Greener Journal of Biological Sciences

Vol. 12(1), pp. 01-10, 2022

ISSN: 2276-7762

Copyright ©2022, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s)

http://gjournals.org/GJBS

 

 

Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\user\Pictures\Journal Logos\GJBS Logo.jpg

 

 

 

 

Morphometric Characterization of Four Commercially Important Fish Species of the New Calabar River, Rivers State, Nigeria.

 

 

Nwafili Sylvanus Anene

 

 

Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, P.M.B 5323, Choba, Rivers State, Nigeria.

 

 

 

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

 

Article No.: 122821158

Type: Research

Full text: HTML, PDF, EPUB, PHP

 

Morphometric analyses have been very useful in separating species, populations and races, and it also helps in identification of species. The objective of this study was to characterize four common species encountered in artisanal catches of the New Calabar River obtained during July to October 2018 market survey. A total of 84 individuals comprising Oreochromis niloticus (22), Tilapia guineensis (22), Mugil cephalus (20) and Liza falcipinnis  (20) were measured for weight (Wt) (0.01gm), total length (TL), head length (HL), body depth (BdP), dorsal fin length (DFL), eye diameter (ED), pectoral fin length (PFL), pelvic fin length (PeFL) and gut length (GL) (0.01cm). The results showed negative allometric growths pattern for the length-weight and length-gut length relationship. The ratios of DFL/HL, DFL/TL and PFL/HL were significantly different between the two tilapinne species (p < 0.05) while HL/TL, BdP/HL, PFL/HL, ED/HL and ED/HL were significantly different between the mugilids (P<0.05). The Relative Gut Length of the four species showed that tilapiine species were herbiores (6.23±0.28 – 6.86±0.14) and mugilids omnivores (2.67±17 – 2.78±0.11).The study contributes to our comparative knowledge of morphometric characteristics of cichlids and mugilids in the New Calabar River.

 

Accepted:  29/12/2021

Published: 20/01/2022

 

*Corresponding Author

Nwafili Sylvanus Anene

E-mail: sylvanus.nwafili@ uniport.edu.ng

 

Keywords: Mugil cephalus; Oreochromis niloticus; New Calabar River; Gut-length; Relative gut length.

 

 

 

 

 

 


INTRODUCTION                                                                                                                          

 

The New Calabar River, NCR is a very important system because of the numerous economic activities centered on it. The  communities  living within  the catchment area of the river rely  on  it  for livelihood including artisanal capture fisheries (Ibim et al., 2016), agricultural,  recreational, lumbering and  sometimes,  domestic  water supplies (Abu and Egenonu, 2008). Various aspects of the ecology and biology of the fish of the NCR have been documented (Uzukwu et al., 2013; Agbugui and Deekae, 2014; Nwineewii and Unochukwu, 2018; Dienye and Woke, 2015; Onojake et al., 2017; Dienye and Olopade, 2018; Dienye et al., 2019; Chukwu, 2019). Nwadiaro and Ayodele (1992) harvested fish of the families Cichlidae, Mugilidae, Clupeidae, Sciaenidae, Bagridae and Haemulidae in the Choba axis while Olori (1995) cited in Ibim et al. (2016) reported 14 fish species including Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus, Chrysicthys auratus, Tilapia Malanorium, Chromidotilapia guentheri, Hemichromis elongatus, Tilapia mariae, Pellonala afzeliusi, Psettias sebae, Alestes nurse, Alestes longipenus, Eliotris diaganensis, Channa obscura, Hepsetus odoe and Brienomyias niger. Dickson et al. (1999) reported that species belonging to the families of Bagridae and Cichlidae were more abundant in the NCR.  In a more recent study, Ibim et al. (2016) reported 61 species belonging to 54 genera and 41 families in the lower and upper reaches of the river.

Anthropogenic inputs into the NCR is huge, putting fish populations at risk; thus, necessitating proper documentation of fish species that could lead to good management practices and culture. Biometric data have important applications in the identifications of species and design of improvement programmes. Knowledge of biometric variations is necessary for the description of species and Umaru et al. (2015) noted that understanding of the differences in morphometric and meristic characters of fish stocks give vital clues about their phylogenetics and provide information that could be useful for genetic improvement. Morphological parameters and biometrical characteristics have remained the simplest and most direct among methods of species identification (Turan et al., 2004).

