By Oli, CI; Idakwoji, S (2022).
|
Greener Journal of
Educational Research Vol. 12(1), pp. 41-47,
2022 ISSN: 2276-7789 Copyright ©2022, the
copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
Assessment of
Factors That Promote Adult Learning in Adult Literacy Centres in Plateau
State.
Oli, Chijioke
Innocent1*; Idakwoji, Solomon2
1 Department of Adult and Non Formal
Education, Federal College of Education, Pankshin.
cinnocent001@ gmail. com
2 Department of Educational Foundations,
Federal College of Education, Pankshin.
kingsollyida@ gmail. com
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article No.: 122522103 Type: Research |
The study assessed factors that promote adult learning in adult
literacy centres in Plateau state. Descriptive survey design was used for
the study. Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the
study. A sample size of 896 respondents comprising 723 adult learners and
173 facilitators in adult literacy centres in Plateau State, were drawn
through the use of proportionate stratified random sampling technique from a
target population of 8,959. A 4-point rating scale questionnaire with face and
content validity ascertained by three experts were used to collect data.
Reliability index values of 0.64, 0.73 and 0.69 respectively for the three
clusters as a measure of internal consistency was obtained through Cronbach
Alpha method. The 896 copies of questionnaires were administered with the
help of three briefed research assistants through on the spot administration
method. All the 896 copies of the instrument were returned and used for data
analysis. Research questions were answered using mean score of 896, while
the hypotheses were tested using t-test analyses at 0.05 level of
significance. The findings revealed that the economic factor promotes adult
learning in adult literacy programme to a low extent, and the educational
factor also promotes adult learning in adult literacy programme to a low
extent in Plateau State. While psychological factor promotes adult learning
in adult literacy programme to a high extent in the State. Therefore, the
study concludes that economic and educational factors promote adult learning
in adult literacy programme to a low extent in Plateau State. The researcher
therefore recommended that: Government should sensitize people on the
economic needs of adult literacy centres in Plateau state; Government at all
levels including local leaders should as matter of importance enlighten the
youths/adults on what they stand to gain educationally in adult literacy
programme. In order to improve enrolment, retention and completion of adult
learners psychologically, there is the need for increased sensitization and
mobilization of the populace by government at all levels among others. |
|
Received: 16/12/2022 Accepted: 24/12/2022 Published: 28/12/2022 |
|
|
*Corresponding
Author Oli, Chijioke Innocent E-mail: cinnocent001@ gmail.com |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Education remains the key to human
development. It is seen as the driving force for meaningful developments in
every human society. The goal of any educational system is to provide or
develop a balanced individual capable of surviving in his environment and
contributing meaningfully towards the survival of that society to which he
belongs. Adult education is one of the principal professions that can take
adequate care of socio-economic, cultural political and environmental problems
of the adults. The success of adult education in terms of achieving its goals
as stated in the National Policy on Education (2004) cannot be over-emphasized.
Adult education changes the social and psychological minds of adults more than
any other profession, instills lost hope in them and liberates them from their
prejudice of seeing themselves as not beings that are capable of learning.
Adult education awakens adult learners to become aware of their environmental
(social, economic, cultural and political) and psychological potentials and
hidden abilities. It also exerts enormous influence on the larger society in
terms of national development.
The definition of Adult Education at this
point, becomes necessary to make this discussion intelligent, and clearly
identify the basic issues that are examined in this discourse. Adult education
as a concept is one most difficult to define. Yet we see people define it from
different perspectives. Most writers seem to agree that adult education is the
education geared towards the adult. This gives rise to the question “who is an
adult”. An adult as a concept, just like adult education, has been defined by
many different authors and writers from different perspectives. Some use the
biological parameter in defining it, while others use the chronological,
historical, economic, psychological, political and social parameters in
defining who an adult is. One may ask “what then can be said about the concept
of an adult”? (Bown, 2007 and Ibeh, 2008) see an adult as one who has achieved
full physical development and is expected to have the right to participate as a
responsible homemaker, worker and member of a society. Nzeneri (2010) perceives
an adult as a person who is physically and psychologically mature, and the
individual is socially, economically, politically, culturally and
environmentally responsible. Looking at the above definitions of an adult, two
key words exist, which are maturity and responsibility. He also informs that in
advanced countries an adult is one who has attained the voting age of
twenty-one (21) years and more, while in developing country like Nigeria, he is
one who has attained the voting age of 18 years. In order to avoid disparities
that exist in different various definitions, UNESCO (1976) gives a
recommendation of who an adult is: it is as a person regarded as such by
society to which he/she belongs. From this recommendation of UNESCO, we may now
see the definition of who an adult is as culture referenced. It depends on who
a particular society considers to be an adult in that society.
