|
Greener Journal of Psychology and
Counselling Vol. 3(1), pp. 33-44,
2019 ISSN: 2672-4502 Copyright ©2019,
the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.15580/GJPC.2019.1.092319176 https://gjournals.org/GJPC |
|
Psycho-Social Factors and School Adjustment Dynamics
among Students in Selected Schools in Bamenda I and
III Sub-Divisions
Roland Kum Bama,
PhD.
Faculty of Education,
University of Bamenda, Cameroon
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article
No.: 092319176 Type: Research DOI: 10.15580/GJPC.2019.1.092319176 |
Adjustment to school is a major life transition that not
all emerging adults manage successfully. Although a multitude of factors
influence students in school, the present study focuses on the relationship
between psycho-social factors and adjustment among students in selected
secondary schools in Bamenda I and III Sub
Divisions in the North West Region of Cameroon. Specifically, the study
examined how educational factors, emotional factors, students’ self-concept
and social support, influenced students’ adjustment in school. The study
used the cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected from a sample of
150 respondents. The subjects were selected using the convenience, purposive
and simple random sampling techniques. A five-point Likert
scale type questionnaire was used to collect data. The chi square test of
independence was used to test the four hypotheses at a 0.05 level of
significance. The findings showed that: Educational factors had a
significant effect on adjustment among secondary school students; Emotional
factors had a significant effect on adjustment among secondary school
students; Self-concept had a significant effect on adjustment among
secondary school students; and there is a moderate correlation between
social support and adjustment among secondary school students. From these
premises, the study concluded that psychosocial factors are strongly related
to students’ adjustment in school. The study recommended that students
should be aware of the negative consequences of maladjustment and as a
result live at equilibrium in the environment. These findings have important
theoretical and practical implications for school governance. |
|
Submitted:
23/09/2019 Accepted: 25/09/2019 Published:
|
|
|
*Corresponding
Author Roland Kum Bama E-mail:
bamarolly@
yahoo.com Phone:
(237)
677 038 342 |
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
|
|
|
This
study addresses the role that psychological and social factors play in the
student's ability to vary his/her behaviour in order to maintain a harmonious
relationship with the school environment in Cameroon and Bamenda
in particular. As such the Cameroon school system is composed of a wide variety
of students with different backgrounds with enormous challenges that require
attention, such as feeling overwhelmed, eating disorders and remaining healthy, poverty or
failing to handle money correctly, inappropriate networking, homesickness, not
resolving relationship issues,
bullying, violence, drugs, sex and pregnancy, poor results/not learning
or reading enough, staying focus in class, poor sleep habits. For a student to be
willing to be in the school environment, he/she must be able to create a
harmonious relationship between educational, social, emotional issues and the
school environment. Most students drop out of school nowadays as a result of
stress, drug abuse, early pregnancies, low self-esteem, academic overload, peer
pressure and the inability to get appropriate help.
In
this swiftly changing contemporary era, ground-breaking changes are taking
place in different arenas, to handle or cope up with such, environment
adjustment becomes indispensable. To keep pace with the mutable society, every
person has to make changes in the self or his/her environment. When one does
not keep pace with the changing time, he/she is flung back in the society. From
the start of life (birth) to exit (death), the individual must effect
appropriate adjustment with the environment in order to fit in (Dhillon, 2016). An individual’s success or failure, harmony
or disharmony, normal or abnormal life, satisfaction or dissatisfaction with
circumstances depend upon his/her adaptability in given situations. Anyone who
does not get suitable way out to his/her challenge may experience anxiety,
resistance and ultimately a feeling of failure. Some people may accept the
circumstances and feel satisfied while others take measures (using appropriate
techniques) to work out solutions to the difficulty. This calls for the need
for adjustment in order to fit in. This process (adjustment) requires the individual to vary his/her behaviours to maintain balance
between his/her needs and environment.
Conceptualising
Psycho-Social and School Adjustment Dynamics
The
school as a formal agency of education is an important instrument geared
towards nurturing the personal good of individuals and the collective good of the
society of which these individuals form an integral part. Good (1959) typifies
knowledge, understanding, competencies, practical know-hows and skills as well
as active involvement in the community, geared towards a sense of achievement.
Law No 98/004 of 14 April 1998 to lay down guidelines for education in
Cameroon, states in its Section 4 that; “The general purpose of education shall
be to train children for their intellectual, social, physical, civic and moral
development and their smooth integration into society bearing in mind
prevailing economic, socio-cultural, political and moral factors” (Law No
98/004 of 14 April 1998). This provision highlights government ardent desire
for school adjustment to be achieved.
This means that for an individual to become a
useful person to himself/herself and to society, appropriate education must be
acquired which can only be guaranteed if the individual effectively adjusts to
the learning environment. Students’ willingness to take part and adjust in
school programme could be influenced by the nature of the school environment
and their experiences both inside and outside school.
Scholars have variedly given meaning to the
concept of adjustment from several perspectives. Kulshrestha
(1979), and Raju and Rahamtulla
(2007a) have referred to it as a process of maintaining harmonious
relationships between a living organism and its environment. The term
adjustment is often used as synonymous to accommodation and adaptation.
