By Johnson NC; Ideozu, HM; Eke, IC; Okachi, VW (2022).
|
Greener Journal of Animal
Breeding and Genetics Vol. 4(1), pp. 1-6, 2022 ISSN: 2384-6429 Copyright ©2022, the copyright of this article is retained by
the author(s) |
|
Evaluation
of Pearled Deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated Barley on Growth Performance of
Early-Weaned Pigs
1Johnson N.C; *1Ideozu, H.M; 2Eke,
I.C; 1Okachi, V.W
1Department of Animal Science, Rivers State University,
Port Harcourt.
2Captain Elechi Amadi Polytechnic, Rumuola Port Harcourt.
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article
No.: 011722005 Type: Research |
96 Cotswold pigs
initial body weight (BW) of 5.96 ± 0.12 kg were blocked based on BW and sex.
After 1-week adaptation pigs were randomly assigned to 4-dietary treatments:
corn diet (control) and 3-diets of pearled DON-contaminated barleys: 1.2,
4.4 and 7.6ppm, respectively. Each dietary treatment has 6 replicate pens of
4 pigs each in a two-phase feeding program: 5 – 10 kg and 10 – 20 kg BW
range. Each phase lasted for 2 weeks. Animals were monitored weekly for
average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed
efficiency (FE). There were significant (P = 0.0356) reductions in ADFI for
barley diets compared to control; no differences (P > 0.05) in ADG; FE of
barley diets were higher (P = 0.0201) compared with control in phase 1. No
differences (P > 0.05) in the ADFI and ADG amongst diets. However, there
was highly significant (P = 0.0004) difference in the FE as barley diets
demonstrated better FE compared with control in phase 2. Overall, there were
no differences (P > 0.05) in ADFI and ADG, but with a tendency (P =
0.0626) for a reduction in ADFI of the barley diets compared to control.
Barley diets had superior (P = 0.0026) FE compared to control. It was concluded
that commercial pearling was effective in reducing DON and fibre contents of
DON-contaminated barley to acceptable levels for use in the rations of
early-weaned pigs. |
|
Accepted: 19/01/2022 Published: 04/04/2022 |
|
|
*Corresponding
Author Ideozu,
HM E-mail:
hansino22@ gmail. com |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The incidence of Fusarium especially F.
graminearum in cereal crops particularly barley is on the increase (Clear et al., 2000). This fungus is known to
produce a metabolite known as DON also known as vomitoxin in affected crops in
the field and in storage. The presence of DON in pig diets leads to severe feed
refusal and depressed growth due to the high susceptibility of pigs to the anorectic
effects of DON than other livestock (Rotter et
al., 1995, 1996 and House et al.,
2002). These effects increase the time required for pigs to reach market
weights resulting in losses of revenue to the hog farmers (Williams et al., 1988; House et al., 2002).
The
negative metabolic effects of DON in pigs may be worse in the young piglets as
DON is capable of depressing growth, weakens their developing immune system
thereby rendering them more susceptible to pathogenic infections (Chavez and
Rheaume, 1986). To this point, Rotter et
al. (1994) showed linear feed intake reductions in young pigs fed diets
containing varying levels of DON at 0, 0.75, 1.5 and 3 ppm in their diets,
respectively. Reduction in feed intake invariably would result in reduced ADG.
Therefore, there is a need to develop a strategy for managing DON in cereal
crops, such as barley for young piglets.
It
has been suggested that one of the ways the nutritive value of barley can be
increased is through de-hulling as it can effectively remove DON from
DON-contaminated barley (Lee et al.,
1992 and House et al., 2003).
However, this suggestion has not been fully tested, especially at the
commercial level involving early-weaned piglets. Therefore, the objective of
this study was to evaluate the growth performance of early-weaned piglets fed different
pearled DON-contaminated barley-based diets in comparison with a standard
corn/soybean diet.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Piglets and Housing
Ninety-six Cotswold piglets (48 males and 48
females) averaging 5.96 ± 0.12 (mean ± SD) kg BW and weaned at 17 ± 1d (mean ±
SD) were acquired from Glenlea Research Station, University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada in two batches (a week difference) as: 24 males and
24 females, respectively and housed in the Animal Science Research Unit. The
animals were blocked on the basis of sex and BW and housed 4 pigs per pen.
