|
Greener Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.
14(2), pp. 196-204, 2024 ISSN:
2276-7797 Copyright
©2024, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) |
|
Postgraduate Students and Academic Writing:
Challenges in a Low-income Setting
Rex Friday Ogoronte Alderton Ijah1,
Tryphosa G. Ordu2, Sokiprim Akoko3, Sukarime F.
Eli4, Seye Babatunde5
1Lead Author
& Senior Lecturer, Department of Surgery, Rivers
State University / Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt,
Rivers State, Nigeria
2PhD Student, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Rivers
State, Nigeria
3Lecturer I, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Basic Clinical
Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
4Associate
Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rivers State University; and
Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Rivers State University Teaching
Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
5Professor
of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Formerly of University of Port
Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria & Technical Officer, World Health
Organization, Nigeria.
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article No.: 110724161 Type: Research Full Text:
PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB |
Background: The goal of most postgraduate programs is to adapt the student to
acquire knowledge available in the desired discipline, and also train to be
committed to the search for new knowledge and new approaches as it relates
to that field of study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the academic writing and its associated
challenges among post-graduate students in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried
out among post-graduate students in tertiary healthcare and
educational institutions of higher learning in Port Harcourt Nigeria over a period of three years (2019-2021). Six hundred and twelve post-graduate students
were selected using multi-stage sampling technique, and information was
obtained using self-administered structured questionnaire. Collected data
were entered into Microsoft Excel® and analyzed with SPSS version 25 to
compute summary statistics, and WinPEPI® to calculate 95% Confidence
Intervals. Chi-square test was used to test differences in proportions, and
a significant level of 5% was used to test association between variables. Results: The mean age of respondents was 35.47±7.90 (95% CI
= 34.844 or 36.096). Four hundred and sixty-seven (76.3%) respondents had published at
least one paper in a journal. Three hundred and eighty (62.1%) respondents
were already involved collaboration, and 456 (74.5%) were proficient in the
use of computer. In decreasing order, literature search (n = 139, 22.71%),
research methodology problem (n = 130, 21.24%), conceptualization of
research idea (n = 118, 19.28%), referencing (n = 109, 17.81%), etc. were
the more challenging sections/areas in academic writing. The impediments
included, lack of funds for research (n = 254, 41.50%), lack of time for
research (n = 176, 28.76%), poor knowledge of reference management software
(n = 128, 20.92%), societal distractions (n = 108, 17.65%). Conclusion:
Although postgraduate students do engage in
academic research publications which are mostly their dissertations /
thesis, challenges and impediments still abound. Postgraduate funding and
intensifying current efforts to improve knowledge of structural components
of academic research is highly recommended. |
|
Accepted: 09/11/2024 Published: 28/11/2024 |
|
|
*Corresponding Author Rex Friday
Ogoronte A. Ijah Email: rexijah@gmail.com Phone: +2348033953290 |
|
|
Keywords: |
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The goal of most postgraduate programs is to adapt the student to acquire
knowledge available in the desired discipline, and also train to be committed
to the search for new knowledge and new approaches as it relates to that field
of study. Academic writing is therefore an
essential element of the training, so important as to warrant inclusion of
dissertation / thesis submission as a prerequisite for completion of the said
program. The postgraduate program may be academic or professional, culminating
in a master’s degree, PhD, professional certificates or diploma, etc., for which
a first degree or bachelor is often required before enrolment into the program.
Postgraduate training, dating back to the 1880s, started with a concept
intended for teachers’ education 1. Postgraduate training lays the foundation for sustenance of educational
institutions. A typical example is the medical / surgical specialties where the
little effort of the New York Polyclinic and the New York Post-Graduate
contributed to shaping specialization and postgraduate medical training in
America 2.
