Greener
Journal of Biological Sciences Vol. 14(1),
pp. 34-41, 2024 ISSN:
2276-7762 Copyright ©2024, Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International. |
|
Click on Play button...
Effect of different
Water Sources on Hatching and Larval Survival of Clarias gariepinus
Kenule, Bariledum
Nudee1; Nnam, Bright Saro*1
1Rivers State University, Port Harcourt Rivers
State, Nigeria.
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
Article No.: 091424114 Type: Research |
Hatcheries in
Nigeria utilize water from various sources ranging from surface water to
water sourced from underground aquifers. This research is aimed at
determining the most ideal of three water sources (Fisheries Department’s
Borehole, Well at Eagle Island Well and Fresh water River) for hatching and
larval survival of Clarias gariepinus. The quality of the water (Temp.=27.16 – 28.280C; DO= 4.63 – 6.47mg/L; pH= 4.85 – 5.89; salinity= 0.01 – 0.08ppt; TDS=
20.64 – 111.56mg/L and Electric. Cond. =32.43 – 168.26ms/cm) did not indicate significant differences between
the water sources (ANOVA,
P<0.05). However the range of values recorded were within ideal range for
production of Clarias garipinus. Mean percentage hatchability did not
indicate significant difference between the water sources (ANOVA P<0.05).
Mean + SD value recorded for hatchability were 87.90±0.10; 85.97±0.06 and 79.97±0.15 for Borehole, Well and River water
respectively. Mean percentage survival did not indicate significance
different between the water sources (ANOVA
P<0.05). Mean + SD value recorded for survival were 96.87±0.81; 98.87±0.23 and 99.50 ±0.17 for Borehole, Well and River water
respectively. At the end of the study there was a difference between the
percentage hatchability and percentage survival in the three water types (ANOVA P>0.05); results indicated that borehole water was better
for hatching, while river water was more ideal for larval survival of C. gariepinus. |
Accepted: 17/09/2024 Published: 08/10/2024 |
|
*Corresponding
Author Nnam Bright Saro E-mail: nnamadoorah@gmail.com, bnk0036@gmail.com Phone: 08137997714, 08160289817 |
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The culture of the
African mud catfish (Clarias gariepinus)
dominate local fish production in Nigeria and has grown rapidly because it grows
fast and feeds on a large variety of food items, tolerate a wide range of water
quality conditions, is relatively easy to reproduce in captivity and can be
raised in high density resulting in high yield (Okechi, 2004). However,
constraints to intensification and expansion of fish culture in Nigeria include
inadequate supply of quality fingerlings and juveniles for stocking in ponds,
cages and pens (Charo & Orirere 2000; Atanda, 2006; Ojutiku, 2008). Also C. gariepinus larvae is hindered by many
factors including low hatching and larval survival rates (Muchlisin et al., 2010), source and quality of
water used in the culture (Madu and Ufodike, 2001).
Hatcheries in Nigeria
utilize water from various sources ranging from ground water from aquifers of
varying depths and water quality to surface water; the variety of water sources
produce water of varying quality (Saeed, 2000; Pulatsu
et al., 2004).
MATERIALS AND METHOD
The study was
conducted in the Fisheries laboratory of the Rivers State University, Nkpolu,
Port Harcourt.
Experimental
design
The study was a
Randomize Design (RD) and utilized a triplicate design for each treatment.
Fig. 1:
An overview of the proposal experimental design.
Triplicate
design for treatment tanks
The experimental
units consist of nine (9) large circular basins of 70 liters capacity
each. These were arranged randomly over
the work space.
Each basin (test
tank) was filled with water to a depth of 8 cm with water collected from one of
the three sources – fresh river water; hand dug well water and borehole
water. The tanks were pre-labeled with
the code of the test water before the introduction of fertilized eggs. The half
and top method of water changing was adopted, such that 50% of the water was
removed and top again in each of the test tanks on daily bases.
Water Sources/Water
quality monitoring
Water samples were
sourced from three (3) places namely; the departmental Borehole water, hand dug
well water from Eagle Island and fresh river water from Luubara creek at Duburo
town. A 50 liters jerry-can was used to collect water from each of the sources
and transported to the fisheries laboratory.
Water quality
parameters such as; pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity, total
dissolve solid (TDS), ammonia and conductivity were measured using a digital
prob (Extech model DO700). Measurement of these water qualities was carried out
before the experiment begins. Daily monitoring of the test water quality were
carried out.
