|
Greener Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 16(1), pp. 1-7, 2026 ISSN: 2276-7800 Copyright ©2026, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. |
|
Roles of Government towards Enhancing a Balanced Society in Plateau State, Nigeria.
Dr. Pofung Dokbish Danung; Dr. Bitrus D. Gyot; Cirfat Timchang Takbol
1 Department of Educational Management, Federal University of Education, Pankshin
2 Department of Educational Management, Federal University of Education, Pankshin
3 Department of Edphysics, Federal University of Education, Pankshin
|
ABSTRACT |
|||
|
A balanced society is characterised by social justice, equitable resource distribution, inclusive governance, and sustainable development, all of which depend significantly on the effectiveness of governmental roles. Despite the constitutional responsibility of governments especially in developing contexts such as Nigeria to provide security, promote economic welfare, and guarantee citizens’ rights, persistent challenges such as corruption, inequality, weak institutions, and poor policy execution continue to hinder societal balance. This study investigated the roles of government in enhancing a balanced society through three key dimensions: policy formulation, policy implementation, and political will. Using a descriptive survey design, data were collected from 200 respondents representing public administrators, civil servants, and community stakeholders. Results revealed that government contributions toward societal balance are moderate, with policy implementation showing the strongest influence, followed by policy formulation and political will. However, weaknesses such as limited transparency, insufficient stakeholder engagement, and inconsistent implementation reduce overall effectiveness. The study concludes that while government efforts are significant, they remain inadequate to fully achieve societal balance. It recommends strengthening institutional capacity, promoting transparency, enhancing citizen participation, and demonstrating stronger political commitment to equity, justice, and sustainable development.
|
|||
|
ARTICLE’S INFO |
|||
|
Article No.: 021626026 Type: Research Full Text: PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB, MP3 DOI: 10.15580/gjss.2026.1.021626026
Accepted: 19/02/2026 Published: 16/03/2026
Keywords: Roles of Government, Balanced Society
|
*Corresponding Author
Dr. Bitrus D. Gyot
E-mail: byencit@gmail.com |
Article’s QR code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
A balanced society is one in which social justice, economic stability, political inclusion, environmental sustainability, and collective security coexist to promote the well-being of all citizens. In most modern states, achieving such balance depends largely on the actions, policies, and institutional capacities of government. The government, as the central coordinating authority, is responsible for creating enabling conditions that support equitable development, protect citizens’ rights, and enhance peaceful coexistence. Historically, political philosophers such as Aristotle, Locke, and Hobbes emphasized the central role of the state in maintaining order and promoting the common good, arguing that society becomes dysfunctional in the absence of effective governance. In contemporary society, global institutions such as the United Nations and the World Bank further highlight that governments are crucial in delivering essential services education, healthcare, water, sanitation, and social protection which are foundational for reducing inequality and promoting inclusive development (World Bank, 2021; UNESCO, 2022).
Societal balance is a central theme in the discourse on governance and development. The idea revolves around the capacity of a society to function harmoniously, ensuring fair distribution of resources, social justice, and equal opportunities for all segments of the population. Historically, societies with weak governance structures and ineffective public institutions have experienced instability, inequality, social conflict, and underdevelopment (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012). As such, governments across the world have adopted increasingly strategic roles aimed at creating equitable environments that promote social, economic, and political well-being. In democratic settings, the government is entrusted with the responsibility of formulating and implementing policies that reflect the collective aspirations of the populace. Policies that promote education, healthcare, economic empowerment, social protection, and security serve as the pillars upon which balanced societies are built (Omeje & Onuoha, 2021). However, the attainment of societal balance requires more than policy presence. It demands effective governance, political readiness, institutional coordination, and enforcement mechanisms that ensure policies translate into tangible outcomes.
In many developing countries, imbalances such as income inequality, poor governance, insecurity, corruption, and marginalization hinder societal stability. These challenges highlight the necessity for governments to play transformative roles that address systemic weaknesses and promote equitable development. Furthermore, globalisation, technological advancement, and changing socio-political dynamics continue to redefine the responsibilities of governments in maintaining social balance.
