|
Greener Journal of
Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 2(1), pp. Copyright ©2021, the
copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
The popularization of common
philosophy - 62
Suqian Economic and Trade Vocational School
|
ABSTRACT |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
ARTICLE INFO |
|
|
|||||||
|
Article
No.: 06082100062 |
Accepted: 01/07/2021 Published: 27/08/2021 |
*Corresponding
Author Zhou Mi E-mail: 1024317354@ qq.com |
Keywords:
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Briefly discuss the
debate between realism and nominalism in scholasticism.
Medieval
Scholasticism inherited its problems while using Greek philosophy to serve
theology. Some philosophers hold that the universal is the true reality, and
that the individual or the individual is merely the phenomenon; others hold
that the individual is the real existence, and that the universal is merely a
concept or a word, and has no meaning of actual
existence. The former is known as "realism" and the latter as
"nominalism".
The
debate between realism and nominalism is divided into three periods: early,
middle and late. Both the early realism and nominalism tended to be extreme.
For example, Anselm, the eleventh-century realist, considered the universal to
be an entity that precedes and exists independently of the individual. It
flourished in the middle of Scholasticism, when Thomas Aquinas advocated a kind
of mild realism. In his view, perceptual knowledge precedes rational knowledge
in epistemology, so that the universal comes first and the universal comes
second. Ontologically, the universal comes first and the distinct comes second.
The late period of Scholasticism was a period of remarkable nominalism, mainly
represented by Rogell Bacon, Duns Scott and William
Ockham. Nominalists emphasize the reality and independence of the individual.
They believe that the individual is the real existence, and that the universal
has no separate existence. The universal is merely a concept or symbol existing
in reason, and there is no real object corresponding to such a symbol in
reality.
Scholasticism
tried to reconcile reason and faith, but under the dispute between realism and
nominalism, it not only shook the pillar of faith, but also doubted reason, and
scholasticism fell down.
Briefly describe
Anselm's ontological proof of the existence of God.
In
the early scholasticism, Anselm is famous for his ontological proof of the existence
of God. He argued that reason must be subject to faith, "believing and
then understanding". For him, a "great and incomparable being,"
that is, God cannot exist only in thought; if he existed only in thought, it
would be possible to conceive a greater being than himself,
which exists both in thought and in reality. All of these are contradictory to
the definition of "unparalleled greatness. "So
there can be no doubt that the incomparable and great thing, namely God, exists
in thought as well as in reality. This ontological proof of existence inferred
from concepts was later strongly criticized by Kant.
|
Cite this Article: Zhou M. (2021). |