerol, vinegar and water was formulated to produce slurry, which was
heated to about 1000c to form gel, dried to about 12% moisture. The
resulting chips were weighed in the
ratios of 1:0, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1, 0:1 (wt/wt %) to pure low
density polyethylene (LDPE) resins. Each formulation of mixture was extruded
at 1600C to produce polymer blends (plastics) in batches. The samples were
chipped into same dimensions of 2.0mm thickness, 15.00mm width and 30.00mm
and characterized. The mechanical properties of the polymer blends were
found to decrease as the Copolymer increased. The best Young modulus was
achieved with pure LDPE extrudate having
0.45±0.005 (109N/m,Gpa)
and the least in the pure copolymer 0.11±0.005 (109N/m,Gpa).
The homogenous dope exhibited compatibility of cassava starch with
polyethylene and it took up to 72 hr for each of
the samples to cure completely. |
|
Accepted: 01/02/2020 Published: 25/02/2020 |
|
|
*Corresponding Author Ikusedun Mojibayo E-mail: mojibayoikusedun@ yahoo.com |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
The high demand for plastics and
their numerous usages had been a major contributor to the world's present
garbage problems
because of their non-biodegradable characteristics after utilization. The need
for such large quantities of conventional plastics and their dominance over
other materials is due to their excellent “long life” properties and tenacity.
Approximately, ten million tons of plastic products are discarded each year
(Halley et al. 2001). Polyethylene is one of common synthetic
polymers of high hydrophobic level and high molecular weight (Abd El-Rahim et al., 2004). Petroleum based polymeric
plastics, films and materials cannot be degraded by natural processes in a
short period of time, hence, they are left as solid waste, causing
environmental problems. They find their ways into water channels causing
flooding and leading to loss of lives and property. Methods normally used to
destroy other types of waste such as burning and burying are not suitable for
plastic destruction. When some types of plastics are burnt, they release toxic
fumes, posing challenges to human health, so there is need to produce plastics
that will disintegrate within a short time. Burying plastics in soil cannot
destroy plastics because they are not biodegradable, there
is also limited space for landfill. Degradation at high temperature, such as in
pyrolysis (burning) tends to cause emission of toxic fumes. Available solutions includes: creation of sanitary
landfills in appropriate places; conducting campaigns by creating awareness
about the inherent problems caused by indiscriminate plastic disposal to the
environment and demanding greater
participation of government authorities (Banerjee, Hung and Srivastava,
2014). Adoption of selective collection and recycling programs which includes
plastic conversion to oil, synthesis of petroleum based fuel from plastics are
front liner solutions (Dipak and Pranav, 2014; Cleetuset al 2013).

Fig 1: A dump site where plastics are burnt
releasing toxic fumes.
Recently, public concerns on
environmental problem, climate change and limited fossil fuel resource have
caused much research and development to be devoted to the study of biodegradable
materials to replace the conventional non-biodegradable plastics. Biodegradable plastics are regarded as Copolymers
(plastics) with similar properties to conventional plastics, but it can
decomposed after disposal to the environment by the activity of microorganisms with
end products of CO2 and H2O (Tharanathan, 2003). A number of aerobic
and anaerobic microorganisms have been identified for biodegradation. The use of starch in the manufacturing of bioplastics began in the 70's (Curvelo
et al., 2001). Among its advantages, the starch is cheap, abundant and
renewable. Besides, it is found in several forms due to the origin of its raw
material as filling agent for polyolefin and as a component in synthetic
polymers blends. (Lawter and Fischer, 2000).
The most popular method in preparation of
starch and polyethylene blends was the conventional extrusion with the addition
of processing aid to enhance the compatibility of the two materials. (Shah et
al, 1995) have prepared detailed experimental approach for blending modified
starch with LDPE. The blending
of polymers with
starch under controlled
conditions leads to co-polymerization that
in turn results
in high molecular
polymers with thermoplastic
properties. The starch is not really thermoplastic, but, in the presence
of a plasticizer (water, glycerin, sorbitol, etc.),
high temperatures (90 - 180°C) and shearing, it melts and fluidizes, enabling its use in
injection, extrusion and blowing equipment, such as those for synthetic
plastics. It is necessary that the starch maintains its semi-crystal granular
structure and that it behaves in a way similar to that of a melted
thermoplastic, obtained through a mono- or twin-screw extrusion with the use of
mechanical and thermal energy (Lourdin et al.,
1999). However, it is necessary to add an additional
plasticizer besides water, such as polyol or destructurating compounds such as glycerol, carbamide, etc. with hydrophilic properties which will be only slightly influenced by the atmospheric conditions in
the sorption -desorption mechanism and
allow a melting phase at a temperature lower than that of the starch
degradation (Averous, 2002).
Starch
is the principal source of food calories for people globally (Jeffry Grotto
2013). Starch consists predominantly of two types of glucose polymers namely,
amylose and amylopectin. In nature, these two polymers are organized in the
semi-crystalline structure packed in the starch granule. The granular structure
of starch is quite strong; it possesses high thermal stability with a
decomposition temperature as high as 220C (Shogren,
1993).
The use of cassava
would not only create an economic alternative for cassava agriculture but would
also lead to a reduction in the impacts caused by the intense use of packaging
plastics derived from petroleum oil (polyethylene, polystyrene, etc.). The structure
of Cassava root tuber is shown in Figure 2.