Test
Organisms and spawning agent
Larval of Clarias gariepinus (African catfish) were
used for the study.
A total of two (2)
brood stocks of C. gariepinus (1
male: 1 female) was bought from a commercial farm in Port-harcourt, Rivers
State. The brood stocks were of similar weight and not less than 1kg. Selection
of brood stocks was based on the readiness of the genitals. Gravid female brood stocks of C. gariepinus was selected based on the
swollen, reddish genital opening and with the release of ripe eggs (golden
colour) by gentle press on the abdomen.
Sexually ready males was selected based on the reddish and pointed
genital papillae.
Brood stocks were
transported from the commercial farm to the Fisheries laboratory of the Rivers
State University. Brood stocks were
acclimated and conditioned in separate tanks a day before inducement.
Ovaprim (SGnRHa +
Domperidone) was used as the spawning agent during this study. The recommended
dose is 0.5ml/kg of fish.
Artificial
Propagation
The female brood
stock was injected intramuscularly into the dorsal muscle above the lateral
line with ovaprim at 0.5ml/kg fish on the same day. After which they were kept
in individual troughs with water level reduced to the minimum for conditioning
of fish.
The male brood stock was
sacrificed and teste removed. Milt was
collected by cutting the testes into smaller pieces, squeezed and washed into
already prepared 0.9% concentration of saline solution. This is to keep the sperm alive but not
active.
Female brood was
brought out from the bowl, the head covered with a moist towel and the body
wiped dry. This action is to prevent the eggs coming in contact with water which
will seal the micropyle and prevent fertilization. Hence, gentle pressure was
applied on the anterior-posterior direction of the abdomen to strip the eggs.
Stripped eggs were collected into pre-weighed dry bowls and weighed again.
Thereafter, the milt
collected in physiological saline was poured on the stripped eggs and stirred
thoroughly to enable the milt saturate the eggs. There was continuous mixing to
ensure increased fertilization and to avoid the eggs sticking together. This
process lasted for 60 to 90 seconds. The
fertilized eggs was spread on a spawning sponge in each treatment tank for
incubation and allowed to stand for 36 hours (until hatched) hatching. When
hatching is completed, larval are expected to go to the bottom of the
incubation trough. While unhatched eggs remains attached to the spawning
sponge. Both the unhatched eggs and spawning sponge was removed from the tanks
after the hatching to avoid fungi attack on the larvae.
The numbers of eggs
released was calculated using this method:
No of eggs released = (Wb - Wa)
g x (no.s of eggs in 1 gram)…………. (Equation 1)
Where:
Wa = weight of female
after stripping female
Wb = weight of female
before stripping
1g
= (I counted the numbers of eggs in one gram)
Percentage
Hatchability
After hatching, the
number of larvae in each experiment trough was carefully counted and the
percentage hatchability was determined as described by Ndimele et al. (2011) using the formula:
………............................….
(Equation 2)
Percentage
survival
Percentage survival
was determined by the end of the experiment as describe by Florence and
Harrison, (2012) using the formula:
………
(Equation 3)
Statistical
analysis of data
The data collected were
subjected to standard statistical analysis such as single ANOVA (Analyses of
variance) and confidence interval statistics with the aid of Microsoft Excel
sheet.
RESULTS
The result of the
water quality parameters of different water sources utilized during hatchery
operations is presented in Tables
4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. The results revealed that value of parameters recorded
during hatching were similar to values recorded during survival. Temperature,
Dissolved Oxygen and pH values range between 27.16 – 28.280C; 4.63 – 6.47mg/L and 4.85 – 5.89
respectively while salinity, TDS and Electric. Cond. Values range between 0.01
– 0.08ppt, 20.64 – 111.56mg/L and 32.43 – 168.26ms/cm respectively.
These values were subjected to analysis of variance and no significant
differences occurred (P<0.05) for hatching and larval survival in the
different water sources.
