Greener
Journal of Environmental Management and Public Safety Vol. 10(1),
pp. 10-17, 2021 ISSN:
2354-2276 Copyright
©2021, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
The Impact of
Discharged Automotive Oil on Heavy Metal Concentrations on Well Water around
Mechanic Workshops in Nasarawa West Senatorial
District, Nasarawa State.
Yahaya U.2; Tukura B.W.1;
Madu P.C.1; Saleh
Borori2; Gav L.B.3
1Department of Chemistry, Nasarawa
State University, Keffi, NIGERIA.
2
Department
of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa, NIGERIA.
3Department of
Chemistry, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi,
NIGERIA.
Article info |
Abstract |
Article No.: 052121048 Type: Research |
The concentration of heavy metals in
ground water in Nasarawa West Senatorial District
was analyzed using a standard method. A total of
one hundred and forty two samples from different auto-mechanic workshops and
control sites were collected at random between July-September representing
wet (rainy) season and February-March representing dry season were analyzed for both heavy metals (Cobalt, Zinc, Cadmium,
Copper, Nickel, Manganese, Chromium, and Lead) and physicochemical parameters
using standard methods. Under ground water and used/unused engine oil were
collected and analyzed using Atomic Absorption
Spectrophotometers (AAS).The results of the heavy metal concentrations in
water from all the sample locations and physiochemical parameters of water
samples were presented in tables. Results generally showed elevation in
metal ion concentrations around automobile workshops investigated vis-a-vis the impact of the
automobile workshops in metal ion concentrations. The values obtained from
the analysis showed that most of the values of metal concentrations and the
physicochemical parameters were higher in the dry season than that of the
rainy season. This may be as a result of percolation, dissolution or
diffusion which may likely occur. |
Accepted: 23/05/2021 |
|
*Corresponding Author Yahaya U E-mail: Yahyus58@ gmail.com; benedictgav@
gmail.com, |
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
1. INTRODUCTION
The
increase in population worldwide has led to a high level of industrialization
and urbanization, which in turn have led to environmental pollution arising
from the indiscriminate discharge of industrial effluents. These effluents may
contain most common heavy metals, such as Hg, Zn, Cu, Co, Pb,
Cr (Madu et
al.; 2007). There is need for research and public information on these
metals, otherwise unknown dangers may create irreparable environmental damage. (Olonisakin et al.; 2005).
Heavy metals are natural components of the
earth crusts. They are stable and persistent environmental contaminants of
coastal waters and sediments. Since they cannot be degraded or destroyed, they
enter our bodies via food chain, drinking water and air (Lawrence, 1990).
Examples of heavy metals include mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd) arsenic (Ar) chromium (Cr) lead (Pb)
nickel (Ni) zinc (Zn), and selenium (Se). Interest in metals like Zinc, Copper,
Iron and Selenium which are required for metabolic activity in organisms lies
in the narrow path between their essentiality and toxicity. Other heavy metals
like lead, cadmium and mercury may exhibit extreme toxicity even at low levels
under certain conditions, thus necessitating regular study, monitoring and
assessment of heavy metal pollution of sensitive aquatic environment (Nriagu, 1996).
Water pollution is contamination of water by
foreign matter that deteriorates the quality of the water. Water pollution
covers pollutions in liquid forms like ocean pollution and river pollution. As
the term applies, liquid pollution occurs in the oceans, lakes, streams,
rivers, underground water and bays, in short liquid-containing areas. It
involves the release of toxic substances, pathogenic germs, substances that
require much oxygen to decompose, easy-soluble substances, radioactivity, etc.
