By Zoraunye, A; Chikumba,
N; Munengwa, A; Mugova, CJ;
Chikwanda D (2023).
|
Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol. 13(1), pp. 15-21, 2023 ISSN: 2276-7770 Copyright ©2023, the copyright of this
article is retained by the author(s) |
|
Response of ROSS 308
Broiler Chickens (Gallus Domesticus) to Dietary Supplementation with Inorganic
Copper
Marondera University of
Agricultural Sciences and Technology, P.O. Box 35, Marondera, Zimbabwe.
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article No.: 090621084 Type: Research |
A dose-response experiment was conducted
to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with Copper (II)
Sulphate (CuSO4) at 0, 62.5, 125, 187.5 and 250mg/kg on the growth
performance, and carcass and meat quality of broilers (Ross 308). Forty-five
2-week old Ross broiler chicks with an initial average weight of
490±0.6g/bird were randomly assigned to 4 dietary treatments with three
replicates of three chicks per treatment. Diets were fed over the grower day
(14-35) and finisher day (35-49) phases.
Average daily water intake (ADWI), feed intake (ADFI), water to feed
ratios (WFR), average daily gain (ADG), body weight (BW), and feed
conversion ratio (FCR) were measured from 14 to 49 days of age. The mean
ADWI and WFR were significantly higher in birds fed a diet containing
250mg/kg CuSO4, while ADFI, ADG and BW were significantly higher in birds
fed diets containing 125 mg/kg CuSO4 compared to the rest of the treatments
(P<0.05). FCR, carcass and viscera weights, meat pH and colour were
similar among the experimental diets (P > 0.05). In conclusion,
supplementation with 125mg/kg CuSO4 was more efficacious than the rest of
the treatments in promoting growth performance. |
|
Accepted: 09/09/2021 Published: 23/02/2023 |
|
|
*Corresponding
Author Nation Chikumba E-mail: nchikumba@
hotmail.com |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations:
ADWI:
Average daily water intake
ADFI:
Average feed intake
WFR:
Water to feed ratios
ADG:
Average daily gain
BW:
Body weight
FCR:
Feed conversion ratio
INTRODUCTION
Copper plays a vital role in the growth of
broilers, having significant influences on the maintenance of production performance,
regulation of enzymatic activity, bone growth, glucose metabolism, hemoglobin
synthesis, cardiovascular structural integrity, and other physiological
functions (Feng et
al., 2020).
The recommended nutritional requirement of copper in broiler diets is in
the range from 8 mg/kg (NRC, 1994) to 15 mg/kg (Aviagen, 2014). However, higher doses
are often administered in the production process to obtain better economic
benefits (Leeson, 2009). Supplementation of trace
minerals with a large safety margin in broiler chicken diets has resulted in broiler
diets with several fold increases in some trace minerals as compared with NRC
recommendations (Guclu et al., 2008), which has led to a high level of mineral excretion
into the environment (Dozier et al., 2002;
Skrivan et al.,
2005). With the application of poultry manure, these elements accumulate in the
soil in some regions, and crop yields have been reduced because of high copper levels
(Karimi et al.,
2011). Furthermore, some of the elements leach into the groundwater and
potentially cause problems for humans (Bao et al., 2007). Today, the optimum
addition of dietary copper is still controversial. For example, Arias
and Koutsos (2006) showed that with increasing copper
level (100–300 mg/kg), the performance of broilers was improved whereas Pang and Applegate (2007) did not observe any significant effects on
bird’s growth performance when copper was supplemented at levels excess to the
requirements (up to 250 mg/kg). Karimi et al (2011), observed that feeding 250 mg/kg of CuSO4
during the starter period had negative consequences on bird performance, and
moderate levels of CuSO4 (125 mg/kg) had beneficial effects on bird
performance at market age. Against this background, the level of copper supplementation
needs to be urgently reassessed.
