Greener
Journal of Biological Sciences Vol. 12(1),
pp. 01-10, 2022 ISSN:
2276-7762 Copyright
©2022, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
Morphometric
Characterization of Four Commercially Important Fish Species of the New Calabar River, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Department of Fisheries, Faculty of
Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, P.M.B 5323, Choba,
Rivers State, Nigeria.
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
Article
No.: 122821158 Type: Research |
Morphometric
analyses have been very useful in separating species, populations and races,
and it also helps in identification of species. The objective of this study
was to characterize four common species encountered in artisanal catches of
the New Calabar River obtained during July to
October 2018 market survey. A total of 84 individuals comprising Oreochromis niloticus
(22), Tilapia guineensis
(22), Mugil cephalus
(20) and Liza falcipinnis (20) were measured for weight (Wt) (0.01gm), total length (TL), head length (HL), body
depth (BdP), dorsal fin length (DFL), eye diameter
(ED), pectoral fin length (PFL), pelvic fin length (PeFL)
and gut length (GL) (0.01cm). The results showed negative allometric
growths pattern for the length-weight and length-gut length relationship. The
ratios of DFL/HL, DFL/TL and PFL/HL were significantly different between the
two tilapinne species (p < 0.05) while HL/TL, BdP/HL, PFL/HL, ED/HL and ED/HL were significantly
different between the mugilids (P<0.05). The
Relative Gut Length of the four species showed that tilapiine
species were herbiores (6.23±0.28 – 6.86±0.14) and mugilids omnivores (2.67±17 – 2.78±0.11).The study
contributes to our comparative knowledge of morphometric characteristics of
cichlids and mugilids in the New Calabar River. |
Accepted: 29/12/2021 Published: 20/01/2022 |
|
*Corresponding
Author Nwafili
Sylvanus Anene E-mail:
sylvanus.nwafili@ uniport.edu.ng |
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The New Calabar
River, NCR is a very important system because of the numerous economic
activities centered on it. The
communities living within the catchment area of the river rely on
it for livelihood including
artisanal capture fisheries (Ibim et al., 2016), agricultural, recreational, lumbering and sometimes,
domestic water supplies (Abu and Egenonu, 2008). Various aspects of the ecology and biology
of the fish of the NCR have been documented (Uzukwu
et al., 2013; Agbugui and Deekae,
2014; Nwineewii and Unochukwu,
2018; Dienye and Woke, 2015; Onojake
et al., 2017; Dienye and Olopade,
2018; Dienye et al., 2019; Chukwu,
2019). Nwadiaro and Ayodele
(1992) harvested fish of the families Cichlidae, Mugilidae, Clupeidae, Sciaenidae, Bagridae and Haemulidae in the Choba axis
while Olori (1995) cited in Ibim
et al. (2016) reported 14 fish
species including Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus,
Chrysicthys auratus, Tilapia Malanorium,
Chromidotilapia guentheri, Hemichromis elongatus,
Tilapia mariae, Pellonala afzeliusi, Psettias sebae, Alestes nurse, Alestes longipenus, Eliotris diaganensis, Channa obscura, Hepsetus odoe and Brienomyias niger.
Dickson et al. (1999) reported that
species belonging to the families of Bagridae and Cichlidae were more abundant in the NCR. In a more recent study, Ibim
et al. (2016) reported 61 species
belonging to 54 genera and 41 families in the lower and upper reaches of the
river.
Anthropogenic inputs
into the NCR is huge, putting fish populations at risk; thus, necessitating
proper documentation of fish species that could lead to good management
practices and culture. Biometric data have important applications in the
identifications of species and design of improvement programmes.
Knowledge of biometric variations is necessary for the description of species
and Umaru et al. (2015) noted that understanding of
the differences in morphometric and meristic characters of fish stocks give
vital clues about their phylogenetics and provide information
that could be useful for genetic improvement. Morphological parameters and
biometrical characteristics have remained the simplest and most direct among
methods of species identification (Turan et al., 2004).
The objective of this
study is to morphologically characterize and determine the gut length of four
commercial fish species of the New Calabar River
obtained during a fish market survey from July to October, 2018. The Choba fish
market is a small market which receives supply of fresh fish from artisanal
fishers of the NCR. The fish mongers rotate their activities on alternate days.
Characterization of the gut length is fundamental to understanding dietary
preferences and feeding habits of different fish species. The gut length, in
particular, provides important information on species’ feeding habits (Kramer
and Bryant 1995) and it can be used as a reference point for interspecific
comparisons (e.g., Al-Hussaini 1947). Differences in gut length of closely related species is used
as good predictor of dietary habits. Thus, the relationship between gut length
and total length are especially important for ecomorphological
studies (Motta, 1988).
