|
Greener Journal of
Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 2(1), pp. Copyright ©2021, the
copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
The popularization of common
philosophy - 70
Suqian Economic and Trade Vocational School
|
ABSTRACT |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
ARTICLE INFO |
|
|
|||||||
|
Article
No.: 06082100070 |
Accepted: 01/07/2021 Published: 27/08/2021 |
*Corresponding
Author Zhou Mi E-mail: 1024317354@ qq.com |
Keywords:
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Briefly describe
Rousseau's theory on the inequality of human society.
French
Enlightenment thinker Rousseau revealed the contradiction between "natural
state" and "social state" on the basis of natural law theory.
Using abstract analytical methods, he compared social man with natural man and
regarded what was left after the elimination of man's sociality as the natural
nature of man. Thus, he studied the natural laws that determine human nature
and explained the basis of human society and the origin of inequality.
There
are two kinds of inequality among human beings, one is natural inequality, that
is, physical inequality, and the other is social inequality, that is, spiritual
or political inequality. Natural differences between people are insignificant
in the natural state, but in the social state, not only social inequality, but
even natural inequality, has grown tremendously. Private ownership is the
beginning of civilized society, the basis of all social development, and the
result of social development is the generation and deepening of social inequality.
The development of social inequality is divided into three stages: the
establishment of law and private property rights is the first stage; The establishment of official posts is the second stage; The
transformation of legitimate power into autocratic power is the third and final
stage. The progress of human civilization has been accompanied by deepening
inequality and widespread moral degradation. Extreme inequality will eventually
be replaced by equality. Rousseau's analysis of the development stage of social
inequality is permeated with profound dialectical thought, which is highly
appraised by Engels.
Briefly describe the
philosophical significance of Kant's "Copernican revolution".
According
to Kant, although empiricism and rationalism failed to prove the universal
necessity of scientific knowledge, their arguments reached a consensus that the
universal necessity of scientific knowledge could not be derived from acquired
experience, but only from a priori. He agreed with the principle of empiricism
that all knowledge is derived from experience, but he also maintained the
rationalism that universal necessity can derive only from what is a priori. The
question is, how can we experience objects a priori?
It was through this puzzle that Kant launched a "Copernican
revolution" in the field of philosophy.
Kant
holds that it is not knowledge that must correspond to the object, but that the
object must correspond to knowledge, that is to say, to the forms of knowledge
of reason, and since these forms of knowledge are inherent in reason before
experience, knowledge formed by the processing of these a priori forms of
knowledge is congenital, or universal necessity. Therefore,
the universal necessity source of scientific knowledge and the rational a priori
form of knowledge.
Kant
thus proved the universal necessity of scientific knowledge, but at once raised
new questions. If the object must conform to the rational a priori form of
knowledge, it means that the object actually has two characters: one is the
"representation" of the thing to us, the
other is the "thing in itself" of the thing. Since the a priori form
of knowledge is both the guarantee of the universal necessity of knowledge and
the limitation of things, we can only know the "expression" of things
to us, but cannot know things in themselves. It also means that there is a side
to things that is not limited by our forms of knowledge. What is unlimited is
infinite, that is, free, and though it is impossible for us to know freedom, we
can think freely without falling into contradiction. Thus agnosticism, while
limiting the cognitive capacity of reason, that is, "theoretical
reason," opens the way for the practical capacity of reason, that is,
practical reason, because practical reason or morality is premised on freedom.
"The
Copernican revolution" has two meanings: one is to prove the universal
necessity of scientific knowledge by means of transcendentalism; the other is
to provide the basis for the possibility of freedom, morality and metaphysics by
means of limiting knowledge.
|
Cite this Article: Zhou M. (2021). |