By Olana, A (2022).
|
Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences ISSN: 2276-7770 Vol. 12(3), pp. 228-235, 2022 Copyright ©2022, the copyright of this article is
retained by the author(s) |
|
Aflatoxin producing fungi and
its management: A Review
Abera Olana
Department
of plant science, Collage of Natural and Environmental sciences, Wollega University. Nekemte, Wollega, Ethiopia P.O.Box 395.
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article No.: 110822090 Type: Research |
Mycotoxins are a
structurally dissimilar group of fungal natural products that are harmful to
vertebrate animals or human when they are contaminants of feeds or food.
There has been tremendous interest in what climate change scenarios have on
crops, toxigenic fungi and aflatoxin
contamination. A number of Aspergillus species
possess the ability to produce aflatoxins though
the main causative agent of contamination globally is Aspergillus
flavus. Crop aflatoxin
contamination is a complex process that starts in the field due to
environmental and biological factors such as host susceptibility, heat and
high-temperature, insect damage, and aflatoxin-producing
potentials of fungal species. Currently, different types of aflatoxins are known, with aflatoxin
B1, B2, G1, and G2 being the most frequent, and aflatoxin
B1 is the most toxic and group 1A carcinogen. Understanding the fungi,
factors those initiate them may allow
development of improved management practices, better allotment of monitoring
efforts, and modification of agronomic procedures in anticipation of global
climate change. Use of resistant variety, recommended planting date, crop
rotation, tillage, avoiding delayed harvesting, chemical, integrated
management and biological control agents are the main strategies for the
management of toxigenic fungi, also awareness creation for the
community play a great role. |
|
Received: 04/08/2022 Accepted: 03/11/2022 Published: 08/11/2022 |
|
|
*Corresponding Author Abera Olana E-mail: aberaolana@ gmail.com, aberao@wollegauniversity. edu.et Phone: +251920409498 |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
The term mycotoxin was named in 1960 as a
result of an unusual veterinary catastrophe near London, England, during which
roughly 100,000 turkeys died (Blout, 1961).
When this unknown turkey X disease was associated with a groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.)
meal contaminated with secondary metabolites from Aspergilus flavus
(Bennett and Klich, 2003, Perdoncini
M, et al., 2019, Joubrane
K, et al., 2020).
Thus, the toxin was coined “aflatoxin” by virtue of its origin from A.
flavus. Aflatoxins (AF) are
produced via a polyketide pathway by various
species of Aspergillus section Flavi,
which includes A. flavus, A. parasiticus,
A. parvisclerotegenus, A. minisclerotigenes and A. nomius (Pleadin
et al., 2014). Both A. flavus and A. parasiticus are
most frequently detected in agricultural products because of their widespread
distribution (Frisvad, J, et al., 2019)
Aflatoxins are largely prevalent in major food crops such as maize (Zea mays L.), groundnuts, tree nuts, wheat (Triticum aestivum L),
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L), spices, milk and meat products (Iqbal et al.,
2015). Aflatoxin contamination depends on Aspergillus species, growing and
storage conditions, management practices employed and other factors (Paterson
and Lima 2010). Aflatoxins
can accumulate through the food chain posing a serious health concern to humans
(Sherif et al., 2009). Aflatoxin contamination is common in tropical countries
where drought is prevalent throughout the year, in such regions, changes in
weather patterns may result in acute aflatoxicoses and deaths (Lewis et al.,
2005). Biosynthesis of aflatoxin depends on pH, water activity, insect
infestation and temperature (Molina and Gianuzzi 2002). Climate change is
anticipated to have a pronounced effect on economically important crops and
mycotoxigenic fungal infection and contamination with aflatoxins
(Paterson and Lima, 2010). Undeniably, climate change may have impact on the
interactions between various mycotoxigenic species and the relative mycotoxin
contamination of staple commodities (Magan et al., 2011).
In
order to minimize the effect of aflatoxin on our
commodity, understanding of the factors that predispose the infection of the
plant with aflatoxin-producing fungi and the
conditions that encourage their formation is crucial (Udomkun et
al., 2017).
As the presence of aflatoxin in food can be hazardous for human health and
signify an enormous economic problem, one has all the reasons to allow for the
implementation of new techniques providing for a safe food production. The first step in reducing aflatoxin contamination is through understanding pre- and post-harvest
management techniques. Pre-harvest bio control technologies can give us the
greatest opportunity to reduce AF production on the spot (Peles,
F.et al., 2021). This can be possible
through proper curing, drying, sorting, storing, physical separation, microbial
degradation and different chemical treatments. Therefore, the objective of this
review is to summarize on aflatoxin producing fungi and its management
strategies.