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Sample Collection
Samples of predominant fishes comprising 22
individuals each of Tilapia guineensis and Oreochromis niloticus and 20 individuals each of Mugil cephalus and Liza falcipinnis
were obtained during market survey of common fishes among fish mongers at the Choba fresh fish market. While O. niloticus
and T. guineensis are tialapinne
cichclids, M. cephalus and
L. falcipinnis belong to the mugilids. Choba market is one of the landing sites on the bank of the
New Calabar River. Monthly purchasing of the specimen was taken for four
months (July to October 2018).The fish specimen were transported in plastic
containers containing ice block to keep the fish fresh.
After the
identification, the total weight (Wt) of individual
species was measured (nearest 0.01gm) using a digital balance. The following
morphometric characters were measured to the nearest 0.1cm in individuals of
each species: total length (TL), head length (HL), head width (HW), eye
diameter (ED), pectoral fin length (PFL), pelvic fin length (PeFL) and dorsal fin length (DFL).
To obtain the
Relative Gut Length, RGL, each individual was split open with the aid of
scissors to expose the viscera. The gut was detached, uncoiled and after
carefully removing mesenteric connective tissues, it was measured as Gut Length
(GL) with a measuring tape to the nearest 0.01cm. The GL was determined following Hyslop (1980), Ribble and Smith
(1983), Kramer and Bryant (1995).
Data
analysis
The data were analyzed using the SPSS v-20
(Statistical Packages for Social Sciences), Medcalc and PAST32b computer software. The
estimation of species Length-weight relationship will be done using the formula
W=aLb, which was transformed into natural
logarithmic form In W=Log a+b Log L, where W=body
weight (g), L=Total length (cm), ‘a’ is a constant; ‘b’ is exponent: allometric coefficient.
The parabolic equation according to Ribble and
Smith (1983), Y= a.Xb, or GL = aTLb (Hyslop, 1980,
Kramer and Bryant, 1995) was used to express the relationship between the gut
length (Y=axis) and total body length X-axis). Gut length, total length, and
relative gut length measurements were log transformed to meet the assumption of
normal distribution of data. The means of the morphometric traits were compared
between the two similar species using the t-test.
Figure 1
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSIONS
The range
and means ± standard deviation values of morphometric characters for the
species are presented in Tables 1-4. The total length and weight of T. guineensis, O. niloticus, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis were 9-18.1cm
( and 11-104 g (
= 57.88±29.26g), 11-16.5cm (
= 13.35±1.51cm) and 23.0-66.0g (
39.2±12.74g),
14-23cm
and 26-90g (
and 14.5-21cm
and 28-94g (
,
respectively. Kurton and Adeniyi (2014)
reported standard length of 13-15cm for T.
guineensis of the Lagos Lagoon and Badagry Lagoon. Similarly, Azua et al. (2017) obtained the means of
15.51 g and 10.76 cm, respectively for body weight and total length in O. niloticus. Kolawole-Daniels et al. (2017) reported from the Lagos Lagoon
that the total length (TL) of M. cephalus ranged between 12.5 to 28.7cm (
16.9±0.14cm),
weight ranged between 20.5 to 196.4g (
49.9±1.53g)
and that of L. falcipinnis ranged
in total length
from 12.5 to
21.5cm (
17.06±0.13
cm) and weight ranged from 20.1g to 180g (
81.76±2.9g).
The
HL in this study were 2.5-4.6, 2.6-4.5, 3.0-4.5 and 3.1-4.5 for T. guineesis, O. niloticus, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis, respectively. There was no difference (P =
1.00) between the HL of M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis. Likewise there was no difference (P = 0.95)
between the HL of the two tilapiine species. The HW significantly differed between the L. falcipinnis and M. cephalus (P =
0.0004) but not between O. niloticus and T. guineensis (P = 0.53). The range of HL in our study is
within the range of 4.2-4.5cm reported by Kurton and Adeniyi (2014) and Olufeagba et al. (2015) for T. guineensis in the Badagry
Creek and Lagos Lagoon and Cichlids of Kainji Lake,
respectively. Azua et al. (2017) obtained mean HL of 3.68 cm for O. niloticus while Raj et al. (2016) obtained mean HL of 6.68cm
for O. niloticus
in lentic habitats of Kerala. The differences observed in this study and those
under reference may be due to various factors such as food availability,
environmental conditions, stage of maturity and seasonal changes, mortality
rate or recruitment or fishing pressure all of which ultimately accumulating in
racial differences.