The objective of this study was to
compare the effects of graded levels of dietary CuSO4 supplementation on feed intake, water intake, feed
conversion ratio, water to feed ratios, body weight gains, carcass and internal
organ weights, breast meat pH and colour of broiler
chickens. It
was hypothesized that incremental dietary CuSO4 supplementation
increases growth performance, carcass and meat quality of broiler chickens.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Site Description
The study was carried out at a farm in a
Highveld area of Zimbabwe at an altitude of 1600m above sea level at 18° 22'
54.066'' S. The farm is located in natural farming region 2b where average
annual rainfall ranges between 600 and 800mm per year. Highest temperatures are
experienced in October averaging to 280C, lowest temperature
being attained in June and averaging around 50C.The minimum,
maximum and average temperature during the experimental period are summarized in
Table 1. The average ambient temperature was 23.5°C.
Table 1: Average minimum and maximum
temperature from 1 week to 5 weeks of age during the experiment.
|
Week |
Temperature
(ºC) |
||
|
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
|
|
1 |
14 |
34 |
24 |
|
2 |
15 |
32 |
23.5 |
|
3 |
20 |
31 |
25.5 |
|
4 |
19 |
28 |
23.5 |
|
5 |
19 |
27 |
23 |
Experimental
design and layout
The experiment was a completely randomized
design with graded levels of CuSO4 in the feed.
Treatments were 0, 62.5, 125, 187.5 and 250mg/kg CuSO4 respectively. Each treatment was replicated 3 times. The basal diet (0mg/kg)
had no additional CuSO4 and was used as a control.
Birds, treatments and management
A total of 45-day old Ross 308 broiler
chickens were used in the experiment. The chicks were weighed prior to
placement and housed in a deep litter system. The birds were fed a Broiler
starter meal from day old to 14 days. At day 14 of age, the chicks were
randomly assigned to five experimental diets, each diet being replicated 3
times. Supplementation with CuSO4 was done at day
15 and continued until day 49. All birds received ad libitum access to assigned diets and water, and the formulated
diets met the requirements of growing broiler birds (NRC, 1994). Other factors
were held constant except the amount of copper. Environmental conditions were
monitored and heat was adjusted using 250-watt infrared lamps and ventilation
by opening or closing curtains.
Commercial starter (21 % CP) diet was fed with
no restriction from day 1 to 14. Grower diet (19.5% CP) was fed to the birds from
day 15 to day 28 and birds switched to the finisher diet (18% CP) from day 29
to day 49. Experimental diets were formulated using broiler concentrate (41%
crude protein), maize meal (9% crude protein) using the Pearson square method
(Table 3.3). Graded levels of CuSO4 were added to
the diets followed by thorough mixing using a rotary drum mixer.
Table 2: Chemical composition (label values)
of broiler starter, grower and finisher used in the experiment.
|
Dietary composition |
Starter crumbles % |
Grower pellets % |
Finisher pellets % |
|
Crude protein |
21 |
19.5 |
18 |
|
Moisture |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
Crude fibre |
3 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
|
Fat |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
|
Calcium |
0.9 |
0.87 |
0.85 |
|
Phosphorus |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.4 |
According to Profeeds, Zimbabwe
Data
collection
Zootechnical evaluation
The daily feed intake (ADFI g/bird) was
determined for birds in each treatment group. This was done by measuring the
difference between the feed supplied every morning and the residuals on the
following day. Body
weight changes were determined by measuring body weight for each bird on a weekly
basis from week zero of the experiment using a
digital electronic scale (Jadever JPS-1050, Micro Precision Calibration Inc, USA). Feed
conversion ratio was calculated as the amount of feed consumed per unit of live
weight gain. Average
daily water intake was determined by measuring the difference between water
supplied in founts and water remaining after a 24-hour period. Evaporation
losses were corrected for by using a 1-liter fount similar in capacity and
design to other drinking founts. The evaporation fount was placed at the center
of the poultry house. Water
to feed ratio was calculated as the proportion of water to feed consumed daily
during the experimental period.
Carcass, organ weights and meat quality
characteristics
At day 49 of age, after being deprived of feed
overnight, 2 birds per replicate (6 birds from each treatment group) were
randomly selected and slaughtered by exsanguination to determine carcass
weight, quality and organ weights (liver, heart, gizzard and intestines).
Slaughtered birds were left to bleed for four minutes followed by hot water
scalding and plucking of feathers manually. Birds were eviscerated and the
dressed carcass weight, liver, heart, gizzard, intestine weights measured using
an electronic digital scale.
