Greener Journal of
Agricultural Sciences Vol. 11(1), pp. 19-25,
2021 ISSN: 2276-7770 Copyright ©2021, the
copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
Moisture characteristics
and soil chemical variations of a degraded soil treated with selected animal
wastes
Department of Soil Science, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Anambra state
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
Article No.: 020221018 Type: Research |
The ability of
animal waste to restore and reclaim the productivity of degraded soil is
dependent on the nutrient content of the waste, rates applied and ability to
release nutrients in available form for crop production. In this present
study the comparative effectiveness of three (3) animal wastes; poultry
waste, swine waste and cow waste in improving the productivity of a degraded
soil was simultaneously investigated in a greenhouse study. The experiment
was laid out in factorial experiment in randomized complete block design and
each treatment was replicated three (3) times. A control was also included.
The findings from the study showed that animal wastes and rates studied
significantly increased water potentials at 0.1bar, 1.0bar and 15bar for the
2 years study. The readily available water and total available water was
increased. On the average the water retention on the amended soils showed an
increased order of PW > SW > CW > CO (1st year cropping) and SW
> PW > CW > CO (2nd year cropping). The characterization of
nutrient content showed that animal wastes significantly increased the
available P, OC, TN and ECEC of the degraded soil. On the average the
nutrient output of the wastes showed an order PW > SW > CW > CO.
Na/K and Ca/Mg ratios were enhanced by the waste
application. Animal waste and rates studied is recommended for organic
farmers, potted plant growing farmers with limited land availability and
green house farmer. |
Accepted: 04/02/2021 Published: 22/02/2021 |
|
*Corresponding Author Nweke,
I.A E-mail: nweksoniyke@ gmail.com |
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Most soils in Nigeria are highly weathered, degraded
and infertile due to over cultivation, erosion, high bulk density and intense
weathering going on in the soil as a result of high temperature. Many of these
soils like ultisols predominantly in south east of
Nigeria have acid surface and subsurface horizon and their moisture stress
conditions make these soils extremely difficult to manage under low-input
conditions. Moisture is a very pressing constraint to food production and
maximization of the degraded soils like sandy soil because when there is no
moisture available in the soil, the soil organic matter (SOM)
find it difficult to thrive and create an enabling environment for soil
organism to live in. Thus the SOM takes a very huge position in the soil as it
tends to aid water retention and therefore can only thrive in moisture enhanced
conditions. Inadequate moisture content can be seen in the degraded sandy soil
due to very little OM content, porous size nature of the aggregates that allow
freely drainage, thus making the soil to be susceptible to soil erosion. In
fact soil moisture stress in degraded sandy soil is perhaps the overriding
constraint to its maximization in crop production. Though the same soil may have
more than one constraints, low moisture content is not
only a function of the low and erratic precipitation but also of the ability of
the soil to hold and release moisture. All these scenario lead to low chemical
soil nutrients for OM is the store house of soil chemical nutrients coupled
with low activities of soil microbes that will liberate plant nutrients through
their activities in soil. Organic matter maintains better soil quality and
reduces contamination of air, water, soil and final food products. Thus a
sustainable food production in a degraded sandy soil must adopt an ecological
approach of using balanced nutrient inputs from organic materials such as
animal wastes which are biological sources. Through this enhanced nutrient
input and recycling, food security in a degraded sandy soil can be achieved for
a rapidly expanding population in the tropical region like Nigeria. The use of
animal wastes is essential to maintain adequate physical, chemical and
biological properties of soils. Hence the essence of this present study is to
evaluate the moisture characteristics and soil chemical variations of a
degraded sandy soil treated with three (3) different rates of contrasting
animal wastes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection
Using soil auger, 0-20cm top soil from University of
Nigeria Nsukka, Teaching and Research Farm was
collected. The soil sample was air dried at room temperature and sieved through
a 2mm sieve. The animal waste (Cow waste, Swine waste and Poultry waste)
materials were dried at room temperature and crushed to fine particles (<
2mm). Maize used as a test crop for the study was purchased locally. The study
was carried out in the department of Soil Science green house complex of the
University. 4kg of soil was weighed out and mixed thoroughly and separately
with the following rates of cow waste, poultry waste and swine waste 0, 0.25,
0.50 and 1.00% an equivalent of 0, 5, 10 and 20tha-1. They were
transferred into clay pots with drainage holes at the base. To avoid
excessively loss of water by drainage the holes were plugged with cotton wool.