Academic
writing scripted in a way that carries a message, in a manner intended by the
author and understood by the reading public without ambiguity, is a learned act
and not easy to accomplish even among graduate students. In settings where
English is not their first language, graduate students are known to encounter
some challenges as reported in Malaysia, necessitating a call for special
programmes to meet academic writing needs 3. Incorporation of academic writing development programme into Masters’
degree of the Biological Sciences was reported to have resulted in remarkable
reduction in plagiarism rates compared to previous years 4. Peculiar challenges, including tensions and apprehensions have been
reported as graduate students navigate the difficult terrain of acquiring the
culture of academic writing, especially among international students in the
United Kingdom 5 and the United States 6. Some students go the extra mile of contracting private tutors to
improve on their academic writing skills 7.
In a bid to
improve the academic writing skills of postgraduate students and lecturers
alike, some universities organized research methods and reference management
software workshops in the academic community. In the Nigerian setting, issues
of academic writing among postgraduate students have been in the public space.
A positive relationship has been reported between the level of training and
awareness of plagiarism among postgraduate students 8. A study done in Ogun State Nigeria found some negative impact of social
media chatting on formal academic writing, in terms of students’ importation of
informal communication styles of social media in formal Writing 9. Also barriers to research among graduate students in African
universities have been mentioned in some studies 10, 11. What are the peculiar challenges with postgraduates and academic
writing as it affects Port Harcourt? What could be done to improve academic
writing among graduate students in our environment? This study evaluated academic
writing and its associated challenges among post-graduate students in Port
Harcourt, Nigeria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among students
undergoing postgraduate training (Masters, PhD) in Port Harcourt over a period
of three years (2019-2021), using self-administered questionnaire. The
institutions of postgraduate trainings used for the study were three
universities – the University of Port Harcourt (Federal
Government institution), the Rivers State University and Ignatius Ajuru
University (both State Government institution); and two teaching hospitals - the
University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (Federal operated), the Rivers
State University Teaching Hospital (State-owned); all located in Port Harcourt
the capital city of Rivers State.
The minimum
sample size of 400 was determined using the formula for survey developed by Taro
Yamane based on the estimated population of postgraduate students in Port Harcourt
estimated to be 2.5million (about 500 for each institution). n
where n = minimum sample size, N = Estimated
Total population size (of Researchers) and e = desired precision / level of
significance, usually 5% (0.05) at 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Hence, n = 2,500,000/ 1+2,500,000 X 0.052
= 399.9 being approximately 400. The multi-stage sampling method was used to distribute a total of 700 semi-structured
questionnaires. Each university / institution was allocated a quota of questionnaires,
and a certain quota was allocated to selected department in each institution using
the systematic sampling method. The questionnaires were thereafter distributed
to identified postgraduate students in their class rooms and clinics in the
selected departments using the convenience sampling method. The Cronbach alpha (in SPSS) was used for the reliability of the study
instrument (0.730). Data
obtained was entered into Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet, formed into tables and
analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)
version 25.0. Chi- square test was used for statistical significance and
logistic regression (odd ratio) for association between variables.
RESULTS
Out of 700 questionnaires distributed, 612 were retrieved (response rate =
87.4%).
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
|
Variables |
Frequency (n = 612) |
Percentage (%) |
|
Sex |
|
|
|
Male |
341 |
55.7 |
|
Female |
271 |
44.3 |
|
Age
(Mean= 35.47±7.90) |
|
|
|
20 - 24
years |
35 |
5.7 |
|
25 - 29
years |
109 |
17.8 |
|
30 - 34
years |
170 |
27.8 |
|
35 - 39
years |
127 |
20.8 |
|
40 - 44
