Public Health Implications of Pesticide Residues in Food: Risks, Regulations, and Interventions

1. Introduction

Pesticide residues in food have become a significant concern in contemporary agricultural practices and public health discussions. These residues refer to the remnants of pesticides that remain on or in food products after they have been applied to crops. Pesticide residues also include their metabolites, which can exhibit varying degrees of toxicity and persistence in the environment (Inyang et al., 2020, 2019a,b, 2016a,b) and the human body. The presence of these residues in food directly results from the widespread use of pesticides in modern agriculture to enhance crop yields and control pest populations. However, the implications of pesticide residues extend beyond agricultural productivity, raising critical questions about water quality and food safety (Inyang et al., 2016c,d) and public health.

Pesticide residues are the trace amounts of pesticides that remain on agricultural products after application, including the active ingredients and their metabolites. According to Wu et al. (2022), the definition of pesticide residues should incorporate both the parent compounds and their metabolites to ensure compliance with Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) and to assess dietary intake risks accurately. This understanding is crucial, as metabolites can sometimes be more toxic than their parent compounds, thus necessitating a broader regulatory framework for monitoring and risk assessment (Pelkonen et al., 2023). Furthermore, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2016) emphasized the importance of accurately defining residues for dietary risk assessments, highlighting the need for a unified approach to include non-extractable residues in evaluations.

The role of pesticides in food production is multifaceted, as they are essential tools for managing pests and diseases that threaten crop yields. Pesticides, including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides, are widely used in agriculture to protect crops from biotic stresses. These agrochemicals have significantly increased food production, allowing farmers to meet the demands of a growing global population (Carvalho, 2017). However, this reliance on pesticides has led to concerns regarding their environmental impact and the potential health risks associated with pesticide residues in food. For instance, studies have shown that improper application and overuse of pesticides can result in higher residue levels in food products, posing risks to consumer health (Tari et al., 2020).

In modern agriculture, pesticides are critical in ensuring food security by enhancing crop resilience and productivity. The application of pesticides has been linked to increased agricultural output, which is vital for feeding the expanding global population (Patil & Patil, 2023). However, the widespread use of these chemicals raises significant concerns about their long-term effects on human health and the environment. For example, studies indicate that pesticide residues are frequently detected in fruits and vegetables, with organophosphorus pesticides being among the most commonly found (Li, 2015). This prevalence highlights the need for stringent monitoring and regulation of pesticide use to mitigate potential health risks associated with dietary exposure to these residues.

The presence of pesticide residues in food is a significant public health concern due to the potential adverse effects on human health. Chronic exposure to pesticide residues has been associated with various health issues, including endocrine disruption, neurodevelopmental disorders, and increased cancer risk (Jawale, 2023). Furthermore, the cumulative effects of multiple pesticide residues can exacerbate these health risks, particularly among vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women (Gu et al., 2021). Winter (2015) highlighted that consumer fears regarding pesticide residues can lead to reduced consumption of fruits and vegetables, which are essential for a healthy diet, thereby negating the health benefits of these foods. This paradox emphasizes the need for effective communication and education regarding the safety of pesticide residues in food.

This paper examines the types and uses of pesticides in food production. It also explores the different routes of human exposure to pesticide residues: dietary, environmental, and occupational, and assesses both the acute and chronic health impacts, emphasizing vulnerable populations. The paper also discusses the regulatory frameworks for pesticide residue limits, the challenges in enforcing these standards, methods for detection, and the implications for food safety and supply chains.

2. Types of Pesticides and Their Uses in Food Production

Pesticides play a crucial role in modern agriculture, serving as essential tools for managing pests, diseases, and weeds that threaten crop yields (Inyang et al., 2018; Aghoghovwia et al., 2019; Aghoghovwia & Izah, 2018) and food security.

They can be broadly categorized into several types: insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and others, each designed to target specific agricultural challenges. Insecticides are formulated to control insect pests, while herbicides are used to manage unwanted vegetation, and fungicides target fungal pathogens that can devastate crops. These chemicals have become a cornerstone of agricultural practices, particularly in regions where intensive farming is prevalent (Yang & Suh, 2015; Dwivedi et al., 2022).

The application of pesticides is not without controversy, as their use raises significant environmental and health concerns. For instance, the indiscriminate application of broad-spectrum pesticides can lead to the decline of non-target species and disrupt local ecosystems. Moreover, pesticide residues can accumulate in the environment, leading to potential health risks for humans and wildlife. Studies have shown that certain pesticides, particularly organophosphates and carbamates, are associated with various health issues, including neurotoxicity and cancer (Damalas & Eleftherohorinos, 2011; Aschebrook‐Kilfoy et al., 2014; Dar, 2023). This highlights the need for careful management and regulation of pesticide use in agricultural practices.

Common crops exposed to pesticides include staples such as corn, soybeans, cotton, and various fruits and vegetables. These crops are often treated with multiple pesticide applications throughout their growing seasons to protect against various pests and diseases. For example, corn and cotton are frequently treated with insecticides to combat pests like the European corn borer and the cotton bollworm, respectively (Yang & Suh, 2015; Dwivedi et al., 2022).

Additionally, fruits such as apples and strawberries are often sprayed with fungicides to prevent fungal infections that can compromise their quality and yield (Chaudhry, 2022; Xu et al., 2017). The widespread use of pesticides in these crops raises concerns about the potential for pesticide residues to enter the food supply. Identifying crops most likely to carry pesticide residues is critical for consumer safety and regulatory compliance. Research indicates that leafy greens, berries, and certain root vegetables have higher pesticide residue levels than other produce. For instance, in various studies, strawberries and spinach have consistently ranked among the top crops with detectable pesticide residues (Xu et al., 2017; Damalas & Eleftherohorinos, 2011). This is often attributed to their growing conditions and the frequency of pesticide applications required to maintain their quality. Monitoring and testing for pesticide residues in these crops is essential to ensure they meet safety standards set by regulatory bodies (Xu et al., 2017; Tognaccini et al., 2019).

Trends in global pesticide usage reflect an increasing reliance on these chemicals as agricultural practices intensify to meet the demands of a growing population. Recent statistics indicate that approximately 2 million tonnes of pesticides are used globally yearly, with herbicides accounting for nearly half of this total (Dwivedi et al., 2022). The top pesticide-consuming countries include China, the United States, and Brazil, where large-scale agricultural operations necessitate extensive pesticide applications (Dwivedi et al., 2022). This trend raises questions about sustainability and the long-term impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment.