The soil and the amendment mixtures were incubated for one week before planting
maize. Five seeds of maize NS1 variety were planted per pot and later thinned
down to three stand per pot after germination. The
plant height was measured and after 42 days of growth, the shoots were cut and
oven dried at 60% for seven days for dry matter yield determination. The same
procedure above was repeated without further addition of wastes to test the
residual effect of the animal wastes on maize growth and yield. Agronomic aspect of this work were discussed in Nweke
and Igwe (2021). The experiment was arranged as a
factorial experiment in a randomized complete block design with each treatment
replicated three times. A control was also included.
Laboratory analysis
pH determination: The pH was
determined in distilled water solution using soil/liquid ratio of 1:2.5
Organic carbon: This was determined by the Walkley and Black (1934) method.
Total Nitrogen: Total nitrogen was determined by Kjeldahl method (Bremner, 1965)
Exchangeable basis: The complexiometric
titration method describe by Chapman (1965) was used for the determination of
calcium and magnesium. Sodium and potassium were determined from IN ammonium
acetate (NH4OAC) using the flame photometer.
Available phosphorous: Bray and Kurtz, (1945)
was used for available P determination
Efective cation exchange capacity
(ECEC): This was obtained by summing of the exchangeable bases
and the exchangeable acidity determined from IN KCl
extract.
Physical properties: Particle size
distribution was determined by the method of Bouyoucos
(1951).
Moisture retention: Moisture
retention at -10 and -1500kPa potentials using the saturation water percentage
based estimation models of Mbah (1998) and total
available water capacity (TAWC) computed as difference between moisture
retained at -10kPa (field capacity) and -1500kPa potentials (wilting point).
Determination of saturated water percentage
For the determination of saturated percentage ceramic
crucible with perforated bottom were used. Duplicate determinations were made
per sample. Portions of the air dry soil samples were transformed into the
crucible a little at a time with intermittent gentle tapping on the work bench
to consolidate the mixture. The process was continued until the crucible was
about four-fifth full. The crucible was then transferred into a basin and water
was added into the basin up to a depth of about two third of height of the
crucible. It was then allowed to stand in the basin for the soil to absorb
water by capillarity through the porous base of the crucible. Water absorption
continued until the exposed soil surface glistened as it reflected light,
indicating that saturation point had been reached. This point was reached after
24hrs of contact with water. The crucible were then
removed from the basin and the outside wiped dry. After obtaining the mass of
the crucible and saturated soil, it was dried in the oven for 24hours at 105oC.
Therefore, the mass of the crucible plus dry soil was recorded. Saturation
water percentage was then calculated as follows
SP = K-J x 100
J – C 1
Where K = weight of crucible + wet sample
J = weight of
crucible + dry sample
C = weight of
crucible only
Data analysis
Data collected from the study were analysed according
to the procedures for a factorial experiment in a randomized complete block
design and least significant difference (LSD) was used to detect differences
between treatment means
RESULTS
The pre-analysis result of the studied soil and animal
waste presented in Table 1 indicated the soil to be acidic in reaction (4.80)
and plant nutrients below their critical value for crop production. In contrast
animal waste showed to be higher in the tested parameters and therefore
expected to influence positively the productivity of the studied soil.