In defining adult education,
Obidiegwu (2013) saw it as all organized and purposeful educational activities
designed for adults for their personal and societal fulfillment in or out of
school which enable them to adapt to global requirements. Furthermore, Apiti,
Adebola and Agusiobo (2013) posited that any person learning anything new for
the purposes of acquiring information, understanding, learning how to
appreciate things new or learning a skill or learning how to manipulate things
is engaged in adult literacy education.
Nigeria cannot develop in any significant way
if the majority of Nigerians are not first considerably developed. Literacy is
critical to the development of individual Nigerians and the country. The
Independent Commission on Population and Quality of Life (ICPQL, 1996)
graphically highlights the limitations of the illiterate. In contemporary
society in which laws, rules and instructions are written, illiteracy is a
“severe handicap when participating in decisions affecting life: it is
tantamount to disability, affecting every aspect of living. It confines job
opportunities to the most menial and low-paid tasks” (ICPQL, 1996, p. 174). For
a significant number of citizens to be illiterate in multi-ethnic Nigeria is a
national handicap. None of the three major indigenous languages (Hausa, Igbo
and Yoruba) is the lingua franca, and the English language which the majority
of the rural dwellers can either not speak or write well enough or cannot speak
or write at all is the official language. Consequently, the participation of
illiterate Nigerians in national discourse and in sundry social and economic
transactions is hardly significant or meaningful.
In defining literacy, Agboeze
(2014) saw it as the ability of an individual to read, write, calculate and be
empowered on how best to make a living particular from the view of poverty
reduction. Agboeze further defined literacy education as simply the teaching of
literacy. This is true because according to Iyabo (2004) literacy expands the
horizon of an individual and brings people out of their narrow and restrained
vision to a broader and unrestrained vision. Through literacy education, people
are properly informed of global best practices and are not taken unawares on
the trends of the present day complexities. Similarly, Iyunade (2014) observed
that in recognition of the roles of adult education in the development of any
society, attention was drawn to the relevance of linking literacy to
socio-cultural and economic development, aspirations of the people, and
improved quality of literacy programmes in order to effectively facilitate
adult literacy education in developing nations.
The Nigerian government through
relevant agencies made deliberate attempts to provide and promote adult
literacy education in the country. In practical terms, Ogbondah (2014) observed
that adult literacy education centres increased in number in urban and rural
communities in Nigeria. Some of the centres are located in primary schools,
secondary schools, local government headquarters, while some are located in
community halls and village centres. To further promote adult literacy
education, Ogbondah (2014) further observed that a legislative backing was
given in the year 1990. The year declared International literacy year following
the Jomtien Conference held in Thailand. The conference was aimed at
reasserting spelt out plan in pursuance of adult literacy education. The
conference raised concern for the provision of learning opportunities for all,
including those who are either excluded or unreached. It also demands that
adults keep on acquiring more information, updating their skills and
re-examining their values so as to be able to face life challenges.
Ordinarily adults who do not meet
up with schooling during their young age should be happy and eager to enroll
for adult learning programme. Adult learning centres should be adequately
equipped with good facilities, competent teachers, motivational factors ranging
from conducive classroom, adequate teaching aids, and subsidized tuition fee
for interested learner, sensitization programmes in all the local centres,
supervision, assessment and maintenance of materials and manpower required for
effective teaching and leraning.
