Greener Journal of Medical Sciences

Vol. 14(2), pp. 196-204, 2024

ISSN: 2276-7797

Copyright ©2024, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s)

https://gjournals.org/GJMS

 

 

 

Postgraduate Students and Academic Writing: Challenges in a Low-income Setting

 

 

Rex Friday Ogoronte Alderton Ijah1, Tryphosa G. Ordu2, Sokiprim Akoko3, Sukarime F. Eli4, Seye Babatunde5

 

 

1Lead Author & Senior Lecturer, Department of Surgery, Rivers State University / Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

2PhD Student, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

3Lecturer I, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Basic Clinical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.

4Associate Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rivers State University; and Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.

5Professor of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Formerly of University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria & Technical Officer, World Health Organization, Nigeria.

 

 

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

 

Article No.: 110724161

Type: Research

Full Text: PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB

 

Background: The goal of most postgraduate programs is to adapt the student to acquire knowledge available in the desired discipline, and also train to be committed to the search for new knowledge and new approaches as it relates to that field of study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the academic writing and its associated challenges among post-graduate students in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among post-graduate students in tertiary healthcare and educational institutions of higher learning in Port Harcourt Nigeria over a period of three years (2019-2021). Six hundred and twelve post-graduate students were selected using multi-stage sampling technique, and information was obtained using self-administered structured questionnaire. Collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel® and analyzed with SPSS version 25 to compute summary statistics, and WinPEPI® to calculate 95% Confidence Intervals. Chi-square test was used to test differences in proportions, and a significant level of 5% was used to test association between variables.

Results: The mean age of respondents was 35.47±7.90 (95% CI = 34.844 or 36.096). Four hundred and sixty-seven (76.3%) respondents had published at least one paper in a journal. Three hundred and eighty (62.1%) respondents were already involved collaboration, and 456 (74.5%) were proficient in the use of computer. In decreasing order, literature search (n = 139, 22.71%), research methodology problem (n = 130, 21.24%), conceptualization of research idea (n = 118, 19.28%), referencing (n = 109, 17.81%), etc. were the more challenging sections/areas in academic writing. The impediments included, lack of funds for research (n = 254, 41.50%), lack of time for research (n = 176, 28.76%), poor knowledge of reference management software (n = 128, 20.92%), societal distractions (n = 108, 17.65%).

Conclusion: Although postgraduate students do engage in academic research publications which are mostly their dissertations / thesis, challenges and impediments still abound. Postgraduate funding and intensifying current efforts to improve knowledge of structural components of academic research is highly recommended.

 

Accepted:  09/11/2024

Published: 28/11/2024

 

*Corresponding Author

Rex Friday Ogoronte A. Ijah

Email: rexijah@gmail.com

Phone: +2348033953290

 

Keywords: Academic Writing, Postgraduate Students, Challenges, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

 

 

 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

The goal of most postgraduate programs is to adapt the student to acquire knowledge available in the desired discipline, and also train to be committed to the search for new knowledge and new approaches as it relates to that field of study. Academic writing is therefore an essential element of the training, so important as to warrant inclusion of dissertation / thesis submission as a prerequisite for completion of the said program. The postgraduate program may be academic or professional, culminating in a master’s degree, PhD, professional certificates or diploma, etc., for which a first degree or bachelor is often required before enrolment into the program. Postgraduate training, dating back to the 1880s, started with a concept intended for teachers’ education 1. Postgraduate training lays the foundation for sustenance of educational institutions. A typical example is the medical / surgical specialties where the little effort of the New York Polyclinic and the New York Post-Graduate contributed to shaping specialization and postgraduate medical training in America 2.

 

Academic writing scripted in a way that carries a message, in a manner intended by the author and understood by the reading public without ambiguity, is a learned act and not easy to accomplish even among graduate students. In settings where English is not their first language, graduate students are known to encounter some challenges as reported in Malaysia, necessitating a call for special programmes to meet academic writing needs 3. Incorporation of academic writing development programme into Masters’ degree of the Biological Sciences was reported to have resulted in remarkable reduction in plagiarism rates compared to previous years 4. Peculiar challenges, including tensions and apprehensions have been reported as graduate students navigate the difficult terrain of acquiring the culture of academic writing, especially among international students in the United Kingdom 5 and the United States 6. Some students go the extra mile of contracting private tutors to improve on their academic writing skills 7.