Analysis of pesticide use patterns globally reveals significant regional variations, with certain areas exhibiting higher usage rates due to specific agricultural practices and pest pressures. For example, in the United States, the use of herbicides has surged, particularly in the cultivation of genetically modified crops engineered to withstand herbicide applications (Yang & Suh, 2015; Dwivedi et al., 2022). Conversely, in developing countries, the reliance on cheaper, often less regulated pesticides can lead to higher risks of exposure for agricultural workers and nearby communities (Maksuk et al., 2018). Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted interventions to mitigate the risks associated with pesticide use. In high-usage regions, the types of crops cultivated often dictate the specific pesticides applied. For instance, in regions where rice is a staple crop, organophosphate and carbamate pesticides are commonly used to control pests that threaten yields (Chowdhury et al., 2012). In contrast, regions focused on fruit and vegetable production may see a higher prevalence of fungicides and insecticides tailored to combat specific threats to these crops (Chaudhry, 2022; Xu et al., 2017). This differentiation in pesticide application underscores the need for region-specific regulations and best practices to minimize environmental and health impacts.

Moreover, the increasing prevalence of pesticide-resistant pests has prompted a shift in pesticide application strategies. Farmers are now faced with the challenge of managing resistance, which can lead to increased pesticide use and more significant environmental impact (Chaudhry, 2022; Sun et al., 2021). Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies are being promoted as a sustainable alternative, combining biological control methods with judicious pesticide use to reduce reliance on chemical inputs while maintaining crop productivity (Damalas & Eleftherohorinos, 2011; Kunkle et al., 2013). This approach helps manage pest populations effectively and mitigates the risks associated with pesticide exposure. The health implications of pesticide exposure extend beyond agricultural workers to the broader community. Studies have shown that proximity to agricultural fields can increase the risk of various health issues, including neurological disorders and certain cancers (Vinceti et al., 2017; Aschebrook‐Kilfoy et al., 2014; Dennis et al., 2010). This is particularly concerning for vulnerable populations, such as children, who may be more susceptible to the adverse effects of pesticide exposure. As such, there is a growing call for stricter regulations and monitoring of pesticide use to protect public health (Vinceti et al., 2017; Bailey et al., 2014).

3. Routes of Pesticide Exposure

Pesticide exposure is a multifaceted issue that poses significant risks to human health and the environment. The primary pesticide exposure routes include dietary, environmental, and occupational exposure (Figure 1). Each pathway contributes uniquely to the overall risk of pesticide-related health issues. Dietary exposure to pesticides primarily occurs through consuming food products containing pesticide residues. Pesticides are extensively used in agriculture to enhance crop yields and protect against pests, but their residues can remain on or within the food products consumed by humans. Studies have shown that these residues can persist in various food items, including fruits, vegetables, and grains, leading to chronic exposure for consumers (Sharma et al., 2019; Bhat, 2023). For instance, the presence of pesticide residues in cereals and vegetables has been documented, indicating that agricultural practices directly influence the levels of these harmful substances in the food chain (Bhat et al., 2023)

Figure 1: Major pathways of pesticide exposure

Moreover, the accumulation of pesticides in the food chain raises concerns about long-term health effects, including neurodevelopmental disorders and various cancers (Mequanint et al., 2019; Shah, 2021). The persistence of pesticides in soil and water also contributes to their eventual plant uptake, further complicating dietary exposure (Gaudin, 2023). The consumption of contaminated food can lead to acute and chronic health effects, particularly in vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women, who may be more susceptible to the toxic effects of these chemicals (Mequanint et al., 2019; Shah, 2021).

Several factors, including agricultural practices, food processing methods, and regulatory standards regarding pesticide use, influence the extent of dietary exposure. For example, inadequate washing and peeling of fruits and vegetables can leave significant residues on the surface, which can be ingested (Gaudin, 2023). Furthermore, some regions' lack of stringent regulations can lead to higher pesticide residues in food products, exacerbating consumer risk (Sharma et al., 2019; Shah, 2021).

Environmental exposure to pesticides occurs through contamination of water and soil, which can subsequently affect human health and ecosystems. Pesticides can leach into groundwater or run off into surface water bodies during rainfall events, leading to widespread contamination (Herrero‐Hernández et al., 2013; Imfeld et al., 2020). The contamination of drinking water sources poses a significant risk, as many communities rely on these sources for their daily water needs. For instance, studies have shown that pesticides and their degradation products are frequently detected in water resources in agricultural areas, raising concerns about their impact on human health (Herrero‐Hernández et al., 2013; Imfeld et al., 2020). Pesticides' environmental persistence means they can remain in the ecosystem for extended periods, leading to bioaccumulation in aquatic and terrestrial organisms (Hashemi et al., 2011; Asim et al., 2021). This bioaccumulation can disrupt food webs and lead to harmful effects on wildlife, which can, in turn, affect human health through consuming contaminated fish and wildlife (Asim et al., 2021). Additionally, pesticide contamination can affect soil microbiota, reducing soil fertility and altering ecosystem functions (Meena et al., 2020; Javaid et al., 2016).

The impact of environmental exposure is not limited to direct contamination; it also includes indirect pathways, such as the inhalation of pesticide-laden dust or vapors during agricultural activities (Sharma et al., 2019; Hashemi et al., 2011). Moreover, the use of pesticides in agriculture can lead to the development of resistant pest populations, necessitating the application of even more toxic chemicals, which can further exacerbate environmental contamination (Sharma et al., 2019; Hashemi et al., 2011).

Occupational pesticide exposure is a significant concern for farmers, agricultural workers, and food processing workers. These individuals are often at the highest risk due to their direct involvement in pesticide application and handling. Studies have indicated that farmers can experience acute and chronic health effects due to pesticide exposure, including respiratory issues, skin conditions, and neurological disorders (Damalas & Koutroubas, 2016; Hashemi et al., 2011). The routes of exposure include dermal contact, inhalation of pesticide aerosols, and ingestion through contaminated hands or food (Devegappanavar, 2020; Hashemi et al., 2011).

The risk of occupational exposure is particularly pronounced in small-scale farming operations where protective measures may be inadequate. For example, farmers may need access to proper protective equipment or training on safe pesticide handling practices, leading to increased exposure (Issa et al., 2010; Hashemi et al., 2011). Additionally, para-occupational exposure can occur when farmers bring pesticide residues home on their clothing, exposing family members, including children, to harmful chemicals (Issa et al., 2010; Hashemi et al., 2011).

Research has shown that the health impacts of pesticide exposure among agricultural workers can be severe, with links to various diseases, including cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, and reproductive issues (Mequanint et al., 2019; Shah, 2021). The lack of awareness and education regarding the safe use of pesticides further compounds the risks these workers face (Hashemi et al., 2011; Marete et al., 2021).