The objective of this study is to morphologically characterize and determine the gut length of four commercial fish species of the New Calabar River obtained during a fish market survey from July to October, 2018.  The Choba fish market is a small market which receives supply of fresh fish from artisanal fishers of the NCR. The fish mongers rotate their activities on alternate days. Characterization of the gut length is fundamental to understanding dietary preferences and feeding habits of different fish species. The gut length, in particular, provides important information on species’ feeding habits (Kramer and Bryant 1995) and it can be used as a reference point for interspecific comparisons (e.g., Al-Hussaini 1947). Differences in gut length of closely related species is used as good predictor of dietary habits. Thus, the relationship between gut length and total length are especially important for ecomorphological studies (Motta, 1988).

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Sample Collection

 

Samples of predominant fishes comprising 22 individuals each of Tilapia guineensis and Oreochromis niloticus and 20 individuals each of Mugil cephalus and Liza falcipinnis were obtained during market survey of common fishes among fish mongers at the Choba fresh fish market. While O. niloticus and T. guineensis are tialapinne cichclids, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis belong to the  mugilids. Choba market is one of the landing sites on the bank of the New Calabar River. Monthly  purchasing of the specimen was taken for four months (July to October 2018).The fish specimen were transported in plastic containers containing ice block to keep the fish fresh.

After the identification, the total weight (Wt) of individual species was measured (nearest 0.01gm) using a digital balance. The following morphometric characters were measured to the nearest 0.1cm in individuals of each species: total length (TL), head length (HL), head width (HW), eye diameter (ED), pectoral fin length (PFL), pelvic fin length (PeFL) and dorsal fin length (DFL).

To obtain the Relative Gut Length, RGL, each individual was split open with the aid of scissors to expose the viscera. The gut was detached, uncoiled and after carefully removing mesenteric connective tissues, it was measured as Gut Length (GL) with a measuring tape to the nearest 0.01cm. The GL was determined following Hyslop (1980), Ribble and Smith (1983),  Kramer and Bryant (1995).

 

Data analysis

 

The data were analyzed using the SPSS v-20 (Statistical Packages for Social Sciences), Medcalc  and PAST32b computer software. The estimation of species Length-weight relationship will be done using the formula W=aLb, which was transformed into natural logarithmic form In W=Log a+b Log L, where W=body weight (g), L=Total length (cm), ‘a’ is a constant; ‘b’ is exponent: allometric coefficient.    The parabolic equation according to Ribble and Smith (1983), Y= a.Xb, or GL = aTLb (Hyslop, 1980, Kramer and Bryant, 1995) was used to express the relationship between the gut length (Y=axis) and total body length X-axis). Gut length, total length, and relative gut length measurements were log transformed to meet the assumption of normal distribution of data. The means of the morphometric traits were compared between the two similar species using the t-test.

 

 

 


Description: victorias map.jpg

Figure 1

 

 


 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

 

The range and means ± standard deviation values of morphometric characters for the species are presented in Tables 1-4. The total length and weight of T. guineensis, O. niloticus, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis were 9-18.1cm ( and 11-104 g ( = 57.88±29.26g), 11-16.5cm ( = 13.35±1.51cm) and 23.0-66.0g ( 39.2±12.74g), 14-23cm  and 26-90g ( and 14.5-21cm  and 28-94g (, respectively.  Kurton and Adeniyi (2014) reported standard length of 13-15cm for T. guineensis of the Lagos Lagoon and Badagry Lagoon. Similarly, Azua et al. (2017) obtained the means of 15.51 g and 10.76 cm, respectively for body weight and total length in O. niloticus. Kolawole-Daniels et  al. (2017) reported from the Lagos Lagoon that the total length (TL) of M. cephalus ranged between 12.5 to 28.7cm (16.9±0.14cm), weight ranged between 20.5 to 196.4g ( 49.9±1.53g)  and  that  of L. falcipinnis ranged  in  total  length  from  12.5  to  21.5cm  (17.06±0.13 cm) and weight ranged from 20.1g to 180g ( 81.76±2.9g). 