 

In a bid to improve the academic writing skills of postgraduate students and lecturers alike, some universities organized research methods and reference management software workshops in the academic community. In the Nigerian setting, issues of academic writing among postgraduate students have been in the public space. A positive relationship has been reported between the level of training and awareness of plagiarism among postgraduate students 8. A study done in Ogun State Nigeria found some negative impact of social media chatting on formal academic writing, in terms of students’ importation of informal communication styles of social media in formal Writing 9. Also barriers to research among graduate students in African universities have been mentioned in some studies 10, 11. What are the peculiar challenges with postgraduates and academic writing as it affects Port Harcourt? What could be done to improve academic writing among graduate students in our environment? This study evaluated academic writing and its associated challenges among post-graduate students in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among students undergoing postgraduate training (Masters, PhD) in Port Harcourt over a period of three years (2019-2021), using self-administered questionnaire. The institutions of postgraduate trainings used for the study were three universities – the University of Port Harcourt (Federal Government institution), the Rivers State University and Ignatius Ajuru University (both State Government institution); and two teaching hospitals - the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (Federal operated), the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (State-owned); all located in Port Harcourt the capital city of Rivers State.

 

The minimum sample size of 400 was determined using the formula for survey developed by Taro Yamane based on the estimated population of postgraduate students in Port Harcourt estimated to be 2.5million (about 500 for each institution). n     where n = minimum sample size, N = Estimated Total population size (of Researchers) and e = desired precision / level of significance, usually 5% (0.05) at 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Hence, n   = 2,500,000/ 1+2,500,000 X 0.052 = 399.9 being approximately 400. The multi-stage sampling method was used to distribute a total of 700 semi-structured questionnaires. Each university / institution was allocated a quota of questionnaires, and a certain quota was allocated to selected department in each institution using the systematic sampling method. The questionnaires were thereafter distributed to identified postgraduate students in their class rooms and clinics in the selected departments using the convenience sampling method. The Cronbach alpha (in SPSS) was used for the reliability of the study instrument (0.730). Data obtained was entered into Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet, formed into tables and analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Chi- square test was used for statistical significance and logistic regression (odd ratio) for association between variables.

 

 

RESULTS

 

Out of 700 questionnaires distributed, 612 were retrieved (response rate = 87.4%).


 

 


Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

Variables

Frequency (n = 612)

Percentage (%)

Sex

 

 

Male

341

55.7

Female

271

44.3

Age (Mean= 35.47±7.90)

 

 

20 - 24 years

35

5.7

25 - 29 years

109

17.8

30 - 34 years

170

27.8

35 - 39 years

127

20.8

40 - 44 years

76

12.4

45 - 49 years

57

9.3

50 - 54 years

36

5.9

55 - 59 years

2

0.3

Marital Status

 

 

Single

319

52.1

Married

289

47.2

Separated/Divorced

4

0.7

Religion

 

 

Christianity

586

95.8

Islam

22

3.6

No religion

4

.7

Category of respondents

 

 

Postgraduate Students (Masters)

403

65.8

Postgraduate Students (PhD)

209

34.2

Institution of training or service

 

 

University of Port Harcourt (UPH)

307

50.2

University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH)

48

7.8

Rivers State University

205

33.5

Rivers State University Teaching Hospital

6

1.0

Ignatius Ajuru University of Education

43

7.0

Number of years in School / Training

 

 

Less than 6 months

113

18.5

6 - 11 months

131

21.4

12 - 17 months

189

30.9

18 - 23 months

109

17.8

24 - 29 months

34

5.6

30 - 35 months

15

2.5

3 years and above

21

3.4

 


 

The demographic characteristics of the respondents is presented in Table 1. There were 341 (55.7%) male and 271 (44.3%) female respondents. Three hundred and nineteen (52.1%) respondents were single, and 289 (47.2%) were married. Most respondents (n = 482, 78.8%) were within 25 and 44 years, with a peak age range of 30-34years seen among 170 (27.8%.) respondents. There were 403 (65.8%) Master degree students and 209 (34.2%) engaged in PhD program.  Three hundred and seven (50.2%) respondents were undergoing training at the University of Port Harcourt (UPH), while 205 (33.5%) in the Rivers State University. The mean age of respondents was 35.47±7.90 years (95%CI = 34.844 or 36.096), while the male to female ratio was 1.26: 1.