Samples of breast meat were taken from the
birds for colour and pH determination. Samples were chilled for 24 hours after
slaughter to facilitate optimum rigor mortis. A precision calorimeter 110 was
used to measure breast meat colour coordinates
(lightness, redness, yellowness, hue and chroma angle). The colour spectrum
for breast meat lightness (L*) values were classified as follows: lighter than
normal (light, L* > 53), normal (48 < L* < 53), and darker than normal
(dark, L* < 46) (Qiao et al., 2001). A hanna
pH meter calibrated with buffers at pH 4 and pH 7 was used for breast meat pH
analysis.
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed using the General Linear
Model procedures of SAS (2010) for a completely randomized design.
The model used was:
Yij = µ + ti + eij
Where:
Yij = Response variable (ADWI, ADFI), WFR,
ADG), FBW, FCR, meat colour and
pH)
µ = overall mean
ti =effect of the ith treatment
eij = error
Least square means
were compared using the PDIFF procedure of SAS (2010). Statistical significance
was considered at the 5% level of probability.
RESULTS
The effects of CuSO4
supplementation on performance parameters of the birds are presented in Table
3. The mean water intake was significantly higher in birds fed a diet
containing 250mg/kg CuSO4
compared to other birds (P<0.05). The water
intake of birds fed a diet containing 250mg/kg CuSO4 was 10, 8, 8 and 9% higher than birds fed 0,
62.5, 125 and 187.5mg/kg CuSO4, respectively. The highest feed intake was observed in birds fed a
diet containing 125mg/kg CuSO4, while
the water to feed ratio tended to be higher
for the birds fed on diets containing 250mg/kg CuSO4 as
compared to the other birds (P<0.05).The water to
feed ratio of birds on the 250mg/kg CuSO4 diet was 8%, 7%, 12%, 8% higher than those of birds on 0, 62.5, 125
and 187.5mg/kg CuSO4
diets respectively. Copper II Sulphate supplementation significantly affected average
daily gain (P<0.05). The mean average daily gain of birds that
received 125mg/kg CuSO4 was 13%, 6%, 11%, 14% higher than the mean
of birds that received 0, 62.5, 187.5 and 250mg/kg CuSO4 diets
respectively.
Feed conversion ratios, final live weights, carcass and organ weights (Table 4)
were similar among the diets (P> 0.05). Although no significant differences
were observed, birds that received the 125mg/kg CuSO4 diet had
relatively higher final, dressed carcass and organ weights compared to the
other birds (P > 0.05). The final live-weight of birds that received the
control diet (0mg/kg CuSO4) were 9% lower than for birds fed the
125mg/kg CuSO4 diet, while dressed carcass weight were 14%, 9%,
0.03% and 12% higher for birds that received the 125mg/kg CuSO4 diet
compared to other birds. Supplementation of the broiler diet with CuSO4 did
not significantly affect breast meat pH and colour
(Table 5: P>0.05). Breast meat pH was however slightly high in birds that
received the 62.5mg/kg CuSO4 diet compared to birds fed on the rest
of the diets.
Table 3: Growth performance parameters of
broilers fed with Copper II Sulphate from week 2 to
week 7 of age.
|
Performance
Characteristics |
|
|
Treatments |
|
|
R2 |
P-
Value |
|
|
0mg/kg CuSO4 |
62.5mg/kg CuSO4 |
125mg/kg
CuSO4 |
187.5mg/kg
CuSO4 |
250mg/kg
CuSO4 |
|
|
|
Water
intake (ml/bird/day) |
242.12b±4.278 |
247.10b±4.278 |
248.09b
±4.332 |
245.22b
±4.354 |
270.11a±4.302 |
0.5 |
0.0001 |
|
Feed
intake (g/bird/day) |
162.85b±2.055 |
164.66b
±2.055 |
176.13a±2.055 |
161.85b
±2.055 |
168.57ab
±2.057 |
0.7 |
0.0001 |
|
Water/feed
ratio (ml/g/bird/day) |
1.582b±0.044 |
1.601b
±0.044 |
1.519b±0.045 |
1.587b
±0.046 |
1.738a
± 0.045 |
0.12 |
0.015 |
|
Daily
gain (g/bird/day) |
71.88b
±1.82 |
77.28ab
±1.82 |
82.853a
±1.82 |
73.663b
±1.82 |
71.146b
±1.82 |
0.79 |
0.01 |
|
Live
weight (g/bird) |
3073.66ab
±64.87 |
3210.55ab
±64.87 |
3385.22a
±64.87 |
3096.71ab
±64.87 |
3037.55b±64.87 |
0.71 |
0.06 |
|
Feed
conversion ratio (g/g) |
2.4189a
± 0.11 |
2.113a
± 0.11 |
1.96a
± 0.11 |
2.33a
±0.11 |
2.473a
± 0.11 |
0.66 |
0.10 |
Means
within a row followed by a different superscript are significantly different
(P>0.05). 1±SE = standard error. 2R2=
Coefficient of determination.