Aflatoxins are toxic and carcinogenic mycotoxins
produced by fungi belonging to Aspergillus section Flavi, primarily A. flavus and A.
parasiticus (Amaike and
Keller, 2011; Baranyi et al., 2013; Cotty et al., 1994; Mahuku et al., 2019). Different types of aflatoxins
have been identified, with aflatoxin B1, B2, G1,
G2, M1 and M2 being the most frequent and
toxic (Akiama et
al., 2001).
When ingested, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)
is hydroxylated to aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and is secreted in
the milk of animals whose feedstuffs have been contaminated by AFB1
and AFB2 (Iqbal et al., 2015; Ketney et al.,
2017; Serraino et
al., 2019). A. flavus produces only AFB1
and AFB2, whereas A. parasiticus produces AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2 (Creppy, 2002). The
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified AFB1, AFB2, AFG1
and AFG2 as Group 1 mutagens, whereas AFM1
as Group 2B (IARC, 2015). Aflatoxins B1 and B2 fluoresce blue,
whereas AFG1
and AFG2 fluoresce green. Aflatoxins are carcinogenic, mutagenic,
teratogenic and immunosuppressive and their presence in food commodities
greatly impacts the food and feed industries (Sherif et al.,
2009; Jalili M, 2015; Peles
F et al., 2019; Ráduly
Z et al., 2020). In particular,
co-occurrence of mycotoxins is a major concern
because the possible synergetic toxicities are not well known (Palumbo, R, et al., 2020)
High dose exposure of AFs on humans result in
vomiting, abdominal pain, and even possible death, while small quantities of
chronic exposure may lead to liver cancer (Sherif et al. 2009). Aflatoxins play a
significant role in development of edema in malnourished people as well as in
the pathogenesis of kwashiorkor in malnourished children (Coulter et al.,
1986). Aflatoxin contamination of
human food and animal feed causes severe health and economic risks worldwide,
especially in low income countries where the majority of the people consume
maize and groundnuts. As a result, most
countries set legislation that restricts movement of aflatoxin
contaminated commodities (Juan et al., 2012). Safe limit of AFs for
human consumption varies from one country to another and ranges from 4 to 30 µg/kg. European Union has set the maximum
acceptable limit at 2 µg/kg for AFB1 and
4 µg/kg for total AFs (EC, 2010)
and the US 20 µg/kg (Wu, 2006).
FAO estimates that 25 per cent of the world food crops are affected by
mycotoxins each year and constitute a loss at post-harvest (FAO, 1997). In the
United States from 1990 to 1996, litigation costs of $34 million from aflatoxin
contamination occurred. In 1998, as a consequence of aflatoxin
contaminations, maize farmers lost $40 million (AMCE, 2010). In 2004 annual
loss was more than $750 million in Africa due to aflatoxin contamination of
agricultural crops. Ultimately, it contributes to increased costs to consumers
(AMCE, 2010). A loss due to aflatoxin contamination costs about $100 million per
year including $26 million loss in peanut ($69.34/ha). In Japan, AFB1
was detected in groundnuts imports from 20 of 31 countries, five lots of large type raw shelled and 269 lots of small type raw shelled
groundnuts were rejected as having above the regulation level (10 ppb) of AFB1.
Warm and humid environments and insect damage promote the growth of fungi
and the production of aflatoxins. Atmosphere
composition has an immense impact on mould growth, with humidity being the most
important variable for their growth (Cotty and Jaime-Garcia, 2007, Valencia-Quintana R,
et al., 2020). Aflatoxin production is determined by a
wide range of substrates due to non-visible spoilage at pre-harvest in the
field and post-harvest during storage or processing. Poor storage conditions
could also influence mold development and aflatoxin
contamination in the stored products (Abdi M, et al., 2021). However, high
contamination and toxin production occur in poorly stored commodities, because
of inadequate moisture and high temperature (Udomkun
et al., 2017). Fungal growth can occur over a wider range of temperatures, pH and water activity levels on maize
(Aldars-garcía L, 2018). Optimum water activity and
temperatures on groundnuts were: 0.94 aw and
34oC for growth and 0.99 aw and
32oC for AFB1 production respectively (Table 1).
Similarly, in maize temperature ranged from 10 to 43oC for fungal
growth and from 13 to 37oC for AFB1 production. Water activity and
temperature range vary for toxin production and for mould
growth (ICMSF, 1996).