From the background information it is clear
that literacy contributes significantly to the development of any country. It
is also evident that countries with high poverty levels are characterized by
high illiteracy rates. The same case applies to Plateau state in Nigeria with
more than half of its residents living below the poverty line which correlates
with its high illiteracy rates. This implies that economic empowerment of
participants in adult literacy centres and education is an effective strategy
for poverty reduction. High poverty levels go hand in glove with high
illiteracy rates. However, the level of participation of learners in the adult
literacy centres in Plateu State of Nigeria is generally low inspite of its
high illiteracy rate and government efforts to provide education to its
citizens. It is against this background that the study aimed at assessing the factors
that promote adult learning in adult literacy centres in Plateau state.
Research
Questions
The following research questions have been raised to guide the
study:
1.
To what extent do economic factors promote adult learning in adult
literacy programmes in Plateau State?
2.
To what extent do educational factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy programmes in Plateau State?
3.
To what extent do psychological factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy programmes in Plateau State?
Hypotheses
The following null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of
significant:
H01: There is no
significant difference between the mean ratings of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent economic factors promote adult learning in adult
literacy centres in Plateau State.
H02: There is no
significant difference between the mean ratings of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent educational factors promote adult learning in adult
literacy centres in Plateau State.
H03: There is no
significant difference between the mean ratings of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent psychological factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy centres in Plateau State.
METHODOLOGY
The
study adopted the descriptive survey design. This
study was carried out in Plateau state Nigeria. The population of the
study is made up of 8,959 respondents consisting of 7,225 adult learners and
1,734 facilitators in the 17 Literacy centres in three education zones in
Plateau state, Nigeria. The sample size for the study is 896 respondents
comprising 723 adult learners and 173 facilitators selected from 8,959
population. Proportionate Stratified simple random
sampling was used to select the centres according to their zones. Questionnaire
was the instrument used for data collection. It is titled “Factors that Promote
Adult Learning Questionnaire” (FPALQ). The construction of the questionnaire
was based on the purpose of the study. The questionnaire has two sections
(Sections A and B). Section A of the FPALQ solicited the bio data of the
respondents. Section B was organized in three clusters. Cluster A looked at the
Economic factors that promote adult literacy programmes in Plateau state,
cluster B looked at the Educational factors that promote adult literacy
programmes in Plateau state and cluster C focused on the Psychological factors
that promote adult literacy programmes in Plateau state. The face validity of
the instrument was ascertained by three experts, two from the Department Adult
and Continuing Education and one from the Department of Science Education
(Measurement and Evaluation) in College of Education, Michael Okpara University
of Agriculture, Umudike. To ensure reliability, the questionnaires were
pilot tested in Pankshin, Mangu and Jos-South centres which ensured clarity of
the items. The rational for the use of Cronbach Alpha
procedure was that the items have no right or wrong answers, as they were not
dichotomously scored. Again, it was considered appropriate as it ensures the
homogeneity of the items in the clusters. The instrument reliability index of
0.73. The data collected for the study were analysed using mean and standard
deviation to answer the research questions, while the null hypotheses were
tested with t-test analysis at 0.05 level of significance.
RESULTS
Research Question 1
To what extent do
economic factors promote adult learning in adult literacy programmes in Plateau
State?
Table: 1: Mean
ratings of respondents on the extent economic factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy programmes in Plateau state
|
|
|
N |
Fac |
|
A.L |
|
|
|
|
|
S/N |
CLUSTER A |
|
|
S.D |
|
S.D |
|
Decision |
|
|
1 |
Perceived
improve income motivate adults to enroll in adult literacy programmes |
896 |
2.33
|
1.4 |
1.34 |
1.3 |
|
Low
extent |
|
|
2 |
Being
gainfully employed creates opportunity for adult literacy programmes |
896 |
2.47 |
1.85 |
2.26 |
1.91 |
|
Low
extent |
|
|
3 |
Better
standard of living makes one to enroll for adult literacy programmes |
896 |
1.88 |
1.8 |
1.88 |
1.1 |
|
Low
extent |
|
|
4 |
Self-reliant
and productive people enroll for adult literacy programmes |
896 |
1.68 |
1.9 |
1.61 |
1.7 |
|
Low
extent |
|
|
5 |
An
improve one’s economic wellbeing makes one to enroll for adult literacy
programmes |
896 |
1.74 |
1.6 |
1.73 |
1.9 |
|
Low
extent |
|
|
|
Cluster
Means |
896 |
2.02 |
1.5 |
1.76 |
1.09 |
|
Low
extent |
|
Key;
Fac = Facilitators and A.L = Adult Learners
Table 1 therefore, showed a cluster mean of
1.89 which is within the criterion mean of 1.49 – 2.49 of a 4 point rating
scale. This indicated that the respondents agreed that economic factors promote
adult learning to a low extent in adult literacy programmes in Plateau State.