4. Health Impacts of Pesticide Residues

The health impacts of pesticide residues are multifaceted, encompassing both acute and chronic effects that can significantly compromise human health. Acute health effects manifest immediately following exposure and can include symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and headaches. These symptoms are often the result of direct contact with or inhalation of pesticide chemicals, which can lead to acute poisoning. For instance, studies have shown that agricultural workers frequently experience these immediate symptoms due to their exposure to pesticides, particularly when inadequate or absent personal protective equipment (Srilesin, 2022; Damalas & Koutroubas, 2016). The acute effects of pesticide exposure are not limited to agricultural workers; they can also affect nearby residents, particularly children, who may be exposed to drift or contaminated water sources (Coronado et al., 2011).

In contrast, chronic health effects develop over time and can lead to severe long-term health consequences. One of the most concerning chronic effects is carcinogenicity, where long-term exposure to certain pesticides has been linked to an increased risk of various cancers. Research indicates that pesticides may contain carcinogenic compounds that can lead to tumor formation, particularly in vulnerable populations such as agricultural workers and their families (Alsen et al., 2021; Bayili et al., 2020). The link between pesticide exposure and cancer risk has been substantiated through numerous epidemiological studies, which have highlighted the increased incidence of cancers such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia among those with prolonged pesticide exposure (Sugeng et al., 2013).

Endocrine disruption is another significant chronic health effect associated with pesticide exposure. Many pesticides are classified as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which can interfere with hormonal balance in the body. This disruption can lead to a range of health issues, including reproductive health problems, thyroid disorders, and developmental issues in children. For example, pesticides like glyphosate have been shown to affect estrogen receptors and disrupt normal hormonal functions, potentially leading to infertility and developmental disorders (Araújo-Ramos et al., 2021; Gea et al., 2022). The implications of endocrine disruption are particularly concerning during critical periods of development, such as prenatal and early childhood stages, where exposure can result in long-lasting health effects (Leemans et al., 2019).

Neurological disorders are also a significant concern linked to pesticide exposure. Chronic exposure to certain pesticides has been associated with cognitive impairments and neurodevelopmental issues in children. Studies have demonstrated that pesticides can affect the nervous system, leading to conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other cognitive deficits (Nasri et al., 2016). Neurological symptoms, including tremors, fatigue, and hearing loss, as well as psychiatric effects such as depression and suicide (Lopes-Ferreira et al., 2022) (Figure 2). Pesticides may contribute to neurodegenerative diseases, impact muscular and cardiac systems, and lead to metabolic disorders such as overweight, underweight, insulin resistance, and diabetes, alongside an increased risk of various cancers (Lopes-Ferreira et al., 2022) (Figure 2). Furthermore, neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease have been linked to pesticide exposure, particularly among agricultural workers who are regularly in contact with neurotoxic chemicals (Bayili et al., 2020). The mechanisms by which pesticides exert neurotoxic effects are complex and may involve oxidative stress and inflammation, which can damage neuronal cells over time (Nasri et al., 2016).

Global monitoring programs for pesticide residues have been established to track levels in food supplies and ensure compliance with safety standards. Organizations such as the FAO and the WHO are pivotal in coordinating international efforts to monitor pesticide residues and assess their impact on human health and the environment (Łozowicka et al., 2015; Mutengwe et al., 2016). Various countries have implemented their monitoring systems, often guided by the MRLs set by regulatory bodies. For example, studies have shown that a significant percentage of vegetable samples in regions like Saudi Arabia and Egypt exceed MRLs, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring and enforcement of pesticide regulations (Ramadan et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2022; Alokail, 2023). Establishing rapid alert systems for food safety, similar to those in the European Union, is crucial for the timely identification and management of risks associated with pesticide residues in imported and locally produced food (Mutengwe et al., 2016).

Despite advancements in detection technologies and global monitoring efforts, several limitations hinder comprehensive pesticide residue monitoring. One major challenge is the variability in detection capabilities across different analytical methods, which can lead to discrepancies in reported residue levels (Sun et al., 2023). Moreover, multiple pesticide residues in a single sample complicate the analysis and risk assessment processes, as interactions between different chemicals can affect their toxicity and health implications (Li, 2015; Turgut et al., 2010). Additionally, gaps in data availability, particularly in developing countries, pose significant challenges to understanding pesticide residue prevalence and exposure risks (Ma et al., 2022; Alokail, 2023). The need for standardized protocols and harmonized regulations across countries further exacerbates these issues, making it difficult to compare data and implement effective monitoring strategies globally (Mutengwe et al., 2016).

Furthermore, the environmental persistence of certain pesticides raises concerns about long-term exposure and accumulation in the food chain. Studies have indicated that pesticide residues can remain in soil and water systems, leading to potential contamination of crops and subsequent human exposure (Hathout et al., 2021). Although generally lower than in conventional systems, the detection of pesticide residues in organic farming systems still highlights the need for vigilance in monitoring practices to ensure consumer safety (Turgut et al., 2010). Additionally, the increasing complexity of agricultural practices, including the use of pesticide mixtures, necessitates the development of more sophisticated analytical techniques capable of detecting and quantifying multiple residues simultaneously (Hathout et al., 2021; (AlSaikhan et al., 2021;

7. Pesticide Residues and Food Safety

Pesticide residues in food have emerged as a significant concern for food safety, impacting food supply chains, consumer confidence, and international trade. The presence of these residues can lead to a decline in food quality, as consumers often associate pesticide residues with potential health risks. This perception can reduce demand for certain food products, mainly fruits and vegetables, which are crucial components of a healthy diet. Studies indicate that consumer fears regarding pesticide residues may lead to decreased consumption of these foods, negating their health benefits (Winter, 2015). Furthermore, pesticide residues can complicate trade relations, as countries impose stringent regulations and maximum residue limits (MRLs) to ensure food safety. Non-compliance with these standards can result in trade barriers, affecting the global food supply chain (Bajwa & Sandhu, 2011). Thus, the implications of pesticide residues extend beyond individual health concerns, influencing broader economic and trade dynamics.

Risk assessment models are critical in evaluating the toxicity levels and exposure risks associated with pesticide residues. These models are essential for understanding the long-term health impacts of pesticide exposure, particularly in vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women. Research has shown that chronic exposure to pesticide residues can lead to various health issues, including neurodevelopmental disorders and endocrine disruption (Jiang et al., 2023). Regulatory bodies utilize these risk assessment models to establish MRLs designed to protect consumers by ensuring that pesticide residues remain within safe limits. For instance, the Codex Alimentarius Commission sets international food standards, including MRLs, based on comprehensive risk assessments considering acute and chronic exposure scenarios (Jara & Winter, 2019). Establishing these safety levels is crucial for mitigating health risks and ensuring food products are safe for consumption.

