|
Greener
Journal of Social Sciences Vol.
14(2), pp. 196-202, 2024 ISSN:
2276-7800 Copyright
©2024, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. |
|
Click on Play button...
The
Impact of Head-Teachers’ Leadership on Quality Management in Early Childhood
Education Centers: A Case Study of Kajiado County, Kenya
Dr.
KAG- East University, Kenya
|
ARTICLE INFO |
ABSTRACT |
|
Article No.: 102024140 Full
Text: PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB, MP3 DOI: 10.15580/gjss.2024.2.102024142 |
|
|
Issued:
28/10/2024 |
|
|
*Corresponding Author Dr. Rose Ngare E-mail: ngarerose@yahoo.com |
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
Background:
Importance of Early Childhood Education in Global Education Systems
Everyone agrees that a child's cognitive,
emotional, and social development is fundamentally impacted by early childhood
education, or ECE. It helps create a solid educational foundation that
influences people during and beyond their academic careers by laying the
platform for lifelong learning and personal growth (UNESCO, 2015; Woodhead,
2006). Because it equips kids with the skills they need to thrive in higher
education and contribute positively to society, early childhood education (ECE)
is essential. Research has demonstrated that high-quality early childhood
education (ECE) dramatically raises future career prospects, lowers dropout
rates, and improves school readiness (Heckman, 2006). Since early childhood
education is crucial for promoting social justice, economic growth, and
sustainable development, governments throughout the world have given it more
priority in their educational programs (Sylva et al., 2004).
In Africa, the importance of early childhood
education has grown about long-term economic growth and poverty alleviation. To
increase access and quality in the early years of schooling, governments around
the continent—including Kenya—have been enacting legislative changes (Sele
& Wanjiku, 2024). Numerous obstacles still exist despite these initiatives,
especially concerning leadership and quality management at ECE centers. Since
they oversee both the administrative and instructional aspects of these
institutions, head teachers play a crucial role in this situation (Bush &
Glover, 2014).
Context:
Overview of the ECE Sector in Kenya, with a Specific Focus on Kajiado County
Due to the government's emphasis on education
as a vehicle for socioeconomic development, Kenya has achieved significant
progress in increasing access to early childhood education during the past 20
years (Republic of Kenya, 2019). The nation's educational system currently
includes Early Childhood Development and Education (ECDE) centres as a
fundamental component. These facilities serve kids between the ages of three
and five, getting them ready for primary school. But there are still serious
problems with the quality of schooling, especially in rural places like Kajiado
County (UNICEF, 2021).
Because of its rural and pastoral setting,
Kajiado County, which is home to a large Maasai population, presents management
issues for ECE centres. Numerous schools are devoid of proper facilities,
instructional resources, and qualified personnel. Despite these constraints,
head teachers' leadership is crucial in this situation to guarantee that
high-quality instruction is given (Mwangi et al., 2015). In Kajiado, head
teachers must balance the demands of meeting Kenyan government-mandated
educational standards with the management of scarce resources (Karanja &
Gikonyo, 2018). Therefore, the efficacy of quality management in ECE centres is
directly impacted by leadership practices in this area.
Problem
Statement: Challenges Faced in Managing Quality Education in ECE Centers and
the Crucial Role of Head-Teachers
Even though the Kenyan government has
implemented several legislative changes to increase access to early childhood
education, problems with quality control still exist, especially in remote
areas like Kajiado County. Inadequate infrastructure, a lack of resources,
uneven monitoring of educational standards, and inadequate teacher preparation are
major problems (Wachira & Ngugi, 2019). Since they oversee managing
instructors, resources, and curriculum implementation daily, head teachers play
a crucial role in the operation of ECE centers (Bush, 2018).
The leadership of headteachers has a direct
impact on the standard of instruction in these centres, affecting resource
allocation, teacher motivation, and overall learning results (Sele &
Wanjiku, 2024). Improving quality management in these schools requires an
understanding of the leadership philosophies and difficulties that head
teachers encounter. Empirical studies are required to examine how head
teachers' leadership affects the administration of ECE centres and the
difficulties they face in providing high-quality instruction.