Research
Question 2
To
what extent do educational factors promote adult learning in adult literacy
programmes in Plateau State?
Table:
2: Mean ratings of respondents on the extent educational factors promote adult
learning in adult literacy programmes in Plateau state
|
|
|
N |
Fac |
|
A.L |
|
|
|
S/N |
CLUSTER B |
|
|
S.D |
|
S.D |
Decision |
|
6 |
Obtaining
certificate for a better job makes one to enroll for adult literacy
programmes |
896 |
2.04 |
0.65 |
1.92 |
1.66 |
Low
extent |
|
7 |
Improvement
on communicative skills makes one to enroll for adult literacy programmes |
896 |
2.36 |
0.71 |
2.26 |
1.91 |
Low
extent |
|
8 |
Ability
to take decisions on developmental processes makes one to enroll for adult
literacy programmes |
896 |
2.02 |
0.64 |
2.45 |
2.13 |
Low
extent |
|
9 |
To
be an educated citizen makes one to enroll for adult literacy programmes |
896 |
2.42 |
0 .71 |
2.21 |
1.90
|
Low
extent |
|
10 |
To
acquire knowledge that will help one to live a better life makes one to
enroll for adult literacy programme |
896 |
2.36 |
0.71 |
2.26 |
1.91 |
Low
extent |
|
|
Cluster
Mean |
896 |
2.24 |
1.5 |
2.22 |
1.22 |
Low
extent |
Thus,
table 2 above showed a cluster mean of 2.23 which are within the criterion mean
of 1.49 – 2.49 of a 4 point rating scale. This indicated that the respondents
agreed that educational factors promote adult learning to a low extent in adult
literacy programmes in Plateau State.
Research
Question 3
To
what extent do psychological factors promote adult learning in adult literacy
programmes in Plateau State?
Table:
3: Mean ratings of respondents on the extent psychological factors promote
adult learning in adult literacy programmes in Plateau state
|
|
|
N |
Fac |
|
A.L |
|
|
|
|
|
S/N |
S/N CLUSTER C |
|
|
S.D |
|
S.D |
|
Decision |
|
|
11 |
Overcoming
inferiority complex makes one to enroll for adult literacy programmes |
896 |
2.54 |
0.65 |
2.78 |
1.66 |
High
extent |
||
|
12 |
Occupying
higher positions of authority in the society makes one to enroll for adult
literacy programmes |
896 |
2.67 |
0.71 |
2.62 |
1.91 |
High
extent |
||
|
13 |
Having
control over your personal lives makes one to enroll for adult literacy
programmes |
896 |
2.55 |
0.64 |
2.87 |
2.13 |
High
extent |
||
|
14 |
Having
attitudinal change makes one to enroll for adult literacy programme |
896 |
2.66 |
0 .71 |
2.54 |
1.90
|
High
extent |
||
|
15 |
To
improve one’s social well-being makes one to enroll for adult literacy
programmes |
896 |
2.73 |
0.71 |
2.50 |
1.91 |
High
extent |
||
|
|
Cluster
Mean |
896 |
2.63 |
1.65 |
2.66 |
1.22 |
High
extent |
||
Table 3
showed a cluster mean of 2.64 which are within the real limit of 2.50 – 4.00 of
a 4 point rating scale. This indicated that the respondents agreed that
psychological factors promote adult learning to a high extent in adult literacy
programmes in Plateau State.
Hypothesis 1
H01: There is no
significant difference between the mean score responses of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent economic factors promote adult learning in adult
literacy programmes in Plateau State.