Relative humidity between 83%-88% has been
found to be appropriate to influence the mold growth and aflatoxins
production (Agriopoulou, 2020). Hotter and drier summers are predicted which may prevent
certain fungi from contaminating vegetation due to the lack of humidity (West et al., 2012). The germination of the
spores is greatly influenced by humidity and temperature, meaning that any
change in climate will greatly affect these processes (Doohan
et al., 2003; Paterson and Lima, 2010).
Significant
correlations have been reported between agro-ecological zones and aflatoxin
levels, with wet and humid climates after longer storage periods increasing
aflatoxin risk (Hell et al., 2000).
Kaaya et al. (2006) disclosed that aflatoxin levels were higher in more humid
areas compared to the drier areas in maize samples collected from Uganda and
this findings concords with maize samples collected from Nigeria (Atehnkeng et al.,
2014).
Table 1. Limits of mould growth
and aflatoxin production by A. flavus
and A. Parasiticus (ICMSF 1996)
|
Parameter |
Aspergillus flavus |
Aspergillus parasiticus |
Aspergillus flavus |
Aspergillus parasiticus |
Aspergillus flavus |
Aspergillus parasiticus |
|
Growth |
Minimum |
Optimum |
Maximum |
|||
|
Temperature (şC) |
10-12 |
12 |
33 |
32 |
43 |
42 |
|
Water activity |
0.8 |
0.80-0.83 |
0.98 |
0.99 |
>0.99 |
>0.99 |
|
pH |
2 |
2 |
5-8 |
5-8 |
>11 |
>11 |
|
Aflatoxin Production |
Minimum |
Optimum |
Maximum |
|||
|
Temperature (şC) |
13 |
12 |
16-31 |
25 |
31-37 |
40 |
|
Water activity |
0.82 |
0.86-0.87 |
0.95-0.99 |
0.95 |
>0.99 |
>0.99 |
|
pH |
- |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
>8 |
When environmental conditions are favorable,
wind and insect dispersal of conidia to plants results in colonization,
infection and within susceptible hosts, production of aflatoxins
(Payne, 2015).
Conidia serve as source of inoculum for secondary infections and reservoirs of A.
flavus for subsequent dispersal to susceptible hosts (Jaime-Garcia and Cotty, 2004). Maize borers on maize, pink bollworm on
cotton, lesser corn stalk borer on groundnut and the navel orange worm on
pistachio vector aflatoxin-producing fungi resulting
in increased aflatoxin contamination (Dowd
et al., 2005).
Cultural practices that minimize the
occurrence of aflatoxin contamination in the field comprises: timely planting,
maintaining optimal plant densities, proper plant nutrition, avoiding drought
stress, controlling pests and proper handling during harvesting. Waliyar et al.
(2008) reported reduction of A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination by 50-90% through
application of lime, farm yard manure and cereal crop residues as soil
improvement. Delayed the harvested crop in the field prior to storage
encourages fungal infection and insect infestation (Udoh
et al., 2000). Growths of toxigenic fungi in stored commodities are influenced
by moisture and temperature content. Hell et al. (2008) reported that when
maize stored for three days, with a moisture content above 13%, aflatoxin
contamination increase 10 fold and recommended cereal commodities should dried
to a moisture levels of 10–13%. To decrease toxin contamination, technological
solutions that assist in decreasing grain moisture quickly have been reviewed
by Udomkun et al. (2017). Farmers in lower-income countries store agricultural products in
containers usually made from wood, bamboo, mud placed and covered with thatch
or metal roofing sheets (Waliyar et al., 2015).
Recently, hermetic storage containers such as metal or cement bins have been
established as alternatives to traditional storage methods, however, their high
costs and difficulties with availability make acceptance by small-scale farms
limited (Hell and Mutegi, 2011). Hell et al. (2000)
investigated that although polypropylene bags are recently used for grains
storage, they are still contaminated by fungal pathogens and aflatoxins especially when those reused bags contain A. flavus spores. Williams et al. (2014) point out that the Purdue
improved crop storage (PICS) bags effectively suppressed the development of A. flavus and minimize aflatoxin contamination in maize in wide range of moisture conditions. Njoroge
et al. (2014) recorded less moisture absorbance in grains stored in PICS bags
than grains stored in woven polypropylene bags.
Aflatoxin levels can be minimized in stored products using physical techniques such as color sorting, density flotation, blanching and roasting. Physical sorting of broken and infected grains from the intact commodity reduce aflatoxins levels by 40-80 per cent (Fandohan et al., 2005). Hell et al. (2008) reported that reduction of aflatoxin in cleaned stores as compared to non-cleaned stores.