Initially, pigs were fed a standard commercial starter diet for a 7-day
adaptation period with water provided ad
libitum. At the end of the adaptation period, pigs were randomly assigned
from within blocks to dietary treatments. Each dietary treatment was assigned
to 6 replicate pens with 4 pigs per pen. The animals had unlimited access to
experimental diets and water. Individual BW and pen feed disappearance were
monitored weekly. The room temperature was initially set at 29.50C and
gradually reduced by 1.50C per week throughout the 4 weeks (28-days)
experimental period. All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by
the University of Manitoba Animal Care Committee and pigs were cared for
according to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC,
1993).
Experimental
Diets
There were four dietary treatments. The first
was a standard corn diet (control diet) whereas the other three were pearled
DON-contaminated barley-based diets that contained DON at: 1.2, 4.4 and 7.6ppm
designated as low, medium and high DON diets, respectively before pearling by
way of passing them through the SatakeTM abrader machine 3 times.
Diets were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC, (1998) recommended levels of
nutrient requirements for 5 to 10kg BW piglets for phase 1 and 10 to 20kg BW
piglets for phase 2, respectively (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1: Ingredient
composition of diets (%)
|
|
|
Phase 1 Diets |
|
|
Phase 2 Diets |
|
||
|
Ingredient |
Corn |
L_DON |
M_DON |
H_DON |
Corn |
L_DON |
M_DON |
H_DON |
|
Corn |
38.75 |
- |
- |
- |
64.29 |
- |
- |
- |
|
L_DON barley |
- |
43.57 |
- |
- |
- |
67.18 |
- |
- |
|
M_DON barley |
- |
- |
43.61 |
- |
- |
- |
68.21 |
- |
|
H_DON barley |
- |
- |
- |
43.84 |
- |
- |
- |
66.95 |
|
SMB,
48% |
24.75 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
24.75 |
32.00 |
27.50 |
26.50 |
26.50 |
|
Lactose |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Dried whey |
15.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
SDBP |
7.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Veg. oil |
1.00 |
1.80 |
1.80 |
1.80 |
- |
1.50 |
1.50 |
2.73 |
|
Vit-Min Pxma |
3.45 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
|
LYS.HCL |
- |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.21 |
0.27 |
0.26 |
0.26 |
|
DL-Met |
0.05 |
0.08 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
- |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
|
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
DE (kcal/kg) |
3,525 |
3,756.9 |
3,752.8 |
3,662.7 |
|
|
|
|
aSupplied per kg of
diet: Ca, 2.51/1.8g; P, 1.19/0.85g; NaCl, 0.84/0.6g; Na,0.34/0.24g; Mg,
0.04/0.03g; Mn,9.8/7mg; Fe, 42.7/30.5mg; Zn, 38.5/27.5mg; Cu, 35/24mg; I,
0.21/0.15mg and Se, 0.08/0.06mg. vit. A, 3290/2350 IU; vit. D3,
420/300 IU; vit. E, 14/10 IU, vit. K, 0.49/0.35 mg; choline chloride, 21/15mg;
Niacin, 10.64/7.6mg; Calcium pantothenate, 10.01/7.15mg, Riboflavin, 2.8/2mg;
Thiamine, 0.28/0.2mg; Pyridoxine, 0.28/0.2mg; vit. B12, 7.7/5.5mg,
Biotin, 28/20mcg and Folic acid, 0.14/0.1mg for diets phase one and two,
respectively.
Table 2:
Calculated nutrient contents1 of diets
|
|
PHASE 1 DIETS |
PHASE 2 DIETS |
||||||
|
Item |
Corn |
L_DON |
M_DON |
H_DON |
Corn |
L_DON |
M_DON |
H_DON |
|
DE (kcal/kg) |
3492 |
3472 |
3472 |
3435 |
3445 |
3416 |
3412 |
3423 |
|
N, % |
22.17 |
22.42 |
22.71 |
22.72 |
20.25 |
20.14 |
20.24 |
20.24 |
|
Tlys, % |
1.47 |
1.47 |
1.47 |
1.46 |
1.34 |
1.34 |
1.33 |
1.33 |
|
Tmet, % |
0.36 |
0.37 |
0.36 |
0.37 |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.32 |
|
Tcys, % |
0.48 |
0.47 |
0.47 |
0.48 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
Tmet+Cys, % |
0.84 |
0.84 |
0.84 |
0.84 |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.69 |
|
Thr, % |
1.02 |
0.99 |
1.03 |
1.01 |
0.78 |
0.76 |
0.81 |
0.78 |
|
Trp, % |
0.31 |
0.32 |
0.31 |
0.31 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
|
Leu, % |
1.60 |
1.78 |
1.81 |
1.81 |
1.17 |
1.46 |
1.50 |
1.49 |
|
Phe, % |
1.14 |
1.18 |
1.19 |
1.22 |
1.02 |
1.05 |
1.06 |
1.09 |
|
His, % |
0.61 |
0.61 |
0.62 |
0.61 |
0.56 |
0.55 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
|
Arg, % |
1.29 |
1.36 |
1.39 |
1.40 |
1.26 |
1.27 |
1.30 |
1.30 |
|
Ca, % |
0.83 |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
0.76 |
|
Ava. P, % |
0.16 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.08 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
|
Total P, % |
0.71 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.70 |
0.73 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
|
Ca: P |
1.18 |
1.14 |
1.14 |
1.14 |
1.09 |
1.05 |
1.05 |
1.06 |
1Based on NRC, (1998)
nutrient requirements. Phase 1 diets were used for (d 0 – d 14) later switched
over to phase 2 diets (d 14 – d 28), respectively.