Table 4: Effects of
graded levels of Copper II Sulphate on carcass and
viscera weights of broiler chickens.
|
Carcass
Characteristics |
|
|
Treatments |
|
|
S.
E |
R2 |
P-
Value |
|
|
0mg/kg CuSO4 |
62.5mg/kg CuSO4 |
125mg/kg
CuSO4 |
187.5mg/kg
CuSO4 |
250mg/kg
CuSO4 |
|
|
|
|
Dressed
weight (g) |
2031.66a |
2140.33a |
2363.83a |
2356.16a |
2067.66a |
±96.17 |
0.63 |
0.14 |
|
Liver
(g) |
41.50a |
38.33a |
45.33a |
38.33a |
40.50a |
±2.33 |
0.52 |
0.30 |
|
Heart
(g) |
13.66a |
10.50a |
10.66a |
12.33a |
12.33a |
±0.72 |
0.63 |
0.13 |
|
GIT
(g) |
74.83a |
72.00a |
77a |
75a |
75a |
±1.92 |
0.42 |
0.49 |
|
Gizzard
(g) |
47.50a |
45.00a |
49.83a |
47.00a |
46.33a |
±2.23 |
0.26 |
0.81 |
Means
within a same row followed by different superscript are significantly different
(P<0.05).1SE = Standard Error. 2R2=
Coefficient of determination.
Table 5: Effects of graded levels of Copper
II Sulphate supplementation on meat pH and colour of
broilers.
|
Meat quality characteristics |
|
|
Treatments |
|
|
S. E |
R2 |
P- Value |
|
|
0mg/kg CuSO4
|
62.5mg/kg CuSO4
|
125mg/kg
CuSO4 |
187.5mg/kg
CuSO4 |
250mg/kg
CuSO4 |
|
|
|
|
pH |
6.59a |
6.62a |
6.59a |
6.51a |
6.51a |
0.03 |
0.65 |
0.11 |
|
Lightness |
57.42a |
59.66a |
60.87a |
55.16a |
56.61a |
3.29 |
0.35 |
0.63 |
|
Redness |
0.40a |
2.34a |
0.53a |
0.49a |
1.42a |
0.512 |
0.68 |
0.08 |
|
Yellowness |
1.90a |
6.30a |
3.5a |
1.9a |
4.4a |
1.49 |
0.52 |
0.31 |
|
Chroma |
2.67a |
6.75a |
3.75a |
3.16a |
4.75a |
1.46 |
0.51 |
0.32 |
|
Hue
angle |
76.89a |
66.24a |
111.36a |
101.90a |
72.89a |
20.46 |
0.41 |
0.53 |
Means
within a row followed by a different superscript are significantly different
(p<0.05). 1SE= Standard Error. 2R2=
Coefficient of determination.
DISCUSSION
Water
intake, water:feed ratio,
feed intake
The observation that increasing CuSO4 concentration in feed
resulted in increased water intake compared to the control diet (0mg/kg CuSO4)
is consistent with previous findings (Deyhim and
Teeter et al., 1995). The increase in
water intake was attributed to a high metabolic heat production. When metabolic
heat production exceeds the capacity of passive heat dissipation, the birds
activate their physiological and behavioral defense mechanisms for heat stress
(Dai and Bessei, 2008). The defensive mechanisms comprise
the decrease in blood flow to the uterus, panting, reduction of feed
consumption and increase in water consumption (May and Lott, 1992). The
immediate increase in water intake helps birds to increase the dissipation of
heat from respiratory surfaces, and the decrease in feed intake reduces the
contribution of metabolic heat to the total heat load. In contrast, Miles et al (1998), noted that CuSO4 supplementation did not
show significant effect on water intake. The high water: feed ratio observed in
birds fed a diet containing 250mg/kg CuSO4 could be attributed to
the higher water intake of birds (Persia et al., 2004).