years |
76 |
12.4 |
|
45 - 49
years |
57 |
9.3 |
|
50 - 54
years |
36 |
5.9 |
|
55 - 59
years |
2 |
0.3 |
|
Marital
Status |
|
|
|
Single |
319 |
52.1 |
|
Married |
289 |
47.2 |
|
Separated/Divorced |
4 |
0.7 |
|
Religion |
|
|
|
Christianity |
586 |
95.8 |
|
Islam |
22 |
3.6 |
|
No
religion |
4 |
.7 |
|
Category
of respondents |
|
|
|
Postgraduate
Students (Masters) |
403 |
65.8 |
|
Postgraduate
Students (PhD) |
209 |
34.2 |
|
Institution
of training or service |
|
|
|
University
of Port Harcourt (UPH) |
307 |
50.2 |
|
University
of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) |
48 |
7.8 |
|
Rivers
State University |
205 |
33.5 |
|
Rivers
State University Teaching Hospital |
6 |
1.0 |
|
Ignatius
Ajuru University of Education |
43 |
7.0 |
|
Number
of years in School / Training |
|
|
|
Less
than 6 months |
113 |
18.5 |
|
6 - 11
months |
131 |
21.4 |
|
12 - 17
months |
189 |
30.9 |
|
18 - 23
months |
109 |
17.8 |
|
24 - 29
months |
34 |
5.6 |
|
30 - 35
months |
15 |
2.5 |
|
3 years
and above |
21 |
3.4 |
The
demographic characteristics of the respondents is presented in Table 1. There
were 341 (55.7%) male and 271 (44.3%) female respondents. Three hundred and
nineteen (52.1%) respondents were single, and 289 (47.2%) were married. Most
respondents (n = 482, 78.8%) were within 25 and 44 years, with a peak age range
of 30-34years seen among 170 (27.8%.) respondents. There were 403 (65.8%)
Master degree students and 209 (34.2%) engaged in PhD program. Three hundred and seven (50.2%) respondents
were undergoing training at the University of Port Harcourt (UPH), while 205
(33.5%) in the Rivers State University. The mean age of respondents was 35.47±7.90
years (95%CI = 34.844 or 36.096), while the male to
female ratio was 1.26: 1.
Table 2: Academic paper publications, collaboration, use of aids, and
proficiency in computer usage (n = 612)
|
Variables |
Frequency (n = 612) |
Percentage (%) |
|
Ever
published a paper in a journal |
|
|
|
Yes |
467 |
76.3 |
|
No |
145 |
23.7 |
|
Number
of papers ever published |
|
|
|
None |
145 |
23.7 |
|
Less
than 10 |
366 |
59.8 |
|
10 - 19 |
80 |
13.1 |
|
20 - 29 |
19 |
3.1 |
|
30 - 39 |
2 |
.3 |
|
Do
Collaborate with other colleagues for publication |
|
|
|
Yes |
380 |
62.1 |
|
No |
170 |
27.8 |
|
Not sure |
62 |
10.1 |
|
Proficient
in the use of computer (MS word/Excel etc.) |
|
|
|
Yes |
456 |
74.5 |
|
No |
56 |
9.2 |
|
Not sure |
100 |
16.3 |
|
Ever use
any Aids in publications |
|
|
|
Yes |
469 |
76.6 |
|
No |
96 |
15.7 |
|
Not sure |
47 |
7.7 |
Table 2 shows
respondents’ academic paper publications, collaboration, use of aids, and
proficiency in computer usage. Four hundred and sixty-seven (76.3%) respondents
had published at least one paper in a journal. Three hundred and eighty (62.1%)
respondents were already involved some form of collaboration with other
colleagues for publication, 456 (74.5%) were proficient in the use of computer,
469 (76.6%) had used some form of aids in publications.
Table 3: Study designs, Types of academic papers published, and Aids
to improve skills used (n = 612)
|
|
Yes |
No |
|||||||
|
Study Designs commonly published |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Descriptive Studies |
194 |
31.70 |
418 |
68.30 |
|||||
|
Analytical Studies |
137 |
22.39 |
475 |
77.61 |
|||||
|
Experimental Studies |
229 |
37.42 |
383 |
62.58 |
|||||
|
Category of Article / Publication commonly published |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Original article |
115 |
18.79 |
497 |
81.21 |
|||||
|
Case Report |
21 |
3.43 |
591 |
96.57 |
|||||
|
Case Series |
8 |
1.31 |
604 |
98.69 |
|||||
|
Review Articles |
23 |
3.76 |
589 |
96.24 |
|||||
|
Systematic Review |
5 |
0.82 |
607 |
99.18 |
|||||
|
Letter to the Editor |
6 |
0.98 |
606 |
99.02 |
|||||
|
Technical reports |
8 |
1.31 |
604 |
98.69 |
|||||
|
Theses and Dissertations |
151 |
24.67 |
461 |
75.33 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Research guide |
172 |
28.10 |
440 |
71.90 |
|
||||
|
Audio-Visual Research Aids |
101 |
16.50 |
511 |
83.50 |
|
||||
|
Research Fair |
85 |
13.89 |
527 |
86.11 |
|
||||
|
Reading Journal Articles |
256 |
41.83 |
356 |
58.17 |
|
||||
|
Academic Conferences |
156 |
25.49 |
456 |
74.51 |
|
||||
|
Grants |
40 |
6.54 |
572 |
93.46 |
|
||||
|
Good knowledge of computer use |
129 |
21.08 |
483 |
78.92 |
|
||||
|
None |
74 |
12.09 |
538 |
87.91 |
|
||||
Table 3 shows
the study designs, types of academic papers published, and aids to academic
writing used by respondents. Thesis / Dissertations (n = 151, 24.67%) and
original articles (n = 115, 18.79%) were the most common articles published.