Figure 4.1 compare the mean temperature values during
hatchery operations in Borehole, Well and River water. Values recorded during
hatching were slightly higher than values for survival in Borehole (28.280C; 27.200C) and Well (28.240C; 27.160C) water while River water maintained
the same values (27.230C; 27.230C) during
hatching and larval survival. DO and pH mean values are presented together in
Fig.4.2 because they are related. DO values recorded during survival test were
higher than values during hatching in Borehole (6.43mg/L;5.42mg/L) and Well
water (6.47mg/L; 4.63mg/L), while DO values recorded during hatching and survival were the same in tanks
containing River water (6.15mg/L;6.15mg/L). pH values recorded in tanks
containing Borehole water (5.79;4.85) were slightly higher during hatching than
survival while pH values recorded in other treatment tanks were almost the same
in Well water (5.66;5.76) and the same River water (5.89; 5.89) for
hatching and survival. Figure 4.3 shows that the different water sources used for the
study were fresh (0.01ppt - 0.08ppt). The mean TDS and Electrical conductivity
values recorded during the hatchery operations are presented in fig.4.4. It shows that TDS and
Electrical Conductivity values were almost the same in tanks containing water
from the Borehole (91.40mg/L; 93.21mg/L) and Well (111.56mg/L; 108.89mg/L)
during hatching and survival test While
tanks containing water from the River recorded the same values for hatching and
survival.
Table 4.1: Mean
and Standard Deviation of Water Quality Parameters Recorded for Borehole water
utilized during Hatchery Operations
Hatchery Operations |
||
Parameters |
Hatching |
Survival |
Temperature(0C) |
28.28 ±1.65 |
27.20 ± 0.91 |
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/L) |
5.42 ± 1.52 |
6.43 ± 0.23 |
pH |
5.79 ± 0.53 |
4.85 ± 0.71 |
Salinity(ppt) |
0.06 ± 0.01 |
0.07 ± 0.01 |
TDS(mg/L) |
91.40 ± 11.78 |
93.21 ± 3.23 |
Electric.Cond. (ms/cm) |
138.89 ± 17.66 |
141.02 ± 4.73 |
Table 4.2: Mean
and Standard Deviation of Water Quality Parameters Recorded for Well water
utilized during Hatchery Operations
|
Hatchery Operations |
|
Parameters |
Hatching |
Survival |
Temperature(0C) |
28.24 ± 1.74 |
27.16 ± 1.11 |
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/L) |
4.63 ± 1.35 |
6.47 ± 0.33 |
pH |
5.66 ± 0.49 |
5.76 ± 0.27 |
Salinity(ppt) |
0.08 ± 0.01 |
0.08 ± 0.00 |
TDS(mg/L) |
111.56 ± 12.56 |
108.89 ± 3.62 |
Electric.Cond. (ms/cm) |
168.26 ± 18.33 |
164.66 ± 4.73 |
Table 4.3: Mean
and Standard Deviation of Water Quality Parameters Recorded for River water
utilized during Hatchery Operations
Parameters |
Hatchery Operations |
|
Hatching |
Survival |
|
Temperature(0C) |
27.23 ± 1.82 |
27.23 ± 0.90 |
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/L) |
6.15 ± 1.74 |
6.15 ± 0.54 |
pH |
5.89 ± 0.61 |
5.89 ± 0.32 |
Salinity(ppt) |
0.02 ± 0.01 |
0.01 ± 0.00 |
TDS(mg/L) |
20.64 ± 7.39 |
20.64 ± 0.99 |
Electric. Cond. (ms/cm) |
32.43 ± 11.03 |
32.43 ± 1.47 |
Fig.
4.1: Mean temperature values during hatchery operations
Fig.
4.2: Mean DO and pH values during hatchery operations
Fig.
4.3: Mean Salinity values during hatchery operations
Fig.
4.4: Mean TDS and Electrical conductivity values during hatchery operation
The mean percentage
hatchability of C. gariepinus using
different water sources is presented in Table 4.4.It shows that the lowest mean
hatchability percentage of 79.97% was recorded in the tanks containing water
from the River while water sourced from the Fisheries Department’s Borehole and
well were slightly higher at 87.90% and 85.97% respectively. The result indicated
that there were no significant differences (P<0.05) in the different water
sources used for the study.
Table 4.4. shows that
Bore hole water with the highest mean (87.90%) percentage hatchability were
with the range of 87.90 to 88.00 while River water with the lowest mean
(79.97%) value were within the range of 79.80 to 80.00. Well water value 85.97%
were within the range of 85.90 to 86.00.
Figure 4.5 compare
the mean percentage hatchability in the different water sources during the
hatchery operations. Tanks containing water from the Borehole has the highest
(87.90) percentage of hatched eggs while the lowest values of 79.97 was
recorded in treatment tanks containing River water.