The HL in this study were 2.5-4.6, 2.6-4.5, 3.0-4.5 and 3.1-4.5 for T. guineesis, O. niloticus, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis, respectively. There was no difference (P = 1.00) between the HL of M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis. Likewise there was no difference (P = 0.95) between the HL of the two tilapiine species.  The HW significantly differed between the L. falcipinnis and M. cephalus (P = 0.0004) but not between O. niloticus and T. guineensis (P = 0.53). The range of HL in our study is within the range of 4.2-4.5cm reported by Kurton and Adeniyi (2014) and Olufeagba et al. (2015) for T. guineensis in the Badagry Creek and Lagos Lagoon and Cichlids of Kainji Lake, respectively. Azua et al. (2017) obtained mean HL of 3.68 cm for O. niloticus while Raj et al. (2016) obtained mean HL of 6.68cm for O. niloticus in lentic habitats of Kerala. The differences observed in this study and those under reference may be due to various factors such as food availability, environmental conditions, stage of maturity and seasonal changes, mortality rate or recruitment or fishing pressure all of which ultimately accumulating in racial differences.

The DFL showed significant difference between the tilapinnes (P = 0.0095) and non-significant in the mugilids (P = 0.57). other paramenters including PeFL and PFL were not also signicantly different from each other between the tilapias (P = 0.06 and 0.10, respectively). Similarly, DFL, PeFL and PFL showed no difference between the two mugilids (P = 0.57, 0.058 and 0.056, respectively). For the tilapinnes, the BdP (P =0.029) also differed.

The eye diameter, ED in this study were in the range of 0.6-1.2cm, 0.7-1.5cm, 0.5-1.2cm and 1.0 -2.1cm for O. niloticus, M. cephalus, T. guineensis and L. falcipinnis, respectively. Statistically, t-test showed there was no difference in ED between the two tilapiine species (P = 0.53); however, the parameter showed significant difference between the mugilids (P = 0.003). Khayyami et al. (2015) reported ED of 1.11 and 1.10 for two populations of M. cephalus in the Persian Gulf. In the Badagry Creek and Lagos Lagoon, ED in T. guineensis ranged between 1.2-1.3cm (Kurton and Adeniyi, 2014). Similar ED (1.30-1.54 cm) was measured for invasive Oreochromis aureus in inland waters of Iran (Valikhani et al., 2016). This result is also in agreement with Olufeagba et al. (2015). However, For L. falcipinnis of Badagry Creek according to Lawson et al. (2010), ED   varied between 6 and 12mm (0.6-1.2cm). Bhatt and Mankodi (2020) also reported ED of 2.1cm for M. cephalus in Sabarmati Rivers in India. The ED of a fish may be influenced by level of water pollution and turbidity.

The gut length and mean gut length are given in Table 1-4. The gut length (GL) ranged from 72 – 110 cm in O. niloticus, 60-135cm in T. guineensis, 35-70cm in M. cephalus and 25-70cm in L. falcipinnis. The gut lengths were 6.67 – 7.46, 6.55 – 6.67, 2.5-3.04 and 1.72 – 3.33 times the TL for T. guineensis, O. niloticus, M. cephalus and L falcipinis, respectively. The highest mean RGL of 6.86 ± 0.14 and 6.23 ±0.28 were found for O. niloticus and T. guineensis, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two (P>0.5). Similarly, mean RGL for the mugilids were 2.26±0.17 and 2.78±0.11 for L. falcipinnis and M. cephalus, respectively. Relative gut lengths in vertebrates have long been studied and compared within and among species (e.g., Al-Hussaini 1947). The GL/ TL ratio is useful in classifying fishes into trophic levels. According to Al-Hussaini (1947) and Kapoor et al. (1975), carnivores, omnivores and herbivores have RGL generally ranging from 0.5–2.4, 0.8–5.0 and 2–21, respectively. Information on the ratio of GL to body length in Nigerian fishes are scarce in the literature. When taken into consideration the GL and RGL index values for the mugilids and tilapias examined in this study, it can be seen that the computed values are compatible with those reported by (Karachle and Stergiou, 2010; Al-Hussaini 1947; Kapoor et al., 1975) for ranking of the feeding relationship. For example, Crosetti (2015) reported that grey mullets are omninivores while tilapias are herbivores (Getachew and Fernado, 1989).  However, Edema and Aiguobasinmwin (2007) and Edema and Ojieh (2006) found the ratio of 3.0 and 9.0, respectively Tilapia mariae. Dankwa, et al. (2005) reported relative gut length of M. cephalus in the Volta estuary to be 4.56 while in the Pra estuary the longest relative gut length of 4.33 was calculated for L. falcipinnis, concluding that the species were herbivorous. It has been observed that herbivores have longer guts needed to digest low quality fibre-rich diets than more easily digestible protein-rich foods (German and Horn 2006, Olsson et al. 2007, Wagner et al. 2009).  The present study shows from the gut length that T. guineensis and O. niloticus are herbivorus while those of mugilidae also indicated either omnivory or herbivory. Gut morphologies have been shown to be plastic, varying among individuals within a species in relation to different diets (e.g., Raubenheimer and Bassil, 2007). In the same species of guppy, GL adapted to changes in environment. In the same species, Zandonà et al. (2015) found that population of origin and the environment also influenced.