 

Table 2: Academic paper publications, collaboration, use of aids, and proficiency in computer usage (n = 612)

Variables

Frequency (n = 612)

Percentage (%)

Ever published a paper in a journal

 

 

Yes

467

76.3

No

145

23.7

Number of papers ever published

 

 

None

145

23.7

Less than 10

366

59.8

10 - 19

80

13.1

20 - 29

19

3.1

30 - 39

2

.3

Do Collaborate with other colleagues for publication

 

 

Yes

380

62.1

No

170

27.8

Not sure

62

10.1

Proficient in the use of computer (MS word/Excel etc.)

 

 

Yes

456

74.5

No

56

9.2

Not sure

100

16.3

Ever use any Aids in publications

 

 

Yes

469

76.6

No

96

15.7

Not sure

47

7.7


Table 2 shows respondents’ academic paper publications, collaboration, use of aids, and proficiency in computer usage. Four hundred and sixty-seven (76.3%) respondents had published at least one paper in a journal. Three hundred and eighty (62.1%) respondents were already involved some form of collaboration with other colleagues for publication, 456 (74.5%) were proficient in the use of computer, 469 (76.6%) had used some form of aids in publications.


 

Table 3: Study designs, Types of academic papers published, and Aids to improve skills used (n = 612)

 

Yes

No

Study Designs commonly published

 

 

 

 

Descriptive Studies

194

31.70

418

68.30

Analytical Studies

137

22.39

475

77.61

Experimental Studies

229

37.42

383

62.58

Category of Article / Publication commonly published

 

 

 

 

Original article

115

18.79

497

81.21

Case Report

21

3.43

591

96.57

Case Series

8

1.31

604

98.69

Review Articles

23

3.76

589

96.24

Systematic Review

5

0.82

607

99.18

Letter to the Editor

6

0.98

606

99.02

Technical reports

8

1.31

604

98.69

Theses and Dissertations

151

24.67

461

75.33

Aids to improve skills in publications used

 

 

 

 

 

Research guide

172

28.10

440

71.90

 

Audio-Visual Research Aids

101

16.50

  511

83.50

 

Research Fair

85

13.89

527

86.11

 

Reading Journal Articles

256

41.83

356

58.17

 

Academic Conferences

156

25.49

456

74.51

 

Grants

40

6.54

572

93.46

 

Good knowledge of computer use

129

21.08

483

78.92

 

None

74

12.09

538

87.91

 

 

 


Table 3 shows the study designs, types of academic papers published, and aids to academic writing used by respondents. Thesis / Dissertations (n = 151, 24.67%) and original articles (n = 115, 18.79%) were the most common articles published. Responses on multiple options on category of study designs commonly published shows that 194 (31.70%), 137 (22.39%), and 229 (37.42%) respondents commonly published descriptive studies, analytical studies, and experimental studies respectively. Respondents’ known aids to improve skills in publications includes: reading journal articles (n = 256, 41.83%), research guide (n = 172, 28.10%), academic conferences (n = 156, 25.49%), knowledge of computer (n = 129, 21.08%), audio-visual research aids (n = 101, 16.50%), etc.


 

 

Table 4: Arears of Challenges and Impediments to academic writing in the 21st century (n =612)

 

Yes

                No

Challenging section/areas in academic writing

 

 

 

 

Conceptualization of research idea

118

19.28

494

80.72

Organizational Problems

106

17.32

506

82.68

Literature Search

139

22.71

473

77.29

Methodology Problem

130

21.24

482

78.76

Language inefficiency

42

6.86

570

93.14

Evaluation Issues

93

15.20

519

84.80

The art of writing and citing

54

8.82

558

91.18

Referencing

109

17.81

503

82.19

Lack of time for research

128

20.92

484

79.08

Opinion on impediments to academic writing

 