Responses on multiple options on category of study designs commonly published
shows that 194 (31.70%), 137 (22.39%), and 229 (37.42%) respondents commonly
published descriptive studies, analytical studies, and experimental studies
respectively. Respondents’ known aids to improve skills
in publications includes: reading journal articles (n = 256, 41.83%), research
guide (n = 172, 28.10%), academic conferences (n = 156, 25.49%), knowledge of
computer (n = 129, 21.08%), audio-visual research aids (n = 101, 16.50%), etc.
Table 4: Arears of Challenges and Impediments to academic writing in
the 21st century (n =612)
|
|
Yes |
No |
||
|
Challenging section/areas in academic writing |
|
|
|
|
|
Conceptualization of research idea |
118 |
19.28 |
494 |
80.72 |
|
Organizational Problems |
106 |
17.32 |
506 |
82.68 |
|
Literature Search |
139 |
22.71 |
473 |
77.29 |
|
Methodology Problem |
130 |
21.24 |
482 |
78.76 |
|
Language inefficiency |
42 |
6.86 |
570 |
93.14 |
|
Evaluation Issues |
93 |
15.20 |
519 |
84.80 |
|
The art of writing and citing |
54 |
8.82 |
558 |
91.18 |
|
Referencing |
109 |
17.81 |
503 |
82.19 |
|
Lack of time for research |
128 |
20.92 |
484 |
79.08 |
|
Opinion on impediments to academic writing |
|
|
|
|
|
Good knowledge of computer use |
129 |
21.08 |
483 |
78.92 |
|
Lack of funds for research |
254 |
41.50 |
358 |
58.50 |
|
Societal distractions |
108 |
17.65 |
504 |
82.35 |
|
Not attending Seminars/Courses on academic |
93 |
15.20 |
519 |
84.80 |
|
Poor computer knowledge |
74 |
12.09 |
538 |
87.91 |
|
Poor knowledge of reference management software
(Endnote, Mendeley) |
128 |
20.92 |
484 |
79.08 |
|
Lack of Collaboration |
104 |
16.99 |
508 |
83.01 |
|
Poor English usage |
37 |
6.05 |
575 |
93.95 |
|
Lack of interest in writing |
63 |
10.29 |
549 |
89.71 |
|
Lack of time for research |
176 |
28.76 |
436 |
71.24 |
Some of the
challenging sections / areas in academic writing are shown in Table 4. In
decreasing order, the opinion pool of respondents showed that literature search
(n = 139, 22.71%), research methodology problem (n = 130, 21.24%),
conceptualization of research idea (n = 118, 19.28%), referencing (n = 109,
17.81%), organizational problems (n = 106, 17.32%), etc. were the more challenging
section/areas in academic writing. Among the impediments, lack of funds for
research (n = 254, 41.50%), lack of time for research (n = 176, 28.76%), poor
knowledge of computer use (n = 129, 21.08%), poor knowledge of reference
management software (n = 128, 20.92%), societal distractions (n = 108, 17.65%),
lack of collaboration (n = 104, 16.99%) were rated higher.