The comparison of pesticide use and residue levels in organic versus conventional farming systems reveals significant differences in agricultural practices and their implications for food safety. Organic farming typically employs a more limited use of synthetic pesticides, relying instead on natural pest control methods and approved organic pesticides (Benbrook et al., 2021). Studies have shown that while organic produce may still contain pesticide residues, these are generally lower and less frequent than those found in conventionally grown produce (Winter, 2015). This difference in pesticide application affects the safety of the food produced and influences consumer perceptions and market dynamics. Consumers often perceive organic products as safer and healthier, leading to increased demand for organic produce despite the higher costs associated with these products (Benbrook et al., 2021). The growing trend towards organic farming reflects a broader societal shift towards sustainability and health consciousness, further emphasizing the need for rigorous monitoring of pesticide residues across all farming practices.

In addition to the differences in pesticide application, the regulatory frameworks governing pesticide use in organic and conventional farming also play a crucial role in food safety. Countries have established MRLs for various pesticides to ensure food products are safe for consumption. These limits are based on extensive research and risk assessments that consider the potential health impacts of pesticide residues (S Janaan et al., 2021). For instance, the European Union has implemented strict regulations regarding pesticide residues, requiring that all food products meet established MRLs before being marketed (Stachniuk & Fornal, 2015). This regulatory oversight is essential for maintaining consumer confidence in the food supply and ensuring that agricultural practices do not compromise public health. Furthermore, enforcing these regulations can help to level the playing field between organic and conventional farming, as both systems are held to the same safety standards.

Food handling and processing methods further complicate the impact of pesticide residues on food safety. Research indicates that various handling practices can influence the levels of pesticide residues present in food products (Bajwa & Sandhu, 2011). For example, washing, peeling, and cooking can reduce pesticide residues, but the effectiveness of these methods varies depending on the type of pesticide and the food product in question (Bajwa & Sandhu, 2011). This variability underscores the importance of consumer education regarding food preparation practices that can minimize pesticide exposure. Developing advanced analytical techniques for detecting pesticide residues in food is crucial for ensuring compliance with safety standards and protecting public health (Stachniuk & Fornal, 2015). These techniques enable more accurate monitoring of pesticide levels, facilitating timely interventions when residue levels exceed acceptable limits.

The global nature of food supply chains further complicates the issue of pesticide residues, as food products often cross multiple borders before reaching consumers. This international trade can lead to discrepancies in pesticide regulations and enforcement, creating challenges for food safety (Bajwa & Sandhu, 2011). For instance, a food product that meets the MRLs in one country may not comply with the standards of another, leading to trade disputes and potential health risks for consumers. As a result, international organizations such as the WHO and the FAO play a vital role in harmonizing pesticide regulations and promoting safe agricultural practices worldwide (Syed et al., 2014). Collaborative efforts among countries to establish common standards for pesticide residues can enhance food safety and consumer confidence, ultimately benefiting global public health.

8. Conclusion

The implications of pesticide residues in food are a critical public health concern, highlighting the intricate relationship between agricultural practices, food safety, and human health. Pesticides, while essential for modern farming, pose significant risks, including acute symptoms and chronic health issues such as cancer, endocrine disruption, and neurological disorders. Vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and the elderly, are particularly at risk. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach involving stricter regulations, robust monitoring systems, and comprehensive education for stakeholders involved in pesticide application.

Establishing maximum residue levels (MRLs) by regulatory agencies such as the WHO, FAO, EPA, and EFSA is vital to safeguarding consumer health. However, challenges persist, especially in developing countries with limited resources. Continuous research into safer pesticide alternatives and integrated pest management strategies is essential to mitigate the risks associated with pesticide residues while ensuring food security. Moreover, effective detection and monitoring of pesticide residues are crucial for ensuring food safety. Advanced analytical techniques and global monitoring initiatives can help identify and address pesticide contamination in food supplies. As the global food supply chain continues to evolve, collaboration among countries and organizations will be pivotal in harmonizing pesticide regulations, enhancing consumer confidence, and protecting public health. Ultimately, a sustainable pesticide use approach that prioritizes agricultural productivity and human health is essential for a healthier future.

References:

1. Aghoghovwia, O. A., & Izah, S. C. (2018). Acute toxicity of paraquat dichloride-based herbicide against Heterobranchus bidorsalis fingerlings. EC Agriculture, 4(2), 128–132.

2. Aghoghovwia, O. A., Morgan, P. I., & Izah, S. C. (2019). Behavioral response and acute toxicity of fingerlings of African cat fish, Clarias gariepinus, exposed to paraquat dichloride. Journal of Plant and Animal Ecology, 1(3), 13–20.

3. Ahmadi, N., Mandegary, A., Jamshidzadeh, A., Mohammadi-Sardoo, M., Mohammadi-Sardo, M., Salari, E., & Pourgholi, L. (2018). Hematological abnormality, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity induction in the greenhouse pesticide sprayers; investigating the role of NQO1 gene polymorphism. Toxics, 6(1), 13.

4. Alokail, M. S., Abd-Alrahman, S. H., Alnaami, A. M., Hussain, S. D., Amer, O. E., Elhalwagy, M. E., & Al-Daghri, N. M. (2023). Regional variations in pesticide residue detection rates and concentrations in saudi arabian crops. Toxics, 11(9), 798.

5. AlSaikhan, W. H., Almatroodi, S. A., Almatroudi, A., Alsahli, M. A., & Rahmani, A. H. (2021). Pesticide residue measurement in commonly used vegetables using the QuEChERS method. Pharmacognosy Journal, 13(1), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2021.13.20

6. Alsen, M., Sinclair, C., Cooke, P., Ziadkhanpour, K., Genden, E., & van Gerwen, M. (2021). Endocrine disrupting chemicals and thyroid cancer: an overview. Toxics, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9010014

7. de Araújo-Ramos, A. T., Passoni, M. T., Romano, M. A., Romano, R. M., & Martino-Andrade, A. J. (2021). Controversies on endocrine and reproductive effects of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides: a mini-review. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 12, 627210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.627210

8. Aschebrook-Kilfoy, B., Ward, M. H., Della Valle, C. T., & Friesen, M. C. (2014). Occupation and thyroid cancer. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 71(5), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101929

9. Asim, N., Hassan, M., Shafique, F., Ali, M., Nayab, H., Shafi, N., Khawaja, S. & Manzoor, S., (2021). Characterizations of novel pesticide-degrading bacterial strains from industrial wastes found in the industrial cities of Pakistan and their biodegradation potential. Peerj, 9, e12211. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12211