Strictly speaking, the term signifies the results of equilibrium, which may be
affected by either of these processes (Monroe, 1990). This term underscores a
person’s struggle to go along or survive in his or her social and physical
environment. On his part, Good (1959) considers adjustment to mean the process
of finding and adopting modes of behaviour appropriate to the environment or
the changes in the environment. Also, adjustment is the process by which a
living organism maintains a balance between its needs and the circumstances
that influence the satisfaction of these needs (Shaffer, 1961). To Kulshrestha (1979), adjustment is the process by which the
individual attempts to deal with stress, tensions, conflicts etc., and meet his
or her needs.
Adjustment therefore involves two crucial
dynamics, i.e. the individual and the environment. Talking about the
individual, attention is given to heredity, biological, psychological factors,
as well as the quality of socialization given to him or her by the more
knowledgeable others in his/her life. The environment would involve all the
social factors. People generally leave their families and attend school,
wherein they would be required to make a wide range of adjustments if they have
to successfully cope in the new environment. Every member of the society encourages
this needed effort for a successful integration of ‘fitting in’. Broadly speaking, there are three
areas where an individual needs to be adjusted to live balanced life. These are
family home, school and society. Several studies have been reported in
the area of social, educational, health and emotional adjustment of students of
both sexes. Some studies relate adjustment with variables such as intelligence,
achievement, age, sex, socio-economic status, needs, anxiety, and security. A
few studies focus on the nature, causes, and extent of indiscipline among
students. A review of the studies carried out in the field of adjustment as
reported in the three surveys of educational research edited by Buch (1991) reveals that no systematic attempt has yet been
made to develop a tool for the assessment of adjustment problems of students in
school.
There have been several studies done
within and outside Cameroon on the effects of home environment as well as the
socio-economic status of parents on the academic achievement of students. On this, Doley (2018) concludes that the home environment definitely
influences the academic achievement of the students. She considers that the
brain of the child develops according to the quality and quantity of the
stimuli the children receive from their parents since the home is the primary
place of education. Research has found many factors that
influence how well a student does in school and the amount of confidence the
students have for themselves. However, adolescent hood is a transition period
in which many changes take place. These changes include physical, social,
psychological or emotional changes. During this stage there is the tendency to
feel autonomous and the yearning to take decisions on their own on issues concerning
career, education and living. Sometimes it may seem indifferent to parents and
thus these adolescents go closer and give more importance to friends.
Friendship is an important factor in determining the nature of adolescents.
This is because they spend more time talking and having fun with their friends.
Sometimes this may lead to peer group influences such
as smoking, alcohol and other risky behaviours. Furthermore, some students tend
to deal with stress from internal and external factors that may lead to them
not being able to create a harmonious relationship with the school environment.
This often leads to the many dropouts due to lack of academic achievement or
situations such as unwanted pregnancies our society is facing today.
Confronted
with the pressures of adolescent hood, most students require assistance and
support to enable them suitably deal with these forces through adjustment. They
need someone trustworthy to follow them up and most importantly someone to
confide in. This help and support is usually not available at home, as parents
are busy with work and many teachers are usually hostile and not welcoming.
With all these the students either seek refuge in their friends or submerge
themselves in their challenges which may lead to low self-esteem and sometimes
depression. With the changes in family life and indeed in societal makeup,
schools are now finding it increasingly problematic to keep parents informed of
and actively engaged in the day-to-day progress of their children (Deslandes & Bertrand, 2005). Teachers and
administrators are realizing that the support they once received in getting
students to do their homework is not there, because the parents are not at home
to insist that students complete their homework. As a result of the challenges
faced by students, many of them engage in unhealthy risky behaviours such as:
substance abuse, dangerous dieting, eating disorders, staying out all night,
unprotected sexual activity, gang violence, handling weapons, bullying,
shoplifting and stealing, scamming, occultism and pornography. Specific
problems that can arise from such risky behaviours during adolescence include
increased levels of stress, depression, anxiety, addiction, anorexia
and substance dependence. This could have a negative incidence on their
academic work and conduct. An in-depth insight into the psychological and
social/environmental factors that impact school adjustment of young learners
could be primordially crucial for the enhancement of school life.
The increased dropout rate from
secondary schools in Cameroon and Bamenda in
particular calls for attention. More students increasingly find it difficult
coping with the school environment and its challenges. With the academic
demands becoming more intense, low self-esteem, emotional problems and
sometimes the inability to get help from the right source, students may tend to
feel frustrated and find it difficult to cope with the school environment. One
would wonder whether educational, emotional, social or the self-concept factor
could be responsible for this.
As
we know adolescence is a crucial period of transition from childhood to
adulthood. It is the stage wherein a young person undergoes physical,
emotional, social, moral and spiritual changes. These changes are speedier and
bring about lots of differences in their perception and attitude which is
reflected in their behaviours. Adolescents most probably experience mixed
feelings on fitting into the world which could lead to role confusion. In the
school environment, this confusion and the struggle in finding their grounds
oftentimes could create emotional challenges such as stress, unwanted
pregnancies, relationship issues, inappropriate eating habits, feeling carried
away, which affect their capacity to concentrate on school work. Given the
primordial role of school adjustment it was crucial exploring the issues
surrounding the psychosocial adjustment of learners with particular focus on
the educational, emotional factors and social support.
To investigate the psycho-social
factors affecting the adjustment of secondary school students.
Research Objectives
Four objectives were formulated for
the study
·
To assess the influence of
educational factors on the adjustment of secondary school students.
·
To find out how emotional factors
affect the adjustment of secondary school students.
·
To establish how the self-concept
affects adjustment among secondary school students.
·
To examine the correlation between
social support and adjustment among secondary school students.