Table 5: Relationship
between ever published a paper in a journal and selected demographic profile
|
|
|
Ever
published a paper in a journal |
|
|||
|
|
|
Yes |
No |
Total |
(X2) |
P-Value |
|
Sex |
Male |
281 (82.4%) |
60 (17.6%) |
341 |
|
|
|
|
Female |
186 (68.6%) |
85 (31.4%) |
271 |
15.836 |
0.000 |
|
|
20 - 24 years |
24 (68.6%) |
11 (31.4%) |
35 |
|
|
|
|
25 - 29 years |
81 (74.3%) |
28 (25.7%) |
109 |
|
|
|
|
30 - 34 years |
115 (67.6%) |
55 (32.4%) |
170 |
|
|
|
Age |
35 - 39 years |
102 (80.3%) |
25 (19.7%) |
127 |
19.515 |
0.007 |
|
|
40 - 44 years |
62 (81.6%) |
14 (18.4%) |
76 |
|
|
|
|
45 - 49 years |
52 (91.2%) |
5 (8.8%) |
57 |
|
|
|
|
50 - 54 years |
30 (83.3%) |
6 (16.7%) |
36 |
|
|
|
|
55 - 59 years |
1 (50.0%) |
1 (50.0%) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Single |
221 (69.3%) |
98 (30.7%) |
319 |
|
|
|
Marital Status |
Married |
244 (84.4%) |
45 (15.6%) |
289 |
20.791 |
0.000 |
|
|
Separated/ Divorced |
2 (50.0%) |
2 (50.0%) |
4 |
|
|
|
Rank |
Postgraduate Students (Masters) |
263 (65.3%) |
140 (34.7%) |
403 |
|
|
|
|
Postgraduate Students (PhD) |
204 (97.6%) |
5 (2.4%) |
209 |
79.651 |
0.000 |
|
|
Total |
467 |
145 |
612 |
|
|
The relationship between “ever published a paper in
a journal” and selected “demographic profile” is shown in Table 5. The
proportion of male respondents that ever published a paper in a journal were
more than their female counterparts and the relationship was statistically
significant (p=0.000). Proportion of those ever published a paper in a journal
significantly increased among those age 35-39 years and reach the peak among
those 45-49 years old. Hence, age of academicians is a factor in publishing in
a journal as the relationship was significant (p = 0.007). Similarly, married
respondents were significantly (p= 0.000) able to ever published a paper in a
journal and higher proportion of postgraduate students with doctor of philosophy (PhD)-in-view had
significantly (p= 0.000) published
papers in journals compare to others.
Table 6: Relationship
between ever published a paper in a journal and impediment to academic writing
|
|
|
Ever published a paper in a journal |
|
|||
|
|
|
Yes |
No |
Total |
(X2) |
P-Value |
|
Lack of funds for research |
Yes |
178 (70.1%) |
76 (29.9%) |
254 |
9.317 |
0.002 |
|
|
No |
289 (80.7%) |
69 (19.3%) |
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Societal distractions |
Yes |
81 (75.0%) |
27 (25.0%) |
108 |
0.124 |
0.405 |
|
|
No |
386 (76.6%) |
118 (23.4%) |
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not attending Seminars |
Yes |
52 (55.9%) |
41 (44.1%) |
93 |
25.226 |
0.000 |
|
|
No |
415 (80.0%) |
104 (20.0%) |
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
48 (64.9%) |
26 (35.1%) |
74 |
6.096 |
0.012 |
|
|
|
No |
419 (77.9%) |
119 (22.1%) |
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
81 (63.3%) |
47 (36.7%) |
128 |
15.190 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
No |
386 (79.8%) |
98 (20.2%) |
484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of Collaboration |
Yes |
78 (75.0%) |
26 (25.0%) |
104 |
0.118 |
0.408 |
|
|
No |
389 (76.6%) |
119 (23.4%) |
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poor English usage |
Yes |
27 (73.0%) |
10 (27.0%) |
37 |
0.242 |
0.374 |
|
|
No |
440 (76.5%) |
135 (23.5%) |
575 |
|
|
|
Lack of interest in writing |
Yes |
46 (73.0%) |
17 (27.0%) |
63 |
0.421 |
0.306 |
|
|
No |
421 (76.7%) |
128 (23.3%) |
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of time for research |
Yes |
108 (61.4%) |
68 (38.6%) |
176 |
30.514 |
0.000 |
|
|
No |
359 (82.3%) |
77 (17.7%) |
436 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
467 |
145 |
612 |
|
|
Table 6 shows the relationship between ever
published a paper in a journal and impediment to academic writing. The
relationship between lack of funds for research and ever published a paper in a
journal was statistical significantly (p= 0.002). Also
significant, were the relationship between “ever published” and non-attendance
of seminars (p= 0.000), poor computer knowledge (p= 0.000), poor knowledge of referencing (p=
0.000), and lack of time for research (p= 0.000) respectively.