Table 1 Properties of soil and animal wastes before the beginning of the
study
Parameters |
Soil |
CW |
PW |
SW |
Silt% |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
Clay % |
12 |
- |
- |
- |
Fine sand% |
36 |
- |
- |
- |
Coarse sand% |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
Textural class |
Sandy |
- |
- |
- |
OC % |
0.56 |
7.86 |
13.50 |
6.84 |
OM % |
0.96 |
13.55 |
23.29 |
11.79 |
TN % |
0.067 |
1.85 |
2.86 |
2.00 |
Na cmolkg-1 |
0.11 |
0.43 |
0.72 |
0.44 |
K cmolkg-1 |
0.15 |
0.48 |
1.50 |
0.65 |
Ca cmolkg-1 |
0.8 |
1.50 |
8.10 |
2.30 |
Mg cmolkg-1 |
0.6 |
1.29 |
6.89 |
1.09 |
Avail. P ppm |
3.2 |
0.23 |
2.05 |
0.82 |
CEC cmolkg-1 |
7.0 |
- |
- |
- |
pH H2O |
4.80 |
6.69 |
7.11 |
6.38 |
CW = Cow waste; PW = Poultry waste; SW = Swine waste
The result in Table 2 presented the chemical
variations in each treatment composition before the commencement of the study
and planting of the maize. The result showed that nutrient concentration was
highest in poultry waste (PW) followed by swine waste (SW) and least in cow
waste (CW). Magnesium (Mg) concentration however, was highest in swine waste
and lowest in cow waste.
.
Table 2 amount of nutrient in each treatment gkg-1
Amendment |
Mg |
Ca |
K |
Na |
N |
P (PPM) |
PW5 |
245 |
1013 |
188 |
90 |
358 |
256 |
PW10 |
490 |
2026 |
376 |
180 |
716 |
512 |
PW20 |
980 |
4052 |
752 |
360 |
1432 |
1024 |
Mean |
572 |
2364 |
439 |
210 |
835 |
597 |
SW5 |
263 |
288 |
81 |
55 |
250 |
103 |
SW10 |
526 |
576 |
162 |
110 |
500 |
206 |
SW20 |
1052 |
1152 |
324 |
220 |
1000 |
412 |
Mean |
614 |
672 |
189 |
128 |
583 |
240 |
CW5 |
175 |
189 |
60 |
54 |
233 |
29 |
CW10 |
350 |
378 |
120 |
108 |
466 |
58 |
CW20 |
700 |
756 |
240 |
216 |
932 |
116 |
Mean |
408 |
441 |
140 |
126 |
544 |
68 |
CW = Cow waste; PW
= Poultry waste; SW = Swine waste
Effect of animal waste on the moisture characteristics
of degraded soil
The recorded value for moisture characteristics of the
degraded soil in Table 3 indicated significant different (P < 0.05) among
the treatments for 0.1bar, 1.0bar and 15bar for the 1st year
cropping and 1.0bar and 15bar for the 2nd year cropping
respectively. Every other tested parameter showed non-significant different (P <
0.05) among the treatment in both 1st and 2nd year
cropping. An indication that organic matter (OM) content of the animal waste
addition rates do not influence the parameters. There
was increase in soil moisture content in the 1st year cropping
compared to the 2nd year cropping with regard to the recorded value
obtained for the parameters tested. There was also inconsistence in the values
obtained in both 1st and 2nd year cropping relative to
the rates of waste applied. As in most parameters the 10tha-1 and
20tha-1 waste recorded the same value independent of the type of
waste applied. While in some parameters value increased with
increment in the rate of waste applied though not constant. Moisture
retained at these tested parameters in the amended soils were
appreciably higher relative to control soil in both 1st and 2nd
year cropping. At the rates of 5, 10, 20tha-1 of the animal wastes
readily available water capacity (RAWC) of degraded soil was slightly increased
over the control in both cropping seasons. On the average water retention in
the amended soils showed an increased order of PW > SW > CW > CO for 1st
and 2nd year cropping respectively.