Based on the research objectives the
following research questions were derived:
·
To what extent do educational
factors affect adjustment of secondary school students?
·
To what extent do emotional factors
affect the adjustment of secondary school students?
·
Does self-concept affect school
adjustment among secondary school students?
·
To what level is there correlation
between social support and school adjustment among secondary school students?
Specific Research Hypotheses
·
Educational factors do not have an
effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
·
Emotional factors do not have a
significant effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
·
Self-concept has no significant
effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
·
Social
support has no effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
The main theory that inspired this
study was the psychosocial development theory of Erik Erikson (McLeod, 2018) wherein he states that personality is influenced by society
and develops through a series of psychosocial crises. Erickson's stages of psychosocial development are a
comprehensive psychoanalytic theory that identifies a series of eight stages.
In child development, there exist bipolar personality traits, the positive and
the negative (Uba, Makinde,
Adejumo & Aladejana,
2004). This implies that each stage in Erikson’s theory is concerned with
becoming competent in an area of life. If each stage in a child’s life is
handled adequately, the child will feel a sense of mastery, which Erikson
referred to as ego strength or ego quality (Cherry, 2010). But if the stage is
managed poorly, the child will emerge with a sense of inadequacy often termed
personal inadequacies. This basically means that according to Erikson (1959),
each stage of psychosocial development plays a major role in the development of
child’s personality and psychosocial skills. Erikson’s theory also assumes that
children or people in general do experience a conflict that serves as a turning
point in their psychosocial development. In his view, these conflicts are
centred on either developing a psychological quality (adjustment) or failing to
develop that quality (maladjustment). During these times, the potential for
normal personal growth is high, but so is also the potential for failure or
maladjustments (Cherry, 2010).
The
first stage of Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development (Trust vs.
Mistrust) occurs between birth and one year of age and is the most fundamental
stage in life. Because an infant is unreservedly dependent, the development of
trust is based on the dependability and quality of the child’s caregivers. If a
child successfully develops trust, he or she will feel safe and secure
(adjusted) in the world (Uba, Makinde,
Adejumo & Aladejana,
2004). Caregivers, who are inconsistent, emotionally unavailable, or rejecting,
contribute to children’s maladjustments as their behaviour often fosters
feelings of mistrust in the children they care for. Failure to develop trust
will result in fear (maladjustment) and a belief that the world is inconsistent
and unpredictable. It is such child rearing practices that hygiene theorists
describe as unhygienic environmental factors (Blair, Jones, & Simpson,
2010; Herbert, 1998).
The second
stage of Erikson’s
theory of psychosocial development (Autonomy vs. Doubt)
takes place during early childhood and is focused on children developing a
greater sense of personal
control. Like Freud, Erikson believes that toilet training is a vital part of
this process to prevent enuresis in children (Blair, Jones, & Simpson,
2010). However, Erikson’s reasoning is quite different from that of Freud’s in
that he (Erikson) believes that learning to control one’s body functions leads
to a feeling of control and a sense of independence. Other important events at
this stage include gaining more control over food choices, toy preferences, and
clothing selection. Children who
successfully complete this stage
feel safe and
confident (adjusted), while those who do not are left with a sense of inadequacy
and self-doubt (maladjustment).
The
third stage of Erickson's theory of psychosocial development (Initiative vs.
guilt) takes place between the ages of 3 to 5 years. During this period the
child experiences a desire to copy from the adults around him/her and take
initiative in creating play situations. The child makes up stories with toys
such as phones and tiny cars, playing out roles in a trial universe,
experimenting with the blueprint for what he/she believes it means to be an
adult. The child also begins to use that wonderful word for exploring the
world—”WHY?” While Erikson was influenced by Freud, he downplays biological
sexuality in favour of the psychosocial features of conflict between child and
parents. Nevertheless, he emphasises that at this stage we commonly become
involved in the classic “Oedipal struggle” and resolve this struggle through
“social role identification.” If we are frustrated over natural desires and
goals, we may easily experience guilt. The most significant relationship is
with the basic family.
The
fourth stage of Erickson's theory of psychosocial development (Industry vs.
Inferiority) takes place during the ages of 6 to 12 years which is the school
age. During this stage, frequently called the Latency, children are capable of
learning, creating and accomplishing numerous new skills and knowledge, thus
developing a sense of industry. This is also a very social stage of development
and if they experience unresolved feelings of inadequacy and inferiority among
their peers, children could experience severe problems in terms of competence
and self-esteem. As the world broadens, the child's most important rapport is
with the school and environs. Parents are no longer the far-reaching
authorities they formerly were, although they are still essential.
The
fifth stage of Erickson's theory of psychosocial development (Identity vs. Role
confusion) takes place during adolescence (12 to 18 years).Up until this fifth
stage, development depends on what is done to a person. At this point, development now depends
largely upon what an individual does. An adolescent must struggle to discover
and find his or her own identity, while negotiating and struggling with social
interactions and “fitting in”, as well as developing a sense of morality and
right from wrong. Some attempt to delay entrance to adulthood and withdraw from
the responsibilities (moratorium) that comes with adulthood. Unproductive
persons with this stage tend to experience role confusion and upheavals. Adolescents begin to develop a strong
affiliation and devotion to ideals, causes, and friends.
The
sixth stage of Erickson's theory of psychosocial development (Intimacy vs.
Isolation) occurs during early adulthood (18 to 35 years). At the young adult
stage, people tend to seek company and love.
