|
Greener Journal of
Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 2(1), pp. Copyright ©2021, the
copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
The popularization of common
philosophy - 69
Suqian Economic and Trade Vocational School
|
ABSTRACT |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
ARTICLE INFO |
|
|
|||||||
|
Article
No.: 06082100069 |
Accepted: 01/07/2021 Published: 27/08/2021 |
*Corresponding
Author Zhou Mi E-mail: 1024317354@ qq.com |
Keywords:
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
A Review
of Hume's View of Causality.
Hume
is one of the main representatives of modern British empiricism. Starting from
Locke's philosophy, he carried out empiricism to the end and reached the
conclusion of skepticism. His view of cause and effect is the concentrated
embodiment of this skepticism.
From
the standpoint of empiricism, Hume argues that all knowledge comes from sensory
experience, but we can never know exactly where sensory experience comes from.
Although sensory experience is passively received by us, the mind is free to
combine and decompose the ideas generated by experience. Hume divided our
knowledge into two categories: the knowledge of ideas and the knowledge of facts.
"Knowledge of ideas" relates only to the relation of ideas to
themselves, and has nothing to do with external things; so far as they
correspond to themselves, they are truth, and therefore "necessary
knowledge". On the other hand, "knowledge of facts," which
includes science, natural philosophy, history, and so on, is "probable
knowledge," for it is based on experience, and experience is, in the final
analysis, probable.
Through
an in-depth examination of causality, Hume believed that the discovery of causality
could not be through reason but only through experience, but experience could
not tell us the inevitable connection between causality. For the repetition of
a relative, individual, and contingent experience ten
thousand times is still a relative, individual, and contingent experience, and
we cannot in any way deduce necessarily the results of tomorrow. Although
repeated experiences do not provide much more than a single example, they can
affect our minds in certain ways. When we regularly experience event A, there
is always the phase of event B, and this creates A habitual association between
our experience of event A and our experience of event B.Thus
Hume concluded that "all inferences from experience are the result of
habit and not of reason", and that "habit is the great guide of
life".
Briefly describe
Montesquieu's theory of "the spirit of law".
Montesquieu
is a French Enlightenment thinker in the 18th century. He elaborated social and
political theory in the form of his philosophy of law comprehensively and
systematically.
Montesquieu
studied the nature and principles of various regimes in history in order to
find and establish a social and political legal system in line with the
"spirit of law". Historically, there have been three kinds of government,
republican, monarchical and absolute. The nature of a republic is that the
people possess supreme power, and its principle is "virtue"; The nature of the monarchy is that the sovereign has the
supreme power, but he exercises it according to the law. Its principle is
"honor". The principle of an autocracy, in which the individual
governs according to his will and inclination, is
terror. Montesquieu believed that both democracy and monarchy were reasonable
government, while autocracy was unreasonable government.
Among
the many factors of "spirit of law", Montesquieu especially
emphasized the importance of geographical environment, believing that
geographical environment plays a decisive role in a nation's character, custom,
morality and spiritual outlook, as well as its legal nature and political
system. Montesquieu's related thought is known as "geographical
environmental determinism". Although this view is wrong, but at the time
did have a positive significance.
|
Cite this Article: Zhou M. (2021). |