The observation that feed intake increased as
Copper II Sulphate increased until it reached a
plateau at the 125mg/kg
CuSO4 level of supplementation then declined
in birds fed
diets containing 187.5 and 250mg/kg CuSO4 suggests that the 125mg/kg
CuSO4 level of supplementation was optimal. Similar results were
reported by Feng et al (2020). On the contrary, Luo et al.,
(2005) reported that copper had no effect on feed intake.
FCR is an important determinant of profitability for broiler
producers. Because the feed constitutes
70–80% of the cost of raising broiler chickens, changes in the feed-conversion
ratio can have a major impact on the profitability of an operation (Aggrey et al., 2010). In agreement with the current
study, Hamdi et al., (2015) reported that feed conversion ratio was not affected by addition of CuSO4
to the diet. The lack of response
of broiler chicken to CuSO4 supplementation suggests that the feed conversion efficiency of broilers was influenced by other
nutritional or environmental factors. Further studies are needed to support
this hypothesis.
Daily
gain and final live weight
Average
daily gain and final live weight
reached a peak in birds fed a diet containing 125mg/kg CuSO4 whilst
higher levels (187.5 and 250mg/kg of CuSO4) retarded growth
performance. The increase in average daily gain and final live weight at 125mg/kg CuSO4 might be might be a consequence of the significant reduction in
the total number of pathogenic organisms in the gut (Pang and Applegate, 2007; Samanta et al, 2011). The reason for the growth-depressing effects of a higher doses
of CuSO4 (250 mg/kg) in the present study is not clear and is in
disagreement with studies reporting growth-stimulating effects from
supplementing broiler diets with an excessive amount of CuSO4 (Bortoluzzi
et al., 2019). Banks et al.,
(2004) reported that increasing concentrations of CuSO4 (0, 62.5,
125, 250, or 375 mg/kg) had growth depressing effects on broiler chicks. Reduced
growth rate is used as a proxy indicator of mineral toxicity to evaluate the
toxic effects of certain levels of specific minerals. Persia et al., (2004), reported that 500 and 800
mg of supplemental CuSO4 depressed body weight gain and final
live-weight. In another study, they suggested levels of 642 and 781 mg/kg CuSO4
as a toxic break point for chick body weight gain and final body weight gain,
respectively. Luo et
al. (2005) also reported that feeding 450 mg/kg of CuSO4 resulted
in decreased broiler average daily gain and feed intake. Because the copper level
used in the present study was less than the toxic copper levels reported in
other studies (Persia et al., 2004;
Banks et al., 2004; Luo et al., 2005),
further research is needed to clarify the nature of the depressive effects of
the higher level of CuSO4 (>125mg/kg) exhibited in the present
study.
Internal
viscera and Meat quality
Dressed weight was
not affected by different copper levels fed to broilers in this study. Our
results are partially consistent with work conducted by Liu et al. (2012) in terms of carcass weight.
In contrast, Chowdhury et al (2003) demonstrated the positive influence of copper
supplementation on carcass yields. No significant differences were observed in
liver, gastrointestinal and gizzard weights between treatments irrespective of
copper supplementation level. The results obtained in the present study are
consistent with findings of Attia et al (2012) who reported no significant
differences between internal organs due to copper supplementation. However, Liu
et al (2012) found a significant
reduction in the weight of liver due to increasing copper levels in layer
diets. Several factors may affect the final results of the trials, such as
copper sulphate source, management practices applied,
or environmental conditions under which experiments were conducted.