that becomes deposited upon the bottom and their accumulations will interfere
with the condition of aquatic ecosystems.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Materials
Soil
sample, water sample, vegetables, nitric acid, sulphuric acid, hydrofluoric
acid, hydrogen peroxide, potassium chloride, sallicyclic
acid, Barrium chloride, potassium chromate, silver
nitrate, potassium dichromate, manganese sulphate, alkali-iodide-azide, potassium sulphate, Ammonium sulphate, Calcium
chloride, magnesium sulphate, ferric chloride, phosphate buffer, Sodium
hydroxide, deionized water, atomic absorption spectrophotometer,
spectrophotometer, UV-visible spectrometer, microwave digestion system,
micro-porous membrane, thermometer, turbdometer, pH
meter, conductivity meter, weighing balance, refrigerator, polyethene
bag, 500 cm3 plastic gallon, aluminium foil, rubber band, measuring
cylinder, sample bottle, hydrochloride
Beaker, evaporated dish, hot plate, Oven, incubator, blast funnel, standard
flask, erlemayer flask, pipette, burrete,
desiccator, Wattman filter paper, Crucible, Agate
Mortar, Nylon sieve
2.2 Methods
Water
sample (250cm3) each from the dry and rainy seasons collected were
measured into a 500 cm3beaker and 5 cm3 of concentrated
hydrochloric acid added and then evaporated to 25cm3 over a hot
plate. The concentrate was transferred to 50cm3 standard flask and
diluted to the mark with deionized water. This was kept prior to analysis.
Physico-chemical
Parameters Determination
Parameters
such as temperature, electrical conductivity (E.C), pH and Dissolved Oxygen
(DO) were measured at the sampling site. The samples were then transported to
the laboratory for analysis of total dissolved solid, turbidity, nitrate,
sulphate, phosphate, chloride, chemical oxygen demand, and biological oxygen
demand. The parameters were carried out according to the standard methods as
described by Lenore, (1989).
3.3 Heavy Metal
Content Determinations
The level of heavy metals cobalt, zinc, cadmium, copper, manganese,
chromium and lead in the filtrates of the digested samples were determined
using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (SHIMAZU) by aspirating sample
solution into the machine. Three (3) replicate determination of each sample
were carried out for heavy metals etc.
4. RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
4.1 DATA ON LEVEL OF PHYSICOHEMICAL
PARAMETERS Table 1; Levels of Physicochemical
Parameters of Water Sample from Toto
L.G.A. |
||||
Parameter |
Gadabuke |
Toto |
Tudu-Uku |
|
E.C.
(΅S/cm) |
0.4 |
0.15 |
0.55 |
|
T.D.S.
(mg/L) |
0.2 |
0.07 |
0.27 |
|
TURB/NTU |
1.65 |
1 |
1.29 |
|
NO3
(mg/L) |
0.4 |
2.4 |
3 |
|
SO42
(mg/L) |
18 |
23 |
36 |
|
SO43
(mg/L) |
2.3 |
5.8 |
12.7 |
|
CI
(mg/L) |
400 |
160 |
140 |
|
BOD
(mg/L) |
3.33 |
6.25 |
2.6 |
|
COD
(mg/L) |
10.05 |
0 |
40.2 |
|
DO
(mg/L) |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.71 |
|
COLOR |
90 |
73 |
59 |
|
Ph |
7.8 |
6.4 |
7.21 |
|
Temp
(0C) |
28.5 |
27.6 |
28.5 |
|
Table
2; Levels of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Sample from Nasarawa L.G.A. |
||||
Parameter |
Shamagye
|
Mararaba |
Nasarawa |
|
E.C.
(΅S/cm) |
0.62 |
0.03 |
0.031 |
|
T.D.S.
(mg/L) |
0.31 |
0.01 |
0.15 |
|
TURB/NTU |
2.45 |
1.51 |
1.59 |
|
NO3
(mg/L) |
2.3 |
5.2 |
4.8 |
|
SO42
(mg/L) |
40 |
27 |
30 |
|
SO43
(mg/L) |
5 |
0.9 |
3.9 |
|
CI
(mg/L) |
143 |
207 |
144 |
|
BOD
(mg/L) |
5.2 |
1.72 |
4.13 |
|
COD
(mg/L) |
10.05 |
0 |
0 |
|
DO
(mg/L) |
4.56 |
4.63 |
4.63 |
|
COLOR |
85 |
70 |
63 |
|
Ph |
7.89 |
7.09 |
8.11 |
|
Temp
(0C) |
26.6 |
26.9 |
26.2 |
|
Table
3; Levels of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Sample from Kokona L.G.A. |
||||
Parameter |
Agwada |
K/Gwari |
Garaku |
|
E.C.