Table 3 Effect of the Animal waste on moisture characteristics of the degraded sandy soil
Treatment |
1st Year
copping |
2nd Year
cropping |
||||||||||
Saturation |
0.1bar |
1.0bar |
15bar |
TAWC |
RAWC |
Saturation |
0.1bar |
1.0bar |
15bar |
TAWC |
RAWC |
|
CW5 |
35.40 |
21.70 |
12.80 |
9.40 |
12.30 |
8.90 |
35.01 |
20.70 |
12.56 |
8.79 |
11.96 |
8.80 |
CW10 |
36.00 |
22.20 |
13.20 |
9.40 |
12.50 |
9.00 |
35.15 |
21.15 |
13.18 |
9.58 |
12.40 |
9.00 |
CW20 |
35.10 |
21.50 |
12.60 |
9.30 |
12.10 |
8.90 |
35.00 |
20.49 |
12.50 |
9.27 |
12.20 |
8.85 |
Mean |
35.50 |
21.80 |
12.87 |
9.47 |
12.30 |
8.93 |
35.05 |
20.78 |
12.75 |
9.21 |
12.19 |
8.88 |
PW5 |
35.30 |
21.60 |
12.60 |
9.30 |
12.30 |
9.00 |
34.75 |
21.60 |
12.55 |
9.00 |
12.20 |
8.75 |
PW10 |
35.90 |
22.10 |
13.10 |
9.70 |
12.40 |
9.00 |
34.98 |
22.05 |
13.05 |
9.45 |
12.37 |
9.00 |
PW20 |
35.90 |
22.10 |
13.10 |
9.70 |
12.30 |
9.00 |
35.58 |
22.08 |
13.08 |
9.40 |
12.19 |
8.76 |
Mean |
35.70 |
21.93 |
12.93 |
9.57 |
12.33 |
9.00 |
35.10 |
21.91 |
12.89 |
9.28 |
12.25 |
8.84 |
SW5 |
35.60 |
21.90 |
12.90 |
9.50 |
12.50 |
9.00 |
35.40 |
21.50 |
12.60 |
9.38 |
12.50 |
9.01 |
SW10 |
35.70 |
22.00 |
13.00 |
9.60 |
12.40 |
9.00 |
35.65 |
21.80 |
12.95 |
9.56 |
12.47 |
8.58 |
SW20 |
35.50 |
21.80 |
12.80 |
9.50 |
12.30 |
9.00 |
35.37 |
21.65 |
12.76 |
9.50 |
12.25 |
8.67 |
Mean |
35.60 |
21.90 |
12.90 |
9.53 |
12.40 |
9.00 |
35.47 |
21.65 |
12.77 |
9.48 |
12.41 |
8.75 |
Control |
33.70 |
20.40 |
11.6 |
8.50 |
11.9 |
8.8 |
33.60 |
20.21 |
11.47 |
8.49 |
11.65 |
8.65 |
LSD0.05 |
NS |
0.95 |
0.53 |
0.07 |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
0.53 |
0.65 |
NS |
NS |
CW = Cow waste; PW = Poultry
waste; SW = Swine waste
Effect of animal waste on the chemical nutrient
content of the degraded soil
The chemical nutrient content variation of the
degraded soil presented in Table 4 showed significant different (P < 0.05)
among the treatment in the parameters tested. Except for the
result of OC of the 1st year cropping season. All the
parameters showed increase in value with increment in the rates of animal waste
applied, though not fairly constant in some parameters. On the average the
nutrient concentration in the animal wastes showed an increased variation of PW
> SW > CW > CO for 1st Year and 2nd year
cropping. Also on the average the highest ECEC value was obtained from SW (1st
year) and PW (2nd year) of the amended soil. The Na/K and Ca/Mg ratios of the waste amended soils indicated the 2nd
year cropping result to be higher in value than the 1st year
cropping result. Except for SW amended soil. In most cases the 2nd
year result showed higher values in rates studied relative to 1st
year cropping with regard to Na/K and Ca/Mg ratios.