10. Bailey, H.D., Fritschi, L., Infante‐Rivard, C., Glass, D.C., Miligi, L., Dockerty, J.D., Lightfoot, T., Clavel, J., Roman, E., Spector, L.G., & Kaatsch, P., (2014). Parental occupational pesticide exposure and the risk of childhood leukemia in the offspring: findings from the childhood leukemia international consortium. International Journal of Cancer, 135(9), 2157-2172. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28854

11. Bajwa, U., & Sandhu, K. S. (2014). Effect of handling and processing on pesticide residues in food-a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51, 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0499-5

12. Bayili, B., Da, O., Bationo, J.F., Coulibaly, V.P., Ilboudo, S., Ouedraogo, R., Ouedraogo, J.B., & Ouedraogo, G.A. (2020). Evaluation of thyroid disorders in cotton growers exposed to pesticides in satiri department. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13(1), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.13.1.0325

13. Benbrook, C., Kegley, S., & Baker, B. (2021). Organic farming lessens reliance on pesticides and promotes public health by lowering dietary risks. Agronomy, 11(7), 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071266

14. Bhat, V., Nayak, P., Bakkannavar, S., & Udupa, P. (2023). Evaluation of paraoxonase I and hemoglobin levels in farmers and agricultural workers in relation to organophosphorus and carbamate levels in their blood and urine samples: A cross sectional study. F1000Research, 12, 478. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131690.2

15. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Carrasco Cabrera, L., Di Piazza, G., Dujardin, B., & Medina Pastor, P. (2023). The 2021 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA Journal, 21(4), e07939. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7939

16. Carvalho, F. P. (2017). Pesticides, environment, and food safety. Food and Energy Security, 6(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.108

17. Chaudhry, D. (2024). Pesticide Use in Indian agriculture: Policy alternatives for environmental health. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 9(1), 133-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/24551333221121890

18. Chen, C., Qian, Y., Chen, Q., Tao, C., Li, C., & Li, Y. (2011). Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Xiamen, China. Food Control, 22(7), 1114-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.01.007

19. Chowdhury, M. A. Z., Banik, S., Uddin, B., Moniruzzaman, M., Karim, N., & Gan, S. H. (2012). Organophosphorus and carbamate pesticide residues detected in water samples collected from paddy and vegetable fields of the Savar and Dhamrai Upazilas in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9), 3318-3329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9093318

20. Coronado, G. D., Holte, S., Vigoren, E., Griffith, W. C., Barr, D. B., Faustman, E., & Thompson, B. (2011). Organophosphate pesticide exposure and residential proximity to nearby fields: evidence for the drift pathway. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 884-891. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e318222f03a

21. Cui, G., Lartey-Young, G., Chen, C., & Ma, L. (2021). Photodegradation of pesticides using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA): a review. RSC Advances, 11(41), 25122-25140. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra01658j

22. Sun, L., Cui, X., Fan, X., Suo, X., Fan, B., & Zhang, X. (2023). Automatic detection of pesticide residues on the surface of lettuce leaves using images of feature wavelengths spectrum. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 929999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.929999

23. Damalas, C. A., & Eleftherohorinos, I. G. (2011). Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5), 1402-1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051402

24. Damalas, C. A., & Koutroubas, S. D. (2016). Farmers’ exposure to pesticides: toxicity types and ways of prevention. Toxics, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4010001

25. Dar, M. A., & Kaushik, G. (2023). Biodegradation of malathion in amended soil by indigenous novel bacterial consortia and analysis of degradation pathway. Soil Systems, 7(4), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7040081

26. Dennis, L. K., Lynch, C. F., Sandler, D. P., & Alavanja, M. C. (2010). Pesticide use and cutaneous melanoma in pesticide applicators in the agricultural heath study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(6), 812-817. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901518

27. Devegappanavar, G. (2020). Occupational Health: Farmers Knowledge on Pesticide usage and it's Harmful Effects on Human Health in Rural Areas of South India. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, 108-113. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2020/25130

28. Dwivedi, S. A., Sonawane, V. K., & Pandit, T. R. (2022). Review on the impact of insecticides utilization in crop ecosystem: Their prosperity and threats. In Insecticides-Impact and Benefits of Its Use for Humanity. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100385

29. EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR). (2016). Guidance on the establishment of the residue definition for dietary risk assessment. EFSA Journal, 14(12), e04549.

30. S Janaan, A., AH Kayaf, K., Abu-Abdoun, I. I., & El-Mageed, N. M. A. (2021). Monitoring of pesticide residues in imported datepalm fruits in United Arab Emirates. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 13(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i830438

31. Gaikwad, A. S., Karunamoorthy, P., Kondhalkar, S. J., Ambikapathy, M., & Beerappa, R. (2015). Assessment of hematological, biochemical effects and genotoxicity among pesticide sprayers in grape garden. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-015-0049-6

32. Galani, J. H., Houbraken, M., Wumbei, A., Djeugap, J. F., Fotio, D., & Spanoghe, P. (2018). Evaluation of 99 pesticide residues in major agricultural products from the Western Highlands Zone of Cameroon using QuEChERS method extraction and LC-MS/MS and GC-ECD analyses. Foods, 7(11), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7110184

33. Galani, Y. J. H., Houbraken, M., Wumbei, A., Djeugap, J. F., Fotio, D., Gong, Y. Y., & Spanoghe, P. (2021). Contamination of foods from Cameroon with residues of 20 halogenated pesticides, and health risk of adult human dietary exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 5043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18095043

34. Gangemi, S., Gofita, E., Costa, C., Teodoro, M., Briguglio, G., Nikitovic, D., Tzanakakis, G., Tsatsakis, A.M., Wilks, M.F., Spandidos, D.A., & Fenga, C. (2016). Occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides and cytokine pathways in chronic diseases (review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 38(4), 1012-1020. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2728

35. Gaudin, V. (2023). Recent developments on colorimetric and dual colorimetric/fluorimetric enzymatic biosensors for the detection of pesticides in food.. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.0526.v1

36. Gea, M., Zhang, C., Tota, R., Gilardi, G., Di Nardo, G., & Schilirò, T. (2022). Assessment of five pesticides as endocrine-disrupting chemicals: effects on estrogen receptors and aromatase. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041959

37. Gu, M. Y., Wang, P. S., Shi, S. M., & Xue, J. (2021). Dietary risk assessment and ranking of multipesticides in Dendrobium officinale. Journal of Food Quality, 2021(1), 9916758. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9916758

38. Handford, C. E., Elliott, C. T., & Campbell, K. (2015). A review of the global pesticide legislation and the scale of challenge in reaching the global harmonization of food safety standards. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 11(4), 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1635