The
DFL showed significant difference between the tilapinnes
(P = 0.0095) and non-significant in the mugilids (P =
0.57). other paramenters
including PeFL and PFL were not also signicantly different from each other between the tilapias
(P = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively). Similarly, DFL, PeFL
and PFL showed no difference between the two mugilids
(P = 0.57, 0.058 and 0.056, respectively). For the tilapinnes,
the BdP (P =0.029) also differed.
The
eye diameter, ED in this study were in the range of 0.6-1.2cm, 0.7-1.5cm,
0.5-1.2cm and 1.0 -2.1cm for O. niloticus, M. cephalus, T. guineensis and L. falcipinnis,
respectively. Statistically, t-test showed there was no difference in ED between
the two tilapiine species (P = 0.53); however, the
parameter showed significant difference between the mugilids
(P = 0.003). Khayyami et al. (2015) reported ED of 1.11 and 1.10 for two populations of M. cephalus in
the Persian Gulf. In the Badagry Creek and Lagos
Lagoon, ED in T. guineensis
ranged between 1.2-1.3cm (Kurton and Adeniyi, 2014). Similar ED (1.30-1.54 cm) was measured for
invasive Oreochromis aureus in
inland waters of Iran (Valikhani et al., 2016). This result is also in agreement with Olufeagba et al.
(2015). However, For L. falcipinnis of Badagry Creek
according to Lawson et al. (2010),
ED varied between 6 and 12mm
(0.6-1.2cm). Bhatt and Mankodi (2020) also reported
ED of 2.1cm for M. cephalus
in Sabarmati Rivers in India. The ED of a fish may be influenced by level of
water pollution and turbidity.
The gut length and mean gut length are given in Table
1-4. The gut length (GL) ranged from 72 – 110 cm in O. niloticus, 60-135cm in T. guineensis,
35-70cm in M. cephalus
and 25-70cm in L. falcipinnis.
The gut lengths were 6.67 – 7.46, 6.55 – 6.67, 2.5-3.04 and 1.72 – 3.33 times
the TL for T. guineensis,
O. niloticus,
M. cephalus
and L falcipinis,
respectively. The highest mean RGL of 6.86 ± 0.14 and 6.23 ±0.28 were found for
O. niloticus
and T. guineensis,
respectively. There was no significant difference between the two (P>0.5).
Similarly, mean RGL for the mugilids were 2.26±0.17
and 2.78±0.11 for L. falcipinnis
and M. cephalus,
respectively. Relative gut lengths in vertebrates have long been studied and
compared within and among species (e.g., Al-Hussaini
1947). The GL/ TL ratio is useful in classifying fishes into trophic levels.
According to Al-Hussaini (1947) and Kapoor et al.
(1975), carnivores, omnivores and herbivores have RGL generally ranging from
0.5–2.4, 0.8–5.0 and 2–21, respectively. Information on the ratio of GL to body
length in Nigerian fishes are scarce in the
literature. When taken into consideration the GL and RGL index values for the mugilids and tilapias examined in this study, it can be
seen that the computed values are compatible with those reported by (Karachle and Stergiou, 2010; Al-Hussaini 1947; Kapoor et al., 1975) for ranking of the feeding
relationship. For example, Crosetti (2015) reported
that grey mullets are omninivores while tilapias are
herbivores (Getachew and Fernado,
1989). However, Edema and Aiguobasinmwin (2007) and Edema and Ojieh
(2006) found the ratio of 3.0 and 9.0, respectively Tilapia mariae. Dankwa,
et al. (2005) reported relative gut
length of M. cephalus
in the Volta estuary to be 4.56 while in the Pra estuary
the longest relative gut length of 4.33 was calculated for L. falcipinnis, concluding that the
species were herbivorous. It has been observed that herbivores have longer guts
needed to digest low quality fibre-rich diets than
more easily digestible protein-rich foods (German and Horn 2006, Olsson et al. 2007, Wagner et al. 2009). The present
study shows from the gut length that T. guineensis and O.
niloticus are herbivorus
while those of mugilidae also indicated either omnivory or herbivory. Gut morphologies
have been shown to be plastic, varying among individuals within a species in
relation to different diets (e.g., Raubenheimer and Bassil, 2007). In the same species of guppy, GL adapted to
changes in environment. In the same species, Zandonà
et al. (2015) found that population of origin and the environment also
influenced.