Table 4 Effect of animal
waste on the chemical properties of degraded sandy soil
Treatment |
1st Year
cropping |
2nd Year
cropping |
||||||||||
OC gkg-1 |
TN gkg-1 |
P mgkg-1 |
Na/K |
Ca/Mg |
ECEC cmolkg-1 |
OC gkg-1 |
TN gkg-1 |
P mgkg-1 |
Na/K |
Ca/Mg |
ECEC cmolkg-1 |
|
CW5 |
600 |
58 |
12.8 |
0.93 |
1.0 |
6.7 |
500 |
14 |
11.79 |
1.0 |
1.19 |
6.32 |
CW10 |
640 |
60 |
16.8 |
0.87 |
1.07 |
6.6 |
590 |
18 |
14.68 |
0.85 |
1.14 |
6.51 |
CW20 |
680 |
61 |
21.0 |
0.93 |
0.67 |
7.0 |
600 |
20 |
19.09 |
1.07 |
1.0 |
7.47 |
Mean |
640 |
60 |
16.87 |
0.87 |
0.91 |
6.8 |
560 |
17 |
15.19 |
1.0 |
1.11 |
6.77 |
PW5 |
650 |
62 |
25.2 |
0.88 |
0.87 |
6.6 |
600 |
15 |
25.01 |
0.86 |
0.91 |
6.53 |
PW10 |
720 |
59 |
31.5 |
0.94 |
1.19 |
7.1 |
890 |
17 |
30.16 |
0.87 |
1.33 |
7.15 |
PW20 |
780 |
69 |
58.8 |
0.94 |
1.19 |
7.5 |
1010 |
30 |
54.35 |
0.81 |
1.24 |
7.27 |
Mean |
720 |
63 |
38.5 |
0.94 |
1.08 |
7.1 |
830 |
21 |
36.51 |
0.87 |
1.17 |
7.99 |
SW5 |
640 |
61 |
18.9 |
0.92 |
0.88 |
6.2 |
500 |
13 |
17.19 |
0.81 |
0.90 |
6.09 |
SW10 |
640 |
63 |
31.5 |
1.0 |
0.88 |
7.2 |
610 |
20 |
31.05 |
1.0 |
0.86 |
7.22 |
SW20 |
760 |
70 |
48.3 |
0.93 |
0.72 |
8.2 |
820 |
16 |
47.23 |
0.93 |
0.59 |
8.23 |
Mean |
680 |
65 |
32.9 |
0.93 |
0.82 |
7.2 |
640 |
16 |
31.82 |
0.73 |
0.77 |
7.18 |
Control |
600 |
58 |
16.8 |
0.83 |
1.0 |
6.8 |
490 |
11 |
14.82 |
0.92 |
1.10 |
6.90 |
LSD0.05 |
NS |
3.0 |
2.05 |
|
|
0.4 |
40 |
3 |
2.35 |
|
|
0.25 |
CW = Cow waste; PW = Poultry
waste; SW = Swine waste
DISCUSSION
The appreciable increase in moisture retained in the
waste amended soil relative to the control soil could be attributed to the OM
content of the waste. Thus indicating that OM from the waste
contributed to the improvement in the soil moisture characteristics of the
degraded soil. Organic matter through its effect on the physical
condition of a soil increase the amount of water a soil can hold and proportion
of this water available for plant establishment, growth, and performance. Mineralization
of plant nutrient is greatest when soil moisture is near field capacity and
declines with soil drying. Manure characteristics significantly influence
nutrient mineralization. The application of poultry manure ranging from
10-50tha-1 by Ewulo et al. (2008) was
observed to improve moisture availability in soil and reduced soil bulk density
leading to nutrient availability and increased tomato yield. They found out
that moisture content increased as the level of manure increased, thus
concurring to the findings of this study. Also with yearly application of OM,
moisture content increased giving cumulative positive effect on water retention
on soils (Agbede et al., 2008). In another study
Mubarak et al. (2009) found a decrease in water movement in sandy soil amended
with organic residues of which provides better environment for crop to absorb
water and nutrients instead of the nutrients being leached down rapidly. The
addition of animal wastes at the rates studied was found to significantly
increased moisture retained at all potentials. Also waste addition rates was
found to have much influence on the total available water capacity (TAWC) by
the virtue of higher value recorded in the amended soils relative to control.
Edward et al. (2000) found that soil application of different organic residues
increased soil moisture over the untreated soil. All the animal waste addition fairly
increased the readily available water (RAWC) over the control. This probably
may be due to high OM added by these wastes. The more the
readily available water in a soil the less the likelihood of moisture stress in
crops.