Aflatoxins
contamination in pistachio nuts is reduced by 95% through colour sorting (Shakerardekani et al., 2012). However, such physical
techniques are usually arduous and ineffective. Computer-based image processing
techniques for large-scale screening of fungal and toxin contaminations in food
and feed are promising modern techniques. Berardo et al. (2005) quantified
fungal infection and mycotoxins produced in maize
grain by Fusarium verticillioides using
Near Infrared Spectroscopy. An additional image based sorting technology has
been forwarded by Ozlüoymak (2014), who revealed that approximately 98% of the aflatoxins in contaminated figs were effectively detected
and separated by a UV light coupled with colour detection system.
The use of chemicals to bind, inactivate or remove aflatoxins has been studied extensively using propionic acid, ammonia, copper sulfate, benzoic acid, urea and citric acid chemicals capable of reacting with aflatoxins (Gowda et al., 2004). Jalili and Jinap (2012) studied the effect of 2% sodium hydrosulphite (Na2S2O4) on the reduction of aflatoxins in black pepper and found that a decrease in AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2, without harm to the outer layer of black pepper. Techniques other than the use of chemical sorbents and ammonization have achieved reduction in aflatoxin bioavailability that due to hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate binding (Phillips et al., 1988). Since 1988 there are several publications that reveal the use of Hydrated Sodium Calcium Aluminosilicates as adsorbents
for mycotoxins in
vivo and in vitro.
Ammonization
method has been shown to efficiently destroy AFB1 in cottonseed and
cottonseed meal, groundnuts and groundnut meal, and maize (Park and Price,
2001). Although ammonia,
sodium bisulfite, and calcium hydroxide treatments are efficient, they do not
fulfill food safety requirements (Piva et al.,
1995).
Among
numerous research approaches, biological degradation of aflatoxins using
microorganisms is one of the striking strategies for the management of these
poisonous fungal toxins in food and feed (Shetty and
Jespersen, 2006). Several microbes viz.,
bacteria, yeasts, actinomycetes, algae and non-toxigenic strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus have been tested to minimize aflatoxin contamination
in different crops such as maize (Dorner et al., 1999) and groundnut (Vijayasamundeeswari et al., 2010; Shifa
et al., 2016). Bandyopadhyay R et a.l
(2016); Lewis M et al. (2019), Senghor,
L.et al (2020) demonstrated that bio
control non-afla toxigenic strains reduced AF
concentrations in treated crops by more than 80% under both field and storage
conditions. A toxigenic strain of A. flavus in the
USA has been approved and marketed as Afla-Guard®. Similarly, in
Nigeria atoxigenic strains of A. flavus has
gained provisional registration (AflaSafe) and confirmed to decrease aflatoxin
concentrations up to 99% both in vitro and in vivo (Atehnkeng et al., 2014). Farzaneh
et al. (2012) isolated Bacillus subtilis strain UTBSP1 from pistachio
nuts and examined for the degradation of AFB1 and found that B.
subtilis UTBSP1 significantly reduced AFB1 by 95 per cent. Several studies showed that
inhibition of mycelial growth and reduction of aflatoxin contamination when
different crops are treated by Bacillus subtilis,
Pseudomonas solanacearum, P. fluorescens and Rhodococcus erythropolis
(Nesci et
al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2009). Several non-lactic acid bacteria, such as Bacillus spp., Brachybacterium spp., Brevundimonas spp., Cellulosimicrobium
spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia spp., Klebsiella spp., Mycolicibacterium
spp., Myxococcus spp., Nocardia
spp., Pseudomonas spp., Rhodococcus spp., Streptomyces
spp., and Stenotrophomonas spp., can also inhibit the
growth and AF production of molds (Peles F et al., 2021).
Plants produce different secondary metabolites to fight against pathogen attack. Antimicrobial compounds produced by plants are safe for the environment and consumers, and are important to control postharvest diseases. They are classified as generally recognized as safe and have low hazard to the consumers (Tian et al., 2011). Plant extracts have been reported to have antifungal activity against aflatoxins produced by A. flavus and A. parasiticus (Hajare et al., 2005; Sandosskumar et al., 2007; Velazhahan et al., 2010). Hajare et al. (2005) reported an 80% decrease in total aflatoxin content over the controls after treatment with aqueous extract of Trachyspermum ammi seeds. Sandosskumar et al. (2007) incubated AFB1 with zimmu extract for five days and verified the potential of zimmu extract to degrade aflatoxin and reduce AFB1 by up to 90 %. In addition, when groundnut was intercropped with zimmu, a significant reduction in the population of A. flavus in the soil, kernel infection by A. flavus and aflatoxin contamination was observed. Haciseferogullary et al. (2005) evaluated the efficacy of garlic extract at different levels against A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. ochraceus, A. terreus,
Penicillium chrysogenum, P. puberulum, P. citrinum, P.
corylophilum, Rhizopus stolonifer, Stachybotrys chartarum, Eurotium chevalieri and Emericella
nidulans
growth. Eighty four per cent reduction in
toxin production occurred at 1% inclusion level.