Table
1: Descriptive statistics for Tilapia guineensis from
New Calabar River
TL |
WT |
ED |
PFL |
PeFL |
DFL |
HW |
BdP |
GL |
RGL |
HL |
|
Min |
9 |
11 |
0.5 |
2.1 |
1.2 |
4 |
2.5 |
3.4 |
60 |
4.63 |
2.5 |
Max |
18.1 |
104 |
1.2 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
9.5 |
4.7 |
8.1 |
135 |
9.05 |
4.6 |
Mean |
14.26 |
57.88 |
0.96 |
3.69 |
3.01 |
6.77 |
3.75 |
5.78 |
90.96 |
6.23 |
3.70 |
Std. error |
0.54 |
5.85 |
0.04 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.31 |
0.13 |
0.27 |
3.41 |
0.28 |
0.12 |
Variance |
7.35 |
856 |
0.03 |
0.53 |
0.70 |
2.37 |
0.44 |
1.79 |
290.6 |
1.72 |
0.37 |
Stand. Dev |
2.71 |
29.26 |
0.18 |
0.73 |
0.84 |
1.54 |
0.67 |
1.34 |
17.05 |
1.31 |
0.61 |
Coeff. Var |
19.02 |
50.55 |
18.67 |
19.78 |
27.87 |
22.73 |
17.78 |
23.16 |
18.74 |
21.08 |
16.43 |
Table
2: Descriptive statistics for Oreochromis niloticus from New Calabar River
TL |
WT |
ED |
PFL |
Pel L |
DFL |
HW |
BdP |
GL |
RGL |
HL |
|
Min |
11.0 |
23.0 |
0.6 |
3 |
1.5 |
4.5 |
3 |
4 |
72 |
5.77 |
2.6 |
Max |
16.5 |
66.0 |
1.2 |
5.2 |
3.9 |
7.2 |
4.5 |
6.3 |
110 |
8.67 |
4.5 |
Mean |
13.35 |
39.92 |
0.99 |
4 |
2.61 |
5.78 |
3.64 |
5.06 |
91.1 |
6.86 |
3.69 |
Std. error |
0.30 |
2.55 |
0.03 |
0.1 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
0.09 |
0.13 |
1.75 |
0.14 |
0.10 |
Variance |
2.29 |
162.33 |
0.02 |
0.23 |
0.27 |
0.55 |
0.22 |
0.43 |
77 |
0.44 |
0.26 |
Stand. dev |
1.51 |
12.74 |
0.14 |
0.48 |
0.52 |
0.74 |
0.47 |
0.66 |
8.77 |
0.63 |
0.51 |
Coeff. Var |
11.32 |
31.92 |
13.93 |
12.1 |
19.90 |
12.82 |
12.87 |
12.98 |
9.63 |
9.25 |
13.83 |
Table
3: Descriptive statistics for M. cephalus from New Calabar
River
TL |
WT |
ED |
PFL |
Pel L |
DFL |
HW |
BdP |
GL |
RGL |
HL |
|
Min |
14 |
26 |
0.7 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
3 |
4.2 |
35 |
1.9 |
3 |
Max |
23 |
90 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
2.7 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
6 |
70 |
3.94 |
4.5 |
Mean |
18.97 |
59.85 |
1.1 |
2.65 |
2.21 |
3.2 |
3.67 |
4.99 |
52.65 |
2.78 |
3.91 |
Std. error |
0.51 |
4.17 |
0.04 |
0.11 |
0.07 |
0.15 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
2.40 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
Variance |
5.21 |
347.82 |
0.04 |
0.26 |
0.11 |
0.47 |
0.24 |
0.35 |
114.77 |
0.25 |
0.18 |
Stand. dev |
2.28 |
18.65 |
0.20 |
0.51 |
0.33 |
0.69 |
0.49 |
0.59 |
10.71 |
0.50 |
0.43 |
Coeff. Var |
12.03 |
31.16 |
17.94 |
19.22 |
14.96 |
21.46 |
13.26 |
11.90 |
20.35 |
17.82 |
11.01 |
Table 4: Descriptive statistics for Liza falcipinnis from New Calabar
River
TL |
WT |
ED |
PFL |
Pel L |
DFL |
HW |
BdP |
GL |
RGL |
HL |
|
Min |
14.5 |
28 |
1 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1 |
2.5 |
25 |
1.66 |
3.1 |
Max |
21 |
94 |
2.1 |
3.5 |
2.6 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
5.7 |
70 |
3.33 |
4.5 |
Mean |
17 |
45.4 |
1.44 |
2.35 |
1.99 |
3.07 |
2.82 |
4.22 |
39.1 |
2.26 |
3.91 |
Std. error |
0.71 |
6.86 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.12 |
0.24 |
0.26 |
0.32 |
4.70 |
0.17 |
0.14 |
Variance |
5.03 |
471.20 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.14 |
0.58 |
0.70 |
1.04 |
220.32 |
0.29 |
0.19 |
Stand. Dev |
2.24 |
21.71 |
0.43 |
0.45 |
0.38 |
0.76 |
0.84 |
1.02 |
14.84 |
0.54 |
0.44 |
Coeff. Var |
13.2 |
47.81 |
30.04 |
19.16 |
19.02 |
24.8 |
29.61 |
24.13 |
37.96 |
24.05 |
11.21 |
Length-weight and
Length-gut length relationships
The
regression equation for estimating length-weight and length-gut length
relationships are shown in Figs. 2-5 and Table 5. The regression coefficient
(b) values of fish species were less than 3, ranging from 1.24 – 1.91. Since
the value b is less than 3, growth is negatively allometric
in which the rate of increase in body length of the fish species is not
proportional to the rate of increase in their body weight. Regression
coefficient of 3 indicates isometric growth or maintenance of dimensional
equality as the organism grows (Thomas et
al., 2003; Olurin and Aderibigbe,
2006). Famoofo
and Abdul (2020) reported similar b values of 1.067 while Obasohan
et al. (2012) and Dan-Kishiya (2013) reported a range
of 1.4–1.6 for Tilapia mariae. In line with the findings of this study,
several authors have reported negative allometric
growths (b < 2.5) which are outside the expected range of 2.5 < b <
3.5 (Carlander, 1969; Pauly
and Gayanilo, 1997) for different cichlid fish
species from various water bodies, despite using a large number of specimen.