Some also begin to “settle down” and start families. Young adults seek
deep intimacy and satisfying relationships, but if unsuccessful, isolation may
occur. Noteworthy relationships at this stage are with marital partners and
friends.
The
seventh stage of Erickson's theory of psychosocial development (Generativity vs. Stagnation) occurs during middle adulthood
between the ages of 35 to 55. Career and work are the key things at this stage,
along with family. Middle adulthood is
also the time when people can take on greater responsibilities and control. At
this stage, effort is made to establish stability and Erikson’s idea of generativity (attempting to produce something) makes a
difference to society. Inactivity and
meaninglessness are common fears during this phase. Additionally, major life
transitions can occur during this period. For example, children leave the household, careers can alter, and so on. Some may struggle
with finding purpose. Major
relationships are those within the family, workplace, local church and other
communities.
The
last stage of Erickson's theory of psychosocial development (Integrity vs.
Despair) occurs during late adulthood between the ages of 55 or 65 to Death.
Erikson believed that much of life is preparing for the middle adulthood stage
and the last stage involves much reflection. As older adults, some can look
back with a feeling of integrity — that is, contentment and fulfilment, having
led a meaningful life and valuable contribution to society. Others may have a sense of despair during
this stage, reflecting upon their experiences and failures. They may fear death
as they struggle to find a purpose to their lives and wondering what the point
of life is all about.
The
focus here is on the adolescence stage of Erickson's theory. This is because
the study is centred on secondary school students of which most Cameroonian
secondary school students are adolescents. This phase of life is impressively
influenced by independence and self-consciousness as the adolescent begins to
ask questions like “Who am I and who can I be?" They are usually concerned
about how they appear to others and the ability to adjust to school or
occupational identity is generally primordial.
Adolescents
are also likely to experience mixed feelings on how they could fit into the
world which may at times result to role confusion. Thus in the school setting
this confusion and the battle to find their grounds can sometimes make them
experience emotional problems such as stress, which affect their ability to
focus in school. As such most depend on their peers for support instead of their
parents or teachers. Educators can do much to help children feel accepted,
loved and significant when at school (Donald, Lazarus & Lolwana,
2007; Weldon, 2000).
Conceptually, figure one illustrates significant
relationships between the psychosocial variables and adjustment.

Figure 1: Conceptual Diagram showing Relationship between
Psychosocial Variables and Adjustment to the School Environment
Figure one
describes the relationship between the independent variables, their sub
variables and the individual in his/her environment. The individual (student)
who needs to achieve a proper balance with his/her environment is faced with
psycho-social predictors such as emotional factors, social support, educational
factors and self-concept. These psycho-social predictors of adjustment manifest
in the various forms demonstrated in the figure such as stress, peer pressure,
academic overload and issues of self-esteem. The variables are seen to be
interdependent as they complement each other in various forms. It is seen that
lack of emotional adjustment through stress and peer pressure may cause the
student not to adjust academically (academic overload) and vice versa. Once the
student is unable to seek help from teachers, counsellors, friends and family,
low self-esteem sets in as the student believes that he/she would be unable to
attain academic achievement and in some cases students may drop out of school.
The cross-sectional survey research design
was used whereby information was collected from different cohorts of a
relatively large group of students from the population used in the study. This
enabled the researcher to discover the various factors that impaired students'
adjustment in school.
The population of this study
constituted all the students of selected Government Bilingual High Schools
within Bamenda I and III Sub Divisions, namely,
Government Bilingual High School (GBHS) Bamendakwe,
Government Bilingual High School Atiela and
Government Bilingual High School Bayelle. The target
population comprised adolescents because they were the subject of study for
this research. Students of forms 3, forms 4 and lower sixth were selected for
the study because it is at this age that most children are at the peak of
adolescence and likely to be confronted with adjustment concerns. The sample
comprised of 150 students.
The
sample comprised of 150 secondary school students selected from Form 3, Form 4
and Lower Sixth classes of the sampled schools. The researcher chose the
schools and sample based on the convenience, purposive and simple random
sampling techniques. Convenience sampling was used to choose schools. This
convenience sampling was chosen for purposes of accessibility given the
socio-political crisis currently rocking the region. Purposive sampling on the
other hand was used to choose only bilingual government secondary schools
because they had a wide variety of students from various backgrounds considered
to have behavioural patterns which could easily be submitted under study. The
simple random sampling technique was used to determine the number of students
to form the sample. To realize this, pieces of paper were cut and numbered according
to the required number (1-150). Several pieces of paper were cut and left
blank. They were all put inside a pocket and shuffled, and students of each
class were asked to pick each a piece of paper from the pocket. Those who
picked numbered papers were considered for the study. The students were all
given the option to be part of the sample or opt out. None opted out.
Table
1: Distribution of Sample
|
School |
Target population |
Accessible population |
Sample |
|
G.B.H.S. Bamendakwe |
730 |
213 |
70 |
|
G.B.H.S. Atiela |
650 |
150 |
50 |
|
G.B.H.S. Bayelle |
500 |
91 |
30 |
|
Total |
1,880 |
454 |
150 |
Table
one shows the distribution of the sample from the various schools chosen for the
study. The table shows the target population of study of the three selected
schools and the accessible population. A sample of 150 students was drawn from
the accessible population.
The main instrument used for data collection was a
questionnaire adopted from the Students’ Adjustment Questionnaire. The
questionnaire comprised various statements designed in a way that students
could easily read and understand each item.