 

 

Table 1: Descriptive statistics for Tilapia guineensis from New Calabar River

TL

WT

ED

PFL

PeFL

DFL

HW

BdP

GL

RGL

      HL

Min

9

11

0.5

2.1

1.2

4

2.5

3.4

60

4.63

   2.5

Max

18.1

104

1.2

4.7

4.3

9.5

4.7

8.1

135

9.05

   4.6

Mean

14.26

57.88

0.96

3.69

3.01

6.77

3.75

5.78

90.96

6.23

   3.70

Std. error

0.54

5.85

0.04

0.15

0.17

0.31

0.13

0.27

3.41

0.28

0.12

Variance

7.35

856

0.03

0.53

0.70

2.37

0.44

1.79

290.6

1.72

0.37

Stand. Dev

2.71

29.26

0.18

0.73

0.84

1.54

0.67

1.34

17.05

 

1.31

0.61

Coeff. Var

19.02

50.55

18.67

19.78

27.87

22.73

17.78

23.16

18.74

21.08

16.43

 

 

Table 2:  Descriptive statistics for Oreochromis niloticus from New Calabar River

TL

WT

ED

PFL

Pel L

DFL

HW

BdP

GL

RGL

HL

Min

11.0

23.0

0.6

3

1.5

4.5

3

4

72

5.77

2.6

Max

16.5

66.0

1.2

5.2

3.9

7.2

4.5

6.3

110

8.67

4.5

Mean

13.35

39.92

0.99

4

2.61

5.78

3.64

5.06

91.1

6.86

3.69

Std. error

 0.30

 2.55

0.03

0.1

0.10

0.15

0.09

0.13

1.75

0.14

0.10

Variance

 2.29

162.33

0.02

0.23

0.27

0.55

0.22

0.43

77

0.44

0.26

Stand. dev

 1.51

 12.74

0.14

0.48

0.52

0.74

0.47

0.66

8.77

0.63

0.51

Coeff. Var

11.32

31.92

13.93

12.1

19.90

12.82

12.87

12.98

9.63

9.25

13.83

 

 

Table 3: Descriptive statistics for M. cephalus from New Calabar River

TL

WT

ED

PFL

Pel L

DFL

HW

BdP

GL

RGL

HL

Min

14

26

0.7

1.6

1.5

2.2

3

4.2

35

1.9

3

Max

23

90

1.5

3.5

2.7

4.9

4.8

6

70

3.94

4.5

Mean

18.97

59.85

1.1

2.65

2.21

3.2

3.67

4.99

52.65

2.78

3.91

Std. error

0.51

4.17

0.04

0.11

0.07

0.15

0.11

0.13

2.40

0.11

0.10

Variance

5.21

347.82

0.04

0.26

0.11

0.47

0.24

0.35

114.77

0.25

0.18

Stand. dev

2.28

18.65

0.20

0.51

0.33

0.69

0.49

0.59

10.71

0.50

0.43

Coeff. Var

12.03

31.16

17.94

19.22

14.96

21.46

13.26

11.90

20.35

17.82

11.01

 

 

Table 4: Descriptive statistics for Liza falcipinnis from New Calabar River

TL

WT

ED

PFL

Pel L

DFL

HW

BdP

GL

RGL

HL

Min

14.5

28

1

2

1.5

1.5

1

2.5

25

1.66

3.1

Max

21

94

2.1

3.5

2.6

4.3

4.2

5.7

70

3.33

4.5

Mean

17

45.4

1.44

2.35

1.99

3.07

2.82

4.22

39.1

2.26

3.91

Std. error

0.71

6.86

0.14

0.14

0.12

0.24

0.26

0.32

4.70

0.17

0.14

Variance

5.03

471.20

0.19

0.20

0.14

0.58

0.70

1.04

220.32

0.29

0.19

Stand. Dev

2.24

21.71

0.43

0.45

0.38

0.76

0.84

1.02

14.84

 