For instance, Gatso et al. (2017) reported a range of values of b (0.14–0.8) for O. niloticus
in their study conducted on Wudil River, Kano,
Nigeria. In the study of Atama et al. (2013), wherein
a total 7091 individual specimen were used, recorded b values of 0.32 for male H. fasciatus,
1.682 for female and 0.738 for the combined sexes; 0.549 in the dry season and
0.233 in wet season. This range of values (0.233–1.682) for b was far below the
one (2.42) recorded in this study.
The TL-GL relationship returned a negative allometric growth pattern (Table 5 and Fig. 2-5). The
values of the slope of the regression, b were 0.6866, 1.2367, 0.397 and 0.2867
for T. guineensis,
O. niloticus, M. cephalus
and L. falcipinnis,
respectively. The coefficient of correlations were weak, being 0.010, 0.166,
0.179 and 0.364 respectively for T. guineensis, O. nilotius, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis.
Table 5: Summary of
Length-weight and Length-Gut relationship parameters of Mugil cephalus, Liza falcipinnis, Oreochromis niloticus and Tilapia guineensis from the New Calabar River, Nigeria.
FISH SPECIES |
LOG TRANSFORMED
LENGTH |
REGRESSION EQUATION |
R2 |
Tilapia
guineensis |
Transformed total length |
W = 1.6161 L1.1676 |
0.4326 |
Transformed gut
length |
W = 1.7196 GL0.6866 |
0.1044 |
|
Oreochromis niloticus |
Transformed total length |
W = 1.5553 L1.2811 |
0.5436 |
Transformed gut
length |
W = 1.6637 GL1.2367 |
0.4079 |
|
Mugil
cephalus |
Transformed total length |
W = 1.3649 L1.5693 |
0.8642 |
Transformed gut
length |
W = 2.0075 GL0.397 |
0.4236 |
|
Liza
falcipinus |
Transformed total length |
W = 1.2872 TL1.914 |
0.6810 |
Transformed gut
length |
W = 1.9123 GL0.2867 |
0.6030 |
Fig 2:
Length-Weight and length-gut Relationship of Tilapia guineensis of New Calabar River, Nigeria
Fig.
3: Length-weight and length-gut relationship of O. niloticus from the New Calabar River, Nigeria
Fig. 4: Length-weight and
length-gut relationship of Mugil cephalus
from New Calabar River, Nigeria
Fig. 5: Length-weight and
length-gut relationship of Liza
falcipinnis from New Calabar River, Nigeria
Morphometric ratios
The
ratios of each morphometric character to TL or HL are shown in Table 6.
The ratios of DFL/HL, DFL/TL and PFL/HL
were significantly different between the two tilapinne
species (p < 0.05) while HL/TL, BdP/HL, PFL/HL,
ED/HL and ED/HL were significantly different between the mugilids
(P<0.05). These ratios could be species-specific. Conventionally, morphometric ratios can be
used in species-specific identification. High rate of interspecific breeding
among some species, for example, cichlids may influence the ratios and hinder
application. However, Solomon et al. (2015) also found significant differences
(p < 0.05) in the HL/SL ratio between wild and cultured Clarias gariepinus. This appears to be supported
by Gonzalez et al. (2016) who obtained mean values for the HL/SL ratio of
between 0.31 and 0.45 in Cichlasoma festae. This
phenotypic divergence in morphometric ratio may possibly result from change in
habitat and domestication. The value of the HL/SL ratio and other relations
among the morphometric measurements are closely identical to the species.