While at the school, permission was
given by the principal for the questionnaire to be administered. The instrument
was administered directly to the respondents who were guided on how to complete
the questionnaire items. The students took the test in silence and asked
questions where they found difficulties.
The
collected data were reviewed, coded and entered into statistical software for
analysis. The package that was used to analyse the data was the statistical package
for social Sciences (SPSS). This software was used to get the mean, percentages
and other measures that gave the results of the study. The chi-square test of
independence was used to test the hypotheses of the study. Each hypothesis was
examined by coding the frequency of the responses of members of the sample.
Theoretical frequencies were then calculated using the formula.
E=
fr x fc
Where
E = theoretical or observed frequencies
fr = frequency of rows
fc =
frequency of columns
n = Total number of observations of
all the contingency frequencies was squared for each observation and the sum of
these squared frequencies was the chi-square (X˛) of independence whose formula
was:
![]()
Where
X˛ = Chi-square
0 = Observed frequency
= Expected frequency
The
critical value of chi-square was checked at 0.05 level of
significance (a) and with varying degrees of freedom.
The
degree of freedom was obtained using the formula ![]()
Where
df = degree of freedom, r =
total number of rows and c = total number of columns.
The
chi-square test was used in testing all the four hypotheses used in the study.
The calculated value was compared to the critical value of chi-square for the
appropriate sampling distribution (as the level of significance). When the
calculated value of the chi-square exceeded the critical value, the null
hypothesis (Ha) was retained. The reverse was true where the critical value
exceeded the calculated value of the chi-square.
Prior to approaching the
participating students, permission was sought and granted
by the competent school officials. The
students in the various schools were minors and as such parental consent was
gotten from the school authorities
who exercised custody over them during school hours. Students were told the
reason for which they were participating in the exercise and also that their
opinions were not to be used for any other purpose than that of the study.
Their basic human rights were taken into consideration by giving them freedom
to choose to participate in the exercise or opt out. This raised their
enthusiasm to take part and none opted out.
RESULTS
The importance of
psychosocial factors when predicting student adjustment and school outcome
cannot be overlooked. These variables which include help-seeking, self-esteem,
perceived stress, test-anxiety, academic overload, self-efficacy, intrinsic
motivation, social support, emotional situation, financial status, are not the
only factors having an influence / impact on students’ success at school. The
present study highlighted not only the central role of adjustment for students’
academic success; but also how the academic, emotional, self-concept and social
factors impact students’ adjustment and success at school.
Research Question I: To what extent do
educational factors affect adjustment of secondary school students?
|
S/N |
ITEM |
SA |
A |
N |
D |
SD |
|
1 |
I am
definite about my reason for being in school. |
140 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
I have
well defined academic goals. |
80 |
50 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
|
3 |
I
consider the school certificate important. |
130 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
4 |
I
keep up to date with my academic work. |
110 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
I am
not motivated to study. |
5 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
115 |
|
6 |
I
attend classes regularly. |
130 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
7 |
I
find academic work difficult. |
20 |
20 |
10 |
45 |
55 |
|
8 |
I am
satisfied with my academic performance. |
55 |
40 |
0 |
25 |
30 |
|
9 |
I have
trouble concentrating when studying. |
35 |
70 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
|
10 |
I am
satisfied with teachers. |
85 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
20 |
|
Mean average |
79 |
26 |
7.5 |
13.5 |
24 |
|
|
Mean percentage (%) |
52.7 |
17.3 |
5.0 |
9.0 |
16.0 |
|
Table
two demonstrated that averagely, a very significant majority (70%) of
respondents were of the opinion that educational factors affect the adjustment
of secondary school students, while barely 25% were on the negative and 5% were
indifferent. The analysis revealed that academic factors (academic overload)
affected adjustment of secondary school students.
Research Question II: To what extent do
emotional factors affect the adjustment of secondary school students?
3: Respondents’ Appreciation of Effect of Emotional
Factors
|
S/N |
ITEM |
SA |
A |
N |
D |
SD |
|
1 |
I
always feel tensed and nervous. |
30 |
55 |
15 |
35 |
15 |
|
2 |
I
have taught about seeking psychological help recently. |
95 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
25 |
|
3 |
I
have trouble coping with school stress. |
25 |
25 |
0 |
40 |
60 |
|
4 |
I
feel tired a lot lately. |
35 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
75 |
|
5 |
I
get a lot of head ache. |
20 |
20 |
10 |
50 |
50 |
|
6 |
I
feel I am in good health. |
85 |
40 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
|
Mean average |
48.3 |
29.2 |
5.0 |
27.5 |
40.0 |
|
|
Mean percentage (%) |
32.2 |
19.4 |
3.3 |
18.3 |
26.7 |
|
Table
three clearly revealed that 51.6% of respondents affirmed that emotional
factors (like stress and peer pressure) have an incident on
the adjustment of secondary school students, while 45% disagreed and just 3.3%
were neutral. Based on this analysis it is clear that emotional factors significantly affect the adjustment of
secondary school students.
Research
Question III: Does self-concept affect school adjustment among secondary school
students?