Figure
2: Cassava root-tubers (Manihort esculential
L)
Nigeria being the world largest
producer of cassava, production of biodegradable packaging materials is thus,
feasible. Starch is readily dispersed in cold
water and thickens as the starch/water mixture is heated to near boiling point to
give a thickened, colloidal solution that gels on cooling. This process is
known as destructuration since it involves
destruction of the granule crystallites. Polymer blends can be
distributed or transported to normal plastic converters, which can process the
blends to products using normal injection or blow moulds. The objectives of this research work is to produce and
characterize a biodegradable plastics from cassava starch.
The
materials used were, powdered cassava starch, glycerol, vinegar and low density polyethylene obtained
from Ojota market, Lagos, Nigeria. De-ionsed water was used in all formulation as it played two major roles of
breaking the structure of the native granule and the bonds of hydrogen chains, and as a plasticizer. The experiments were
conducted at Federal Institute of Industrial Research Oshodi
(FIIRO).
The moisture content of the powdered cassava
starch was first determined using a moisture analyzer model AND MS 70 in which
cassava starch was scanned for 30mins.
This was done to ensure that the starch moisture content did not exceed
the acceptable limit of 13% because higher moisture content causes loss of
starch structure due to invasion by microbes. Solutions of different measure of
cassava starch in the range of 1.0 to 1.6 Kg were respectively dissolved in 1
Litre of water, 200 ml of vinegar and 200 ml glycerol, while the magnitude of
the cassava starch were kept constant. Each
mixture recipe were stirred continuously and
heated to 100oC over a hot plate till the mixture turned from
white suspensions to clear, consistent gel-like mass dope. The dope were removed from the hot
plate and extruded into pellets of about 30.0mm x 15.0mm x 2.0mm dimensions and
allowed to dry at ambient temperature of about 27oC till a constant
weight is attained . Two other batches of 100% polyethylene and 100% starch
plastics were also produced separately to serve as the control experiments.
Other blends were constituted in the ratios of 25/75; 50/50; and 75/25 cassava
starch to polyethylene.
The extruded and dried samples were processed
with low density polyethylene resins at 1600C to produce plastics in
three different batches in a twin screw extruder with a melt flow of 5g/10min. Mechanical
properties of the biodegradable polymer were determined and recorded. The
tensile test of the samples was carried out using testometric
universal tensile testing machine M500-25KN at a cross-head speed of 10mm/sec.
The method used is in accordance with ASTM. The assay was repeated three times
and the average results computed for analysis.
For biodegradability test, 1g each of the all
batches was weighed and buried in a bucket of soil; they were brought out after
30 days and carefully examined, observations were recorded.
The quality of the
plastics produced, in terms of strength, flexibility, transparency and texture
depends on the proportion of the materials and additives used. Cassava starch
was the only material that was varied while other materials were kept constant.
The different formulations experimented were carefully observed and it was
found that the first formulation produced the best result due to its stability,
and that was what was used for the blends of five batches.
It took up to 72hr for each of the samples to
dry completely. The exercise showed the
compatibility of cassava starch with polyethylene. The different formulations
experimented were carefully observed and it was found that the first
formulation with the last cassava blend produced the best result due to its
stability, and this was used for the blending of five batches. The mechanical
property of samples was observed to decrease with the increasing cassava
quantity. This sample texture is shown in Figure 3.0.