 

 

 

Good knowledge of computer use

129

21.08

483

78.92

Lack of funds for research

254

41.50

358

58.50

Societal distractions

108

17.65

504

82.35

Not attending Seminars/Courses on academic

93

15.20

519

84.80

Poor computer knowledge

74

12.09

538

87.91

Poor knowledge of reference management software (Endnote, Mendeley)

128

20.92

484

79.08

Lack of Collaboration

104

16.99

508

83.01

Poor English usage

37

6.05

575

93.95

Lack of interest in writing

63

10.29

549

89.71

Lack of time for research

176

28.76

436

71.24

 

 


Some of the challenging sections / areas in academic writing are shown in Table 4. In decreasing order, the opinion pool of respondents showed that literature search (n = 139, 22.71%), research methodology problem (n = 130, 21.24%), conceptualization of research idea (n = 118, 19.28%), referencing (n = 109, 17.81%), organizational problems (n = 106, 17.32%), etc. were the more challenging section/areas in academic writing. Among the impediments, lack of funds for research (n = 254, 41.50%), lack of time for research (n = 176, 28.76%), poor knowledge of computer use (n = 129, 21.08%), poor knowledge of reference management software (n = 128, 20.92%), societal distractions (n = 108, 17.65%), lack of collaboration (n = 104, 16.99%) were rated higher.


 

 

Table 5: Relationship between ever published a paper in a journal and selected demographic profile

 

 

Ever published a paper in a journal

 

 

 

Yes

No

Total

(X2)

P-Value

Sex

Male

281 (82.4%)

60 (17.6%)

341

 

 

 

Female

186 (68.6%)

85 (31.4%)

271

15.836

0.000

 

 

20 - 24 years

24 (68.6%)

11 (31.4%)

35

 

 

 

25 - 29 years

81 (74.3%)

28 (25.7%)

109

 

 

 

30 - 34 years

115 (67.6%)

55 (32.4%)

170

 

 

Age

35 - 39 years

102 (80.3%)

25 (19.7%)

127

19.515

0.007

 

40 - 44 years

62 (81.6%)

14 (18.4%)

76

 

 

 

45 - 49 years

52 (91.2%)

5 (8.8%)

57

 

 

 

50 - 54 years

30 (83.3%)

6 (16.7%)

36

 

 

 

55 - 59 years

1 (50.0%)

1 (50.0%)

2

 

 

 

 

 

Single

221 (69.3%)

98 (30.7%)

319

 

 

Marital Status

Married

244 (84.4%)

45 (15.6%)

289

20.791

0.000

 

Separated/

Divorced

2 (50.0%)

2 (50.0%)

4

 

 

 

 

Rank

 

 

Postgraduate Students (Masters)

263 (65.3%)

140 (34.7%)

403

 

 

 

Postgraduate Students (PhD)

204 (97.6%)

5 (2.4%)

209

79.651

0.000

 

Total

467

145

612

 

 

 

 


The relationship between “ever published a paper in a journal” and selected “demographic profile” is shown in Table 5. The proportion of male respondents that ever published a paper in a journal were more than their female counterparts and the relationship was statistically significant (p=0.000). Proportion of those ever published a paper in a journal significantly increased among those age 35-39 years and reach the peak among those 45-49 years old. Hence, age of academicians is a factor in publishing in a journal as the relationship was significant (p = 0.007). Similarly, married respondents were significantly (p= 0.000) able to ever published a paper in a journal and higher proportion of postgraduate students with doctor of philosophy (PhD)-in-view had significantly (p= 0.000) published papers in journals compare to others.