0.54

0.44

Coeff. Var

13.2

47.81

30.04

19.16

19.02

24.8

29.61

24.13

37.96

24.05

11.21

 

 

 


Length-weight and Length-gut length relationships

 

The regression equation for estimating length-weight and length-gut length relationships are shown in Figs. 2-5 and Table 5. The regression coefficient (b) values of fish species were less than 3, ranging from 1.24 – 1.91. Since the value b is less than 3, growth is negatively allometric in which the rate of increase in body length of the fish species is not proportional to the rate of increase in their body weight. Regression coefficient of 3 indicates isometric growth or maintenance of dimensional equality as the organism grows (Thomas et al., 2003; Olurin and Aderibigbe, 2006).  Famoofo and Abdul (2020) reported similar b values of 1.067 while Obasohan et al. (2012) and Dan-Kishiya (2013) reported a range of 1.4–1.6 for Tilapia mariae. In line with the findings of this study, several authors have reported negative allometric growths (b < 2.5) which are outside the expected range of 2.5 < b < 3.5 (Carlander, 1969; Pauly and Gayanilo, 1997) for different cichlid fish species from various water bodies, despite using a large number of specimen. For instance, Gatso et al. (2017) reported a range of values of b (0.14–0.8) for O. niloticus in their study conducted on Wudil River, Kano, Nigeria. In the study of Atama et al. (2013), wherein a total 7091 individual specimen were used, recorded b values of 0.32 for male H. fasciatus, 1.682 for female and 0.738 for the combined sexes; 0.549 in the dry season and 0.233 in wet season. This range of values (0.233–1.682) for b was far below the one (2.42) recorded in this study.

The TL-GL relationship returned a negative allometric growth pattern (Table 5 and Fig. 2-5). The values of the slope of the regression, b were 0.6866, 1.2367, 0.397 and 0.2867 for T. guineensis, O. niloticus, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis, respectively. The coefficient of correlations were weak, being 0.010, 0.166, 0.179 and 0.364 respectively for T. guineensis, O. nilotius, M. cephalus and L. falcipinnis.


 

 

Table 5: Summary of Length-weight and Length-Gut relationship parameters of Mugil cephalus, Liza falcipinnis, Oreochromis niloticus and Tilapia guineensis from the New Calabar River, Nigeria.

 

FISH SPECIES

LOG TRANSFORMED LENGTH

REGRESSION EQUATION

     R2

 

Tilapia guineensis

Transformed  total length

W = 1.6161 L1.1676

0.4326

Transformed gut length

W = 1.7196  GL0.6866

0.1044

 

Oreochromis niloticus

Transformed  total length

W = 1.5553   L1.2811

0.5436

Transformed gut length

W = 1.6637 GL1.2367

0.4079

 

Mugil cephalus

Transformed  total length

W = 1.3649  L1.5693

0.8642

Transformed gut length

W = 2.0075 GL0.397

0.4236

 

Liza falcipinus

Transformed  total length

W = 1.2872 TL1.914

0.6810

Transformed gut length

W = 1.9123 GL0.2867

0.6030

 

 

 

Fig 2: Length-Weight and length-gut Relationship of Tilapia guineensis of New Calabar River, Nigeria                                

 

 

Fig. 3: Length-weight and length-gut relationship of O. niloticus from the New Calabar River, Nigeria                                                                                                                                         

 

 

Fig. 4: Length-weight and length-gut relationship of Mugil cephalus from New Calabar River, Nigeria

 

 

 

Fig. 5: Length-weight and length-gut relationship of Liza falcipinnis from New Calabar River, Nigeria

 

 

 


Morphometric ratios

 

The ratios of each morphometric character to TL or HL are shown in Table 6.

         The ratios of DFL/HL, DFL/TL and PFL/HL were significantly different between the two tilapinne species (p < 0.05) while HL/TL, BdP/HL, PFL/HL, ED/HL and ED/HL were significantly different between the mugilids (P<0.05). These ratios could be species-specific.  Conventionally, morphometric ratios can be used in species-specific identification. High rate of interspecific breeding among some species, for example, cichlids  may influence the ratios and hinder application. However, Solomon et al. (2015) also found significant differences (p < 0.05) in the HL/SL ratio between wild and cultured Clarias gariepinus. This appears to be supported by Gonzalez et al. (2016) who obtained mean values for the HL/SL ratio of between 0.31 and 0.45 in Cichlasoma festae. This phenotypic divergence in morphometric ratio may possibly result from change in habitat and domestication. The value of the HL/SL ratio and other relations among the morphometric measurements are closely identical to the species. Perhaps, more individuals and comparison between populations is necessary in future study to validate this result


.