DISCUSSION
Enrolment in
postgraduate program is potentially an indirect expression of interest in being
part of the body of academicians that would shape the faith of the society by
way of teaching the next generation, researching to improve on the present and
the future, and carrying out community services to improve the quality of life
of a people. The respondents in this study were postgraduate degree students
that cut across different disciplines. A wide age range is seen in this study as
majority of respondents were within the age range of 25 and 44 years, with a
peak at 30-34years. This is unlike the graduate students in China who are
mostly in their early 20s and 30s 12, and hence have more years of productive service after post-graduate
training before retirement. More than half of the respondents were males, and
more than half were single. This can be explained from the fact that the study
was carried out in predominantly Christian Southern Nigeria that is known to be
associated with a relatively late age at marriage 13, male predominance in this study align with the already documented
gender disparity in Africa affected by cultural, sociological, economical,
psychological, historical, and political factors 14. However, recent change in trend have been reported in some parts of
Africa.15 Postgraduate students undergoing Master’s Degree dominated the
respondents, and most were at the University of Port Harcourt (UPH). This is
expected as it is natural for the number to reduce with increasing
specialization.
We found that
majority (76.3%) of the respondents had published at least one paper. This
finding is higher than what was reported among postgraduate students of nine
universities in South-Eastern Nigeria where only 23% of the respondents had
published a scholarly paper 16. The content of postgraduate academic publications were the commonly
published articles of thesis / dissertations and original articles, and
experimental studies (amongst others) also dominated the publications by
postgraduate students. The implication of these findings is that postgraduate
students restricted themselves to publishing articles on their dissertations / thesis
because it is a requirement for graduation. Limited ability of postgraduate
students to fund their researches would also probably have led to publications
restricted to their thesis. To improve publication skills, less than half of
postgraduate students engaged in reading journal articles, using research
guide, attending academic conferences, improving their knowledge of computer,
and using audio-visual research aids.
Most of our respondents
were already proficient in the use of the computer. The computer and
information era may have partly accounted for this finding, especially with
availability of computer-based research tools that boost productivity in
literature search, writing (e.g. ChatGPT, WordTune), grammar and paraphrasing,
citations, illustrations, and digital data (qualitative and qualitative). However,
although these and other artificial intelligence-based tools have greatly
improved access to information and writing, there are reports about thei17r use and misuse in academic writing.17-20 A direct relationship has been found between computer literacy skills
and access to e-resources by postgraduates 21, 22, and these e-sources are necessary for needed for academic scholarly
publications. However, a study done in India showed that postgraduate students
use internet services for social networking than for academic purposes 23. With this information, it implies that it is not just enough to know
how to use the computer, but also this knowledge should be directed to
beneficial academic scholarly works. Most postgraduate students in our study
used some form of aids in publications, and were collaborating with colleagues
for publication. The workshops organized by universities and training medical
colleges on research methods and use of reference management software in our
environment might have contributed to this finding. It is interesting to note
that the use of information and technology platforms has broaden avenues for collaboration
among scientists in education to include even social media 24. Different disciplines are involved in collaborations for different
purposes 25-28.