 

 

Table 6: Relationship between ever published a paper in a journal and impediment to academic writing

 

 

Ever published a paper in a journal

 

 

 

Yes

No

Total

(X2)

P-Value

Lack of funds for research

 Yes

178 (70.1%)

76 (29.9%)

254

9.317

0.002

 

No

289 (80.7%)

69 (19.3%)

358

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Societal distractions

Yes

81 (75.0%)

27 (25.0%)

108

0.124

0.405

 

No

386 (76.6%)

118 (23.4%)

504

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not attending Seminars

Yes

52 (55.9%)

41 (44.1%)

93

25.226

0.000

 

No

415 (80.0%)

104 (20.0%)

519

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poor computer knowledge

Yes

48 (64.9%)

26 (35.1%)

74

6.096

0.012

 

No

419 (77.9%)

119 (22.1%)

538

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poor knowledge of referencing

Yes

81 (63.3%)

47 (36.7%)

128

15.190

0.000

 

No

386 (79.8%)

98 (20.2%)

484

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lack of Collaboration

Yes

78 (75.0%)

26 (25.0%)

104

0.118

0.408

 

No

389 (76.6%)

119 (23.4%)

508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poor English usage

Yes

27 (73.0%)

10 (27.0%)

37

0.242

0.374

 

No

440 (76.5%)

135 (23.5%)

575

 

 

 

Lack of interest in writing

Yes

46 (73.0%)

17 (27.0%)

63

0.421

0.306

 

No

421 (76.7%)

128 (23.3%)

549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lack of time for research

Yes

108 (61.4%)

68 (38.6%)

176

30.514

0.000

 

No

359 (82.3%)

77 (17.7%)

436

 

 

 

Total

467

145

612

 

 

 

 


Table 6 shows the relationship between ever published a paper in a journal and impediment to academic writing. The relationship between lack of funds for research and ever published a paper in a journal was statistical significantly (p= 0.002). Also significant, were the relationship between “ever published” and non-attendance of seminars (p= 0.000), poor computer knowledge (p= 0.000), poor knowledge of referencing (p= 0.000), and lack of time for research (p= 0.000) respectively.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Enrolment in postgraduate program is potentially an indirect expression of interest in being part of the body of academicians that would shape the faith of the society by way of teaching the next generation, researching to improve on the present and the future, and carrying out community services to improve the quality of life of a people. The respondents in this study were postgraduate degree students that cut across different disciplines. A wide age range is seen in this study as majority of respondents were within the age range of 25 and 44 years, with a peak at 30-34years. This is unlike the graduate students in China who are mostly in their early 20s and 30s 12, and hence have more years of productive service after post-graduate training before retirement. More than half of the respondents were males, and more than half were single. This can be explained from the fact that the study was carried out in predominantly Christian Southern Nigeria that is known to be associated with a relatively late age at marriage 13, male predominance in this study align with the already documented gender disparity in Africa affected by cultural, sociological, economical, psychological, historical, and political factors 14. However, recent change in trend have been reported in some parts of Africa.15 Postgraduate students undergoing Master’s Degree dominated the respondents, and most were at the University of Port Harcourt (UPH). This is expected as it is natural for the number to reduce with increasing specialization.

 

We found that majority (76.3%) of the respondents had published at least one paper. This finding is higher than what was reported among postgraduate students of nine universities in South-Eastern Nigeria where only 23% of the respondents had published a scholarly paper 16. The content of postgraduate academic publications were the commonly published articles of thesis / dissertations and original articles, and experimental studies (amongst others) also dominated the publications by postgraduate students. The implication of these findings is that postgraduate students restricted themselves to publishing articles on their dissertations / thesis because it is a requirement for graduation. Limited ability of postgraduate students to fund their researches would also probably have led to publications restricted to their thesis. To improve publication skills, less than half of postgraduate students engaged in reading journal articles, using research guide, attending academic conferences, improving their knowledge of computer, and using audio-visual research aids.

 

Most of our respondents were already proficient in the use of the computer. The computer and information era may have partly accounted for this finding, especially with availability of computer-based research tools that boost productivity in literature search, writing (e.g. ChatGPT, WordTune), grammar and paraphrasing, citations, illustrations, and digital data (qualitative and qualitative). However, although these and other artificial intelligence-based tools have greatly improved access to information and writing, there are reports about thei17r use and misuse in academic writing.17-20 A direct relationship has been found between computer literacy skills and access to e-resources by postgraduates 21, 22, and these e-sources are necessary for needed for academic scholarly publications. However, a study done in India showed that postgraduate students use internet services for social networking than for academic purposes 23. With this information, it implies that it is not just enough to know how to use the computer, but also this knowledge should be directed to beneficial academic scholarly works. Most postgraduate students in our study used some form of aids in publications, and were collaborating with colleagues for publication. The workshops organized by universities and training medical colleges on research methods and use of reference management software in our environment might have contributed to this finding. It is interesting to note that the use of information and technology platforms has broaden avenues for collaboration among scientists in education to include even social media 24. Different disciplines are involved in collaborations for different purposes 25-28.