Experimental
Design
The experiment was designed and carried out
as a completely randomized design. Individual BW and pen feed disappearance
were monitored weekly as a measure of feed intake relative to BW gain used in
the computation of gain to feed ratio (feed efficiency). Animals had unlimited
access to feed and water throughout the experimental period.
General
Conduct of Study
At the beginning of each phase in the week
the different feeds were weighed into the individual pen feeders and then
monitored to minimize feed waste. Depending on the rate of feed disappearance
from the feeders more feeds were weighed into the feeders. At the end of each
week residual feeds in the feeders were collected and weighed. The difference
between the total quantity of the feed weighed into the feeders and residuals
represents the actual feed consumed for the week.
Average daily feed (ADFI) was computed as the
difference between the total amount of feed served and remnants divided by the
number of pigs in the pen and then by fourteen (number of days in the phase).
Average daily gain (ADG) for each phase was determined by computing the weight
gained by each pig at the end of the previous phase to the beginning of a new
phase and divided by the number of days in the phase. Feed efficiency (FE)
gains: feed was computed by dividing the ADG by the ADFI for each phase. The
overall for ADFI, ADG and FE were also computed for the study.
Statistical
Analysis
Data were subjected to analysis of variance
(ANOVA) using general linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., Cary, NC).
Means were compared using Bonferoni’s test and α-level of 0.05 was used for statistical
difference. The model was Yij = µ + Xi + Eij:
where Yij = individual observation of the treatment, µ = population
mean, Xi = effect of the ith treatment and Eij
= the error term.
RESULTS
All
animals in each dietary treatment readily consumed their rations and grew
throughout the experimental duration. The results of the ADFI, ADG and FE are
presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Growth
performance of piglets fed corn and pearled DON-contaminated barley-diets
|
|
|
DIETS |
|
|
|
||
|
Item |
Corn |
L_DON |
M_DON |
H_DON |
SEM1 |
P-Value |
|
|
PHASE 1 (5 – 10 kg) |
|||||||
|
ADFI (g/d) |
432.8a |
390.2ab |
346.2b |
383.7ab |
18.46 |
0.0356 |
|
|
ADG (g/d) |
346.3 |
354.8 |
331 |
340.3 |
11.09 |
0.5030 |
|
|
G: F |
0.81a |
0.91ab |
0.96b |
0.90ab |
0.03 |
0.0201 |
|
|
PHASE 2 (10 – 20
kg) |
|||||||
|
ADFI (g/d) |
667.7 |
645.8 |
623.3 |
626.5 |
17.04 |
0.2701 |
|
|
ADG (g/d) |
484.2 |
502.7 |
525.8 |
539 |
14.9 |
0.0860 |
|
|
G: F |
0.73a |
0.79ab |
0.85b |
0.87b |
0.02 |
0.0004 |
|
|
OVERALL (5 – 20 kg) |
|||||||
|
ADFI (g/d) |
550.3 |
518 |
484.8 |
505.1 |
15.81 |
0.0626 |
|
|
ADG (g/d) |
415.3 |
428.8 |
428.4 |
439.7 |
11.24 |
0.5182 |
|
|
G: F |
0.77a |
0.85ab |
0.91b |
0.88b |
0.02 |
0.0026 |
|
SEM1
= standard error of the mean. a,bMeans with different superscripts
within the same row are significantly (P
< 0.05) different.
In phase 1, there was significant (P < 0.05) difference between the
control and barley-based diets. Animals on the control diet consumed more of
their diet compared with animals on the barley diets. However, there was no
difference between the consumption rates between the control and low DON diets.