Fig 3: Structure of the blended PET-Cassava Macromolecules
The
100% polyethylene possessed better mechanical properties than the blended
biodegradable plastics which also possessed good mechanical properties. Results
also showed that polyethylene can be used to improve the mechanical properties
of cassava starch.
The
glass transition temperature (Tg)
of pure, dry starch is above the decomposition point, so it does not soften and
flow. This “thermoplastic starch” (TPS) will flow at elevated temperature and
pressure and can be extruded to give both foams and solid molded
articles. Unfortunately, the properties of these simple thermoplastics tend to
be disappointing. For example, TPS plasticized with water has poor dimensional
stability and becomes brittle as water is lost, and the properties of water-
and glycerol-plasticized TPS are poor at high humidity which necessitated the
blend of cassava starch with polyethylene.
The tensile strength test carried
out showed that tensile strength, elongation and modulus decrease with increase
in cassava starch in all the blends which means that polyethylene possessed
good mechanical properties. The 100%
polyethylene possessed better mechanical properties than the blended
biodegradable plastics which also possessed good mechanical properties; it also
shows the compatibility of cassava starch with polyethylene. Results also showed
that polyethylene can be used to improve the mechanical properties of cassava
starch.
The products are formed by the
swelling and expansion of starch through the
action of high temperature and water vapour.
The biodegradability test revealed 100% cassava starch plastic showed
decrease in weight 0.2g, which is an indication of microbial attack in the
soil. The other batches did not show any form of reduction for that period of
30 days.

Figure
4: Young Modulus Responses of Biodegradable Polymer Blend with Polyethylene

Figure 5: Elongation
percentage of Biodegradable Polymer Blend with Polyethylene

Figure 6: Tensile
Strength Responses of Biodegradable Polymer Blend with Polyethylene
This
study has shown that the development of starch-based biodegradable plastics
looks very promising given the fact that starch is inexpensive, available
throughout the year, and biodegradable in various environments. This research shows that cassava starch
based plastics can compete with petroleum based plastics if well plasticized, even
though results in this work showed that 100% polyethylene plastic possessed tensile
strength higher than polyethylene -cassava
starch plastics, but with time and continuous research in this direction, 100% biodegradable
plastics will displace conventional plastics in different areas of applications,
so research and development must
continue in this direction in order to get rid of petroleum based, non
biodegradable plastics for a more friendly environment
Averous, Averous, L. 2002. Etude de systemes polyrneres multiphases: approche des relations materiaux-procedes-proprietes. Habilitation a diriger
des recherches, Universite
de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 2002.46p.
Bastioli, C. (2005). Handbook of Biodegradable
Polymers (Toronto-Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Chem
Tech. Publishing,)
Christine
C, Shijo T. and Soney V.
2013. Synthesis of Petroleum-Based Fuel from Waste Plastics and Performance
Analysis in a CI Engine Journal of Energy
Volume 2013, Article ID 608797, 10 pages.
Gattin,
R.; Copinet, A..; Bertrand, C; Couturier, Y. (2002). Biodegradation study
of a starch and poly(lactic acid) co-extruded material
in liquid, composting and inert mineral media. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, v.50,
n. 1. p.25-31.
Gulab H., Jan M. R., Shah J., and G. Manos,
“Plastic catalytic pyrolysis to fuels as tertiary polymer recycling method:
effect of process conditions,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health,
vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 908–915, 2010.
Guilbert, 2000 Guilbert,
S. Potential of the protein based biomaterials for the food industry. In: The
Food Biopack Conference, 2000, Copenhagen. Proceedings Copenhagen, 2000. p.13-18.
Halley, P.; Rutgers, R.; Coombs, S; Kettels,
J.; Christie.
G; Jenkins. M; Beh,
H; Griffin, K.; Jayasekara, R.; and Lonergan, G 2001. Biodegradable
packaging for the food industry. In: The Food Biopack
Conference. 2000, Copenhagen. Proceedings ... , Copenhagen, 2000. p81-83.
Lawter and Fischer, 2000 Lawter, M.;
Fischer, G. Potential of starch based packaging for the food industry. In: THE Food Biopack Conference, 2000, Copenhagen. Proceedings ... , Copenhagen,
2000. p.8-11.
R.
Auras, B. Harte, S. Selke, 2004. An
overview of polyactides as packaging materials.
Macromol Biosci 4 (9), , 835-64.
Tharanathan, R.N 2003,
Biodegradable films and composite coating: Past, present, and future, trends in
food science and technology 14, pp, 71-78.
|
Cite
this Article: Duduyemi, O; Ikusedun M; Shonaike GO; Olodu OE; Babatunde BH; Adaran AS; Moradeyo OT; Ajise BE; Sadiq SKL; Omotola O (2020). Effects of Copolymer blends in the Production and
Characterisation of Biodegradable polymer from Agricultural Product-Using
Cassava Starch (Manihort Species) as case studies. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences
10(1): 51-56. . |