The
relationship between poultry meat color and pH has been well documented, but
the relative influence on poultry meat quality is not as well established. Barbut (1993) suggested that apparent pale color in turkey
meat is associated with lower pH and is similar to the pale soft exudative
condition in pork meat. Fletcher (1999a) reported that extremes of light and
dark poultry breast fillets showed corresponding differences in muscle pH, and
Allen et al. (1998) reported on
differences in color extremes on functional properties similar to those for
PSE- and dark, firm, and dry-like conditions in red meat. In the present study,
no significant differences in pH were detected between diets. However, birds
fed a diet containing 62.5mg/kg CuSO4 had higher pH values than
birds fed diets containing 187.5mg/kg and 250mg/kg CuSO4,
respectively. Meat
color is one of the proxy indicators of meat quality, and copper is responsible
for erythropoiesis, hemoglobin, myoglobin formation, so the potential to alter
meat color. Supplementation with graded levels of CuSO4 in broiler
diets did not significantly affect meat color coordinates. Our results are partially
consistent with those reported by Yang et
al (2011) who also found no effect on the meat redness a* and yellowness b*
values, but differ on lightness L* values which they reported an increase in
the lightness L* value of the breast meat. There is a paucity of information on
the effects of CuSO4 on broiler carcass and meat quality, and
further experiments are needed to elucidate the effect of CuSO4 on
meat quality (Zhang et al., 2009).
CONCLUSION
Results
of the present study indicate that dietary supplementation with 125mg/kg CuSO4
produced beneficial changes in feed intake, daily gain and final live-weight
while the converse was true for doses exceeding 125mg/kg CuSO4.
Doses exceeding 125mg/kg CuSO4 increased water intake, and reduced
the average daily feed intake, daily gain and final live-weight. Supplementation
with CuSO4 had no effect on meat quality characteristics and
internal organs of broilers. Small-scale poultry producers can boost food and
nutrition security in developing countries by using 125mg/kg CuSO4
as a supplement in broiler enterprises. Future research should focus on the
effect dietary CuSO4 supplementation on the sensory attributes of
meat.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interests.
Acknowledgements
The
authors are grateful for the financial support from Marondera
University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology students’ research fund.
Ethics declarations
All
applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the
care and use of animals were followed.
REFERENCES
Aggrey SE, Karnuah
AB, Sebastian B, Anthony NB (2010). Genetic properties of
feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens. Genet
Sel Evol. 42:
article no.25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-25.
Allen CD, Fletcher DL,
Northcutt JK and Russell SM (1998). The relationship of broiler breast color to meat quality and
shelf-life. Poultry Sci.77: 361–366.
Arias VJ and Koutsos EA (2006). Effects
of copper source and level on intestinal physiology and growth of broiler
chickens. Poultry Science 85: 999-1007.
Attia YA, Qota
EM, Zeweil HS, Bovera F, Abd, AA, Sahledom MD (2012). Effect of
different dietary concentrations of inorganic and organic copper on growth
performance and lipid metabolism of White Pekin male
ducks. British Poultry Science 53: 77-78.
Aviagen (2014). Broiler
Nutrition Specification Ross 308. Aviagen, Huntsville,
AL.
Banks KM, Thompson KL, Rush JK
and Applegate TJ (2004). Effects of copper source on
phosphorus retention in broiler chicks and laying hens. Poult.
Sci. 83: 990–996.
Bao YM, Choct M, Iji, PA and Bruerton K (2007). Effect of organically complexed copper, iron, manganese, and zinc on broiler
performance, mineral excretion, and accumulation in tissues. J. Appl. Poult. Res.16: 448–455.
Barbut S (1993). Color measurements for
evaluating the pale soft exudative (PSE) occurrence in turkey meat. Food
Res. Int. 26: 39-43.
Bortoluzzi C, Lumpkins
B, Mathis GF, França M, King WD, Graugnard
DE (2019). Zinc source modulates intestinal inflammation and intestinal
integrity of broiler chickens challenged with coccidia
and Clostridium perfringens, Poult
Sci. 98: 2211–19.
Chowdhury S, Paik I, Namkung H and Lim H
(2003).
Responses of broiler chickens to organic copper fed in the form of
copper-methionine chelate. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 115:
281–29.
Dai NV and Bessei W (2008). The
effects of sodium and potassium chloride supplementation in the drinking water
on performance of broilers under tropical summer conditions, Arch. Geflügelk.
Deyhim F and Teeter RG (1995). Effect of heat
stress and drinking water salt supplementations on plasma electrolytes and
aldosterone concentration in broiler chickens. Int. Journal
of Biometeorol. 38: 216-217.