Irrespective of the differences in the ADFI there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the
DISCUSSION
DON is a known anorectic agent in pigs. For
instance when pigs were fasted for 24 hours to favor feed intake after which
diets containing DON were offered the pigs refused to consume them due to the
anorectic properties of DON (Williams et
al., 1988). Therefore, the acceptability of the pearled DON-contaminated
barley diets in this study is a confirmation that commercial pearling was
effective in removing DON from DON-contaminated barley for pigs, including the
early-weaned piglets (House et al.
2002 and 2003). This assertion becomes stronger when one considers the initial
DON level in the high DON barley (7.6 ppm) diet. Williams et al. (1988) that investigated the effect of DON on feed intake of
young growing pigs found that most of the pigs that readily consumed the
DON-contaminated diets for the first 10 – 15 minutes later ate sparingly or not
at all for the next 2 hours. This led to reduced voluntary feed intake, reduced
growth rate and some pigs even lost weights significantly due to feed refusal.
Pigs on the high DON-containing diet vomited within 20 – 30 minutes of
consuming the DON diets. This is why DON is also known as vomitoxin. Thus,
pearling can be recommended for adoption in dealing with DON in barley for the
swine industry in regions where the DON menace is endemic. This is more so as
the technique is less labor-intensive.
There were
differences in the ADFI in the first phase amongst dietary treatments. The ADFI
of the barley diets were lower than that of the control. However, the
difference disappeared in the second phase amongst the animals on the four
diets, including the overall. The lowered ADFI for the barley diets might not
be related to DON but might be more related to the concentrated nature of their
energy and other nutrients. This assertion is dependable because the piglets
did not show any sign of feed refusal indicating that DON was significantly
removed to the level that piglets found the diets palatable (Trenholm et al. 1991; Lee et al. 1992). The barley diets would have supplied its energy to
the animals more in the form of glucose that is readily available in the small
intestine due to reduced fibre levels compared with the intact corn (Moeser et al. 2002) thereby met more readily
the energy requirements of the animals compared to the intact corn diet. This
also implied that more of the corn diet needs to be consumed to meet the energy
requirements of the animal as the animals at that physiological stage totally
depend on glucose from the grains for their energy. Therefore, the increased
ADFI for the intact corn diet could be an attempt by the animas to ingest
enough energy for their maintenance and production purposes.
Fibre is an anti-nutritive
factor in pig nutrition, especially for early-weaned piglets, therefore, the
presence of fibre in corn and barley would undoubtedly impact their
digestibilities and hence their digestible energy values as well as other
nutrients they provide, such as protein and amino acids. Corn is known to
contain fibre in its hulls as with other cereals, but in addition contains some
fibre in the germ of the kernel. The fibre contain in the hull of corn
contributes approximately 5% of the total kernel weight and this has been shown
contribute about 51% of the total kernel fibre with the one in the germ of the
kernel contributing about 11% of the total kernel weight and also contribute
about 16% of the total fibre (Watson, 1987). This chemistry of corn fibre compositions
would therefore affect the availability of energy and other nutrients in the
corn diets of both phases 1 and 2 as they were used as intact corn compared
with the barley diets that were pearled before incorporation in the diets that
would have removed most of the hulls in the barleys (Trenholm et al., 1991; House et al., 2003). The negative impacts of fibre on nutrient
availability is more severe with young piglets because of their fragile and low
capacity of their gastrointestinal tract to handle bulky feedstuffs,
particularly fibre as they are deficient in enzymes that degrade fibre (Grieshop
et al., 2001; Lampe et al., 2004).
The difference in the
ADFI but similar ADG amongst animals of all treatment groups therefore resulted
in better FE for the barley diets. The findings in this study are in agreement
with data found in the literature such as those of Rodas et al. (1995) and Dritz et
al. (1996). The effect of sex on pigs consuming DON-containing diets had
been inconsistent. Williams et al.
(1988) did not find any effect whereas House et al. (2002) found difference in the sex response of barrows and
gilts that consumed diets containing low levels of DON. In this study, the
effect of sex and its interaction with the diets were included in the model to
evaluate possible gender effect on the growth parameters studied; there was no
gender difference in the response of animals to diets and their interactions.
CONCLUSIONS
Commercial pearling is effective in removing
DON and fibre from DON-contaminated barley for use in the nutrition of swine,
including early-weaned piglets. Pearling eliminates the anorectic effects of
DON and minimizes fibre contents of DON-contaminated barley thereby rendering
such barley acceptable grain for pigs, including piglets. Additionally,
pearling due to fibre removal improved the feeding value of DON-contaminated
barley for swine. Therefore the pearling technology can be adopted in managing
DON in grains for the swine industry in any DON endemic region.