(΅S/cm) |
0.05 |
0.42 |
0.08 |
|
T.D.S.
(mg/L) |
0.02 |
0.21 |
0.4 |
|
TURB/NTU |
7.27 |
1.45 |
8.89 |
|
NO3
(mg/L) |
3.2 |
1.9 |
3.3 |
|
SO42
(mg/L) |
40 |
39 |
29 |
|
SO43
(mg/L) |
4.2 |
3.5 |
4.5 |
|
CI
(mg/L) |
157 |
115 |
140 |
|
BOD
(mg/L) |
3.46 |
5.2 |
2.88 |
|
COD
(mg/L) |
10.05 |
10.2 |
20.1 |
|
DO
(mg/L) |
4.7 |
4.43 |
4.83 |
|
COLOR |
93 |
75 |
86 |
|
Ph |
8.26 |
7.46 |
8.36 |
|
Temp
(0C) |
28 |
27 |
27.4 |
|
Table
4; Levels of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Sample from Keffi L.G.A. |
||||
Parameter |
Keffi |
KNG |
KMG |
|
E.C.
(΅S/cm) |
0.09 |
0.29 |
0.52 |
|
T.D.S.
(mg/L) |
0.04 |
0.14 |
0.26 |
|
TURB/NTU |
4.63 |
1.09 |
3.08 |
|
NO3
(mg/L) |
0.06 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
|
SO42
(mg/L) |
33.6 |
42 |
24 |
|
SO43
(mg/L) |
0.92 |
0.65 |
3.82 |
|
CI
(mg/L) |
158 |
130 |
208 |
|
BOD
(mg/L) |
1.36 |
4.14 |
2.82 |
|
COD
(mg/L) |
30.15 |
40.2 |
30.15 |
|
DO
(mg/L) |
4.63 |
4.77 |
4.83 |
|
COLOR |
83 |
58 |
69 |
|
Ph |
7.23 |
7.3 |
8.01 |
|
Temp
(0C) |
27.8 |
27.5 |
26.4 |
Table
5; Levels of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Sample from karu L.G.A. |
||||
Parameter |
Karu |
Nyanya |
Karshi |
|
E.C.
(΅S/cm) |
0.7 |
0.24 |
0.57 |
|
T.D.S.
(mg/L) |
0.35 |
0.12 |
0.28 |
|
TURB/NTU |
5.55 |
1.26 |
0.92 |
|
NO3
(mg/L) |
0.68 |
2.6 |
1.3 |
|
SO42
(mg/L) |
35 |
28 |
33 |
|
SO43
(mg/L) |
0.7 |
7.1 |
5.3 |
|
CI
(mg/L) |
220 |
145 |
117 |
|
BOD
(mg/L) |
3.4 |
3.33 |
1.66 |
|
COD
(mg/L) |
40.2 |
20.1 |
30.15 |
|
DO
(mg/L) |
4.83 |
4.63 |
4.9 |
|
COLOR |
87 |
67 |
81 |
|
Ph |
8 |
8.36 |
7.81 |
|
Temp
(0C) |
20.2 |
28.1 |
26 |
Table 7: Concentration (Mg/L) of Heavy
Metals in well water from Nasarawa L.G.A. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mararaba |
Nasarawa |
Shamagye |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element |
Mean |
|
CV |
Mean |
|
CV |
Mean |
SD |
CV |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co |
0 |
|
ND |
0 |
|
ND |
26.61 ± 2.29 |
2.29 |
8.61 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zn |
20.02 ± 1.67 |
|
8.34 |
48.43
± 3.08 |
|
8.22 |
2.72 ± 0.28 |
0.28 |
10.29 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cd |
1.68 ± 0.11 |
|
6.55 |
2.84 ± 0.29 |
|
10.21 |
1.91 ± 0.26 |
0.26 |
13.61 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cu |
1.64 ± 0.17 |
|
10.37 |
1.65 ± 0.17 |
|
10.30 |
2.45 ± 0.29 |
0.29 |
11.84 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ni |
50.72 ± 4.16 |
|
8.20 |
0 |
|
ND |
14.12 ± 1.16 |
1.16 |
8.22 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mn |
140.28 ± 9.82 |
|
7.00 |
224.52 ± 18.06 |
|
8.04 |
142.57 ± 11.42 |
11.42 |
8.01 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cr |
11.81 ± 0.97 |
|
8.21 |
14.42 ± 1.29 |
|
8.95 |
7.21 ± 0.67 |
0.67 |
9.29 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pb |
