Greener Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs

Vol. 2(1), pp. 186-188, 2021

Copyright ©2021, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s)

https://gjournals.org/GJPPA

 

 

Description: C:\Users\user\Pictures\Journal Logos\GJPPA Logo.jpg

 

 

                 

The popularization of common philosophy - 88

 

Zhou Mi

 

Suqian Economic and Trade Vocational School.

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

 

 

This paper introduces the field of philosophy, western philosophy and Chinese philosophy of some common sense to popularize common sense, for popularizing the basic knowledge of philosophy, can play a role in the introduction, the basic coverage of the field of philosophy of some basic knowledge.

 

 

ARTICLE INFO

 

 

Article No.: 06082100088

 

 

Accepted:  01/07/2021

Published: 27/08/2021

*Corresponding Author

Zhou Mi

E-mail: 1024317354@ qq.com

Keywords: philosophy; popularization; common Sense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Try to discuss the significance of scientific foresight.

 

1. Scientific foresight provides the possibility to understand the development process of things and foresee the recent and future development prospects. It is the ideological basis for human beings to transform the world.

2. A good theory necessarily expands our understanding of knowledge by anticipating phenomena that were not present when the theory was proposed.

3. The reliability and correctness of scientific foresight mark the nature of the object explained by the theory to the extent possible.

4. The foreseeing function of science is one of the clearest and most remarkable manifestations of the active role of scientific theories, and also one of the most distinctive manifestations of the relative independence of scientific theories.

5. The realization of the explaining and foreseeing functions of scientific theory makes it a weapon to change reality, and provides the possibility for human beings to control and transform nature and society consciously.

6. The highest value of a new theory lies in its prediction of new empirical laws.

 

Describe the role of scientific experiments and their relativity.

 

(1) The basic functions of scientific experiments are: (1) to provide some factual material to strengthen or refute a hypothesis. 2. Provide fresh factual material that forms the empirical basis for a new hypothesis or theory.

(2) Relativity of scientific experiments 1. No specific experimental results can be idolized. Every experiment is individual, and extrapolation should be used. 2. Relativity of the experiment itself. Experimental results are bound to be limited by technical and knowledge conditions.

 

How to correctly interpret constants in measurements.

 

1. The constant in measurement is the quantitative reflection of human beings to the objective world, not the intuitive image of the object. The real world is not made up of numbers, but of matter of different shapes and sizes. Quantitative relationships are an alternative way for humans to understand the interrelationships of topological structures in the real world.

2. The selection and determination of invariable parameters are the direct prerequisite for observation and experiment.

Try to discuss the role of measurement and philosophical significance.

 

(1) The role of measurement. Measurement connects theory to practice, empirical knowledge to mathematical expression.

 

1. Measurement provides the necessary conditions for applying mathematical concepts and techniques to the study of nature.

2. Measurement refines the scientific structure.

3. measurement as a description has simplicity, accuracy, universality and invariance.

 

(2) The philosophical significance of measurement.

 

1, measurement depends on measurement technology.

2. Measurement poses a major challenge to epistemology. Measurement cannot be separated from material means, so there is interference to the measured object. Especially in the atomic scale, there exists some absolute interference, with the development of quantum mechanics and uncertainty relationship, become an important philosophical issue.

 

On the characteristics of scientific experiments.

 

1. Simplify and purify to the point of strengthening natural processes. In order to study it under artificial conditions.

2. Implement the principle of modeling in various forms.

3. It must be repeatable. Repeatability reflects that the experimental process is an objective material process in essence, which guarantees the objectivity and reality of the experiment, and is the basic requirement of the experiment.

 

How is the new rule of experience derived from the theoretical law.

 

1. Theoretical laws use conceptual theoretical words, while empirical laws contain only observable words. The former cannot directly deduce the latter. For example, the theoretical term "molecular kinetic energy," which cannot be observed, is associated with the observable "temperature." This presents a set of rules that link theoretical words with observable words. This is called a "correspondence rule."

2. Use corresponding rules to transform theoretical words into observable words and derive empirical rules, which are characterized by:

 

(1) This interpretation is incomplete and open-ended.

(2) Will not be completed at one time, with no finality.

 

Try to discuss a few basic characteristics of the theoretical law.

 

1. Theoretical laws are generally expressed in abstract language, with the help of some concepts created by scientists to express the laws.

2. The words of a theoretical law do not refer to something observable; in other words, it expresses something that cannot be measured by simple, direct means.

3. Theoretical laws are not direct generalizations and summaries of observed phenomena. That is, the sources of theoretical law and empirical law are fundamentally different.

4. Theoretical laws have the ability of prophecy, which can explain existing empirical laws and derive new ones.

 

Try to discuss the relationship between tradition and innovation in scientific discovery.

 

Tradition and innovation are two complementary aspects of scientific discovery.

Conventional research is a kind of thinking activity that follows tradition and is highly convergent. This kind of research is always carried out within the scope of scientific tradition, trying to adjust existing theories or existing observations to make them more and more consistent.

Scientific revolutions are relatively rare. Moreover, the sustained phase of intensive research is the essential preparation for a revolutionary shift.

Only when scientific research is firmly rooted in the contemporary scientific tradition can it break the old tradition and make innovations. Existing traditions give meaning to problems, and their resolution prompts new traditions.


 

 

Cite this Article: Zhou M. (2021). The popularization of common philosophy - 88. Greener Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2(1): 186-188.