 

Most sections of research work were considered challenging however, literature search, research methodology, and conceptualization of research idea were topmost in the opinion of many respondents. The findings of this study is similar to what was observed  among the legal profession, where inadequacy in the teaching of legal research methods and methodology were identified as major impediment to effective legal academic writing in Nigeria 29. In another study done in Rivers State among postgraduate education students, it was observed that proficiency in research writing / information seeking was high but that of methodological skill was low 30. The issues considered impediments were also numerous, however, rated top on the list by respondents were lack of funds for research, lack of time for research, poor knowledge of computer use, poor knowledge of reference management software, societal distractions, and lack of collaboration. The trio issues of funds and lack of time and societal distractions which are topmost in this study are related, and may imply that most postgraduate students were probably engrossed with some other work to generate funds for living, such that they did not have enough time for academic issues. The fact that these postgraduate students in our study were both full time and part time students strengthens this thinking, especially in an era of general economic down-turn. However, there was statistically significant relationship between “ever published” and non-attendance of seminars, poor computer knowledge, poor knowledge of referencing, lack of time for research, and lack of funds for research respectively. The relationship between ever published and societal distractions was not statistically significant.

The challenges therefore may be dynamic, time-related and vary with discipline under consideration. It is instructive to note that the legal study in reference was all inclusive without isolating issues among postgraduate students.

 

Study Limitations: The quality of scholarly publications of postgraduate students could not be evaluated in this study, and is subject for further studies. Also, our study did not indicate the type of services that postgraduate students use their knowledge of computer for as it relates to academic scholarly publications.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

Although postgraduate students do engage in academic research publications which are mostly their dissertations / thesis, there are constraints / impediments that negatively affect the ability of up-coming academicians to fully contribute to developing the society, bothering on postgraduate research funding and structural components of academic research.

 

Recommendations: There is need to intensify on the efforts being made by universities and colleges in organizing research workshops to improve on skills for research methods and reference management usage for academic writing. Funding for postgraduate research should be looked into by relevant government agencies for public good. Provision of incentives for academic research work would an attraction to increase participation of postgraduate students.

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Acknowledgement: We acknowledge the efforts of our field officers in the who worked to ensure proper data collection for this study. Also, the lecturers and students who spent their precious time filling the questionnaires that generated the data for this study.

 

Ethical Considerations: Approval of the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital obtained. Confidentiality of information was ensured during data collection.

 

Conflict of Interest: None declared

 

 

REFERENCES

 

1.      ld Bernbaum G, Patrick H. . A history of postgraduate initial teacher education in England and Wales, 1880–1980.  Rethinking teacher education: Routledge; 2012. p. 17-28.

2.      Rutkow I. The education, training, and specialization of surgeons: turn-of-the-century America and its postgraduate medical schools. Annals of surgery. 2013; 258(6):1130-6.

3.      Singh MKM. International graduate students’ academic writing practices in Malaysia: Challenges and solutions. Journal of International Students. 2019;5(1):12-22.

4.      Divan A, Bowman M, Seabourne A. Reducing unintentional plagiarism amongst international students in the biological sciences: An embedded academic writing development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2015; 39(3):358-78.

5.      Maringe F, Jenkins J. Stigma, tensions, and apprehension: The academic writing experience of international students. International Journal of Educational Management. 2015; 29(5):609-26..

6.      Cennetkuşu NG. International students’ challenges in academic writing: A case study from a prominent US university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2017; 13(2):309-23.

7.      Tran LT. Journeys of adaptation of Chinese and Vietnamese international students to academic writing practices in higher education 2007.

8.      Idiegbeyan-Ose J, Nkiko C, Osinulu I. Awareness and Perception of Plagiarism of Postgraduate Students in Selected Universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2016.