Most sections
of research work were considered challenging however, literature search,
research methodology, and conceptualization of research idea were topmost in
the opinion of many respondents. The findings of this study is similar to what
was observed among the legal profession,
where inadequacy in the teaching of legal research methods and methodology were
identified as major impediment to effective legal academic writing in Nigeria 29. In another study done in Rivers State among postgraduate education
students, it was observed that proficiency in research writing / information
seeking was high but that of methodological skill was low 30. The issues considered impediments were also numerous, however, rated
top on the list by respondents were lack of funds for research, lack of time
for research, poor knowledge of computer use, poor knowledge of reference
management software, societal distractions, and lack of collaboration. The trio
issues of funds and lack of time and societal distractions which are topmost in
this study are related, and may imply that most postgraduate students were
probably engrossed with some other work to generate funds for living, such that
they did not have enough time for academic issues. The fact that these postgraduate
students in our study were both full time and part time students strengthens
this thinking, especially in an era of general economic down-turn. However,
there was statistically significant relationship between “ever published” and
non-attendance of seminars, poor computer knowledge, poor knowledge of
referencing, lack of time for research, and lack of funds for research
respectively. The relationship between ever published and societal distractions
was not statistically significant.
The
challenges therefore may be dynamic, time-related and vary with discipline
under consideration. It is instructive to note that the legal study in
reference was all inclusive without isolating issues among postgraduate
students.
Study Limitations: The quality of scholarly publications of
postgraduate students could not be evaluated in this study, and is subject for
further studies. Also, our study did not indicate the type of services that
postgraduate students use their knowledge of computer for as it relates to
academic scholarly publications.
CONCLUSION
Although postgraduate students do engage in academic research publications which are
mostly their dissertations / thesis, there are constraints / impediments that
negatively affect the ability of up-coming academicians to fully contribute to
developing the society, bothering on postgraduate research funding and
structural components of academic research.
Recommendations: There is need to intensify on the efforts being made by universities and
colleges in organizing research workshops to improve on skills for research
methods and reference management usage for academic writing. Funding for
postgraduate research should be looked into by relevant government agencies for
public good. Provision of incentives for academic research work would an
attraction to increase participation of postgraduate students.
OTHER INFORMATION
Acknowledgement: We acknowledge the efforts of our field officers in the who worked to ensure
proper data collection for this study. Also, the lecturers and students who spent
their precious time filling the questionnaires that generated the data for this
study.
Ethical
Considerations: Approval of the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Port
Harcourt Teaching Hospital obtained. Confidentiality of information was ensured
during data collection.
Conflict of
Interest: None declared
REFERENCES
1. ld
Bernbaum G, Patrick H. . A history of postgraduate initial teacher education in
England and Wales, 1880–1980. Rethinking
teacher education: Routledge; 2012. p. 17-28.
2. Rutkow I. The education, training, and
specialization of surgeons: turn-of-the-century America and its postgraduate
medical schools. Annals of surgery. 2013; 258(6):1130-6.
3. Singh MKM. International graduate
students’ academic writing practices in Malaysia: Challenges and solutions.
Journal of International Students. 2019;5(1):12-22.
4. Divan A, Bowman M, Seabourne A. Reducing
unintentional plagiarism amongst international students in the biological
sciences: An embedded academic writing development programme. Journal of
Further and Higher Education. 2015; 39(3):358-78.
5. Maringe F, Jenkins J. Stigma, tensions,
and apprehension: The academic writing experience of international students.
International Journal of Educational Management. 2015; 29(5):609-26..
6. Cennetkuşu NG. International
students’ challenges in academic writing: A case study from a prominent US
university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2017; 13(2):309-23.
7. Tran LT. Journeys of adaptation of Chinese
and Vietnamese international students to academic writing practices in higher
education 2007.
8. Idiegbeyan-Ose J, Nkiko C, Osinulu I.
Awareness and Perception of Plagiarism of Postgraduate Students in Selected
Universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2016.
9. Oyinloye CA, Banuso OO, Ofodu GO,
Osikomaiya MO, Adeoye AO. Media Chatting Inscription as Determinant of
Students’ Academic Writing in Higher Institutions of Nigeria. European Journal
of Scientific Research. 2019; 152(2):167-175.
10. Desmennu AT, Owoaje ET. Challenges of
Research Conduct among Postgraduate Research Students in an African University.