Table
4: Respondents’ Appreciation of Effect of Self-Concept on School Adjustment
|
S/N |
ITEM |
SA |
A |
N |
D |
SD |
|
1. |
I am happy
with who I am. |
115 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
|
2. |
I
have a lot of things to be proud of. |
100 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
3. |
I am
sure I will be able to reach my goal. |
120 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
4. |
I
feel like I am a failure. |
10 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
115 |
|
5. |
I can
do better than others at school. |
90 |
35 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
|
6. |
I
have a good understanding of the things I learn at school. |
65 |
70 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
|
7. |
My
skills are weaker than others in this school. |
15 |
15 |
20 |
20 |
80 |
|
Mean Average |
73.6 |
25.7 |
9.3 |
7.1 |
34.3 |
|
|
Mean Percentage (%) |
49.0 |
17.1 |
6.2 |
4.8 |
22.9 |
|
Table
four revealed that a large majority (66.1%) of respondents held the view that
the self-concept (self-esteem and background) affected school
adjustment among secondary school students, while a lesser (27.7%) proportion
was negative and a meagre 4.8% were neutral. This analysis
point to the fact that the self-concept significantly affects school adjustment
among secondary school students.
Research Question IV: To what level is
there correlation between social support and school adjustment among secondary
school students?
Table 5: Respondents’ Appreciation of Social Support
|
S/N |
ITEM |
SA |
A |
N |
D |
SD |
|
1 |
I
feel that there is not one to share most private worries and fears with. |
70 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
65 |
|
2 |
When
I need suggestions on how to deal with a personal; problem, I know someone I
can turn to. |
105 |
20 |
0 |
5 |
20 |
|
3 |
I
don’t often get invited to do things with others. |
25 |
10 |
15 |
55 |
45 |
|
4 |
If a
family crisis arise, it will be difficult to find someone who can give me
good advice on how to handle it. |
40 |
5 |
10 |
30 |
65 |
|
Mean average |
60.0 |
11.3 |
6.3 |
23.8 |
48.8 |
|
|
Mean percentage (%) |
40.0 |
7.5 |
4.2 |
15.8 |
32.5 |
|
Table
five provided a discovery of 47.5% or respondents having the view that there
was a correlation between social support (help-seeking)
and school adjustment among secondary school students, while 48.3% held a
negative opinion and 4.2% were neither affirmative nor negative as to whether
there was a correlation between the two variables. The correlation was
therefore average. Based
on the analysis of this finding, it was discovered that social support and
school adjustment among secondary school students were not significantly
related.
Research Hypothesis I
Educational factors do not have an
effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
Table 6: Test Statistics for
Hypothesis I
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis I |
|
Chi-Square |
68.933a |
|
Df |
19 |
|
Asymp. Sig. |
.000 |
|
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum
expected cell frequency is 7.5. |
|
Table
six demonstrates that the chi square calculated value was read at 68.933 with a
degree of freedom of 19. The asymptotic significance was 0.000. This value was found
to be significantly less than the p-value of 0.05, indication therefore
according to the rule that the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternate
retained. This led to the conclusion that educational
factors had an effect on adjustment among secondary school students. The value for the
Contingency Coefficient (CC) was calculated at 0.560, implying therefore that
the relationship between the educational
factors and adjustment among secondary school students was positive and moderate in
nature.
Research Hypothesis II
Emotional factors do not have a
significant effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
Table 7: Test Statistics for
Hypothesis II
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis II |
|
Chi-Square |
54.000a |
|
Df |
16 |
|
Asymp. Sig. |
.000 |
|
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The
minimum expected cell frequency is 8.8. |
|
Table
seven reveals that the chi square calculated value was read at 54.000 with a
degree of freedom of 16. The asymptotic significance was 0.000, this value was
found to be significantly less than the p-value of 0.05 Therefore, according to
the rule the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternate retained. This led
to the conclusion that emotional factors had an effect on
adjustment among secondary school students. The value for the Contingency Coefficient
(CC) was calculated at 0.514, implying therefore that the relationship between
the emotional factors and adjustment
among secondary school students was positive and moderate in nature.
Research Hypothesis III
Self-concept has no significant
effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
Table 8: Test Statistics for
Hypothesis III
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis III |
|
Chi-Square |
44.027a |
|
Df |
16 |
|
Asymp. Sig. |
.000 |
|
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The
minimum expected cell frequency is 8.8. |
|
Table
eight shows that the chi square calculated value was read at 44.027 with a degree
of freedom of 16. The asymptotic significance was 0.000; this value was found
to be significantly less than the p-value of 0.05. This,
according to the rule that the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternate
retained, led to the conclusion that self-concept
had a significant effect on adjustment among secondary school students. The
value for the Contingency Coefficient (CC) was calculated at 0.486, implying
therefore that the relationship between the self-concept
and adjustment among secondary school students was positive and moderate in
nature.
Research Hypothesis IV
Social
support has no effect on adjustment among secondary school students.
Table 9: Test Statistics for
Hypothesis IV
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis IV |
|
Chi-Square |
58.000a |
|
df |
12 |
|
Asymp. Sig. |
.000 |
|
a. 0 cells (0.0%)
have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is
11.5. |
|
Table
nine shows that the chi square calculated value was read at 58.000 with a degree
of freedom of 12. The asymptotic significance was 0.000,
this value was found to be significantly less than the p-value of 0.05.
Therefore, according to the rule the null hypothesis was rejected and the
alternate retained. This led to the conclusion that social support has a significant effect on adjustment among
secondary school students. The value for the Contingency Coefficient (CC) was
calculated at 0.528, implying therefore that the relationship between the social support and adjustment among secondary school
students had positive effect and moderate in nature.