9.      Oyinloye CA, Banuso OO, Ofodu GO, Osikomaiya MO, Adeoye AO. Media Chatting Inscription as Determinant of Students’ Academic Writing in Higher Institutions of Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research. 2019; 152(2):167-175.

10.     Desmennu AT, Owoaje ET. Challenges of Research Conduct among Postgraduate Research Students in an African University. Educational Research and Reviews. 2018;13(9):336-342.

11.     Oyewole O, Abioye A. Awareness of plagiarism acts and policy by postgraduate students in university of Ibadan, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2018:1(1). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1956

12.     Huang Y. Transitioning challenges faced by Chinese graduate students. Adult learning. 2012;23(3):138-147.

13.     Garenne M. Age at marriage and modernisation in sub-Saharan Africa. Southern African Journal of Demography. 2004; 9(2):59-79.

14.     Teferra D, Altbachl PG. African higher education: Challenges for the 21st century. Higher education. 2004; 47(1):21-50.

15.     Wan C-D. Student enrolment in Malaysian higher education: is there gender disparity and what can we learn from the disparity? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2018; 48(2):244-61.

16.     Tella A, Onyancha B. Scholarly publishing experience of postgraduate students in Nigerian Universities. Accountability in Research. 2021; 28(7):395-427.

17.     Ivanivna VO, Yuriyivna KD, editors. Technology in academic writing instruction: producing a compare-and-contrast essay. The 12 th International scientific and practical conference “Topical aspects of modern scientific research”(August 8-10, 2024) CPN Publishing Group, Tokyo, Japan 2024 376 p; 2024.

18.     Vovk O, Kryvoshyia D. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: composing a for-and-against essay. PrOsvita. 2024(1):19-28.

19.     Rezaei M, Salehi H, Tabatabaei O, editors. Uses and Misuses of ChatGPT as an AI-Language Model in Academic Writing. In: 2024 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (QICAR). Qazvin, Islamic Republic of Iran. 2024; pp. 256-260, doi: 10.1109/QICAR61538.2024.10496607.

20.     Merine R, Purkayastha S, editors. Risks and Benefits of AI-generated Text Summarization for Expert Level Content in Graduate Health Informatics, 2022 IEEE 10th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Rochester, MN, USA, 2022, pp. 567-574. doi: 10.1109/ICHI54592.2022.00113.

21.     Abubakar D, Adetimirinz A. Influence of computer literacy on postgraduates use of e-resources in Nigerian university libraries. 2015. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1207

22.     Abubakar D, Chollom K. Relationship of user education, computer literacy and information and communication technology accessibility and use of e-resources by postgraduate students in Nigerian university libraries. Library Philosophy & Practice. 2017. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1555

23.     Makgahlela L, Bopape S. The use of electronic information resources for academic research by postgraduate students at Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 2014;80(2):1-7.

24.     Van Noorden R. Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature news. 2014;512(7513):126. http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711

25.     Riviello R, Ozgediz D, Hsia RY, Azzie G, Newton M, Tarpley J. Role of collaborative academic partnerships in surgical training, education, and provision. World journal of surgery. 2010;34(3):459-465.

26.     Adenomon MO. Statistical Consulting and Collaboration Practises: The Experience of NSUK-LISA Stat Lab.  Promoting Statistical Practice and Collaboration in Developing Countries: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2022. p. 131-138.

27.     Nkemleke DA, Schmied J. Eds. Academic Writing and Research across Disciplines in Africa. Gottingen, Germany : Cuvillier Verlag; 2016.

28.     Ajegbomogun FO, Oduwole OK. Social media trends and collaborative learning for scholarly research among postgraduate students in a Nigerian University. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal. 2018;13(1):117-132.

29.     Solomon E. Towards Effective Legal Writing in Nigeria. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education. 2017;12(1): 65-94.

30.     Lwehabura MJ. An assessment of information literacy skills among first-year postgraduate students at Sokoine University of Agriculture Tanzania. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2018;50(4):427-34.


 

 

 

Cite this Article: Ijah, RFOA; Ordu, TG; Akoko, S; Eli, SF; Babatunde, S (2024). Postgraduate Students and Academic Writing: Challenges in a Low-income Setting. Greener Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(2): 196-204.