Perhaps, more individuals and comparison between populations is necessary in
future study to validate this result
.
Table
6: Ratio of average measurements of some morphometric characters in relation to
head length and total length
Species |
N |
ED |
PFL |
DFL |
BdP |
HL |
||||
|
|
HL |
TL |
HL |
TL |
HL |
TL |
HL |
TL |
TL |
T. guineensis |
22 |
0.26a |
0.067a |
0.99a |
0.26a |
1.83a |
0.48a |
1.56a |
0.41a |
0.26a |
O. niloticus |
22 |
0.27a |
0.074a |
1.41b |
0.30a |
1.57b |
0.43b |
1.37a |
0.38a |
0.28a |
M. cephalus |
20 |
0.28b |
0.058b |
0.68c |
0.14c |
0.82c |
0.17c |
1.28c |
0.26c |
0.21b |
L falcipinnis |
20 |
0.37c |
0.085c |
0.60d |
0.14c |
0.79c |
0.18c |
1.08d |
0.25c |
0.23c |
Values
with different superscript(s) indicated in columns (between pairs of species,
that is T. guineensis
vs O. niloticus and M. cephalus vs L. falcipinnis)
are significantly different at 5% level.
REFERENCES
Abu, G.O. and Egenonu
C. 2008.
The
current pollution status of the New Calabar River in
the Niger Delta region of Southern Nigeria: A survey of antibiogram
profiles of its bacterial isolates.
African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Vol. 2 (6), pp.
134-141
Agbugui, M. O.
and Deekae, S.N. 2014. Assessment
of the Physico-chemical Parameters and Quality of
Water of the New Calabar-Bonny River, Porthacourt, Nigeria. Cancer Biology 2014;4(1):1-9
Al-Hussaini, A.H. (1947). The feeding habits
and the morphology of the alimentary tract of some teleosts
living in the neighborhood of the Marine Biological Station, Ghardaga, Red Sea. Publication of Marine Biological Station, Ghardaga, Red Sea, 5(1947):1-61.
Atama, C.I., Okeke, O.C., Ekeh, F.N., Ezenwaji, N.E., Onah, I.E., Ivoke, N., Onoja, U.S., and Eyo, J.E., 2013, Length-weight relationship and condition
factor of six cichlids (Cichlidae perciformes)
species of Anambra river, Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculure,
4(2):82–86.
Azua, E.T., Akaahan, T.J., and Akogwu, S.A.,
2017, Variation in the morphometry measurements of
two Tilapia fish species in relation to their body weight obtained from Lower
Benue River at Makurdi, Benue State Nigeria. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal, 8:
208. doi:
10.4172/2150-3508.10002.
Bhatt, D.M., and Mankodi,
P.C., 2020, Diversity record of family mugilidae
(Curvier, 1829) from estuary of Sabarmati River, Gujarat, India. Journal of Biological Studies, 3(2):
58-68.
Carlander, K.D., 1969,
Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology. The Iowa State
University Press; Ames, IA. p. 752.
Chukwu, O. K.,
2019, Population Biology of the Sleeper fish Eleotris
vittata from New Calabar
River, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Research
& Reviews: Journal of Ecology, 2019: 8(2): 28–31p.
Dan-Kishiya, A.S., 2013, Length-weight relationship and
condition factor of five fish species from a tropical water supply reservoir in
Abuja, Nigeria. American Journal of
Research Communication, 1(9):175–178.
Dankwa,
H.R., J. Blay Jr, and Yankson, K. (2005). Food and Feeding
Habits of Grey Mullets (Pisces: Mugilidae) in Two
Estuaries in Ghana. West African Journal of Applied Ecology, 8(1): 65-77.
Dickson,
S. A., and Victor, R.P., 1999, Influence of land use on species diversity and
abundance. Niger Delta, Nigeria.
Dienye, H.E.,
and Woke, G.N., 2015, Pysico-chemical Parameters of
the Upper and Lower Reach of the New Calabar River
Niger Delta. Journal of
Fisheries and Livestock Production, 3:154. doi:10.4172/2332-2608.1000154.
Dienye, H.E., Olopade, O.A. & Ogbonnaya,
I.J. (2019). Diversity and abundance of the family Mugilidae in the New Calabar
River, Nigeria Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences, 36(3), 313-318.
Edema,
C. U. and Aiguobasinmwin, M. O. (2007).
Determination of intestine length to standard length ratio of some fishes from
the Ikpoba River and Ovia
River, Nigeria with a review of culture of Parachanna
obscura (Pisces: Channidae).