Educational Research and Reviews. 2018;13(9):336-342.
11. Oyewole O, Abioye A. Awareness of
plagiarism acts and policy by postgraduate students in university of Ibadan,
Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2018:1(1).
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1956
12. Huang Y. Transitioning challenges faced by
Chinese graduate students. Adult learning. 2012;23(3):138-147.
13. Garenne M. Age at marriage and
modernisation in sub-Saharan Africa. Southern African Journal of Demography.
2004; 9(2):59-79.
14. Teferra D, Altbachl PG. African higher
education: Challenges for the 21st century. Higher education. 2004; 47(1):21-50.
15. Wan C-D. Student enrolment in Malaysian
higher education: is there gender disparity and what can we learn from the
disparity? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2018;
48(2):244-61.
16. Tella A, Onyancha B. Scholarly publishing
experience of postgraduate students in Nigerian Universities. Accountability in
Research. 2021; 28(7):395-427.
17. Ivanivna VO, Yuriyivna KD, editors. Technology
in academic writing instruction: producing a compare-and-contrast essay. The 12
th International scientific and practical conference “Topical aspects of modern
scientific research”(August 8-10, 2024) CPN Publishing Group, Tokyo, Japan 2024
376 p; 2024.
18. Vovk O, Kryvoshyia D. Artificial
intelligence in academic writing: composing a for-and-against essay. PrOsvita.
2024(1):19-28.
19. Rezaei M, Salehi H, Tabatabaei O, editors. Uses
and Misuses of ChatGPT as an AI-Language Model in Academic Writing. In: 2024
10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (QICAR).
Qazvin, Islamic Republic of Iran. 2024; pp. 256-260, doi:
10.1109/QICAR61538.2024.10496607.
20. Merine R, Purkayastha S, editors. Risks and
Benefits of AI-generated Text Summarization for Expert Level Content in
Graduate Health Informatics, 2022 IEEE 10th International Conference on
Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Rochester, MN, USA, 2022, pp. 567-574. doi:
10.1109/ICHI54592.2022.00113.
21. Abubakar D, Adetimirinz A. Influence of
computer literacy on postgraduates use of e-resources in Nigerian university
libraries. 2015. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1207
22. Abubakar D, Chollom K. Relationship of user
education, computer literacy and information and communication technology
accessibility and use of e-resources by postgraduate students in Nigerian
university libraries. Library Philosophy & Practice. 2017.
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1555
23. Makgahlela L, Bopape S. The use of
electronic information resources for academic research by postgraduate students
at Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. South African Journal of Libraries
and Information Science. 2014;80(2):1-7.
24. Van Noorden R. Online collaboration:
Scientists and the social network. Nature news. 2014;512(7513):126.
http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711
25. Riviello R, Ozgediz D, Hsia RY, Azzie G,
Newton M, Tarpley J. Role of collaborative academic partnerships in surgical
training, education, and provision. World journal of surgery. 2010;34(3):459-465.
26. Adenomon MO. Statistical Consulting and
Collaboration Practises: The Experience of NSUK-LISA Stat Lab. Promoting Statistical Practice and
Collaboration in Developing Countries: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2022. p. 131-138.
27. Nkemleke DA, Schmied J. Eds. Academic
Writing and Research across Disciplines in Africa. Gottingen, Germany :
Cuvillier Verlag; 2016.
28. Ajegbomogun FO, Oduwole OK. Social media
trends and collaborative learning for scholarly research among postgraduate
students in a Nigerian University. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal.
2018;13(1):117-132.
29. Solomon E. Towards Effective Legal Writing
in Nigeria. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education. 2017;12(1): 65-94.
30. Lwehabura MJ. An assessment of information
literacy skills among first-year postgraduate students at Sokoine University of
Agriculture Tanzania. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.
2018;50(4):427-34.
|
Cite
this Article: Ijah,
RFOA; Ordu, TG; Akoko, S; Eli, SF; Babatunde, S (2024). Postgraduate Students
and Academic Writing: Challenges in a Low-income Setting. Greener Journal of Medical Sciences,
14(2): 196-204. |