Table 4.4: Percentage
Hatchability of C. gariepinus using
different water sources (mean ±SD)
Water Source |
Mean |
Range min max |
Borehole Water |
87.90±0.10 |
87.90 88.00 |
Well water |
85.97±0.06 |
85.90 86.00 |
River Water |
79.97±0.15 |
79.80 80.00 |
Key: TRT-01= Borehole
Water; TRT-02= Well Water and TRT-03 = River Water
Percentage
Survival
The mean percentage
survival of C. gariepinus using
different water sources is presented in Table 4.5.The result shows that the
lowest mean percentage survival of 96.87% was recorded in the tanks containing
water from the Fisheries department’s Bore hole while water sourced from the
River and Well were higher at 99.50% and 98.87% respectively. The difference
observed was not significant (P<0.05).
Table 4.5 shows that
River water with the highest mean (99.50%) percentage survival were within the range
of 99.3 to 99.6 while Bore hole water with the lowest value (96.87%) were
within the range of 96.60 to 97.60. Well water value of 98.87% was within
the range of 98.60 to 99.00.Figure 4.6 compare the mean percentage survival in the
different water sources during the hatchery operations. Tanks containing water
from the River has the highest (99.50) percentage of larval survival while the
lowest values of 96.87 was recorded in treatment tanks containing fisheries
department’s Borehole water.
Table 4.5: Percentage survival of C. gariepinus using different water
sources (mean ± SD)
Water Source |
Mean |
Range Min Max |
Borehole Water |
96.87±0.81 |
96.60 97.60 |
Well water |
98.87±0.23 |
98.60 99.00 |
River Water |
99.50 ±0.17 |
99.30 99.60 |
Key: TRT-01= Borehole
Water; TRT-02= Well Water and TRT-03 = River Water
DISCUSSIONS
Water
Quality Parameters
Fish larval are very
sensitive to changes in their environment. Any changes add stress to the fish larval
and the larger and faster the changes, the greater the stress. So the
maintenance of all the factors becomes very essential for getting maximum yield
in a hatchery (Boyd, 1982).
Water Temperature
influences performance of fish species, especially the interval between
fertilization and embryonic development (Laurel and Bradbury, 2006). Small
fluctuation affects a species vital rate (O’Connor et al., 2007), genetic structure (Bradbury et al., 2010) and survival (Houde, 2008).It also affects dissolved
oxygen level in water - solubility of oxygen and rate of oxidation of organic
matter (Pepin, 1991). The water temperature recorded in this study were within
temperature values obtained in an earlier researched (King, 1998), for
successful fish production and Boyd and Tucker (1998) for optimum production of
Clarias species.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
is a very basic requirement for aquaculture species. Is a complex parameter
because its concentrations are dependent upon many processes. Reduced levels
impair growth and development of different life stages of fish (Boyd,1982;
Chatakond and Torrans, 2012).Such impact affects fitness and survival by
altering embryo incubation periods, and decreasing feeding activity (Townsend et
al., 2003). DO values measured were within values obtained in an earlier
research (Ufodike and Garba, 1992), for adequate culture (Afroz et al., 2014) production of Clarias
larva species.
Hydrogen ion
concentration (pH) is an important parameter which determines the suitability
of water for various purposes. Source water with a proper pH is imperative, and
the pH of any potential source water should be screened. An extreme pH value
affects growth and cause mortality in fish culture with a lower tolerance at
embryonic and larval stages (Lloyd and Jordan, 1964; Zweig et al.,
1999). At lower pH, ability to maintain its salt balance is affected, <6.5
species experience slow growth ≤pH 4 and >pH 11 most species die. The
pH values obtained for this study are within the limits for optimum larva fish
production (Boyd, 1982).
The salinity values
were within freshwater values and were within values recommended for production
of Clarias species (FAO, 2006). TDS
varies widely across the different water sources and were within TDS required
levels recommended (FAO, 1992) for a successful production of Clarias species. The variations in
electrical conductivity were wide and were within the desired and acceptable
range and agree with earlier researched (Boyd, 1990)
for optimum production of Clarias
species.
Percentage
Hatchability
Percentage
hatchability is usually as low as between 50-70% in hatcheries (de Graaf et
al., 1995). However breeding failure has been attributed to biological (broodstock
size and age, strain and species) and environmental (dissolved oxygen, pH,
temperature, stocking density, photoperiod etc.) factors (Ataguba et al., 2012,
Ataguba et al., 2013). For this experiment the hatchability rate were
higher suggesting that the biological and environmental factors were suitable for
production of C. gariepinus. Percentage
hatchability varies in the different water source used for the study; Fisheries
Department’s Borehole water in rivers state university has the highest percentage
hatchability of 87.90%
while River water recorded the lowest values (79.97%) in hatchability. These values are
higher than those reported by de Graaf et al.(1995).