In: Araoye, P. A., Adikwu,
I. A. and Banke, R. O. K. (Eds).
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of Fisheries
Society of Nigeria (FISON), pp.106- 112.
Edema,
C. U. and Ojeh, P. A. (2006). A study of ratio of intestine length to body length in fish species
from the Okhuo River, Nigeria. In: Enin, U. I., Chukwu, E. I., Ajah, P. O., Ama-Abasi, D. A. and
Nwosu, F. M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of Fisheries Society of
Nigeria. (FISON), pp. 123- 128.
Famoofo, O.O.,
and Abdul, W.O., 2020, Biometry, condition factors and length-weight
relationships of sixteen fish species in Iwopin fresh-water
ecotype of Lekki Lagoon, Ogun
State. Heliyon, 6 (2020): e02957.
Gatso, B.U., Abdullahi, J.M., and Yola, I.A.,
2017, Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus of Wudil
River, Kano, Nigeria. Agro-Science.
16(1):1–4.
German, D.
P., and. Horn, M. H., 2006, Gut length and mass in herbivorous and carnivorous prickleback fishes (Teleostei: Stichaeidae): ontogenetic, dietary, and phylogenetic
effects. Marine Biology,
148:1123-1134.
Getachew,
T., and Fernado, C.H., 1989. The food
habits of a herbiovorous fish
(Oreochromis niloticus) in
Lake Awasa, Ethiopia. Hydobiologia, 174: 195-200.
González, M.A., Rodriguez, J.M., Angón, E., Martínez, A., Garcia,
A., and Peña, F., 2016. Characterization of
morphological and meristic traits and their variations between two different
populations (wild and cultured) of Cichlasoma festae, a species native to tropical Ecuadorian rivers.
Archives of Animal Breeding, 59:435–444.
Hyslop, E.J., 1980. Stomach
contents analysis-a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17: 411-429.
Ibim A.T., Gogo, O.O., and Igbani, F., 2016,. The Ichthyofaunal Assemblage of
the Lower and Upper Reaches of New Calabar River,
Rivers State, Niger Delta, Nigeria, Journal
of Environment and Earth Science, 6(9): 186-197.
Kapoor, B.G., Smit, H., and Verighina, A.I.,
1975, The alimentary canal and digestion in teleosts. Advances in
Marine Biology, 13:109–239.
Karachle, P.K., and Stergiou, K.I., 2010, Intestıne morphometric of fıshes:
A compilation and analysis of bibliographic data. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 40(1): 45–54.
Khayyami,
H., Zolgharnein, H., Negin,
S., and Abdolali, M., 2015, Morphological variability
of Mugil cephalus
(Linnaeus, 1758) from Bandar Abbas Port and Qeshm
Island in Northeastern Persian Gulf. International Journal of Pure and Applied
Zoology, (3) 2: 103-112.
Kolawole-Daniels,
A.O., Fola-Mathews, O. O., and Nicholas, E., 2017.
Comparative study on length weight relationship of the grey mullet Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus 1758)
and sickle fin Liza falcipinnis (Valenciennes,
1836) from Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria. International
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 5(5): 17-20.
Kramer,
D.L. and Bryant M.J., 1995, Intestine length in the fishes of a tropical stream. 1.
Ontogenetic allometry. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 42: 115–127.
Kurton, M.P.,
and Adeniyi, B.T., 2014. Morphological variations of Tilapia guineensis
(Bleeker 1862) and Sarotherodon melanotheron (Ruppell1852) (Pisces: Cichlidea) from Badagry and Lagos
lagoon, South-West, Nigeria. J Fisheries Livest Prod
2: 112. doi:
10.4172/2332-2608.100011.
Lawson,
E.O., 1991, Biology of the Grey mullet, Mugil cephalus, L. in Lagos lagoon, Nigeria. M.Sc dissertation, University of
Lagos, Nigeria. 1991, 88
Motta,
P.J., 1988. Functional morphology of the feeding apparatus of
ten species of Pacific butterfly fishes (Perciformes,
Chaetodontidae), an ecomorphological
approach. Environmental Biology of
Fishes, 22:39.67.
Nwadiaro,
C. S., and Ayodele, R.O.O., 1992, Contribution to the
biology of Sarotherodon melanotheron
in the New Calabar River (Nigeria). Acta hydrobiologia,. 34(3): 287-300.
Nwineewii, Jack Dumka and
Unochukwu Peace U.G. 2018. An Evaluation
of the Level
of Some Physicochemical Parameters
in the New Calabar River,
Rivers State, Nigeria. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2018,
5(3):135-142.