5.22 ± 0.49 |
|
9.39 |
68.81 ± 4.87 |
|
7.08 |
53.21 ± 4.37 |
4.37 |
8.21 |
|
||||||||||
|
Agwada |
Garaku |
Kufan-Gwari |
|||||||
Element |
Mean |
|
CV |
Mean |
|
CV |
Mean |
|
CV |
|
Co |
137.7 ± 11.51 |
|
8.36 |
118.32 ± 8.38 |
|
7.08 |
60.42 ± 5.06 |
|
8.37 |
|
Zn |
1.05 ± 0.17 |
|
16.19 |
2.72 ± 0.29 |
|
10.66 |
0 |
|
ND |
|
Cd |
1.05 ± 0.19 |
|
18.10 |
2.91 ± 0.26 |
|
8.93 |
1.11 ± 0.19 |
|
17.12 |
|
Cu |
2.79 ± 0.22 |
|
7.89 |
0.86 ± 0.16 |
|
18.60 |
2.11 ± 0.28 |
|
13.27 |
|
Ni |
35.91 ± 2.98 |
|
8.30 |
9.29 ± 034 |
|
3.66 |
0.42 ± 0.09 |
|
21.43 |
|
Mn |
2.32 ± 0.31 |
|
13.36 |
11.48 ± 0.93 |
|
8.10 |
0 |
|
ND |
|
Cr |
15.74 ± 1.37 |
|
8.70 |
13.73 ± 109 |
|
7.94 |
15.72 ± 1.37 |
|
8.72 |
|
Pb |
0 |
|
ND |
19.83 ± 1.47 |
|
7.41 |
6.34 ± 0.59 |
|
9.31 |
Table 9 : Concentration (mg/L) of Heavy Metals in
well water from Keffi L.G.A. |
|||||||||
|
Keffi-Nasarawa
Junction |
Keffi-Main
Garage |
S/G keffi
(NYSC) |
||||||
Element |
Mean |
|
CV |
Mean |
|
CV |
Mean |
|
CV |
Co |
0 |
|
ND |
67.61 ± 5.49 |
|
8.12 |
45.93 ± 3.67 |
|
7.99 |
Zn |
6.12 ± 0.123 |
|
2.12 |
2.51 ± 0.29 |
|
11.55 |
2.32
± 0.38 |
|
16.38 |
Cd |
1.35 ± 0.18 |
|
13.33 |
1.19 ± 0.12 |
|
10.08 |
0.22 ± 0.09 |
|
40.91 |
Cu |
1.81 ± 0.19 |
|
10.50 |
3.51 ± 0.36 |
|
10.26 |
1.91 ± 0.28 |
|
14.66 |
Ni |
24.83 ± 2.21 |
|
8.90 |
15.36 ± 1.29 |
|
8.40 |
22.9 ± 1.62 |
|
7.07 |
Mn |
3.51 ± 0.39 |
|
11.11 |
8.62 ± 0.76 |
|
8.82 |
1.59 ± 0.12 |
|
7.55 |
Cr |
11.82 ± 0.97 |
|
8.21 |
11.19 ± 0.87 |
|
7.77 |
15.01 ± 1.27 |
|
8.46 |
Pb |
80.33 ± 6.49 |
8.08 |
2.12 ± 0.29 |
|
13.68 |
0 |
|
ND |
Table 10: Concentration (mg/L) of Heavy
Metals in well water from Karu L.G.A. |
|||||||||
|
Karu |
Nyanya |
Karshi |
||||||
Element |
Mean |
SD |
CV |
Mean |
SD |
CV |
Mean |
SD |
CV |
Co |
0 |
0 |
ND |
39.88 |
3.81 |
9.55 |
0 |
0 |
ND |
Zn |
0 |
0 |
ND |
1.23 |
0.17 |
13.82 |
4.22 |
0.37 |
8.77 |
Cd |
0.32 |
0.09 |
28.13 |
2.23 |
0.21 |
9.42 |
1.82 |
0.24 |
13.19 |
Cu |
0.51 |
0.02 |
3.92 |
2.34 |
0.28 |
11.97 |
2.01 |
0.25 |
12.44 |
Ni |
0 |
0 |
ND |
9.52 |
0.81 |
8.51 |
0 |
0 |
ND |
Mn |
0.33 |
0.04 |
12.12 |
7.61 |
0.72 |
9.46 |
6.38 |
0.63 |
9.87 |
Cr |
9.22 |
0.76 |
8.24 |
0 |
0 |
ND |
13.13 |
1.26 |
9.60 |
Pb |
10.42 |
0.91 |
8.73 |
61.51 |
5.03 |
8.18 |
0 |
0 |
ND |
4.2 DISCUSSION
Physicochemical
parameters of water samples
The interaction of a compound with it
physical environment determine its physicochemical properties (e.g. solubility
and passive permeability). The analytical data of various physicochemical
parameters indicator that some parameters like PH, electrical
conductivity, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, turbidity and
sodium are found to be in excess than the prescribed limit in some water
samples of the study areas. The quality is a function of the physical, chemical