Across many developing nations, including those in Africa, persistent challenges such as poverty, insecurity, corruption, unemployment, and environmental degradation have made the role of government even more central to societal balance. Weak institutions, unequal access to resources, and socio-political conflicts often distort social harmony and widen the gap between the privileged and the marginalized (UNDP, 2020). As a result, governments are expected to not only manage economic systems but also ensure justice, protect human rights, maintain security, regulate markets, and implement environmental sustainability policies. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2023) also stresses that government intervention is key to mitigating climate-related risks that threaten long-term societal stability. In addition, effective governance characterized by transparency, accountability, participation, and rule of law is increasingly recognized as a prerequisite for achieving a cohesive and resilient society (OECD, 2020).
Despite these expectations, many governments face structural constraints such as limited financial resources, corruption, rapid population growth, weak policy implementation, and political instability. These challenges often hinder their ability to deliver essential services and maintain social equilibrium. Consequently, scholars and policymakers emphasize the need for governments to adopt development-oriented, people-centered, and inclusive strategies that promote equity, environmental protection, peace, and sustainable national transformation. Understanding the role of government in enhancing a balanced society is therefore essential for addressing contemporary social, economic, political, and environmental challenges. This background provides the foundation upon which this study examines the multifaceted responsibilities of government and how these functions shape societal stability, cohesion, and sustainable development.
One of the principal issues in the analysis of development is the extent to which the state and corporate organizations influence it. Prevailing ideas about the links among democracy, good governance/ and economic growth have come almost full circle over the past three decades. It is believed that good governance and development go hand in hand. Recent discussion about the conditions for good governance raise questions about the structure and functioning of the state, its relationship to society and its actual and potential role in promoting a balanced society. At its core, governance is about managing relationships, resources, and power within a society. Effective governance ensures that laws and regulations are applied equitably, that institutions function transparently, and that citizens can participate in the decision-making processes that affect their lives. This includes everything from ensuring the rule of law to making policy decisions that promote economic and social welfare. The government operates as a central agent within governance, and its authority is vested in different branches such as the legislature, executive, and judiciary. Each branch plays a crucial role in maintaining balance, ensuring fairness, and upholding the constitutional principles that protect society. Governance, therefore, is a dynamic process that must adapt to changing societal needs, technological advancements, and evolving social norms.
Statement of the Problem
A balanced society one that ensures social justice, equitable distribution of resources, effective governance, and sustainable development depends largely on the extent to which the government performs its statutory roles. In many developing contexts, including Nigeria, the government is constitutionally mandated to provide security, maintain law and order, deliver basic social services, promote economic welfare, and protect the rights of citizens. However, despite the existence of policies, institutions, and legal frameworks designed to promote societal balance, persistent challenges continue to reflect gaps in governance. Issues such as corruption, insecurity, unemployment, inadequate public infrastructure, weak policy implementation, and limited citizen participation undermine the government’s ability to create an enabling environment for societal stability and development.
While the government is expected to serve as a catalyst for national cohesion, fairness, and equality, many citizens still experience marginalization, poverty, and social exclusion, indicating inconsistencies between policy intentions and real-life outcomes. The rising levels of social imbalance evidenced in ethnic conflicts, youth restiveness, economic disparity, and declining public trust in institutions raise concerns about the effectiveness of governmental roles in promoting a harmonious and equitable society. Furthermore, empirical studies examining the link between governmental roles and balanced societal development remain inadequate, particularly in the Nigerian context where political, economic, and institutional realities differ significantly across regions.
Consequently, the problem that necessitates this study is the apparent disconnect between the roles government is expected to play and the actual experiences of citizens with regard to social stability, equality, good governance, and sustainable development. This study therefore seeks to critically examine the roles of government in enhancing a balanced society, identify the existing gaps, and explore how governmental functions can be strengthened to achieve societal harmony and equity.
Aim and objectives of the Study
The main purpose of the study was to investigate the roles of government towards enhancing a balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria. The specific objectives are;
1. To determine the extent does policy formulation enhance balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria
2. To assess the extent does policy implementation enhance a balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria
3. To evaluate the extent does the will of government enhance a balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria
Research Questions
1. To what extent does policy formulation enhance balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria
2. To what does policy implementation enhance a balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria
3. To what extent does the will of government enhance a balanced society in Plateau State, Nigeria
LITERATURE REVIEW
Government refers to the political and administrative authority vested with power to guide, regulate, and direct the affairs of a nation or community (Dye, 2017). It comprises institutions responsible for law-making, policy formulation, implementation, and adjudication. Adebayo (2020) notes that government embodies the machinery through which political will is expressed and public interests are protected. In contemporary governance studies, government is viewed not only as a structure but as a dynamic system that ensures social stability, economic progress, and political order.