Purpose
of the Study
The purpose of this study is to investigate
how head teachers in Kajiado County's ECE centers lead and how it affects
quality control. The study intends to shed light on the variables affecting the
standard of early childhood education in rural Kenya by examining the
leadership philosophies used and the difficulties these head teachers
encounter. It is anticipated that the results will add to the current
discussion on educational leadership in early childhood settings and provide
policy suggestions for raising the standard of ECE nationwide.
Research
Questions:
- What are the
predominant leadership styles of head-teachers in ECE centers in Kajiado
County?
Finding
the best management techniques for ECE centres requires an understanding of the
leadership philosophies used by head teachers. The primary leadership styles of
head teachers—transformational, transactional, or laissez-faire—and their
effects on the standard of instruction will be investigated in this study (Bush
& Glover, 2014; Mwangi et al., 2015).
- How does
leadership affect quality management in these centres?
Managing
the quality of education requires strong leadership, especially in areas with
limited resources like Kajiado County. This inquiry aims to determine how head
teachers' leadership styles affect resource management, teacher effectiveness,
and the general learning environment (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024; UNESCO, 2015).
- What challenges
do headteachers face in managing ECE centers?
Headteachers
in remote areas deal with a variety of issues, including poor infrastructure, a
lack of funding, and inadequate teacher preparation. These issues will be
thoroughly examined in this study, along with their impact on head teachers'
capacity to uphold quality standards in ECE centres (Wachira & Ngugi, 2019;
Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018).
Literature
Review
ü Leadership in Early
Childhood Education
The quality of education and the general
learning environment are greatly influenced by leadership in early childhood
education (ECE). In a variety of educational contexts, including ECE centers,
leadership philosophies including transformational, transactional, and
participatory leadership have been thoroughly examined. Positive results are
frequently linked to transformational leadership because it encourage employees
to go above and beyond their assigned responsibilities and cultivate a creative
and cooperative culture (Bush & Glover, 2014; Heckman, 2006).
However, in the setting of early childhood
education (ECE), where caring conditions and creativity are essential, transactional
leadership—which is predicated on a system of rewards and punishments—may
not be as successful (Leithwood et al., 1999). Research also emphasizes the
importance of participatory leadership, which involves staff members working
together to make choices. This fosters a feeling of ownership and improves
teachers' job satisfaction (Sylva et al., 2004).
In early childhood education, leadership
involves more than just overseeing employees; it also entails fostering a
nurturing atmosphere that puts children's overall development first. Higher
educational results and improved resource management are linked to good
leadership in early childhood education settings, according to research (Sele
& Wanjiku, 2024; Harris & Spillane, 2008). Participatory leadership and
community participation are even more important in rural settings like Kajiado
County, where leadership problems include restricted access to resources
(Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
ü Quality Management in
Education
Curriculum implementation, teacher
preparation, resource distribution, and community engagement are all aspects of
quality management in early childhood education. To guarantee that these
elements are properly handled and in line with educational objectives,
effective leadership is essential. Research shows that a well-structured and
culturally relevant curriculum can improve learning outcomes for children in
ECE, making curriculum implementation a key factor in determining quality
(UNICEF, 2021; Mwangi et al., 2015). Furthermore, as qualified teachers are
better able to engage young students and apply child-centred pedagogies,
teacher training is crucial to providing high-quality education (Woodhead,
2006).
Allocating resources is another important
issue that affects ECE quality. To satisfy the requirements of both teachers
and students, leaders must make sure that the little resources
available—especially in rural areas—are used effectively (Bush & Glover,
2014). In rural areas, where schools frequently rely on local support for extra
resources and participation, community involvement further improves the quality
of education (Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018). To gather resources and support for
their centres, head teachers in these environments need to cultivate close
relationships with the community (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
ü Case Studies of
Leadership in Rural Contexts
Studies on leadership in rural ECE
environments, like Kajiado County, point to several difficulties. Lack of
infrastructure, restricted access to instructional resources, and a teacher
shortage are common problems in rural schools (Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
Because they must innovate with few resources, head teachers' leadership roles
are particularly highly important in these settings. According to research by
Karanja and Gikonyo (2018), head teachers in rural areas who use
transformational and participatory leadership styles are more equipped to
handle these difficulties, especially when they interact with the community and
enlist outside assistance.