Percentage
Survival
Channel
catfish survival rates for production of fingerlings from fry in ponds ranges
from 40 to 85% (UFL, 2009); for Hybrid bass survival rates tend to be between
25 and 40 percent for hatcheries (Ludwig, 2004)and striped bass fingerlings are
between 25 and 40 percent (Brewer and Rees, 1990). Muskellunge survival rates
seem to be extremely low due to cannibalism (TWRA, 2012). For this experiment
the survival rate were much higher suggesting that the general conditions of
the water and hatchery were suitable for C.
gariepinus production. Larval survival varies in the different water sources,
as shown in the study; River water has the highest percentage survival of 99.5%
while Well water and Fisheries Department’s Borehole water were slightly lower
at 98.87% and 96.87% respectively.
REFERENCES
Afroz A,
Islam MS, Hasan MR, Hasnahena M, Tuly DM.(2014) Larval rearing of spiny eel, Mastacembeluspancalusin
the captivity with emphasis on their development stages. International Journal
of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies; 1(6):163-167.
Ataguba
G. A. Solomon S. G. & Onwuka M. C. (2012). Broodstock Size Combination in
artificial spawning of cultured Clarias gariepinus. Livestock
Research for Rural Development. Vol 24(12).www.Irrd.org/Irrd24/12atag24223
Ataguba
G.A., Okomoda V.T. &Onwuka M. C. (2013): Relationship between broodstock
weight combination and spawning success in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus).
Croatian Journal of Fisheries Vol.71 (4) Pp 176-181.
Atanda,
A.N. (2006) Analysis of freshwater fish seed resources in Nigeria. Proceedings
of the 1st Annual Conference of the Fisheries Society of Nigeria Calabar p: 12.
Boyd CE,
Tucker CS (1998) Pond Aquaculture Water Quality Management. London: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Boyd, C. E. 1990. Water Quality in ponds for aquaculture.
Agriculture Experiment Station, Auburn Univ., Alabama, U.S.A: 482.
Boyd, D.C
(1982). Water Quality Management for
Fish Culture. Development in Aquaculture
and Fisheries Science, 19(1), 21-22.
Bradbury
I.R, S. Hubert, B. Higgins, T. Borza, S. Bowman, I.G. Paterson, P.V.R
Snelgrove, C.J. Morris, R.S. Gregory, D.C Hardie, J.A Hutchings, D. E.
Ruzzante, C.T. Taggart, & Bentzen, P. (2010). Parallel adaptive evolution of Atlantic Cod
on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean in response to Temperature. Proc. R. Soc. B. Doi: 277(1701)
3725-3734. 10.1098/rspb. 2010.0985.
Brewer,
Daniel L. &Robert A. Rees. (1990). Pond culture of phase I striped bass
fingerlings. Culture and Propagation of Striped Bass and its Hybrids. 1990:
Ch.8: 99-120.
Charo,
H., & Oirere, W. (2000) River-based artificial propagation of the African
Catfish, Clarias garipinus: An option
for the small fish farmer. Naga-The
Iclarm Q 2, 14-16.
De Graaf, G.J.,
F. Galemoni & Banzoussi, B. (1995). The artificial reproduction and
fingerling production of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell
1822) in protected and unprotected ponds. Aquaculture
Research 26: 233-242.
FAO (1992) Fishery information, data
and statistics service; A strategic assessment of warm water fish farming
potential in Africa.
FAO
(2010) Regional Compendium on Aquaculture and Inland Fisheries Legislation
(Asian Region). Rome: FAO Development Law Service.
FAO, (1992) manual on seed production of
African catfish Clarias gariepinus.
Volume 74, FAO fish series 43, FAO, Rome, Italy, Pages: 677.
FAO. (2007).
Status of world fisheries and aquaculture 2006, FAO fisheries and aquaculture
department. FAO, Rome, Italy,180
Federal
Department of Fisheries (2005) Fishery Statistics. Federal Department of
Fisheries, Abuja, Nigeria.
Haruna,
A.B. (2003) Aquaculture in the Tropics: Theory
and Practice. Kano: Alh Nassan Publication pp: 79-81.