A balanced society denotes a social environment in which equity, justice, peace, and sustainable development are systematically ensured for all individuals, irrespective of socioeconomic background (Fukuyama, 2013). It is characterized by fair distribution of opportunities, access to public goods, functional institutions, and social cohesion. According to Acemoglu and Robinson (2012), societies become balanced when inclusive institutions provide equal chances for participation in economic, political, and social spheres. Conversely, imbalanced societies suffer from inequality, instability, poverty, marginalization, and weak governance structures.
Policy formulation is one of the primary responsibilities of government. Dye (2017) describes it as the stage where the government identifies societal issues, defines objectives, and develops strategies to address them. Effective policy formulation ensures that national goals such as equity, justice, national security, and development are articulated in ways that meet the collective needs of society. Policies on education, healthcare, taxation, infrastructure, and welfare influence societal balance by shaping access to essential services and opportunities. According to Omeje and Onuoha (2021), inclusive policies strengthen national cohesion and promote equitable distribution of resources.
Policy implementation translates formulated policies into programs, projects, and services. Pressman and Wildavsky (1984) emphasize that no matter how well a policy is designed, poor implementation undermines its impact. Effective implementation requires adequate resources, administrative capacity, monitoring, and strong institutional coordination. Successful implementation promotes balanced development by ensuring delivery of essential services such as education, health, security, and justice. Conversely, corruption, weak institutions, and political interference create imbalances that widen inequality (Igbokwe-Ibeto et al., 2019).
Governments are responsible for providing public goods such as roads, healthcare, water, electricity, and security. These goods are critical for human well-being and societal development. When governments allocate these resources equitably, social balance improves. Akinola (2018) notes that investments in public infrastructure stimulate economic growth and reduce regional marginalization.
Social welfare programmes such as healthcare insurance, poverty alleviation, social protection schemes, and education subsidies address socioeconomic disparities. According to Sen (1999), the government plays a critical role in enhancing human capabilities by ensuring access to basic services. Balanced societies prioritize welfare policies that reduce vulnerability and enhance quality of life.
A balanced society requires policies that promote gender equality, youth empowerment, disability inclusion, and protection of minority groups. According to the World Bank (2020), inclusive governance reduces social tensions and enhances national stability in security. Security is foundational to social balance. Governments that provide stable and safe environments enable economic activities, social mobility, and development (Buzan, 1991). Insecurity, terrorism, and communal conflict destabilize societies and widen inequalities. Governance systems that promote accountability, transparency, public participation, and anti-corruption mechanisms support societal balance. Kaufmann et al. (2010) assert that nations with strong governance frameworks outperform others in human development indicators and stability.
METHOD AND PROCEDURES
This study will adopt a descriptive survey research design to investigate the roles of government in enhancing a balanced society. The design is suitable because it enables the collection of data from a large population and allows for the analysis of existing conditions, perceptions, and relationships without manipulating variables. The population will consist of public administrators, community leaders, civil servants, and citizens across selected regions, from which a representative sample will be drawn using stratified and simple random sampling techniques to ensure inclusiveness. A structured questionnaire will serve as the main instrument for data collection, supplemented by key informant interviews to enrich the findings with qualitative insights. The instrument will be validated by experts in public administration and research methodology, while a pilot test will be conducted to establish reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Data collected will be analyzed using descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This section presents the results of the data collected from 200 respondents on the prevalence and consequences of youth deviant behaviour in the community and the implementation of civic education as a corrective mechanism. The analysis is guided by the research questions using descriptive statistical tools, specifically the mean and standard deviation, to determine respondents’ perceptions.