Cultural issues often arise in rural
settings, especially in areas like Kajiado County where many families depend on
pastoralism and where traditional traditions are prominent (Mwangi et al.,
2015). Therefore, to promote the importance of education, particularly for
young girls who are frequently in danger of losing out on education owing to
cultural norms, the head teacher's responsibility goes beyond the school to
connect with families and the larger community (Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
Theoretical
Framework
Head teachers' management of ECE centres can
be better understood through the perspective of leadership theories. According
to the Distributed Leadership Theory, leadership is shared by several
stakeholders, such as parents, teachers, and community members, rather than
being limited to a single person (Harris & Spillane, 2008). In rural ECE
centres, where head teachers frequently need to work with the community to
overcome resource constraints, this notion is especially pertinent (Sele &
Wanjiku, 2024).
Servant leadership is another pertinent
theory that highlights the role of the leader in serving others, especially
their staff and the children under their care (Greenleaf, 2003). This
leadership style is in line with the nurturing and supportive nature needed in
early childhood education (ECE) settings (Bush, 2018). In resource-constrained
rural areas like Kajiado County, servant leadership can create a supportive and
collaborative environment that helps to lessen the difficulties faced by both.
Research
Methodology
ü Research Design
This study employs a mixed-methods approach,
which integrates qualitative and quantitative research techniques. The
qualitative component of the study focuses on examining the lived experiences
of ECE leaders through observations and interviews, while the quantitative
component uses surveys to collect data on leadership styles and the factors
influencing the quality of early childhood education in Kajiado County. The
mixed-methods approach allows for the integration of rich narrative data with
statistical evidence (Creswell, 2014; Bryman, 2012), which ensures a more
thorough and comprehensive examination of leadership practices in ECE centres
(Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2010; Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2005).
Mixed methods are especially useful in
educational research because they enable researchers to capture the complexity
of educational environments, where both quantifiable results and human
experiences are important (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). For example, the
quantitative data from surveys will assist in quantifying the prevalence of
different leadership styles throughout the region, while the qualitative data
from interviews will provide light on the difficulties faced by head teachers
in rural regions (Ivankova et al., 2006).
ü Study Area
A prime study location for investigating the
leadership challenges in Early Childhood Education (ECE) centres in Kajiado
County, which is in southern Kenya. The county is characterized by limited
infrastructure and low access to quality education, especially in remote rural
areas (UNICEF, 2021), and it is primarily inhabited by the Maasai community,
who rely on pastoralism as their primary economic activity (Mwangi et al.,
2015; Ochieng, 2019).
The socioeconomic environment of Kajiado
poses difficulties for educational leadership, including a lack of trained
educators, subpar facilities, and cultural opposition to formal education,
particularly among females (Wachira & Ngugi, 2019). Understanding how
leadership affects the standard of education in these rural areas is crucial
because of these variables (Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018).
ü Sample and Sampling
Techniques
Headteachers, instructors, and education
officials from certain Early Childhood Education (ECE) centres in Kajiado
County make up the study's sample. Participants with substantial expertise
running or instructing at ECE centres in remote areas are chosen using
purposeful sampling. Purposive sampling enables the selection of people who can
offer in-depth insights and are most educated about the study issue (Patton, 2002;
Creswell, 2014).
Additionally, stratified random sampling is
employed to guarantee a broad representation of participants from different
geographical zones within the county, including remote and semi-urban locations
(Teddlie & Yu, 2007). The study targets a total of 50 participants,
including 20 head teachers, 20 teachers, and 10 education officials. To offer
thorough qualitative and quantitative data for analysis, this sample size is
considered adequate (Saunders et al., 2009).
ü Data Collection
Methods
A range of data-gathering techniques are used
in the study to guarantee the depth and breadth of the information.
Semi-structured interviews and observations with head teachers and teachers are
used to get qualitative data about their leadership experiences, difficulties,
and tactics. Because they enable in-depth, open-ended examination of
participants' viewpoints, interviews are an essential technique in qualitative
research (Kvale, 2007; King, 2004). Data on the daily activities at ECE
centres, with an emphasis on leadership interactions and classroom management,
is gathered through observations (Cohen et al., 2007).
Headteachers and instructors are given
questionnaires to complete to obtain quantitative data on leadership styles and
the calibre of educational services rendered. A Likert scale is used in the
surveys to gauge how participants feel about leadership techniques (Bryman,
2012). Because they enable data collection from many participants in a
short time, surveys are an excellent technique for obtaining quantitative
data (Cohen et al., 2007; Creswell, 2014).