Houde,
E.D. (2008). Emerging from Hjort’s Shadow. Journal
of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science
41,53-70.
King, R.P. (1998) Physico-chemical
indices of the fisheries potential of Nigerian rainforest pond. J Aqua Sci 13:
49-54.
Laurel,
B.J & Bradbury, I.R. (2006). “Big” Concerns with high latitude marine
protected areas (MPAs): Trends in connectivity and MPA size. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Aquatic
Science 63,2603-2607.
Lloyd R,
Jordan D.H.M, (1964). Some factors affecting the resistance of Rainbow Trout, International Journal of Air water Pollution.
8, 393-403
Ludwig,
Gerald M. (2004). Hybrid striped bass: fingerling production in ponds. Southern
Regional Aquaculture Center. January 2004: 302: 1-7.
Madu CT, Ufodike
EBC.(2001).
Growth and Survival of Mudfish, Clarias anguillaris). Hatchlings fed
various natural and artificial feeds as test starter diets for indoor nursery
management. Journal of Aquatic Sciences16 (2), 127-131.
Muchlisin,
Z.A., Nadiya, N., Nadiah, W.N., Musman, M., & Siti-Azizah, M.N. (2010)
Preliminary study on the natural extenders for artificial breeding of African
catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell,
1822).AACL Bioflux3, 119-124
O’Connor,
M.I, J.F. Bruno, S.D. Gaines, B.S. Halpern, S.E. Lester, B.P. Kinlan, &Weiss,J.M.
(2007). Temperature control of Larval dispersal and the implications for Marine
Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Proc.
Natl. Academic Science.104,266-1271.
Ojutiku,
R.O. (2008) Comparative Survival and Growth Rate of Clarias gariepinus and Hetero clarias Hathclings Fed Live and
Frozen Daphnia. Pakistan Journal of
Nutrition 7, 527-529.
Okechi,
J.K., (2004) Profitability assessment: a case study of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) farming in the lake
Victoria basin, Kenya. Final project, Fisheries Training Programme. Iceland:
The United Nations University p: 70 .
Pepin, P.
(1991). The effect of temperature and size on development and mortality rates
of the pelagic early life history stages of marine fish. Canadian Journal of Fish Aquatic Science.48,503–518.
Pulatsu, S., Rad, F., Koksal, G., Aydin, F.,
Benli, A.C.K. &Topcu, A. (2004) The Impact of Rainbow Trout Farm Effluents
on Water Quality of Karasu Stream, Turkey. Turkish
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 4, 9-15. [Citation
Time(s):2]
Saeed, M. S. (2000). A study on factors affecting fish production
from certain fish farms in the delta. M. Sc. Thesis. Ins. Environmental studies
and Research. Ain Shams Univ. Egypt.
Tennessee
Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA). 2012. The angler's guide to Tennessee fish including
aquatic nuisance species. January 2012. 328898:
1-68http://www.tn.gov/twra/pdfs/anglersguide.pdf. Accessed: May 3, 2012.
Townsend,
C.R., L.V.F Silva & Baldisserotto, B. (2003). Growth and Survival of Rhamdiaquelen (Siluriformes Pimelodidae) Larvae exposed to
different levels of water hardness. Aquaculture.215, 103-108.
Ufodike,
E.B. &Garba, A.J. (1992). Seasonal variation in Limnology and productivity
of a tropical highland fish pond in Jos Plateau, Nigeria journal of Aquatic
sciences, 7:29-34
University
of Florida IFAS Extension (UFL). 2009. Farm-Raised Channel Catfish. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fa010.
Accessed: April 30, 2012
Woynarovich, E. & Horvath, L. (1980). The
artificial propagation of warmwater fin fishes: A manual for extension. FAO
Fisheries Technical Paper. 201:183
Woynarovitch, E. & Horvath, L. (1980). La
Reproduction Artificielle des Poissons en eau Chaude: Manuel de Vulgarization,
Food and Agricultural Organization Document, Techniques de peche Volume 201, page 191.
Zweig
.R.D, Morton J.D &Stewart M.M (1999).Source water quality for Aquaculture. A guide for assessment. Environmentally
and socially sustainable development. 23764
Cite
this Article: Kenule, BN;
Nnam, BS (2024). Effect of different Water Sources on Hatching and Larval
Survival of Clarias gariepinus. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences, 14(1): 34-41, https://doi.org/10.15580/GJBS.2024.1.091424114.
|