and biological particular use it in intended for (Tijani,
1994). The temperature range observed in the analyses corroborate with the
values observed by Oni (2000) who observed a temperature range (28o
30oc and 26o 31oc) of water samples analysed
at Ibadan, Oyo State and this is also very close to the values observed by Buekers (2007) who observed a temperature range of 26.7 and
29.10oc on Shallow water of Ibadan. Electrical Conductivity is a
measure of the amount of electrical current a material can carry on its ability
to carry a current. The values obtained for electrical conductivity ranged from
0.03 to 0.62 ΅S/cm in mararaba and Shamageye respectively. These values were lower than that
reported by Pam et al,; (2013), value recorded
ranged from 8.23 14-46. The values obtained were within the WHO standard
recommended limit.
From the values of total dissolved solids,
all the values are very far below the WHO recommended guide line value of
1000mg/L. Low TDS is said to be a characteristics of hills and upload areas
that represent areas of recharge according to Verma et
al.;(2010). Water containing TDS less than 1000mgle could be considered to
be fresh water and good enough both for drinking and irrigational purposes, as
this would not affect the Osmotic pressure of soil solution as reported by
Gupta et al.;(2009) and Navneet et al.;(2010).
Chemical Oxygen demand (COD) values ranged
from 10.20 mg/L 43.25mg/L in kufan-Gwari and Karu respectively. In general, the COD value for this study
areas suggest a rather low organic content in the water samples of this study
areas. As organic matter is the major source of carbonaceous and nitrogenous
substances in soil and water bodies arising from anthropogenic sources pH
values of water samples from each area are displayed in the results of the
physicochemical parameters. A pH range of 6.40 8.65 were obtained in all, Nyanya had the most acidic pH of 8.65 rising slightly above
the guide line limit of 6.5 8.5, thus indicating corrosiveness. The result
obtained is consistent with that obtained by Basavaraja
et al.; (2011).
The biological oxygen demand may be defined
as this oxygen required for the microorganism to perform biological
decomposition of dissolved solids or organic matter in the waste water under
aerobic condition Manjare et al.; (2010). The
biological oxygen demand reported for this investigation ranged from 1.36mg/L
to 6.25mg/L in Keffi and Toto. The high increase in
BOD may be due to possible addition of high amount of waste oil along with rain
water from the surrounding and addition of organic waste by certain human
activities which also be responsible for the increase in BOD as reported by
Adnan et al.; (2010). The lowest BOD was recorded in Keffi
1.3mg/L due to more vegetation.