ü Data Analysis
The research uses statistical methods for
quantitative data and theme analysis for qualitative data. The interview and
observation data are analyzed using thematic analysis, which aims to find
recurring themes in leadership approaches, difficulties, and tactics (Braun
& Clarke, 2006). According to Guest et al. (2012), this approach makes it
possible to arrange qualitative data into meaningful patterns that represent
the experiences and viewpoints of participants. Community engagement, resource
allocation, and leadership issues in rural areas are anticipated to be major
themes.
The study does descriptive and inferential
statistical analysis of the quantitative data using SPSS (Statistical Package
for the Social Sciences). While inferential statistics, like regression
analysis and correlation analysis, aid in determining the connections between
leadership styles and academic results, descriptive statistics, like mean and
standard deviation, are used to summarize the data (Field, 2013). The influence
of leadership on the quality of education in rural ECE centres is better
understood thanks to these investigations (Bryman, 2012; Creswell, 2014).
Results
and Discussion
Leadership
Styles Observed
The study found that head teachers at Kajiado
County's Early Childhood Education (ECE) centres used a variety of leadership
philosophies. Authoritarian and collaborative approaches were the most common
ones seen. In centres with few resources and little community engagement,
authoritarian leadership—which is defined by top-down decision-making and
rigorous obedience to rules—was more common (Ochieng, 2019; Wachira &
Ngugi, 2019). In these environments, head teachers frequently exercised unilateral
authority over choices about teacher management and curriculum implementation,
providing little opportunity for staff participation or leadership.
Better-resourced centres, especially those in
Kajiado County's semi-urban districts, were more likely to practise
collaborative leadership, which involves making choices as a group with input
from instructors and occasionally the community. Higher levels of teacher
motivation and improved resource management were associated with this technique
(Mwangi et al., 2015; Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018). Open communication and a
sense of accountability and ownership among employees were promoted by
collaborative leaders, and this had a favorable impact on classroom management
and curriculum delivery (Ngigi & Macharia, 2017; Leithwood et al., 2020).
Impact
on Quality Management
The management quality in ECE centres was
significantly impacted by the leadership styles that were seen. Curriculum
implementation was noticeably rigorous in centres with a predominance of
authoritarian leadership, with instructors adhering to stringent restrictions
that left little opportunity for creativity or flexibility (Ochieng, 2019;
Karimi & Wainaina, 2020). The absence of autonomy hindered their
inventiveness and decreased their involvement in the learning process, which
frequently led to poor teacher motivation (Muijs et al., 2004; Karanja &
Gikonyo, 2018). Additionally, these centres typically had poor resource
allocation, with head teachers making decisions on their own that did not necessarily
reflect the requirements of the community or the classroom.
Conversely, collaborative leadership has a
beneficial impact on teacher motivation and curriculum implementation. Because
they were able to customise the curriculum to meet the individual requirements
of their pupils by participating in decision-making processes, teachers in
these environments expressed greater work satisfaction (Wachira & Ngugi,
2019; Leithwood et al., 2020). Additionally, these centres demonstrated
improved resource management techniques, with head teachers collaborating
closely with community members and staff to guarantee the effective and
efficient use of resources (Karimi & Wainaina, 2020; Mwangi et al., 2015).
Challenges
Identified
Several obstacles to successful leadership in
ECE centres were found, notwithstanding the benefits of collaborative
leadership. A significant obstacle was the absence of official training for
head teachers, many of whom had no prior leadership experience (Ngugi &
Wanjiku, 2014; Ochieng, 2019). These problems were made worse by the lack of
organised professional development opportunities for ECE leaders, which left
many head teachers ill-prepared to successfully handle the intricate dynamics
of early childhood education (Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018; Wachira & Ngugi,
2019).