All the amended soils
when compared with the control showed increases in chemical parameters of the
studied soil. On the average the soil/poultry (PW) recorded the highest value
in these parameters. Relative improvement in P, ECEC, OC and TN observed over
the control may be due to higher content of these nutrients in the rates of
wastes applied. Increases in these nutrients appeared to be associated with
their high contents and values as shown in Table 2. Manure from different
animals have different qualities and require different application rates, they contribute to the fertility of the soil by
adding OM and nutrients such as N that is trapped by bacteria in the soil. The
P, OC and TN levels of the studied soils may be associated with improved
biological and mineralization process due to high quality resulting from
chemical decomposition. The obtained Na/K and Ca/Mg
ratios were due to degradation and mineralization of applied animal waste with
consequent release of nutrients. Though the recorded values
indicated to be non-optimal to most crops probably because it is potted
experiment or due to the rates of animal wastes used. In all the amended
soils increases in the Na/K and Ca/Mg were not all
that reflected in the increasing rate of application. The highest increment in the ratios however were obtained from PW
amended soil. Increases in exchange properties of soils following organic
wastes application were well documented in Nweke, (2018
and 2019ab). The chemical composition of animal waste varies with the animal
size and species, housing and rearing management, feed ration, method of manure
storage, climate etc all these might have contributed
to the nature of result obtained from this study.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results obtained from the present study
animal wastes (Poultry, Swine and Cow wastes) have a high fertilizing value
with good potential for restoration of productivity of degraded soil. The
moisture and chemical characteristics of the soil improved with the application
of the animal waste. Following the characteristics of the nutrients of the
animal wastes, poultry waste had the highest concentration of nutrients
compared with swine waste and cow waste of which the order of increase showed
PW > SW > CW > CO. Thus animal wastes and rates studied are good soil
amendments, they improved water retention ability of the degraded soil and
essential element contained in then were mineralized of which is capable to
support any growing crop in the medium.
REFERENCES
Agbede, T. M., Ojeniyi, S. O. and Adeyemo, A. J. (2008). Effect of poultry manure on soil physical properties growth and
grain yield of sorghum in south west, Nigeria Am. Eurasian J. Sustain.
Agric. 2(1):72-77
Bouyoucos, G. H. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical
analysis of soils, Agronomy Journal 43: 434-38
Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of
total organic and available forms of phosphorous in soils Soil Science 59:
39-45
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Total nitrogen. In CA Black (ed) Method of soil analysis part
II Am. Soc. Agron. 9:1149-1178
Chapman, H. D. (1965). Total
exchangeable bases. In CA Black Method of soil analysis part II Am. Soc.
Agron. 9: 902-904
Edwards, L., Burney, J. R., Rochter,
G. and Macrae, A. H. (2000). Evaluation of compost and straw mulching on soil-loss characteristics
in erosion plots, potatoes in Prince Edwards Island Canada, Agricultural
Ecosystem and Environment 81: 217-222.
Ewulo, B. S., Ojeniyi, S. O., and Akanni D. A.
(2008). Effect of poultry manure on selected soil physical
and chemical properties growth yield and nutrient status of tomato African
Journal of Agricultural Research 3(9):612-616
Mbah, C. N. (1998).
Evaluation of agronomic and pollution potentials of some animal wastes M. Sc.
Thesis submitted to the Department of Soil Science University of Nigeria Nsukka
Mubarak, A. R., Omaima, E.
R., Amal, A. A. and Nemat,
E. H. (2009). Short term studies on use of organic amendments for
amelioration of a sandy soil. African Journal of Agricultural Research
4(7):621-627
Nweke I. A. (2018). Residual effect of organic waste amendment on soil productivity and
crop yield-A review Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(9): 209-218 DOI:
10.15580/GJAS.2018.9.090618129
Nweke I. A. (2019b). Two years influence of composted crop residues on the productivity of typic tropaqualf and maize yield
J. Biol. Phys. Math. 2(2): 68-76
Nweke,
I.A. (2019a). Two years
evaluation of four contrasting organic wastes on soil productivity and maize
yield in ultisol at Igbariam
soil south east, Nigeria Global J. Agric. Res. 7(1) 11-22
Nweke, I. A. and Igwe, A.
C. (2021). An evaluation of three contrasting rates of animal wastes on degraded
sandy soil and their immediate and residual effect on dry matter yield of
maize, J Agriculture and Veterinary Science In Press
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A (1934): An
Examination of the Degtiarelt method for determining
soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the Chromic acid titration
Method. Soil Science 37: 29 – 38.
Cite
this Article: Nweke, IA; Chime, EU (2021).
Moisture characteristics and soil chemical variations of a degraded soil
treated with selected animal wastes. Greener
Journal of Agricultural Sciences 11(1): 19-25. |