Chloride concentration ranged between 115mg/L
to 450mg/L in K/Gwari and Gadabuke.
High chloride ion concentration indicates organic pollution which could be
attributed to used engine oil spills in the water. Chloride is a natural
substance present in all portable water as well as sewage effluence as metallic
salt. Many researchers reported that rainfall add chloride directly. The
chloride concentrations in this study are well below the maximum permissible
limits 500mgle (WHO, 1993).
Nitrates contribute to fresh water through
discharge of sewage and industrial wastes and run off from agricultural fields.
The concentration of nitrate recorded in this study ranged between 0.06mg/L to
5.45mg/L in Sabon Garin Keffi (NYSC) and Mararaba. The
levels of nitrate concentration in all the location were within the United
States Public Health Service recommended limit of 10mg/L (EPA, 2014).
Dissolved oxygen (DO) is one of the most
important parameter in assessing water quality and understanding the physical
and biological process prevailing in the water. This is very important because
many researchers reported that DO in aquatic ecosystem brings out various
biochemical changes and it influence on metabolic activities on organisms. Adefemi S. O.
and E. E. Awokunmi, (2010) reports that, good water
should have a solubility or oxygen 7.0mg/L at 30o. DO of the
water analyzed ranged from
4.43mg/L to 5.64mg/L in k/Gwari and Karshi. The dissolve oxygen of the water sample collected
from the study area in close to the prescribed values.
The highest obtained for Turbidity is 8.89
NTU in Garaku and lowest Turbidity
is 9.02 NTU in Karshi. Turbidity is mainly a function
of the suspended materials in the water which ranges from colloidal to coarse
dispersion. The values of turbidity recorded in this study from different water
sources corroborate with ones recorded for some well water samples collected
from different mechanic workshops located in other parts of the country,
Nigeria as reported by Aremu et al.; (2008), Gav et al.; (2015) and Fapetu
OM. (2000) where they recorded turbidity values from 0.86 9.10 NTU, 0.91
9.05 NTU and 0.91 9.07 NTU respectively.
Phosphorous (PO43-)
occurs in natural water and in waste water almost solely as phosphates Agarwal et al.; (2011). The result of present study
showed that the highest levels of phosphate was recorded in Tudu-Uku
13.7mg/L and lowest in Keffi-Nasarawa Junction
0.65mg/L. Phosphate is an essential element for plant life, but when there is
too much of it in water, it can speed up eutrophication (a reduction in
dissolved oxygen in water bodies caused by an increase of mineral and organic
nutrients of rivers and lakes. The maximum recommended limited for phosphate in
drinking water is 5.0mg/L (EPA 2005).
Colour in water may result from the presence
natural metallic ions (iron from manganese). The highest colour concentration
from the study area was in Gadabuke and Agwada 95.0 and lowest in Keffi-Nasarawa
Junction 58.0. The World Health Organization (WHO) standard is less than 5
colours units, (WHO, 2004).
Sulphate in widely distributed in nature and
may be present in natural water. The levels of sulphate concentration in the
water samples ranged from 18.00mg/L to 45.30mg/L in Gadabuke
and Keffi-Nasarawa Junction respectively. The World
Health Organization standard of sulphate concentration in water is 500 mg/L.
The values obtained for sulphate from this study showed that the levels were
far below the recommended limit and is save for
consumption (WHO, 1993). The values obtained for this investigation were below
the findings of Gomez et al.; (1995).
CONCENTRATION OF
METALS
The concentrations of heavy metals in water
sample from all the locations were summarized in Table 6 10. The highest
concentration of Cobalt was reported in Garaku with
mean value of 137.7 mg/L and lowest in Tudu-uku with
mean value of 7.23 mg/L. The metal was not detected in Toto, Nasarawa, Mararaba, Keffi-Nasarawa Junction, Karu and
Karshi. All the values obtained for Cobalt
concentration in the analysis were above the Who standard (0.1 mg/L, 2004).