Research Question One: To what extent does policy formulation enhance balanced society
Table 1: Mean and Standard Deviation for Policy Formulation and Balanced Society
|
Item |
Mean |
SD |
Decision |
|
Awareness of government policies |
3.45 |
1.12 |
Moderate |
|
Contribution of policies to societal balance |
3.62 |
0.98 |
Moderate |
|
Community involvement |
3.10 |
1.15 |
Moderate |
|
Transparency in policy formulation |
2.85 |
1.20 |
Low |
|
Evaluation of policy outcomes |
3.20 |
1.05 |
Moderate |
|
Cluster Mean |
3.24 |
1.64 |
Moderate Extent |
The results in Table 1 indicate that respondents rated the influence of policy formulation on enhancing a balanced society at a moderate extent, with a cluster mean of 3.24. Items such as awareness of government policies (Mean = 3.45), contribution of policies to fairness (Mean = 3.62), and outcome evaluation (Mean = 3.20) all fall within the moderate range. This implies that citizens recognize the existence of policies and believe they contribute somewhat to societal balance. However, the lowest-rated item is transparency in policy formulation (Mean = 2.85), which falls below the moderate threshold. This suggests that many respondents perceive policy formulation processes as lacking openness and clear communication. The moderate involvement of communities (Mean = 3.10) further shows that citizens are only partially engaged in shaping the policies that affect them. Overall, the table reflects that although policy formulation contributes to societal balance, its effectiveness is weakened by limited transparency and incomplete stakeholder participation.
Research question two: To what does policy implementation enhance a balanced society
TABLE 2: Mean and Standard Deviation for Policy Implementation and Balanced Society
|
Item |
Mean |
SD |
Decision |
|
Equitable resource distribution |
3.55 |
1.10 |
Moderate |
|
Reducing social disparities |
3.40 |
1.02 |
Moderate |
|
Community involvement |
3.05 |
1.20 |
Moderate |
|
Long-term benefits |
3.80 |
0.90 |
Moderate–High |
|
Collaboration among stakeholders |
3.60 |
1.00 |
Moderate |
|
Cluster Mean |
3.48 |
1.21 |
Moderate Extent |
Table 2 shows that respondents perceive policy implementation as contributing to a balanced society to a moderate extent, with a cluster mean of 3.48, the highest among the three variables studied. Respondents believe that implemented policies moderately ensure equitable distribution of resources (Mean = 3.55), reduce social disparities (Mean = 3.40), and encourage collaboration among government, the private sector, and civil society (Mean = 3.60). The highest rating is for the belief that well-implemented policies can lead to long-term benefits for social balance (Mean = 3.80), indicating optimism that proper implementation can drive sustainable development. Despite these strengths, community involvement remains moderate (Mean = 3.05), revealing that implementation activities may not sufficiently include citizens in monitoring or decision-making processes. This aligns with longstanding criticisms that policy implementation in many developing contexts is often top-down. The interpretation overall shows that while policy implementation is fairly effective, better community engagement and consistent execution are needed to achieve a fully balanced society.
Research question three: To what extent does the will of government enhance a balanced society
TABLE 3: Mean and Standard Deviation for Will of Government and Balanced Society
|
Item |
Mean |
SD |
Decision |
|
Awareness of government priorities |
3.30 |
1.15 |
Moderate |
|
Alignment of policies to societal needs |
3.45 |
0.95 |
Moderate |
|
Commitment to social justice |
3.55 |
1.05 |
Moderate |
|
Transparency in decision making |
2.90 |
1.20 |
Low |
|
Stakeholder consultation |
3.20 |
1.00 |
Moderate |
|
Government adaptability |
3.00 |
1.10 |
Moderate |
|
Cluster Mean |
3.23 |
1.46 |
Moderate Extent |
The results in Table 3 reveal that the will of government enhances a balanced society to a moderate extent, with a cluster mean of 3.23. Respondents believe that government priorities (Mean = 3.30), policy alignment with societal needs (Mean = 3.45), commitment to social justice (Mean = 3.55), and stakeholder consultation (Mean = 3.20) are reasonably fair but not strong. This indicates that citizens perceive the government as partly responsive and moderately committed to equity and justice. However, transparency in government decision-making is low (Mean = 2.90), suggesting that the lack of openness is a major obstacle to realizing a balanced society. Government adaptability to evolving societal challenges (Mean = 3.00) also shows a neutral-to-moderate perception, meaning citizens feel the government responds slowly or inconsistently to changing social needs. Table 3 indicates that although the government demonstrates some willingness to support societal balance, its effect is limited by weak transparency, inadequate stakeholder engagement, and inconsistent responsiveness.
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
The purpose of this study was to examine the roles of government in enhancing a balanced society through policy formulation, policy implementation, and political will. The findings revealed that government efforts in these areas contribute to societal balance only to a moderate extent, indicating significant gaps that still undermine the achievement of equity, justice, and social cohesion.