 

 

Table 6: Ratio of average measurements of some morphometric characters in relation to head length and total length

Species

N

           ED

        PFL

       DFL

        BdP

HL

 

 

HL

TL

HL

TL

HL

TL

HL

TL

TL

T. guineensis

22

0.26a

0.067a

0.99a

0.26a

1.83a

0.48a

1.56a

0.41a

0.26a

O. niloticus

22

0.27a

0.074a

1.41b

0.30a

1.57b

0.43b

1.37a

0.38a

0.28a

M. cephalus

20

0.28b

0.058b

0.68c

0.14c

0.82c

0.17c

1.28c

0.26c

0.21b

L falcipinnis

20

0.37c

0.085c

0.60d

0.14c

0.79c

0.18c

1.08d

0.25c

0.23c

Values with different superscript(s) indicated in columns (between pairs of species, that is T. guineensis vs O. niloticus and M. cephalus vs L. falcipinnis) are significantly different at 5% level.

 

 

 


REFERENCES

 

Abu, G.O. and Egenonu C.  2008. The current pollution status of the New Calabar River in the Niger Delta region of Southern Nigeria: A survey of antibiogram profiles of its bacterial isolates.  African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Vol. 2 (6), pp. 134-141

Agbugui, M. O. and Deekae, S.N. 2014. Assessment of the Physico-chemical Parameters and Quality of Water of the New Calabar-Bonny River, Porthacourt, Nigeria. Cancer Biology 2014;4(1):1-9

Al-Hussaini, A.H. (1947). The feeding habits and the morphology of the alimentary tract of some teleosts living in the neighborhood of the Marine Biological Station, Ghardaga, Red Sea. Publication of Marine Biological Station, Ghardaga, Red Sea, 5(1947):1-61.

Atama, C.I., Okeke, O.C., Ekeh, F.N., Ezenwaji, N.E., Onah, I.E., Ivoke, N., Onoja, U.S., and Eyo, J.E., 2013, Length-weight relationship and condition factor of six cichlids (Cichlidae perciformes) species of Anambra river, Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculure, 4(2):82–86.

Azua, E.T., Akaahan, T.J., and Akogwu, S.A., 2017, Variation in the morphometry measurements of two Tilapia fish species in relation to their body weight obtained from Lower Benue River at Makurdi, Benue State Nigeria. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal, 8: 208. doi: 10.4172/2150-3508.10002.

Bhatt, D.M., and Mankodi, P.C., 2020, Diversity record of family mugilidae (Curvier, 1829) from estuary of Sabarmati River, Gujarat, India. Journal of Biological Studies, 3(2): 58-68.

Carlander, K.D., 1969, Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology. The Iowa State University Press; Ames, IA.  p. 752.

Chukwu, O. K., 2019, Population Biology of the Sleeper fish Eleotris vittata from New Calabar River, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology, 2019: 8(2): 28–31p.

Dan-Kishiya, A.S., 2013, Length-weight relationship and condition factor of five fish species from a tropical water supply reservoir in Abuja, Nigeria. American Journal of Research Communication, 1(9):175–178.

Dankwa, H.R., J. Blay Jr, and Yankson, K. (2005). Food and Feeding Habits of Grey Mullets (Pisces: Mugilidae) in Two Estuaries in Ghana. West African Journal of Applied Ecology, 8(1): 65-77.

Dickson, S. A., and Victor, R.P., 1999, Influence of land use on species diversity and abundance. Niger Delta, Nigeria.

Dienye, H.E., and Woke, G.N., 2015, Pysico-chemical Parameters of the Upper and Lower Reach of the New Calabar River Niger Delta. Journal of Fisheries and Livestock Production, 3:154. doi:10.4172/2332-2608.1000154.

Dienye, H.E., Olopade, O.A. & Ogbonnaya, I.J. (2019). Diversity and abundance of the family Mugilidae in the New Calabar River, Nigeria Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 36(3), 313-318.

Edema, C. U. and Aiguobasinmwin, M. O. (2007). Determination of intestine length to standard length ratio of some fishes from the Ikpoba River and Ovia River, Nigeria with a review of culture of Parachanna obscura (Pisces: Channidae). In: Araoye, P. A., Adikwu, I. A. and Banke, R. O. K. (Eds). Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of Fisheries Society of Nigeria (FISON), pp.106- 112.