Obasohan, E.E., Obasohan, E.E., Imasuen, J.A.,
and Isidahome, C.E., 2012, Preliminary studies of the
length-weight relationships and condition factor of five species from Ibiekuma stream, Ekpoma, Edo
state, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural
Research and Development, 2:061–069.
Olori, O. O., 1995, The Nature and Relative Abundance of Fish in the New Calabar River, Choba, Rivers
State. Pp
26.
Olsson,
J., Quevedo, M., Colson, C., and Svanback,
R., 2007, Gut length plasticity in perch: into the bowels of resource
polymorphisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90:517-523.
Olufeagba, S.O., Aladele, S.E., Okomoda, V.T, Sifau, M.O., Ajayi, D.A., Oduoye, O.T., Bolatito, O.A, Nden, D.S,, Fabunmi-Tolase
A.S. and Hassan, T. 2015. Morphological Variation of Cichlids
from Kainji Lake, Nigeria. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com,
9(3): 070-080.
Olurin, K.B., and Aderibigbe O.A., 2006, Length-weight relationship and
condition factor of pond reared Oreochromis niloticus. World
Journal of Zoology, 1(2):82–85.
Onojake,
M.C., Sikoki, F.D., Omokheyeke,
O. and Akpiri, R.U. 2017. Surface
water characteristics and trace metals level of the Bonny/New Calabar River Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria.
Appl Water
Sci 7, 951–959 (2017).
Pauly
D., Gayanilo F.C., Jr. 1997. An Alternative Approach to Estimating the Parameters of a
Length-Weight Relationship from Length Frequency Samples and their Bulk.
NAGA ICLARM.
Pauly,
D., 1984. Fish population dynamic in tropical waters: a manual for
use with programmable calculators. Naga
ICLARM Quarterly, 5-95.
Raj, S., Kumar, A.B., and Abraham, K.M.,
2016.
Length-weight and length-length telationship
of invasive alien Species, Oreochromis niloticus from lentic habitats of Palakkad District,
Kerala. Journal of Aquatic Biology
and Fisheries, 4: 41-146.
Ribble,
D.O., and M.H. Smith. 1983. Relative intestine length and feeding
ecology of freshwater fishes. Growth, 47:292‑300.
Solomon,
S.O., Okomoda, V.T. and Ogbenyikwu,
A.I., 2015. Intraspecific morphological variation between cultured and wild Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) (Clariidae.; Siluriformes). Arch. Pol.
Fisheries, 23: 53–61.
Stergiou, K.I.,
and Moutopoulos, D.K., 2001, A
review of length-weigth relationships of fishes from
Greek marine waters. Naga ICLARM
Quarterly, 24 (1-2): 23–39.
Thomas, J., Venus, S.D., and Kurup, B.M., 2003, Length-weight relationship of some deep
sea fishes inhabiting the continental slope beyond 250m depth long west coast
of India Naga. ICLARM Quarterly, 26:17–21.
Turan,
C., Erguden, D., Turan, F.,
and Gurlek, M., 2004, Genetic and morphologic
structure of Liza Abu (Heckel, 1843) populations from the Rivers Orontes,
Euphrates and Tigris. Turkish
Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 28:729–734
Umaru, J.A., Annune, P.A., Cheikyula, J.O.,
and Okomoda, V.T., 2015. Some biometricparameters
of four selected fish species in doma Dam, Nassarawa state, Nigeria.
International Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 5 (31): 1–7.
Uzukwu, P.U. and
Leton, T.C. and Jamabo,
N.A. (2013) Survey of physical characteristics of the upper reaches of new Calabar River, Niger Delta, Nigeria. In: 28th Annual
Conference of the Fisheries Society of Nigeria (FISON) ,
25-29 Nov 2013 ,Abuja, Nigeria, pp. 206-210.
Valikhani, H., Abdoli, A., Kiabi, H.B and Nejat,
F. 2016. First record and distribution of the blue tilapia, Oreochromis
aureus (Steindachner, 1864)
(Perciformes: Cichlidae) in
inland waters of Iran. Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March
2016), 3(1): 19–24.
Wagner,
C. E., McIntyre, P. B., Buels, K. S., Gilbert, D. M.
and Michel. E., 2009, Diet predicts intestine length in Lake
Tanganyika's cichlid fishes. Functional
Ecology, 23:1122-1131.
Zandonà, E.,
Auer, S.K., Kilham, S.S., and Reznick,
D.N., 2015. Contrasting Population and Diet Influences on Gut
Length of an Omnivorous Tropical Fish, the Trinidadian Guppy (Poecilia reticulata).
PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136079. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0136079.