Table 4: t-test
analysis of responses from Adult Learners and Facilitator on the extent
economic factors promote adult learning in adult literacy programmes in Plateau
state
|
Group |
N |
|
S.D |
Df |
t-cal |
t-tab |
Decision |
|
|
|
Adult
Learners |
723 |
1.76 |
1.5 |
894 |
-1.26 |
1.96 |
Not
Significant |
|
|
|
Facilitators |
173 |
2.02 |
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P = 0.05
The
mean scores of the two groups were subjected to t-test statistic. The result
presented in Table 4 showed that there is no significant difference between the
mean ratings of the two groups. This is because the t-calculated (-1.26) is
less than the t-tabulated of 1.96 with degree of freedom 894. Since the value
of t- calculated is less than t-tabulated, this implies that there is no
significant difference in the mean score responses of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent economic factors promote adult learning in adult
literacy programmes in Plateau State.
Hypothesis 2
H02: There is no
significant difference between the mean score responses of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent educational factors promote adult learning in adult
literacy programmes in Plateau State.
Table
5: t-test analysis of responses from Adult Learners and Facilitator on the
extent educational factors promote adult learning in adult literacy programmes
in Plateau state
|
Group |
N |
|
S.D |
Df |
t-cal |
t-tab |
Decision |
|
|
|
Adult
Learners |
723 |
2.22
|
1.22 |
894 |
1.70 |
1.96 |
Not
Significant |
|
|
|
Facilitators |
173 |
2.42 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P = 0.05
The
mean scores of the two groups were subjected to t-test statistic. The result
presented in Table 5 showed that there is no significant difference between the
mean ratings of the two groups. This is because the t-calculated (1.7) is less
than the t-tabulated of 1.96 with degree of freedom 894. Since the value of t-
calculated is less than t-tabulated, this implies that there is no significant
difference in the mean score responses of adult learners and facilitators on
the extent educational factors promote adult learning in adult literacy
programmes in Plateau State.
Hypothesis 3
H03: There is no
significant difference between the mean score responses of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent psychological factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy programmes in Plateau State.
Table
6: t-test analysis of responses from Adult Learners and Facilitator on the
extent psychological factors promote adult learning in adult literacy
programmes in Plateau state
|
Group |
N |
|
S.D |
|
Df |
|
t-cal |
t-tab |
Decision |
|
|
Adult
Learners |
723 |
2.66
|
1.02 |
|
894 |
|
2.32 |
1.96 |
Significant
|
|
|
Facilitator |
173 |
2.63 |
1.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P = 0.05
The
mean scores of the two groups were subjected to t-test statistic. The result
presented in Table 6 showed that there is significant difference between the
mean ratings of the two groups. This is because the t-calculated (2.32) is
greater than the t-tabulated of 1.96 with degree of freedom 894. Since the
value of t- calculated is greater than t-tabulated, this implies that there is
a significant difference in the mean score responses of adult learners and
facilitators on the extent psychological factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy programmes in Plateau State.
DISCUSSION OF
FINDINGS
The extent economic
factors promote adult learning in adult literacy centres in Plateau state,
which revealed that economic factors promote adult learning to a low extent in
literacy centres in Plateau state. The findings of the study is in line with
Yusuf (2014) who revealed that economic factors has not significantly promote
adult learning in open and distance learning institutions in the north-east of
Nigeria. Also, Tom (2016) agreed with the findings and revealed that economic
factors to a low extent enhance adult learning in adult literacy centres in
Kajiado County, Kenya. In a contrary view, Liani (2013) argued the findings and
revealed that economic factors have the highest influence on the implementation
of the adult literacy education programmes in Homa Bay County Kenya.
More so, the extent
educational factors promote adult learning in adult literacy centres in Plateau
state revealed that educational factors promote adult learning to a low extent
in literacy centres in Plateau state. This findings is in line with Liani
(2013) who revealed that educational factors were the least that promotes adult
literacy programme in HomaBAy County, Kenya. In another view, Bua, Ogasele and
Iorlaha agreed that educational factors have increased literacy rate in the
rural communities of Benue.