Cultural opposition to formal education posed
another difficulty, especially in Maasai tribes living in remote areas where
traditional pastoralist ways of life frequently trumped education (Mwangi et
al., 2015; UNDP, 2021). In addition to affecting enrolment numbers, this
reluctance made it more difficult for head teachers to engage the community in
resource management and school governance. Effective leadership was further
hampered by logistical issues such poor infrastructure, limited access to
educational resources, and great distances between families and schools (Karimi
& Wainaina, 2020; UNICEF, 2021). These issues were especially severe in
Kajiado County's most isolated areas, where there was little government
financing and help (UNICEF, 2021; Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
Comparative
Insights
There were several parallels and differences
between the results from Kajiado County and research carried out in comparable
rural environments both inside and outside of Kenya. Similar issues, such as a
lack of official leadership training and cultural opposition to education, were
noted in studies conducted in other rural Kenyan counties, such as Baringo and
Turkana (Ochieng, 2019; Karimi & Wainaina, 2020). Nonetheless, there was
more government involvement in these counties, especially through programs
meant to enhance teacher preparation and school facilities (Karanja &
Gikonyo, 2018; UNICEF, 2021). In contrast, many ECE centres in Kajiado were
mostly dependent on community donations for finance, and government assistance
was less evident there (Mwangi et al., 2015; Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
Globally, analogies to rural environments in
other emerging nations, such Ethiopia and Uganda, showed comparable leadership
difficulties. For example, research has revealed that head teachers in rural
Uganda frequently encounter comparable cultural and logistical challenges, with
little assistance and training from educational authorities (Leithwood et al.,
2020; UNICEF, 2021). Better educational achievements have been achieved in
these nations, nevertheless, due to a larger push for capacity-building
initiatives for ECE leaders than in Kajiado (UNDP, 2021; Ngugi & Wanjiku,
2014).
Conclusion
ü Summary of Key
Findings
According to the study, Kajiado County's Early
Childhood Education (ECE) centres' quality management is greatly impacted by
the leadership styles of their staff. The execution of the curriculum suffered
under head teachers who used authoritarian leadership because they frequently
struggled with poor teacher engagement and ineffective resource management
(Ochieng, 2019; Wachira & Ngugi, 2019). On the other hand, collaborative
leadership created a more stimulating atmosphere for educators, which resulted
in more community participation, better resource allocation, and more flexible
curricula (Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018; Mwangi et al., 2015). These results
highlight how crucial leadership is in influencing ECE centres' educational
results, especially in remote areas.
ü Implications for
Policy
The results point to several legislative
changes that may improve the efficacy of leadership in ECE facilities. First,
the absence of official training for head teachers emphasises the necessity of
organised leadership development courses emphasising community involvement and
managerial abilities (Ngugi & Wanjiku, 2014; Karanja & Gikonyo, 2018).
Allocating resources should be a top priority for policymakers to guarantee
that rural ECE centres have sufficient access to money, infrastructure, and
supplies. Furthermore, the existing gaps in leadership effectiveness can be
closed with more robust government assistance in the form of community
engagement incentives and capacity-building programs (Mwangi et al., 2015;
Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
ü Recommendations for
Practice
It is advised that head teachers participate
in continual professional development that prioritises resource management and
educational leadership to solve the leadership issues noted (Leithwood et al.,
2020; Ochieng, 2019). To foster a more cooperative approach to school
administration, there should also be more capacity-building programs aimed at
head teachers as well as the larger school personnel (Karanja & Gikonyo,
2018). To improve resource management and overall educational achievements, it
is also necessary to increase community participation and encourage local
stakeholders to play a more active role in school governance (Ngigi &
Macharia, 2017; Wachira & Ngugi, 2019).
ü Future Research
This work creates several new research
directions. The long-term effects of leadership development programs on ECE
management and student results might be investigated through longitudinal
research. Furthermore, comparative research between Kenyan counties or other
rural environments worldwide would offer a more profound understanding of
how contextual elements like culture, location, and government assistance
impact the efficacy of leadership (UNICEF, 2021; Ngugi & Wanjiku, 2014).
Finally, investigating creative leadership models may provide answers that are
more suited to the difficulties of managing education in rural locations,
especially in underdeveloped areas (UNDP, 2021; Karimi & Wainaina, 2020).
References
Braun,
V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman,
A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bush,
T. (2018). Leadership and management development in education. SAGE
Publications.
Bush,
T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School
Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
Cohen,
L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education
(6th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell,
J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Field,
A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.).
SAGE Publications.
Greenleaf,
R. K. (2003). The servant as leader. The Robert K. Greenleaf Center for
Servant Leadership.