4.
Policy directions
In order to reduce aflatoxin
contamination policies should focuses on: (1) improving awareness on sources of
aflatoxin contamination along the value chain (farmers, consumers, processors,
and traders) and health impacts; (2) implementing appropriate pre- and
post-harvest Aspergillus fungi control strategies and
(3) developing accessible low cost technologies and infrastructure to monitor
contamination levels.
CONCLUSIONS
Infection of crops with the fungi in the
genus Aspergillus both at field and storage conditions leads to aflatoxin contamination in warm and humid areas. Aflatoxin contamination causes stunting in
children, immune suppression, liver cancer and death. It is possible to reduce aflatoxin contamination by using management
options such as sorting, crop rotation, irradiation, fumigation, chemical,
botanical, biological control and improved storage structures to improve health
conditions of people, and increase food safety and security. In the future
multidisciplinary and inclusive research is vital to evaluate the effect of
climate change and the potential benefits of integrated management technologies..
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Abdi M, Tsehaynesh T, Hassen S and Wendimeneh T (2021). Aspergillus species and aflatoxin
contamination in pepper (Capsicum annuum l.)
in West Gojjam, Ethiopia. Afr.J.Food
Agri.Nutr.Dev.17178-17194
Akiama H, Goda Y, Tanaka T, Toyoda M (2001). Determination
of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 in
spices using multi-functional column clean-up. Journal of Chromatography
A 932: 153-157.
Agriopoulou S, Stamatelopoulou E, Varzakas
T (2020). Advances in Occurrence,
Importance, and Mycotoxin Control Strategies:
Prevention and Detoxification in Foods. Foods 137, 137.
Aldars-garcía L, Berman M, Ortiz J, Ramos AJ, Marín S (2018). Probability
models for growth and a flatoxin B1 production as a_ected by intraspecies
variability in Aspergillus flavus.
Food Microbiol. J. 72,
166–175.
Amaike S,
Keller N (2011). Aspergillus flavus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49, 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095221.
AMCE
(Aflatoxin mitigation center of excellence) (2010). Preventing
health hazards and economic losses from aflatoxin. Texas
Corn producers.
Atehnkeng J, Ojiambo PS, Cotty PJ, Bandyopadhyay R (2014). Field
efficacy of a mixture of atoxigenic Aspergillus
flavus Link: Fr vegetative compatibility groups in preventing aflatoxin
contamination in maize (Zea mays L.).
Biological Control 72: 62-70.
Bandyopadhyay R, Ortega-Beltran A, Akande A, Mutegi C, Atehnkeng J, Kaptoge L, Senghor AL, Adhikari
BN, Cotty PJ (2016).
Biological control of aflatoxins in Africa: Current status
and potential challenges in the face of climate change. World Mycotoxin J. 9, 771–789.
Baranyi N, Kocsubé S, Vágvölgyi C, Varga J (2013). Current trends in aflatoxin research.
Acta Biol. Szeged. 57, 95–107.
Bennett JW, Klich M (2003). Mycotoxins.
Clinical Microbiology Review
16: 497-516.
Berardo N, Pisacane V, Battilani P, Scandolara A, Pietro A, Marocco A
(2005). Rapid detection of kernel rots and mycotoxins in
maize by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Agriculture
and Food Chemistry 53: 8128-8134.
Blout WP (1961). Turkey x disease. Journal of British Turkey Federation 9:
52-57.
Cotty PJ(1994). Comparison of four media for the
isolation of Aspergillus flavus
group fungi. Mycopathologia 125, 157–162
Cotty PJ, Jaime-Garcia R
(2007). Influences of climate on
aflatoxin-producing fungi and aflatoxin contamination. International Journal of Food and Microbiology 119: 109-115.
Coulter JBS, Hendrickse RG, Lamplugh SM, Macfarlane SBJ, Moody JB,
Omar MIA, et al. (1986). Aflatoxins and kwashiorkor: Clinical studies in
Sudanese children. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and
Hygiene 80: 840-847.
Creppy EE (2002). Update of survey, regulation and toxic effects of
mycotoxins in Europe. Toxicology Letters 127: 19-28.
Doohan FM, Brennan J, Cooke BM (2003).