Edema, C. U. and Ojeh, P. A. (2006). A study of ratio of intestine length to body length in fish species from the Okhuo River, Nigeria. In: Enin, U. I., Chukwu, E. I., Ajah, P. O., Ama-Abasi, D. A. and Nwosu, F. M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of Fisheries Society of Nigeria. (FISON), pp. 123- 128.

Famoofo, O.O., and Abdul, W.O., 2020, Biometry, condition factors and length-weight relationships of sixteen fish species in Iwopin fresh-water ecotype of Lekki Lagoon, Ogun State. Heliyon,  6 (2020): e02957.

Gatso, B.U., Abdullahi, J.M., and Yola, I.A., 2017, Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus of Wudil River, Kano, Nigeria. Agro-Science. 16(1):1–4.

German, D. P., and. Horn, M. H., 2006, Gut length and mass in herbivorous and carnivorous prickleback fishes (Teleostei: Stichaeidae): ontogenetic, dietary, and phylogenetic effects. Marine Biology, 148:1123-1134.

Getachew, T., and Fernado, C.H., 1989. The food habits of a herbiovorous fish
(Oreochromis niloticus) in Lake Awasa, Ethiopia. Hydobiologia, 174: 195-200.

González, M.A., Rodriguez, J.M., Angón, E., Martínez, A., Garcia, A., and Peña, F., 2016. Characterization of morphological and meristic traits and their variations between two different populations (wild and cultured) of Cichlasoma festae, a species native to tropical Ecuadorian rivers. Archives of Animal Breeding, 59:435–444.

Hyslop, E.J., 1980. Stomach contents analysis-a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17: 411-429.

Ibim A.T., Gogo, O.O., and Igbani, F., 2016,. The Ichthyofaunal Assemblage of the Lower and Upper Reaches of New Calabar River, Rivers State, Niger Delta, Nigeria, Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 6(9): 186-197.

Kapoor, B.G., Smit, H., and Verighina, A.I., 1975, The alimentary canal and digestion in teleosts. Advances in Marine Biology, 13:109–239.

Karachle, P.K., and Stergiou, K.I., 2010, Intestıne morphometric of fıshes: A compilation and analysis of bibliographic data. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 40(1): 45–54.

Khayyami, H., Zolgharnein, H., Negin, S., and Abdolali, M., 2015, Morphological variability of Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) from Bandar Abbas Port and Qeshm Island in Northeastern Persian Gulf. International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology, (3) 2: 103-112.

Kolawole-Daniels, A.O., Fola-Mathews, O. O., and Nicholas, E., 2017. Comparative study on length weight relationship of the grey mullet Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus 1758) and sickle fin Liza falcipinnis (Valenciennes, 1836) from Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 5(5): 17-20.

Kramer, D.L. and Bryant M.J., 1995, Intestine length in the fishes of a tropical stream. 1. Ontogenetic allometry. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 42: 115–127.

Kurton, M.P., and Adeniyi, B.T., 2014. Morphological variations of Tilapia guineensis (Bleeker 1862) and Sarotherodon melanotheron (Ruppell1852) (Pisces: Cichlidea) from Badagry and Lagos lagoon, South-West, Nigeria. J Fisheries Livest Prod 2: 112. doi: 10.4172/2332-2608.100011.

Lawson, E.O., 1991, Biology of the Grey mullet, Mugil cephalus, L. in Lagos lagoon, Nigeria. M.Sc dissertation, University of Lagos, Nigeria. 1991, 88

Motta, P.J., 1988. Functional morphology of the feeding apparatus of ten species of Pacific butterfly fishes (Perciformes, Chaetodontidae), an ecomorphological approach. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 22:39.67.

Nwadiaro, C. S., and Ayodele, R.O.O., 1992, Contribution to the biology of Sarotherodon melanotheron in the New Calabar River (Nigeria). Acta hydrobiologia,. 34(3): 287-300.

Nwineewii, Jack Dumka and  Unochukwu Peace U.G. 2018. An  Evaluation  of  the  Level  of  Some  Physicochemical  Parameters  in  the  New Calabar River, Rivers State, Nigeria. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2018, 5(3):135-142.