The concentration of Zinc is highest in Nasarawa 48.43 mg/L and the lowest concentration was
recorded in Tudu Uku 0.44
mg/L. Zinc was not found at the locations such Kufan
Gwari, Agwada, and Karu. The highest concentration of Zinc could be as a
result of natural deposit. The values obtained for Zinc concentration in all
the location were below the WHO. WHO standard for Zinc
concentration is (50 mg/L, WHO 2004).
The highest concentration of Cadmium in the water
sample was recorded in Garaku with mean value of 2.91
mg/L and the lowest was recorded in Sabon Garin Keffi with mean value of
0.22 mg/L. The result obtained for Cadmium concentration in the water samples
were in most cases below the WHO recommended limit (5.0 mg/L).
The analysis of Copper shows that the highest
concentration was recorded in Keffi-main market 3.51
mg/L and lowest in Karu 0.51 mg/L. The metal is
widely distributed across all the location. Result obtained for the analysis
was lower than the WHO (1000 mg/L) standard for Copper concentration in water.
Nickel records it highest concentration in Mararaba 50.72 mg/L and the lowest in Kufan
Gwari 0.42 mg/L. The metal was not at detectable
limit of AAS in sample collected from Nasarawa town.
The result obtained for Nickel concentration some cases lower than the WHO standard
(50.0 mg/L, WHO 2004).
Manganese has its highest concentration in Nasarawa 224.52 mg/L and the lowest concentration was
recorded in Karu 0.33 mg/L. The results show no trace
of Manganese in Kufan Gwari.
The result of the analysis of Chromium shows
that the highest concentration was obtained in Tudu
Uku 35.32 mg/L and the lowest was recorded in Toto
0.71 mg/L. There was no trace of Chromium metal in Nyanya.
The high concentration of the metal is in Tudu Uku where no activity of Mechanics in the area. This can be
concluded that the high concentration of the metal could be as a result of
natural deposit. The result obtained is within the WHO standards for Chromium
concentration in water (50.0 mg/L).
Lead concentration in water sample collected
from the study area shows that the highest concentration of the metal was
recorded in Keffi Nasarawa
Junction with mean value 80.33 mg/L and lowest in Keffi-
Main Garage with 2.12 mg/L. The metal was not at detectable limit of AAS in Agwada, Sabon Garin
Keffi and Karshi.
The
WHO permissible limit for Lead concentration in water sample is (50 mg/L WHO,
2014). These variations in metal concentration of the analysis of water sample
were as a result of evaporation, percolation and dissolution of the metals. The
result obtained of heavy metal concentration in this analysis of water sample
is similar to that reported by Hanuman et
al.; 2012.
5. CONCLUSION
There
are many different chemicals, substances and process used in auto-mechanic
workshops, which are potentially dangerous, both to the environment and to
health of human beings. This is very clear from the results of the analytical
investigation of the physicochemical parameters and heavy metals analysis of
waters from the sample sites of Nasarawa West
Senatorial district that there is high degree of contamination and pollution.
It was observed that the various pollutants (heavy metals) build up to very
high concentration in the soils, and thereby percolate into the wells around
the auto-mechanic workshop thereby posing great threat to the people that drink
the water.
REFERENCES
Adefemi S. O. and E. E. Awokunmi,
(2010), Determination of physico-chemical parameters
and heavy metals in water samples from Itaogbolu area
of Ondo-State, Nigeria, African Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology, 4(3), pp
145-148.
Adeyemo, O & Ayodeji,
I.,(2002). Heavy metal concentrations in Ground water
around some selected mechanic workshops in Ibadan. Nigeria Africa journal of biomedical research.Ibadan, biomedical communications group, (1-2), 51-55
(2002).
Adnan,
Amin, Taufeeq, Ahmad, Malik, Ehsanullah,
Irfanullah, Muhammad, Masror,
Khatak and Muhammad, Ayaz,
Khan, (2010), Evaluation of industrial and city effluent quality using
physicochemical and biological parameters, Electronic Journal of Environmental,
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 9(5), pp 931-939.