Influence of climatic factors on Fusarium species pathogenic to cereals.
European Journal of Plant Pathology 109: 755–768.
Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Wicklow DT (1999). Aflatoxin reduction in corn through field application of
competitive fungi. Journal of
Food Protection 62: 650-656.
Dowd
P, Johnson E, Williams W (2005). Strategies for insect management targeted
toward mycotoxin management. In: Abbas HK, editors. Aflatoxin
and food safety. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 517–541.
EC (European Commission) (2010). Commission regulation (EU) no 165/2010 of 26 February 2010,
amending regulation (EC) no 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as
regards aflatoxin. Official Journal of the European
Union. 8-12. L 50.
Fandohan P, Zoumenou D, Hounhouigan DJ, Marasas WF,
Wingfield MJ, Hell K (2005). Fate of aflatoxins and
fumonisins during the processing of maize into food products in Benin. International Journal of Food Microbiology 98(3):
249-259.
FAO (Food
and Agriculture Organization) (1997).
Worldwide Regulations for Mycotoxins. A compendium. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper.
Rome: FAO.
Farzaneh M, Shi Q, Ghassempour A, Sedaghat S,
Ahmadzadeh M, Mirabolfathy M, Javan-Nikkhah M (2012). Aflatoxin B1
degradation by Bacillus subtilis
UTBSP1 isolated from pistachio nuts of Iran. Food Control 23(1): 100-106.
Frisvad, J.C.; Hubka, V.; Ezekiel,
C.N.; Nov, A.; Chen, A.J.; Arzanlou, M.; Larsen,
T.O.; Sklen, F.;Mahakarnchanakul,
W.; Samson, R.A.; et al (2019). Taxonomy of Aspergillus section Flavi and
their production of aflatoxins, ochratoxins
and other mycotoxins. Stud. Mycol. 63, 1–63. [CrossRef]
Gowda NKS, Malathi V, Suganthi
RU (2004). Effect of
some chemical and herbal compounds on growth of Aspergillus parasiticus and aflatoxin production. Animal Feed Science and Technology
116: 281-291.
Haciseferogullary´ H,
Özcan M, Demir F, Caly´sy´r S (2005). Some nutritional and
technological properties of garlic (Allium
sativum L.). Journal of Food Engineering; 68: 463–469.
Hajare
SS, Hajare SH, Sharma A (2005). Aflatoxin inactivation
using aqueous extract of Ajowan (Trachyspermum
ammi) seeds. Journal of Food Science 70: 29-34.
Hell K, Cardwell KF,
Setamou, M, Poehling HM (2000). The influence of storage practices on aflatoxin
contamination in maize in four agro-ecological zones of Benin, West Africa. Journal of Stored Products Research 36(4): 365-382.
Hell
K, Fandohan P, Bandyopadhyay R, Cardwell K, Kiewnick S, Sikora R, Cotty P (2008).
Pre- and post-harvest management of aflatoxin in maize.
In: Leslie JF, Bandyopadhyay R, Visconti A,
editors. Mycotoxins: detection methods, management, public health, and
agricultural trade. Wallingford: CAB International p. 210-219.
Hell K, Mutegi C (2011). Aflatoxin control and
prevention strategies in key crops of sub-Saharan Africa. African
Journal of Microbiology Research 5: 459-466.
IARC (International Agency for Research on
Cancer) (2015). Mycotoxin control in low
and middle income countries. Report No. 9. Lyon: publisher p. 31-42.
ICMSF (International Commission on
Microbiological Specifications for Food) (1996). Toxigenic Fungi: Aspergillus Microorganism in foods, Characteristics of food pathogens.
London: Academic p. 347-381.
Iqbal SZ, Jinap S, Pirouz AA, Ahmad Faizal AR (2015). Aflatoxin M1
in milk and dairy products, occurrence and recent challenges: A review. Trends
in Food Science and Technology 46: 110-119.
Jaime-Garcia R, Cotty
PJ. Aspergillus flavus in soils and corncobs in south Texas:
implications for management of aflatoxins in corn-cotton rotations. Plant Dis. 2004; 88: 1366–1371.
Jalili M (2015).
A review on aflatoxins reduction in
food. Iran. J. Health Saf. Environ. 3,
445–459.
Jalili M, Jinap S (2012). Role of sodium hydrosulphite and pressure on
the reduction of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in
black pepper. Food Control 27: 11-15.
Joubrane K, Mnayer D, El Khoury A, et al.
(2020) Co-occurrence of Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and Ochratoxin A (OTA) in Lebanese
stored wheat. J Food Prot 83: 1547–1552.