Feng C, Xie
B, Wuren Q, Gao
M (2020). Meta-analysis of the correlation between dietary
copper supply and broiler performance. PLoS
ONE 15(5): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0232876.
Fletcher DL (1999). Broiler
breast meat color variation, pH, and texture. Poultry Sci.78: 1323–1329.
Guclu BK, Kara K, Beyaz
L, Uyanik F, Eren M, Atasever A (2008). Influence of dietary copper proteinate on performance, selected biochemical parameters,
lipid peroxidation, liver, and egg copper content in laying hens. Biological
Trace Element Research 125: 160-169.
Hamdi M, Sola D, Franco R, Durosoy S, Romeo A and Perez JF (2015). Including copper
sulphate or dicopper oxide in the diet of broiler
chickens affects performance and copper content in the liver. Anim. Feed Sci.
Technol. 237: 89–97.
Karimi A, Sadeghi
G, Vaziry A (2011). The effect of
copper in excess of the requirement during the starter period on subsequent
performance of broiler chicks. J Appl. Poult. Res 20: 203–209.
Leeson S (2009). Copper metabolism and dietary
needs. World’s Poultry Science Journal 65: 353–366.
Liu S, Lu L, Li S, Xie
J, Zhang L, Wang R (2012). Copper in organic proteinate
or inorganic sulfate form is equally bioavailable for broiler chicks fed a
conventional corn-soybean meal diet. Biol Trace Elem
Res. 147: 142–148.
Luo XG, Ji
F, Lin YX, Steward FA, Lu B, Liu B (2005). Effect of dietary
supplementation with copper sulfate or tribasic
copper chloride on broiler performance, relative copper bioavailability, and
oxidation stability of vitamin E in feed. Poultry Science 84: 888-893.
May JD and Lott BD (1992). Feed and water consumption
patterns of broilers at high environmental temperatures. Poultry Science 71: 331-336.
Miles RD, O'Keefe SF,
Henry PR, Ammerman CB and Luo
XG (1998). The effect of dietary
supplementation with copper sulfate or tribasic copper chloride on broiler
performance, relative copper bioavailability and dietary prooxidant
activity. Poult. Sci.77: 416-425.
National Research Council (1994). Nutrient Requirements of
Poultry, 9th Revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Pang Y and Applegate TJ (2007).
Effects of dietary copper supplementation and copper source on digesta pH, calcium, zinc, and copper complex size in the
gastrointestinal tract of broiler chicken, Poultry Science 86: 531- 537.
Persia ME, Baker DH, Parsons CM
(2004). Tolerance for excess basic zinc chloride and basic copper chloride in
chicks, Brit Poult Sci.45: 672–676.
, , and The
influence of broiler breast meat color variation on chemical composition. Poult. Sci.81:
422– 427.
Samanta B, Ghosh
PR, Biswas A, Das SK (2011). The
effects of copper supplementation on the performance and hematological
parameters of broiler chickens. Asian Austral J. Anim Sci. 24:
1001–1006.
SAS Version SAS 8.02,
(2010). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC
Skrivan M, Skrivanova V and Marounek M (2009). Effect of various copper
supplements to feed of laying hens on Cu content in eggs, liver, excreta, soil,
and herbage. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 50: 280–283.
Zhang XQ, Ding K, Boi
X (2009). Effects of dietary supplementation with copper sulphate or tribasic copper chloride on carcass
characteristics, tissular nutrients deposition and
oxidation in broilers. Pak. J. Nutr 8: 1114-1119.
Yang Z, Qi XM, Yang HM, Dai H, Xu CX, Wang ZY (2018). Effects of dietary
copper on growth performance, slaughter performance and nutrient content of
fecal in growing goslings from 28 to 70 days of age. Brazil
J. Poult. Sci.20: 45-52.
|
Cite this Article: Zoraunye,
A; Chikumba, N; Munengwa,
A; Mugova, CJ; Chikwanda
D (2023). Response of ROSS 308 Broiler Chickens (Gallus Domesticus) to Dietary
Supplementation with Inorganic Copper. Greener
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(1): 15-21, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7670574.
|