REFERENCES
CCAC, 1993. Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the care and use
of experimental animals. Vol. 1, 2nd ed. CCAC Ottawa, ON.
Chavez, R. R. and Rheaume, J. A. 1986. The significance of reduced feed
consumption observed in growing pigs fed vomitoxin-containing diets. Can. J.
Anim. Sci. 66:277-287.
Clear, R. M. Patrick, S. K. and Gaba, D. 2000. Prevalence of fungi and
fusariotoxins on barley seed from western Canada, 1995 to 1997. Can. J. Plant
Pathol. 22:44-50.
Dritz, S. S. Owen, K. Q. Nelson, J. L. Goodband, R. D. and Tokach, M. D.
1996. Influence of weaning age and nursery diet complexity on growth
performance and carcass characteristics and composition of high-health status
pigs from weaning to 109 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci.74:2975-2984.
Grieshop, C. M. Reese, D. E. and Fahey, G. C. 2001. Nonstarch
polysaccharides and oligosaccharides in swine nutrition. In: A. J. Lewis and L.
L. Southern (Eds.) Swine Nutrition, page 107, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
House, J. D. Abrahamson, D. Crow, G. H. and Nyachoti,
C. M. 2002. Feed intake, growth and carcass parameters of swine consuming diets
containing low levels of deoxynivalenol from naturally contaminated barley.
Can. J. Anim. Sci. 82:559-565
House,
J. D. Nyachoti, C. M. and Abramson, D. 2003. Deoxynivalenol removal from barley
intended as swine feed through the use of an abrasive pearling procedure. J.
Agric. Food Chem. 51:5172-5175.
Lampe,
J. F. Mabry, J. W. Baas, T. and Holden, P. 2004. Comparison of grain sources
(barley, white corn, and yellow corn) for swine diets and their effects on meat
quality and production traits. Iowa State University Animal Industry Report,
ASL-R1954.
Lee,
U. S., Lee, M. Y., Park, W. Y. and Ueno, Y. 1992. Decontamination of Fusarium
mycotoxins, nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, and zearalenone in barley by the
polishing process. Mycotoxin Res. 8:31-36.
Moeser,
A. J. Kim, I. B. van Heugten, E. and Kempen, T. A. T. 2002. The nutritional
value of degermed, dehulled corn for pigs and its impact on the
gastrointestinal tract and nutrient excretion. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2629-2638.
NRC,
1998. Nutrient Requirements of swine (10th Ed.) Natl. Acad. Press,
Washington, DC.
Rodas,
B. Z. Sohn, K. S. Maxwell, C. V. and Spicer, L. J. 1995. Plasma protein for
pigs weaned at 19 to 24 days of age: effect on performance and plasma
insulin-like growth factor 1, growth hormone, insulin and glucose
concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 73:3657-3665.
Rotter,
B. A. Thompson, B. K. Lessard, M. Trenholm, H. L. and Tryphonas, H. 1994.
Influence of low-level exposure to Fusarium mycotoxins on selected
immunological and hematological parameters in young swine. Fundam. Appl.
Toxicol. 23:117-124.
Rotter,
B. A. Thompson, B. K. and Lesard, M. 1995. Effects of
deoxynivalenol-contaminated diet on performance and blood parameters in growing
swine. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 75:297-302.
Rotter, B. A. Prelusky, D. B. and Pestka, J. J. 1996. Toxicology of
deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 48:1-34.
Trenholm, H. L. Charmley, L. L. Prelusky, D. B. and Warner, R. M. 1991.
Two physical methods for the decontamination of four cereals contaminated with
deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39:356-360.
Watson, 1987. Structure and composition. In: S. A. Watson and P. E.
Ramstad (Eds.). Corn: Chemistry and Technology, page 53. Am. Assoc. Cereal
Chem. Inc., St. Paul, MN.
Williams, K. C. Blaney, B. J. and Magee, M. H. 1988. Responses of pigs
fed wheat naturally infected with Fusarium graminearum and containing the
mycotoxin 4-deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Aus. J. Agric. Res. 39:1095-1105.
|
Cite
this Article: Johnson NC; Ideozu,
HM; Eke, IC; Okachi, VW (2022). Evaluation of Pearled Deoxynivalenol
(DON)-contaminated Barley on Growth Performance of Early-Weaned Pigs. Greener Journal of Animal Breeding and
Genetics, 4(1): 1-6. |