Aremu, M.O; Sagari
D.U.; Musa B.Z. &Chanda M.S. (2008).Assessment of
Ground Water and Stream Quality for Heavy Metals and Physico-chemical
Contamination in Toto local Government Area, Nasarawa
State. International
Journal of Chemical Science. 2(1): 8 -11.
Basavaraja, Simpi,
S. M., Hiremath, K. N. S. Murthy, K. N. Chandrashekarappa, Anil N. Patel, E.T.Puttiah,
(2011), Analysis of Water Quality Using Physico-Chemical
Parameters Hosahalli Tank in Shimoga
District, Karnataka, India, Global Journal of Science Frontier, Research, 1(3),
pp 31-34.
Buekers J. (2007) Fixation of cadmium,
copper, nickel and zinc in soil: kinetics, mechanisms and its effect on metal
bioavailability, Ph.D. thesis, KatholiekeUniversiteitLueven.
Dissertationes De Agricultura,
Doctoraatsprooefschrift nr.
European Economic Commission Regulation (EEC).2006 No.
2092/91.
Gomez G.G, Sandler
R.S, Seal E. Jnr (1995) High level of inorganic sulphate cause diarrhea in neonatal piglets. Journal of nutrition,125(9):2325-2332
Gupta,
D. P., Sunita and J. P. Saharan, (2009),
Physiochemical Analysis of Ground Water of Selected Area of Kaithal
City (Haryana) India, Researcher, 1(2), pp 1-5.
GWRTAC (1997) Ground Water Remediation Technologies Analysis
Center, Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and
groundwater, Tech. Rep. TE-97-01, GWRTAC, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, GWRTAC-E
Series.
View at Google Scholar
Madu,
P.C; Adoda R.A. Ehitonihu
C.A. &Moumouni A. (2007). Analysis of some
heavy metals in selected soil in Keffi town, Nasarawa state Nigeria.
Indiana journal of multidisciplinary research Res. Vol. 3.
Manjare, S. A., S. A. Vhanalakar
and D. V. Muley, (2010), Analysis of water Quality
using Physico-Chemical parameters Tamdalge
Tank in Kolhapur District, Maharashtra, International Journal of Advanced
Biotechnology and Research, 1(2), pp 115-119.
.
Navneet, Kumar, D. K. Sinha,
(2010), Drinking water quality management through correlation studies among
various physicochemical parameters: A case study, International Journal of
Environmental Sciences, 1(2), pp 253-259.
Oguntimehin I & Ipinmoroti KO (2008). Profile of heavy metals from automobile workshops in Akure, Nigeria. Journal of Evironmental Science and Technology. 1 (7):19-26.
Pam
A.A, Sha;ato R, Offem JO. (2013). Contributions of automobile mechanic
sites of heavy metals in soil: A case study of North Bank Mechanic Village Makurdi, Benue State, central Nigeria J. Chem. Biol.
Physical Sci. 3(3): 2337-2347.
Verma PU, Chandawat
D,&Solanki HA (2010) Study of water quality of Hamirsar
lake Bhuj.
International journal of Bioscience Reporter 8: 145-153.
World Health
Organization (WHO),(2006).Guidelines for
drinking-water quality criteria.3rd edition incorporating 1st&
2nd addenda, 1: 13-33
World
Health Organization, WHO (1996).World Health Organization .guidelines for
drinking-water quality. 2ndEdn., vol. 2,
Health criteria and supporting information, WHO, Geneva.
World Health Organization, WHO (2004). The Guidelines for
Drinking water quality, third edition.www.who.int/water-sanitation-health/dwq/gdwq3rev.
World Health Organization, WHO (2014). The Guidelines for
Drinking water quality, third edition.www.who.int/water-sanitation-health/dwq/gdwq3rev.
Cite this Article: Yahaya U; Tukura BW; Madu PC; Saleh B; Gav LB (2021). The Impact of Discharged Automotive Oil on
Heavy Metal Concentrations on Well Water around Mechanic Workshops in Nasarawa West Senatorial District, Nasarawa
State. Greener Journal of Environmental
Management and Public Safety, 10(1):10-17. |