Juan C, Ritieni A, Manes J (2012). Determination of
trichothecenes and zearalenones
in grain cereal, flour and bread by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy.
Food Chemistry 134(4): 2389-2397.
Kaaya AN, Kyamuhangire W, Kyamanywa S (2006). Factors
affecting aflatoxin contamination of harvested maize in the three
agro-ecological zones of Uganda. Journal of Applied Sciences 6:
2401-2407.
Ketney O, Santini A, Oancea S (2017). Recent aflatoxin
survey data in milk and milk products: A review. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 70, 320–331.
[CrossRef]
Lewis
L, Onsongo M, Njapau H, Schurz-Rogers H, Luber G, Kieszak S, Nyamongo J, Backer
L, Dahiye A, Misore A, DeCock K, Rubin C (2005). Aflatoxin
contamination of commercial maize products during an outbreak of acute
aflatoxicosis in Eastern and Central Kenya. Environmental Health
Perspectives 113: 1762–1767.
Lewis M.H, Carbone I, Luis JM,
Payne GA, Bowen KL,Hagan AK, Kemerait
R, Heiniger R, Ojiambo
PS(2019). Biocontrol
strains differentially shift the genetic structure of indigenous soil
populations of Aspergillus flavus.
Front. Microbiol, 10, 1738.
Magan N, Medina A, Aldred D (2011). Possible
climate change effects on mycotoxin contamination of food crops pre-and
postharvest. Plant Pathology
60: 150-163.
Molina
M, Giannuzzi L (2002). Modelling of aflatoxin production by Aspergillus
parasiticus in a solid medium at different temperatures, pH and
propionic acid concentrations. Food
Research International 35:
585-594.
Mahuku G, Nzioki HS, Mutegi C, Kanampiu F, Narrod C, Makumbi D (2019). Preharvest management is a critical practice for minimizing
aflatoxin contamination of
maize. Food Control 96, 219–226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.032.
Nesci AV, Bluma RV, Etcheverry MG (2005). In vitro selection of maize
rhizobacteria to study potential biological control of Aspergillus section Flavi and aflatoxin production. European Journal
of Plant Pathology 113: 159–171.
Njoroge AW, Affognon HD, Mutungi CM, Manono J,
Lamuka PO, Murdock LL (2014). Triple bag hermetic storgae
delivers a lethal punch to Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in stored maize. Journal of Stored Products Research 58: 12-19.
Ozlüoymak OB (2014). Development of a UV-based
imaging system for real-time detection and
separation of dried figs contaminated with aflatoxins. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 20: 302-316.
Park
DL, Price WD (2001). Reduction of aflatoxin hazards using ammoniation. Review of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology 171: 139–175.
Paterson R, Lima N (2010). How will climate
change affect mycotoxins in food? Food Research
International
43(7): 1902-1914.
Payne
G (2015). Process of contamination by aflatoxin producing
fungi and their impact on crops. In: Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Safety. Sinha KK, Bhatnagar D, editors. New York: Marcel Decker p. 279-300.
Peles F, Sipos P, Gy˝ori
Z, Pfliegler WP, Giacometti F, Serraino
A, Pagliuca G, Gazzotti T, Pócsi I (2019). Adverse effects, transformation, and
channeling of aflatoxins into food raw materials in
livestock. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2861.
Peles F, Sipos P, Kovács
S, Gy˝ori Z, Pócsi I, Pusztahelyi T (2021). Biological Control
and Mitigation of Aflatoxin Contamination in Commodities.
Toxins 13, 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13020104
Perdoncini M, Sereia M, Scopel F, et al. (2019)
Growth of fungal cells and the production of mycotoxins.
Cell growth. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86533.
Phillips
TD, Kubena LF, Harvey RB, Taylor DR, Heidelbaugh ND. Hydrated sodium
calcium aluminosilicates: A high affinity sorbent for aflatoxin. Poultry Science
1988; 67: 243–7.
Piva G, Galvano F,
Pietri A, Piva A (1995). Detoxification methods of
aflatoxins. Nutrition Research
15: 767-776.
Pleadin J, Vuli A, Per N, Skrivanko M, Capek
B, Cvetni Z (2014). Aflatoxin B1 occurrence in maize sampled from Croatian farms and feed
factories during
2013. Food Control 40: 286-291.
Ráduly Z, Szabó L, Madar
A, Pócsi I, Csernoch L(2020). Toxicological and medical aspects
of Aspergillus-derived mycotoxins
entering the feed and food chain. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2908. [CrossRef]
Reddy KR N, Reddy CS, Muralidharan K (2009). Potential
of botanicals and biocontrol agents on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus infecting rice
grains. Food Control 20: 173–178
Sandosskumar R, Karthikeyan M, Mathiyazhagan S, Mohankumar M, Chandrasekar
G, Velazhahan R (2007). Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus growth and detoxification of aflatoxin B1
by the medicinal plant zimmu (Allium
sativum L. x Allium cepa L.).