Moreover, the extent
psychological factors promote adult learning in adult literacy centres in Plateau
state revealed that psyhological factors promote adult learning to a high
extent in literacy centres in Plateau state. The findings are in line with
Umezulike (2006) who revealed that psychological factors promote the adult
learners to be responsible citizens of Enugu state. Also, Ugwuabonyi (2005)
agreed with the findings and revealed that psychological factors promotes adult
learners and liberates them from shackles of ignorance. Yusuf (2014) also
agreed that increase in psychological factors has significantly promoted adult
learning in Open and Distance learning centres in North-East.
CONCLUSION
Based on the
discussion of findings of this study, the following conclusions are made; that
economic and educational factors promote adult learning to a low extent in
adult literacy centres in Plateau state. While psychological factors promotes
adult learning to a high extent in adult literacy centres in Plateau state.
Also,
the hypotheses revealed that there is no significant difference in the mean
score responses of adult learners and facilitators on the extent economic
factors promote adult learning in adult literacy programmes in Plateau State,
there is no significant difference in the mean score responses of adult learners
and facilitators on the extent educational factors promote adult learning in
adult literacy programmes in Plateau State, there is a significant difference
in the mean score responses of adult learners and facilitators on the extent
psychological factors promote adult learning in adult literacy programmes in
Plateau State.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based
on the findings of this study, the researcher made the following
recommendations:
1.
Government should sensitize people on the economic needs of adult
literacy centres in Plateau state.
2.
Government at all levels including local leaders should as matter
of importance enlighten the youths/adults on what they stand to gain
educationally in adult literacy programme.
3.
In
order to improve enrolment, retention and completion of adult learners
psychologically, there is the need for increased sensitization and mobilization
of the populace by government at all levels.
4.
Facilitators
should be trained to understand the psychological makeup of adult learners
before planning their content and before making up their minds on the choice of
relevant methodology.
REFERENCES
Agboeze, M. U. (2014). Literacy Education: A tool for
entrepreneurship skills acquisition and development in Nigeria. Journal of Adult Educational and Development,
6 (1), 90-105.
Apiti, A. A., Adebola, H. E. & Agusioba, P. A. (2013). The
Role of NYSC in the delivery of adult education programmes in Nigeria. UNIZIK Orient Journal of Education. 7
(1), 65-80.
Independent
Commission on Population and Quality of Life (1996). Caring for the Future: Making the Next Decades Provide a Life Worth
Living. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iyabo,
T. U. (2004). Personnel preparation: recurring challenges and the need for
action to ensure access of general education. Journal of Research and Practice for persons with severe Disabilities. 8 (8), 89-107.
Liani, M. L. S. (2013). Factors influencing the implementation of
adult education programmes in adult literacy centres in HomaBay County, Kenya. Published thesis of Department of Adult and
Continue Education, University of Nairobi.
Nzeneri,
I.S. (2010): Adults in battle: Any hope
of victory? Inaugural Lecture Series No. 71. Port Harcourt, University of
Port Harcourt Press
Obidiegwu, L. (2013). Teaching and learning in further and adult
education. Delta Place: Stanley Thomas Publishers
Ogbondah, M. D. (2014). An Analysis of the Place of Literacy in
poverty Reduction Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education
Tom, O. O. (2016). Factors that enhance adult learning in adult
literacy centres in Kaijado County, Kenya. Published
thesis of Department of Adult and Continue Education, University of
Nairobi.
Ugwuabonyi, A. (2005). The role of adult education in community
development. (A case study of literacy centres in Nsukka, Enugu State. An
unpublished thesis submitted to the department of Adult Education, UNN.
Umezulike, N. (2006). Contributions of adult education programmes
to the economic development of Enugu State. Adult Education in Nigeria. The Journal of the Nigerian National Council
for Adult Education. Ibadan: Franco-Ola Printers.
Yusufu, G. B. & Aishatu, T. (2014). Determinants of factors
that enhance adult learning in open and distance learning institutions in
North-East Nigeria. Journal of Education
and Vocational Practices, 5(3), 56-82.
|
Cite this Article: Oli, CI; Idakwoji, S (2022). Assessment of
Factors That Promote Adult Learning in Adult Literacy Centres in Plateau
State.
Greener Journal of Educational Research, 12(1): 41-47. |