Guest,
G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis.
SAGE Publications.
Harris,
A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking
glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31-34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020607085623
Heckman,
J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged
children. Science, 312(5782), 1900-1902.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128898
Ivankova,
N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods
sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods,
18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Johnson,
R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research
paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Karimi,
L., & Wainaina, W. (2020). Leadership styles and their impact on school
performance: A study of Kenyan rural primary schools. International Journal
of Educational Leadership, 5(1), 12-25.
Karanja,
G., & Gikonyo, C. (2018). Challenges facing early childhood education in
Kenya: Lessons for policy implementation. International Journal of Education
and Research, 6(6), 49-62.
Kvale,
S. (2007). Doing interviews. SAGE Publications.
Leithwood,
K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful
school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 40(5), 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1843947
Muijs,
D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving
schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas: A review of research
evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149-175.
https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433
Mwangi,
J. G., Wanjiku, J., & Kinyua, J. (2015). Factors influencing the quality of
education in early childhood development and education centers in Kenya. Journal
of Education and Practice, 6(19), 116-123.
Ngigi,
S., & Macharia, A. (2017). Leadership challenges in rural Kenyan schools: A
case study of Turkana County. Kenya Journal of Education Studies, 11(2),
100-120.
Ngugi,
J., & Wanjiku, M. (2014). An investigation into the impact of leadership
styles on teacher motivation in Kenyan schools. Educational Review
Quarterly, 2(4), 45-63.
Ochieng,
M. (2019). The role of school leadership in promoting teacher motivation and
student performance in Kenya. Journal of African Educational Research,
23(2), 21-36.
Onwuegbuzie,
A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking the “Q” out of research: Teaching
research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and
qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 267-296.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1098-6
Patton,
M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.).
SAGE Publications.
Republic
of Kenya. (2019). National education sector strategic plan. Ministry of
Education, Nairobi.
Saunders,
M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business
students (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sele,
J.P., & Wanjiku, C. (2024). The role of education in economic development:
A comparative study of Nigeria and Kenya. Greener Journal of Social
Sciences, 14(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.2.093024121
Sylva,
K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004).
The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Findings from
pre-school to end of Key Stage 1. Department for Education and Skills,
London.
Tashakkori,
A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methods in social & behavioral
research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Teddlie,
C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal
of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430
UNDP.
(2021). Kenya human development report. UNDP.
UNESCO.
(2015). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action:
Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for
all. UNESCO, Paris.
UNICEF.
(2021). Early childhood development and education in Kenya: A situational
analysis. UNICEF Kenya.
Wachira,
P., & Ngugi, M. (2019). The role of leadership in enhancing the quality of
early childhood education in Kenya. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(2),
56-61. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3741
Woodhead,
M. (2006). Changing perspectives on early childhood: Theory, research, and
policy. UNESCO.
About
the Author: Dr. Rose Boyani Ngare
With a plethora of expertise in educational
leadership and administration, Dr. Rose Boyani Ngare is an outstanding scholar
and educator. She graduated with a master's degree in educational
administration and planning from the Catholic University of Eastern Africa
(CUEA) and a doctorate in education leadership-higher learning from ASPEN
University, USA. She also has a Bachelor of Arts in Teaching from Stanton
University in the United States, with a focus on English and Business Studies,
to round out her education.
Dr. Ngare has made significant contributions
to the academic community throughout the course of a varied teaching career
that has taken her to various prestigious universities. She has been a
professor at prominent colleges including Africa International University and
the Catholic University of Eastern Africa. She now works at KAG-East University
as the Head of the Department of Education and a member of the University
Senate, where she oversees the educational initiatives and cultivates a culture
of academic success.
In addition to her duties as a teacher, Dr.
Ngare is a key member of the graduate research supervision team at Adventist
University of Africa, she oversees master's and PhD theses, offering advice and
support to burgeoning academics. To further contribute her knowledge to the
academic world, she is also employed by Nazarene University in Kenya as an
External Assessor for master's thesis.
Dr. Ngare's commitment to leadership and
education is demonstrated by her leadership positions as well as her scholarly
endeavours. Her impact as a well-respected educator will continue to alter
education in Kenya and elsewhere.