The popularization of common philosophy

Greener Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs

Vol. 2(1), pp. 71-72, 2021

$Description: C:\Users\user\Pictures\Journal Logos\GJPPA Logo.jpg$

The popularization of common philosophy - 36

Zhou Mi

ABSTRACT
This paper introduces the field of philosophy, western philosophy and Chinese philosophy of some common sense to popularize common sense, for popularizing the basic knowledge of philosophy, can play a role in the introduction, the basic coverage of the field of philosophy of some basic knowledge.
ARTICLE INFO
*Article No.:* 06082100036	*Accepted:* 01/07/2021 *Published:* 09/08/2021	Corresponding Author Zhou Mi* *E-mail:* 1024317354@ qq.com	*Keywords:* philosophy; popularization; common Sense.

What is Sun Yat-sen's "human" principle?

Sun Yat-sen accepted the western view of generalizing all cosmic phenomena in terms of matter and spirit, and believed that anything immaterial was spirit. But he criticizes the historical view that "mind and matter are absolutely separated without knowing that the two are originally one", because it does not correspond to the basic fact that body and use are inseparable. In his opinion, the material is the body, and the spirit is the use, which is a clearer view of the use of organ, body and Tao. Although there are two parts, but complementary to the use of robots, because there is no human spirit, is not a person, "the only material body in the world, and no spiritual use, will not be human". Although Sun Yat-sen's view of physical use is relatively simple, it has obviously gone beyond the tradition and stood in the forefront of The Times.

Try to describe the difference and connection between "the theory of good nature" and "the theory of evil nature".

Mencius put forward "benevolence of human nature" from the internal basis of benevolence and righteousness, and held that benevolence and righteousness are born and born, and lie in the heart. Benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom are people, so human nature is good, as long as people follow it to develop, it will become a good man.

Xunzi did not agree with Mencius' theory of good nature, and put forward the opposite theory of evil nature: "people are evil, and their good nature is false. "He divided human nature into two parts: "sex" and "false". The latter refers to the innate physical quality of human beings, while the latter refers to the manmade rituals and laws. "Pseudo" is based on the physiological quality of "sex", but for people, it has more significance.

Mencius's "nature is good" is based on the inner and the outer, while Xunzi's "nature is false" is changed to the first day and the day after tomorrow, the former focus on the inner, the latter focus on the day after tomorrow. Although Mencius did not deny the role of the sage's rites and teachings, fundamentally speaking, whether a person is good or not depends on himself. Namely, the goodness of nature is certain both in value and in fact.