Educational
Factors and their Effect on Students’ Adjustment
Research question one
sought to know the extent to which educational factors affect adjustment of
students in secondary school. Ten questionnaire items were generated all
targeting the different educational factors that affect students’ adjustment in
school. The findings revealed that, students were very positive for their
reasons for being in school, they also had well defined goals, as well as
considered that their school certificate was very important. A good number of
the students indicated that they were motivated to study, as they attend
classes regularly and found academic work normal. Also, they were very satisfied
with their teachers as well as their academic performance but that they had
trouble concentrating in class.
A crucial revelation
here was that educational factors significantly influenced students’ adjustment
in school. This finding was similar to that of Boyer (1987) who asserted that
the transition from home to school could be a stressful experience and a
challenging time for learners. It also corresponded with Backhaus (2009), who
found that students from low
socioeconomic backgrounds were
less adjusted academically,
personally, emotionally and were
less attached to the
school and were most likely to drop out. This view also matched with
that of Kantanis
(2000) who argued that students
would face extreme
difficulties at school if they
did not adjust to the
social and academic demands
of school life. Poor student
adjustment to the demands
and requirements of secondary
school life could also impact
on the psychological and physical health of the students.
Emotional Factors and their Effect on Students’
Adjustment
The second research
question sought to know the degree to which emotional factors affected
students’ adjustment in school. To verify this phenomenon, six questionnaire
items were raised each targeting a different emotional aspect that could affect
students in school. The findings revealed that on the average, students always
felt nervous and had been thinking about seeking psychological help recently. A
good number of them had trouble coping with school stress and get a lot of
headache. Just a few felt tired in school lately but had the feeling that they
were in good health. From the test of the second research hypothesis, it was
discovered that emotional factors were also crucial in affecting students’
adjustment in school. This finding was in line with the studies of Criss, Pettit, Bates, Dodge, and Lapp (2002) as well as that of Ladd
and Burgess (2001) who affirmed that
children seem to be better
adjusted overall when they were
accepted by peers
and had one or more
close, supportive friendships. This meant therefore that
children needed emotional stability to be well adjusted in school. To verify this, a good number of students had
trouble coping with school stress and majority thought of seeking psychological
help.
Self-Concept and its Effects on Students’ Adjustment
The third research
question, sought to find out whether self-concept affected students’ adjustment
in school. To this, seven questionnaire items were raised each targeting a
different aspect of self-concept that could affect students’ adjustment. It was
discovered from the findings that almost all the students were happy with who
they were and had a lot of things to be proud of as well as being sure that
they would attain their goals. Many of them did not have the feeling of failure
as they believed that they had a good understanding of the things taught in
school and they could not be failures. Generally, most of them acknowledged that
their skills were not really weaker than those of others.
After research
hypothesis III was tested, the findings revealed that students’ self-concept
had a significant effect on adjustment among secondary school students. This
finding was in line with that of Barker,
Wright and Gornick (1996) who noted that physically challenged persons were
more frequently maladjusted than their physically normal counterparts and that
the resultant child maladjustments could take such forms as being delinquent,
unsocial or withdrawn, unhappy, depressed, fearful, shy, anxious, resentful,
sensitive to all forms of criticism, nervous, over-critical of others, easily
discouraged, throwing temper tantrums, domineering, dishonest, quarrelsome,
cheating, tardy, inquisitive, slovenly in personal appearance, impertinent,
defiant, stubborn, disobedient and gossiping. This finding was also in line
with that reported by Blair, Jones and Simpson (2010) that more often than not a child who was
hyperactive, restless and who sought attention through non-conformity or
wise-cracking was merely striving in the classroom to attain the satisfaction
of a need which he or she had been denied at home. It also tallied with the
work of Uba, Makinde, Adejumo and Aladejana (2004) who claimed
that children who came from homes where they were neither loved nor valued by
their parents felt rejected and that such a treatment threatened their needs
for affection and security and could leave them feeling helpless and lonely,
consequently, a very poor self-concept.
Social Support and its Effects on Students’ Adjustment
The fourth research
objective aimed at finding out if social support correlated to adjustment of
students in secondary school. To verify this, four questionnaire items were raised
each on a different facet of social support. The findings showed that about
half of the students felt that there was no one to share their most private
worries and fears with, meaning that not all students took their worries for
counselling. But when they needed suggestions on how to deal with personal
problems, they rushed with it to a third person and that they often got invited
to do things with the other. A good number of the respondents claimed that it
was difficult for them to get someone to give them appropriate guidance on how
to handle family crises.
The fourth research
hypothesis which was tested proved that social support had equally an influence
on students’ adjustment in secondary school. Confirming this finding were the
works of Bagwell, Newcomb, and Bukowski
(1998) that held that general
peer acceptance also predicted adjustment outcomes. Equally, Taylor
(1999) perceived social support to
the belief that assistance, help and support was available
from parents, family members, friends and significant others
when required. He confirmed this by saying that adequate social
support for students was
instrumental in helping and supporting them
in their transition from the home
to school, as well as adjusting
to the new demands, tasks, responsibilities and requirements of school life.