Obasohan, E.E., Obasohan, E.E., Imasuen, J.A., and Isidahome, C.E., 2012, Preliminary studies of the length-weight relationships and condition factor of five species from Ibiekuma stream, Ekpoma, Edo state, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 2:061–069.

Olori, O. O., 1995, The Nature and Relative Abundance of Fish in the New Calabar River, Choba, Rivers State. Pp 26.

Olsson, J., Quevedo, M., Colson, C., and Svanback, R., 2007, Gut length plasticity in perch: into the bowels of resource polymorphisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90:517-523.

Olufeagba, S.O., Aladele, S.E., Okomoda, V.T, Sifau, M.O., Ajayi, D.A., Oduoye, O.T., Bolatito, O.A, Nden, D.S,, Fabunmi-Tolase A.S. and Hassan, T. 2015. Morphological Variation of Cichlids from Kainji Lake, Nigeria. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 9(3): 070-080.

Olurin, K.B., and Aderibigbe O.A., 2006, Length-weight relationship and condition factor of pond reared Oreochromis niloticus. World Journal of Zoology, 1(2):82–85.

Onojake, M.C., Sikoki, F.D., Omokheyeke, O. and Akpiri, R.U. 2017. Surface water characteristics and trace metals level of the Bonny/New Calabar River Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Appl Water Sci 7, 951–959 (2017).

Pauly D., Gayanilo F.C., Jr. 1997. An Alternative Approach to Estimating the Parameters of a Length-Weight Relationship from Length Frequency Samples and their Bulk. NAGA ICLARM.

Pauly, D., 1984. Fish population dynamic in tropical waters: a manual for use with programmable calculators. Naga ICLARM Quarterly, 5-95.

Raj, S., Kumar, A.B., and Abraham, K.M., 2016. Length-weight and length-length telationship of invasive alien Species, Oreochromis niloticus from lentic habitats of Palakkad District, Kerala. Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 4: 41-146.

Ribble, D.O., and M.H. Smith. 1983. Relative intestine length and feeding ecology of freshwater fishes. Growth, 47:292300.

Solomon, S.O., Okomoda, V.T. and Ogbenyikwu, A.I., 2015. Intraspecific morphological variation between cultured and wild Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) (Clariidae.; Siluriformes). Arch. Pol. Fisheries, 23: 53–61.

Stergiou, K.I., and Moutopoulos, D.K., 2001, A review of length-weigth relationships of fishes from Greek marine waters. Naga ICLARM Quarterly, 24 (1-2): 23–39.

Thomas, J., Venus, S.D., and Kurup, B.M., 2003, Length-weight relationship of some deep sea fishes inhabiting the continental slope beyond 250m depth long west coast of India Naga. ICLARM Quarterly, 26:17–21.

Turan, C., Erguden, D., Turan, F., and Gurlek, M., 2004, Genetic and morphologic structure of Liza Abu (Heckel, 1843) populations from the Rivers Orontes, Euphrates and Tigris. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 28:729–734

Umaru, J.A., Annune, P.A., Cheikyula, J.O., and Okomoda, V.T., 2015. Some biometricparameters of four selected fish species in doma Dam, Nassarawa state, Nigeria. International Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 5 (31): 1–7.

Uzukwu, P.U. and Leton, T.C. and Jamabo, N.A. (2013) Survey of physical characteristics of the upper reaches of new Calabar River, Niger Delta, Nigeria. In: 28th Annual Conference of the Fisheries Society of Nigeria (FISON) , 25-29 Nov 2013 ,Abuja, Nigeria, pp. 206-210.

Valikhani, H., Abdoli, A., Kiabi, H.B and  Nejat, F. 2016. First record and distribution of the blue tilapia, Oreochromis aureus (Steindachner, 1864) (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in inland waters of Iran. Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2016), 3(1): 19–24.

Wagner, C. E., McIntyre, P. B., Buels, K. S., Gilbert, D. M. and Michel. E., 2009, Diet predicts intestine length in Lake Tanganyika's cichlid fishes. Functional Ecology, 23:1122-1131.

Zandonà, E., Auer, S.K., Kilham, S.S., and Reznick, D.N., 2015. Contrasting Population and Diet Influences on Gut Length of an Omnivorous Tropical Fish, the Trinidadian Guppy (Poecilia reticulata). PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136079. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0136079.

 


 

 

 

 

Cite this Article: Nwafili, SA (2022). Morphometric Characterization of Four Commercially Important Fish Species of the New Calabar River, Rivers State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences, 12(1): 01-10.