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 23: 1007–1014.
Senghor, L.A.; Atehnkeng, J.; Callicott, K.A.; Cotty, P.J.; Bandyopadhyay, R
(2020). The Atoxigenic Biocontrol Product Aflasafe SN01
Is a Valuable Tool to Mitigate Aflatoxin
Contamination of Both Maize and Groundnut Cultivated in Senegal. Plant Dis. 104,
510–520.
Serraino A, Bonilauri P, Kerekes K, Farkas Z, Giacometti F,
Canever A, Zambrini AV, Ambrus Á(20190. Occurrence of aflatoxin
M1 in raw milk marketed in Italy: Exposure assessment and risk
characterization. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2516. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shakerardekani A, Karim, R, Mirdamadiha F (2012). The
effect of sorting on aflatoxin
reduction of pistachio nuts. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment
10(1): 459-461.
Sherif SO, Salama EE, Abdel-Wahhab MA (2009). Mycotoxins and child health: The need for health risk assessment.
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental
Health 212: 347-368.
Shetty PH, Jespersen L (2006). Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid
bacteria as potential mycotoxin decontaminating agents. Trends in Food Science and Technology
17: 48-55.
Shifa H, Shazia T, Gopalakrishnan C, Velazhahan R (2016). Biological control of pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination in
groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with Bacillus subtilis G1. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 49 (5-6): 137–148.
Tian J, Ban X, Zeng H, He J,
Huang B, Wang Y (2011). Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil from Cicuta virosa L. var. latisecta Celak. International Journal of Food Microbiology
145: 464-470.
Udoh
JM, Cardwell KF, Ikotun T (2000). Storage structures and aflatoxin content of
maize in five agroecological zones of Nigeria. Journal
of Stored Products Research 36: 187-201.
Udomkun P, Wiredu AN,
Nagle M, Müller J, Vanlauwe B, Bandyopadhyay R (2017). Innovative technologies to manage aflatoxins in
foods and feeds and the profitability of application. Food Control
76:127-138.
Valencia-Quintana
R, Milić M, Jakšić
D, et al. (2020) Environmental research and public health review environment
changes, Aflatoxins, and health issues, a Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 7850.
Velazhahan R,
Vijayanandraj S, Vijayasamundeeswari A, Paranidharan V, Samiyappan R, Iwamoto T
(2010). Detoxification of aflatoxins by seed extracts of the medicinal plant, Trachyspermum ammi (L.) Sprague ex Turrill structural analysis and biological toxicity of
degradation product of aflatoxin G1. Food Control 21:
719–725.
Vijayasamundeeswari
A, Vijayanandraj S, Paranidharan V, Samiyappan R, Velazhahan R (2010). Integrated management of aflatoxin B1 contamination of
groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with
Burkholderia sp. and zimmu (Allium
sativum L. x Allium cepa L.)
intercropping. Journal of Plant Interactions 5: 59-68.
Waliyar
F, Kumar LP, Traore A, Ntare BR, Diarra B, Kodio O (2008). Pre-
and postharvest management of aflatoxin contamination in peanuts. In:
Leslie et al. (eds.). Mycotoxins: Detection methods,
management, public health and agricultural trade. London: Cromwell Press p.
209-218.
Waliyar F, Umeh VC, Traore A, Osiru M, Ntare
BR, Diarra B, et al.
(2015). Prevalence and
distribution of aflatoxin contamination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in
Mali, West Africa. Crop Protection 70: 1-7.
West JS, Holdgate S,
Townsend JA, Edwards SG, Jennings P, Fitt BDL (2012). Impacts of changing climate and agronomic factors on Fusarium ear
blight of wheat in the UK. Fungal
Ecology 5:53–61.
Williams SB, Baributsa,
D, Woloshuk C (2014). Assessing
Purdue Improved Crop
Storage (PICS) bags to mitigate fungal growth and aflatoxin contamination. Journal of Stored Products Research 59: 190-196.
Wu F (2006). Mycotoxin reduction in Bt corn: Potential economic, health, and regulatory impacts. ISB News report, September 2006.
|
Cite this Article: Olana, A (2022). Aflatoxin
producing fungi and its management: A Review. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(3): 228-235. |