39. Hashemi, S. M., Hosseini, S. M., & Hashemi, M. K. (2012). Farmers’ perceptions of safe use of pesticides: determinants and training needs. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0641-8

40. Hathout, A. S., Saleh, E., Hussain, O., Amer, M., Mossa, A. T., & Yassen, A. A. (2022). Determination of pesticide residues in agricultural soil samples collected from Sinai and Ismailia Governorates, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, 65(3), 415-425. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.93174.4404

41. Herrero-Hernández, E., Andrades, M. S., Álvarez-Martín, A., Pose-Juan, E., Rodríguez-Cruz, M. S., & Sánchez-Martín, M. J. (2013). Occurrence of pesticides and some of their degradation products in waters in a Spanish wine region. Journal of Hydrology, 486, 234-245.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.025

42. Hu, R., Huang, X., Huang, J., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Yin, Y., Chen, Z., Jin, Y., Cai, J., & Cui, F. (2015). Long- and short-term health effects of pesticide exposure: a cohort study from China. Plos One, 10(6), e0128766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128766

43. Imfeld, G., Meite, F., Wiegert, C., Guyot, B., Masbou, J., & Payraudeau, S. (2020). Do rainfall characteristics affect the export of copper, zinc and synthetic pesticides in surface runoff from headwater catchments?. Science of the Total Environment, 741, 140437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140437

44. Inyang, I. R., Tegu, D. U., & Izah, S. C. (2020). Electro-metabolic aberrations in New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) induced by chloropyrifos. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 11(1), 45–48.

45. Inyang, I. R., Izah, S. C., & Suobo, K. (2019a). Effect of phenol on the kidney and liver biochemical and metabolites of Clarias gariepinus. Noble International Journal of Scientific Research, 3(3), 33–40.

46. Inyang, I. R., Akparata, O. J., & Izah, S. C. (2019b). Evaluation of some blood cells and metabolites of Heterobranchus bidorsalis (Hybrid) exposed to sublethal concentrations of sarosate. International Journal of Research in Environmental Science, 5(1), 17–23.

47. Inyang, I. R., Ayogoi, T. A., & Izah, S. C. (2018). Effect of lindane on some selected electrolytes and metabolites of Clarias gariepinus (juveniles). Advances in Plants and Agricultural Research, 8(5), 394–397.

48. Inyang, I. R., Okon, N. C., & Izah, S. C. (2016a). Effect of glyphosate on some enzymes and electrolytes in Heterobranchus bidorsalis (a common African catfish). Biotechnological Research, 2(4), 161–165.

49. Inyang, I. R., Akio, K., & Izah, S. C. (2016b). Effect of dimethoate on lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine kinase, and amylase in Clarias lazera. Biotechnological Research, 2(4), 155–160.

50. Inyang, I. R., Thomas, S., & Izah, S. C. (2016c). Activities of electrolytes in kidney and liver of Clarias gariepinus exposed to fluazifop-p-butyl. Journal of Biotechnology Research, 2(9), 68–72.

51. Inyang, I. R., Thomas, S., & Izah, S. C. (2016d). Evaluation of activities of transferases and phosphatase in plasma and organs of Clarias gariepinus exposed to fluazifop-p-butyl. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 4(3), 94–97.

52. Inyang, I. R., Kenobi, A., & Izah, S. C. (2016e). Effect of dimethoate on some selected metabolites in the brain, liver, and muscle of Clarias lazera. Sky Journal of Biochemistry Research, 5(4), 63–68.

53. Issa, Y., Sham'a, F. A., Nijem, K., Bjertness, E., & Kristensen, P. (2010). Pesticide use and opportunities of exposure among farmers and their families: cross-sectional studies 1998-2006 from Hebron governorate, occupied Palestinian territory. Environmental Health, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069x-9-63

54. Jara, E. A., & Winter, C. K. (2019). Safety levels for organophosphate pesticide residues on fruits, vegetables, and nuts. International Journal of Food Contamination, 6, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-019-0076-7

55. Javaid, M. K., Ashiq, M., & Tahir, M. (2016). Potential of biological agents in decontamination of agricultural soil. Scientifica, 2016(1), 1598325. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1598325

56. Jawale, R. S. (2023). Pesticide residues in fruits: health risks and safety measures. International Journal of Zoological Investigations, 9(1), 674-680. https://doi.org/10.33745/ijzi.2023.v09i01.076

57. Jiang, Z., Zhuang, Y., Guo, S., Sohan, A. M. F., & Yin, B. (2023). Advances in Microfluidics Techniques for Rapid Detection of Pesticide Residues in Food. Foods, 12(15), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152868

58. Jin, J., Yu, M., Hu, C., Ye, L., Xie, L., Jin, J., Chen, F., & Tong, H. (2014). Pesticide exposure as a risk factor for myelodysplastic syndromes: a meta-analysis based on 1,942 cases and 5,359 controls. Plos One, 9(10), e110850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110850

59. Kongtip, P., Nankongnab, N., Pundee, R., Kallayanatham, N., Pengpumkiat, S., Chungcharoen, J., Phommalachai, C., Konthonbut, P., Choochouy, N., Sowanthip, P. et al. (2021). Acute changes in thyroid hormone levels among Thai pesticide sprayers. Toxics, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9010016

60. Kowalska, G., Pankiewicz, U., & Kowalski, R. (2022). Assessment of pesticide content in apples and selected citrus fruits subjected to simple culinary processing. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031417

61. Kudavidanage, E. P., Dissanayake, D. M. I., Keerthirathna, W. R., Nishshanke, N. L. W., & Peiris, L. D. C. (2020). Commercial formulation of chlorpyrifos alters neurological behaviors and fertility. Biology, 9(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9030049

62. Kunkle, B., Bae, S., Singh, K. P., & Roy, D. (2014). Increased risk of childhood brain tumors among children whose parents had farm-related pesticide exposures during pregnancy. JP journal of biostatistics, 11(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2013.i4.kunkle

63. Leemans, M., Couderq, S., Demeneix, B., & Fini, J. B. (2019). Pesticides with potential thyroid hormone-disrupting effects: a review of recent data. Frontiers in endocrinology, 10, 743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00743

64. Zhao, H., & Li, S. (2015). Analysis of Vegetables and Fruits Organophosphorus Pesticides Residual Detecting Results in Qingdao Market. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 9(6), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.9.1905

65. Zhao, H., & Li, S. (2015). Analysis of Vegetables and Fruits Organophosphorus Pesticides Residual Detecting Results in Qingdao Market. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 9(6), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.9.1905

66. Li, J., Ren, F., Li, Y., Luo, J., & Pang, G. (2019). Chlorpyrifos induces metabolic disruption by altering levels of reproductive hormones. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 67(38), 10553-10562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03602

67. Lopes-Ferreira, M., Maleski, A.L.A., Balan-Lima, L., Bernardo, J.T.G., Hipolito, L.M., Seni-Silva, A.C., Batista-Filho, J., Falcao, M.A.P. and Lima, C. (2022). Impact of pesticides on human health in the last six years in Brazil. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(6), 3198.