The
outcomes of this study have repercussions for parents, students, teachers, and
counsellors. For parents, this study is a pointer for them to watch out their
children’s behaviours, especially that which has to do with their educational
welfare. The child’s environment has a great influence on the way he/she
behaves, thus parents have a prominent role here in providing the necessary
needs of students so that these children can meet up and be well adjusted in
the school milieu. Students could became aware of the importance of the
necessity of being at equilibrium in school because there is need to be
educationally, emotionally and socially balanced so as to enhance their
academic pursuit. Resident school counsellors would also realize the salient
role they could play in identifying maladjusted students and helping them to be
appropriately adjusted in the school milieu. Pointing out the important role of
the school counsellor, Idowu (1986) states clearly that “the counsellor in the school system is a
person to whom students can open up and express their feelings of frustration
by exposing what is bothering them”.
CONCLUSION
This study revealed that psychosocial factors
(educational, emotional, self-concept and social support) are responsible for
students’ adjustment within the school milieu. One of the major contributions
of this work to the field of counselling is that it has identified counsellors
as very important stakeholders that could be used to check, control and monitor
factors of adjustment in school through counselling in school and the community
at large.
a)
Parents
should be careful with the values they impact in their children, and therefore
take off some time to talk with their children on the essence of respecting
societal, community and school norms and values.
b)
Students
should always consult their parents and school counsellors if they face any
challenges that could lead to maladjustment behaviours. Students should be
aware of the negative consequences of maladjustment and as a result live at
equilibrium in the environment. Students should also be encouraged to
participate in co-curricular activities in school through which they could
express their inherent potential talents.
c)
Teachers
should collaborate and cooperate with school counsellors by frequently making
referrals of deviant cases to counsellors for appropriate diagnoses and
counselling.
d)
School
counsellors should multiply several opportunities to talk to both parents and
students about the negative incidence of psychosocial factors on students’
general wellbeing. Counsellors should encourage parents to openly discuss
educational, social as well as personal problems with their children to enable
them understand this and therefore desist from getting entangled with the
negative behaviours which often cause maladjustments in school.
REFERENCES
Backhaus,
A. L. (2009). The college experience:
Exploring the relationships among student socioeconomic background, experiences
of classism, and adjustment to college. Open Access Theses and Dissertations from the College of Education and Human
Sciences. Retrieved from
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/56.
Bagwell,
C. L., Newcomb, A.F., & Bukowski, W.M. (1998).
Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development.
69,140–153.
Barker, R. G., Wright, A.B., & Gornick,
M. R. (1996). Adjustment to physical
handicap and illness:
A survey of the
social psychology of
physique and disability. New York Social Science Research Council, 12, 72-75.
Blair, G. M., Jones, R. S., &
Simpson, H. R. (2010). Educational
psychology.
London: Macmillan.
Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in
America. New York: Harper & Row.
Cameroon.
(1998). Law No. 98/004 of 14 April 1998 lay down guidelines on education in
Cameroon. Yaoundé: Ministry of National Education.
Cherry, K. (2010). The Everything psychology
book: Exploring the human
psychology to understand why. New York: Adams Media.
Criss, M., Pettit, G.,
Bates, J., Dodge, K., & Lapp, A. (2002). Family adversity, positive peer
relationships, and children’s externalizing behaviour:
A longitudinal perspective on risk and resilience. Child development, 73. 1220-37. 10.1111/1467-8624.00468.
Deslandes,
R., & Bertrand, R. (2005). Parent involvement in schooling at the
secondary level: Examination of the motivations. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 164-175.
Dhillon, C. K.
(2016). Adjustment status of students in relation to intelligence.
International Journal of Social Science,
5(1), 23-27.
Doley,
L. (2018).
The impact of home environment factors on academic
achievement of adolescents. Journal
of Arts, Science & Commerce, IX(1), 137-147.
Donald, D., Lazarus, S., & Lolwana,
P. (2007). Educational
psychology in social context.
London: Oxford.
Good, C. V. (1959). Dictionary of education (2ed.).
New York: Mc Graw–Hill Book
Company.
Herbert,
A. (1998). Mental hygiene. Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Idowu, A. I. (1986). Choice
of occupational training programmes and parent-child
interactions of Nigerian male Universities students. Nigerian Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 1(1), 158-174.
Kantanis,
T. (2000).
The role of social transition in students' adjustment to the
first-year of university. Journal of Institutional
Research, 9(1).
Kulshrestha, S.P. (1979). Educational psychology.
Meerut, India: Loyal Book Depot.
Ladd, G., &
Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the
linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school
adjustment? Child
Development, 72(5),
1579-1601.
McLeod, S. A. (2018, May 03). Erik Erikson's
stages of psychosocial development. Retrieved
from https://www.simplypsychology.org/Erik-Erikson.html.
Monroe,
K. B. (1990). Making profitable decisions. New York: McGraw Hill.
Raju, M. V. R.,
& Rahamtulla, T. K. (January 2007). Adjustment problems among
school students.
Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 33(1), 73-79.
Shaffer, L.F. (1961). Article in Boring, Longfield
& Welb (Eds.), Foundation of psychology.
New York, USA: John Wiley.
Taylor, S. E. (1999). Health Psychology (4th ed).
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Uba, A., Makinde,
O., Adejumo, D., & Aladejana,
A. (2004). Essentials of educational foundations and
counselling. Ile-Ife: Obefami Owolowo University.
Weldon,
L. (2000). Cheating in
school: Teachers are partners in crime. The Clearing House, 40(4), 462-463.
|
Cite this Article: Bama, RK (2019). Psycho-Social Factors and School
Adjustment Dynamics among Students in Selected Schools in Bamenda
I and III Sub-Divisions. Greener Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 3(1):
33-44, https://doi.org/10.15580/GJPC.2019.1.092319176. |