68. Lozowicka, B., Abzeitova, E., Sagitov, A., Kaczynski, P., Toleubayev, K., & Li, A. (2015). Studies of pesticide residues in tomatoes and cucumbers from Kazakhstan and the associated health risks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 1-19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4818-6

69. Ma, C., Wei, D., Liu, P., Fan, K., Nie, L., Song, Y., Wang, M., Wang, L., Xu, Q., Wang, J. et al. (2022). Pesticide residues in commonly consumed vegetables in Henan Province of China in 2020. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.901485

70. Maksuk, M., Malaka, T., Suheryanto, S., & Umayah, A. (2018). Risk quotient of airborne paraquat exposure among workers in palm oil plantation. International Journal of Public Health Science, 7(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v7i2.11776

71. Marete, G. M., Lalah, J. O., Mputhia, J., & Wekesa, V. W. (2021). Pesticide usage practices as sources of occupational exposure and health impacts on horticultural farmers in Meru County, Kenya. Heliyon, 7(2), e06118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06118

72. Mathiesen, L., Mørck, T.A., Poulsen, M.S., Nielsen, J.K.S., Mose, T., Long, M., Bonefeld‐Jørgensen, E., Bossi, R. and Knudsen, L.E. (2020). Placental transfer of pesticides studied in human placental perfusion. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 127(6), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13456

73. Meena, R.S., Kumar, S., Datta, R., Lal, R., Vijayakumar, V., Brtnicky, M., Sharma, M.P., Yadav, G.S., Jhariya, M.K., Jangir, C.K. et al. (2020). Impact of agrochemicals on soil microbiota and management: a review. Land, 9(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020034

74. Memon, S. A., Memon, N., Shaikh, S. A., Butt, Z., & Mal, B. (2021). Assessment of profenofos exposure an endocrine disrupting chemical in relation with serum testosterone alterations. Pure and Applied Biology, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2015.41001

75. Mequanint, C., Getachew, B., Mindaye, Y., Amare, D. E., Guadu, T., & Dagne, H. (2019). Practice towards pesticide handling, storage and its associated factors among farmers working in irrigations in Gondar town, Ethiopia, 2019. BMC Research Notes, 12, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4754-6

76. Ucles Moreno, A., Herrera Lopez, S., Reichert, B., Lozano Fernandez, A., Hernando Guil, M. D., & Fernández-Alba, A. R. (2015). Microflow Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry An Approach to Significantly Increase Sensitivity, Decrease Matrix Effects, and Reduce Organic Solvent Usage in Pesticide Residue Analysis. Analytical Chemistry, 87(2), 1018-1025. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5035852

77. Mutengwe, M. T., Chidamba, L., & Korsten, L. (2016). Pesticide residue monitoring on South African fresh produce exported over a 6-year period. Journal of Food Protection, 79(10), 1759-1766. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-16-022

78. Nasri, A., Valverde, A.J., Roche, D.B., Desrumaux, C., Clair, P., Beyrem, H., Chaloin, L., Ghysen, A., & Perrier, V., (2016). Neurotoxicity of a biopesticide analog on zebrafish larvae at nanomolar concentrations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(12), 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17122137

79. Naveed, N., Javed, U., Fatima, B., Atiq, U., Ahmad, S., Maqsood, K., Iqbal, M.A., & Roohi, N. (2023). Alterations in serum thyroid and reproductive hormone levels in occupationally exposed pesticides sprayers. Albus Scientia, 2023(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.56512/as.2023.1.e230504

80. Patil, R. B., & Patil, S. R. (2023). Pesticide residues: impact on environment and human health, risk assessment and safety measures - a review. International Journal of Zoological Investigations, 9(1), 538-552. https://doi.org/10.33745/ijzi.2023.v09i01.059

81. Pelkonen, O., Abass, K., Parra Morte, J.M., Panzarea, M., Testai, E., Rudaz, S., Louisse, J., Gundert-Remy, U., Wolterink, G., Jean-Lou CM, D., et al. (2023). Metabolites in the regulatory risk assessment of pesticides in the Eu. Frontiers in Toxicology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1304885

82. Ramadan, M.F., Abdel-Hamid, M.M., Altorgoman, M.M., AlGaramah, H.A., Alawi, M.A., Shati, A.A., Shweeta, H.A. & Awwad, N.S. (2020). Evaluation of pesticide residues in vegetables from the asir region, saudi arabia. Molecules, 25(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010205

83. Shah, R. (2021). Pesticides and human health.. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93806

84. Sharma, A., Kumar, V., Shahzad, B., Tanveer, M., Sidhu, G.P.S., Handa, N., Kohli, S.K., Yadav, P., Bali, A.S., Parihar, R.D. et al. (2019). Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Applied Sciences, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1

85. Shrestha, S., Parks, C.G., Goldner, W.S., Kamel, F., Umbach, D.M., Ward, M.H., Lerro, C.C., Koutros, S., Hofmann, J.N., Beane Freeman, L.E., & Sandler, D.P., (2018). Pesticide use and incident hypothyroidism in pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(9). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp3194

86. Srilesin, C., Ruttanapattanakul, J., Amornlertwatana, Y., Watcharakawin, R., & Jaikang, C. (2022). Hematological Parameters Alteration in Thai Garlic Farmers Exposed to Mixed Pesticides. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 16(3), 108-111. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v16i3.18263

87. Stachniuk, A. and Fornal, E. (2015). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in the analysis of pesticide residues in food. Food Analytical Methods, 9(6), 1654-1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0342-0

88. Sugeng, A. J., Beamer, P. I., Lutz, E. A., & Rosales, C. B. (2013). Hazard-ranking of agricultural pesticides for chronic health effects in Yuma County, Arizona. Science of the Total Environment, 463, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.051

89. Syed, J.H., Alamdar, A., Mohammad, A., Ahad, K., Shabir, Z., Ahmed, H., Ali, S.M., Sani, S.G.A.S., Bokhari, H., Gallagher, K.D. et al. (2014). Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Pakistan: a review of the occurrence and associated human health risks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(23), 13367-13393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3117-z

90. Tari, K., Samarghandi, M. R., Fard, N. J. H., Jorfi, S., Yarie, A. R., & Fard, M. P. (2020). Pollution status of pesticide residues in food products in Iran: A mini-review within 2008-2018. Archives of Hygiene Sciences, 9(3), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.29252/archhygsci.9.3.214

91. Tognaccini, L., Ricci, M., Gellini, C., Feis, A., Smulevich, G., & Becucci, M. (2019). Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for in-field detection of pesticides: A test on dimethoate residues in water and on olive leaves. Molecules, 24(2), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24020292

92. Turgut, C., Ornek, H., & Cutright, T. J. (2011). Determination of pesticide residues in Turkey’s table grapes: the effect of integrated pest management, organic farming, and conventional farming. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1389-4

93. Vinceti, M., Filippini, T., Violi, F., Rothman, K.J., Costanzini, S., Malagoli, C., Wise, L.A., Odone, A., Signorelli, C., Iacuzio, L. et al. (2017). Pesticide exposure assessed through agricultural crop proximity and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Environmental Health, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0297-2

94. Wang, Y., Han, J., Zhang, J., Li, X., Bai, R., & Hu, F. (2022). A monitoring survey and health risk assessment for pesticide residues on Codonopsis Radix in China. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 8133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11428-w

95. Wang, Z., Chang, Q., Kang, J., Cao, Y., Ge, N., Fan, C., & Pang, G. F. (2015). Screening and identification strategy for 317 pesticides in fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight high resolution mass spectrometry. Analytical Methods, 7(15), 6385-6402. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ay01478f

96. Winter, C. K. (2015). Chronic dietary exposure to pesticide residues in the United States. International Journal of Food Contamination, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-015-0018-y

97. Wu, Y., An, Q., Hao, X., Li, D., Zhou, C., Zhang, J., Wei, X., & Pan, C. (2022). Dissipative behavior, residual pattern, and risk assessment of four pesticides and their metabolites during tea cultivation, processing and infusion. Pest Management Science, 78(7), 3019-3029. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6927.

98. Yi, X., Yuan, Z., Yu, X., Zheng, L., & Wang, C. (2023). Novel microneedle patch-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy sensor for the detection of pesticide residues. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 15(4), 4873-4882. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c17954

99. Xu, M. L., Gao, Y., Han, X. X., & Zhao, B. (2017). Detection of pesticide residues in food using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65(32), 6719-6726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02504

100. Yang, Y., & Suh, S. (2015). Changes in environmental impacts of major crops in the US. Environmental Research Letters, 10(9), 094016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094016.

ARTICLE INFO	ABSTRACT
*Article No.:* 102024144 *Type: Research* *Full Text:* PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB, MP3 *DOI: 10.15580/gjbhs.2024.1.102024144*	Pesticides enter food primarily through direct application to crops during farming, where residues can remain on the surface or be absorbed into plant tissues. Additionally, pesticide drift from nearby treated areas and contamination of soil or water used for irrigation can introduce residues into food crops, further increasing the risk of exposure. This paper focuses on the public health implications of pesticide residues in food. The paper found that pesticide residues in food pose significant public health challenges, with potential risks ranging from acute toxicity to chronic health issues such as cancer, endocrine disruption, and neurological disorders. Vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and the elderly, are particularly at risk. Effective regulation and monitoring become crucial as the agricultural sector relies heavily on pesticides for crop protection. Regulatory bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) play crucial roles in setting Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) to ensure food safety. However, implementing these regulations faces obstacles, particularly in developing countries, where resource constraints, lack of technical expertise, and socio-economic factors impede effective monitoring. Integrating pest management (IPM), advanced monitoring techniques and consumer education are essential to mitigate the risks posed by pesticide residues. The global harmonization of pesticide standards and continued research into safer alternatives and residue detection methods are critical for ensuring a secure food supply. As agricultural practices evolve, a multi-stakeholder approach involving policymakers, farmers, and consumers will be vital in reducing pesticide exposure and safeguarding public health.
*Accepted:* 05/11/2024 *Published:* 19/11/2024
Corresponding Author Sylvester Chibueze Izah* *E-mail:* chivestizah@gmail.com
*Keywords: Pesticide residues, Public health, Food safety, Chronic health risks, Regulatory frameworks, Integrated pest management, Vulnerable populations, Food security.*

Challenge	Description
Limited resources	Insufficient funding and infrastructure for monitoring and enforcement of pesticide regulations.
Lack of technical expertise	Shortage of trained personnel and experts in toxicology, agriculture, and food safety.
Inadequate regulatory framework	Weak or outdated legislation that fails to establish comprehensive standards for pesticide use.
Poor enforcement mechanisms	Ineffective enforcement of existing regulations due to corruption or lack of political will.
Fragmented supply chains	Complex and poorly regulated supply chains that make monitoring pesticide use challenging.
Cultural practices	Traditional farming practices that rely heavily on pesticides, often without awareness of risks.
Public awareness	Limited public knowledge and awareness about pesticide risks and the importance of compliance.
Environmental factors	Difficulties in assessing pesticide impact due to varying environmental conditions and practices.
Market pressures	Economic pressures on farmers to use pesticides to increase yields, often overriding safety concerns.
Global trade dynamics	Challenges in meeting international standards for exports, leading to conflicts with local practices.

Technique	Description	Advantages	Disadvantages
Gas Chromatography (GC)	A technique that separates volatile pesticide compounds for detection and quantification.	High sensitivity and resolution; suitable for a wide range of pesticides.	Requires derivatization of non-volatile compounds; expensive equipment.
Liquid Chromatography (LC)	Separates pesticides in liquid samples; can be combined with mass spectrometry for enhanced detection.	Effective for thermally unstable compounds; high accuracy.	Generally slower than GC; less sensitive for volatile compounds.
Mass Spectrometry (MS)	An analytical technique that identifies compounds by measuring their mass-to-charge ratio.	Extremely sensitive and specific; can detect trace levels of residues.	High cost; complex operation; requires skilled personnel.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)	A form of liquid chromatography that uses high pressure to separate and analyze compounds.	High resolution and sensitivity; suitable for a wide range of pesticides.	Requires solvent disposal management; expensive equipment.
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS)	A highly sensitive method that enhances Raman scattering for detecting pesticides.	Ultra-sensitive; minimal sample preparation required.	Expensive; less commonly used in routine analysis.
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)	A simple method that separates compounds on a thin layer of adsorbent material.	Cost-effective; easy to perform; good for preliminary screening.	Lower sensitivity and resolution compared to GC and HPLC.
Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)	Measures the absorption of infrared light to identify chemical compounds.	Non-destructive; fast analysis; minimal sample preparation.	Lower sensitivity compared to GC-MS and LC-MS; may be less specific.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)	Identifies chemical structures by measuring the magnetic properties of atomic nuclei.	Provides detailed structural information; non-destructive.	Expensive; may be less sensitive for low-level residues compared to other methods.