Findings from Table 1 show that policy formulation moderately enhances a balanced society, with a cluster mean of 3.24. Respondents agreed that policies contribute to social fairness, but transparency and community participation remain weak. This aligns with the observation of Adebayo (2019), who argued that public policy in many African states is characterized by limited citizen involvement, resulting in weaker legitimacy and reduced effectiveness. Similarly, Omeje and Adeyemi (2020) emphasized that transparent and inclusive policy processes increase accountability and improve policy outcomes. The low rating of transparency confirms that, despite existing policy structures, citizens still perceive government decision-making as opaque and elite-driven.
The results from Table 2 show that policy implementation contributes to societal balance to a moderate extent, with the highest cluster mean of 3.48 among the variables. Respondents believe that implementation facilitates equitable resource distribution and reduces disparities, although community involvement is still limited. According to Nwankwo and Chukwu (2021), implementation remains the most challenging stage of the policy process in developing countries, often due to inadequate coordination, resource shortages, and weak institutional capacity. The moderate but not high effectiveness reported in this study supports the argument by Ekong (2020) that policy implementation in Nigeria is frequently hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies and political interference.
Findings from Table 3 revealed that the will of government enhances a balanced society to a moderate extent, with a cluster mean of 3.23. Although respondents acknowledged government commitment to social justice and alignment of policies with societal needs, issues of transparency and stakeholder consultation remain critical weaknesses. This is consistent with the work of Agagu (2018), who stated that political will is central to governance effectiveness, especially in societies facing inequality and social tension. Without sustained commitment, government initiatives may fail to achieve transformative impact. The low mean score for transparency reinforces the assertion by Oloruntoba (2021) that public trust erodes when governmental decisions appear concealed or self-serving.
Overall, the discussion suggests that while the government plays an active role in promoting societal balance, the impact is hindered by limited transparency, insufficient community participation, and inconsistent implementation. Strengthening these areas would significantly enhance efforts toward building a fair, inclusive, and cohesive society.
CONCLUSION
This study investigated the roles of government in enhancing a balanced society through policy formulation, policy implementation, and political will. Findings showed that although the government contributes meaningfully to societal balance, the overall impact remains moderate due to persistent challenges such as low transparency, weak community involvement, inadequate stakeholder consultation, and inconsistencies in policy execution. A balanced society requires effective governance anchored in openness, inclusiveness, and accountability. Therefore, the government must strengthen its institutional capacity, deepen citizen participation, and demonstrate stronger political will to drive equitable development and social harmony.
Recommendations
Based on the findings, the following recommendations are made:
1. Government should adopt open-government principles, publish policy drafts, and provide clear information on decision-making to rebuild public trust.
2. Government agencies should receive adequate resources, training, and oversight to ensure policies are carried out effectively and consistently across sectors.
3. The government must show genuine commitment to addressing issues of inequality, social justice, and security, including taking decisive actions against corruption and political interference.
4. Anti-corruption agencies, public service commissions, and oversight bodies should be empowered to enforce transparency and ensure responsible use of public resources.
REFERENCES
Adebayo, P. F. (2019). Public policy formulation and implementation in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(3), 45–58.
Adebayo, P. F. (2020). Government and public administration in Nigeria. Lagos: Concept Publications.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.
Agagu, A. A. (2018). Governance and political will in Nigeria: Implications for national development. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12(2), 21–32.
Akinola, S. R. (2018). Public infrastructure and national development: Rethinking policy and institutional frameworks. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 6(1), 1–15.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post–cold war era. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding public policy (15th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Ekong, C. N. (2020). Policy implementation and service delivery in Nigeria: Institutional challenges and prospects. International Journal of Development Studies, 8(1), 55–67.
Fukuyama, F. (2013). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Igbokwe-Ibeto, C. J., Okechukwu, E. O., & Nkomah, B. B. (2019). Challenges of public policy implementation in Africa: A review of current literature. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 431–442.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2023: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.
Nwankwo, B. C., & Chukwu, M. O. (2021). Governance, policy implementation, and development outcomes in Nigeria. Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 16(1), 72–89.
OECD. (2020). Government at a glance 2020. OECD Publishing.
Oloruntoba, S. O. (2021). Transparency, accountability, and governance in Africa: An institutional perspective. African Governance Review, 14(2), 103–118.
Omeje, K., & Adeyemi, S. (2020). Inclusive governance and public trust in West Africa: A policy perspective. Governance and Development Review, 6(1), 1–16.
Omeje, K., & Onuoha, B. (2021). Public policy and inclusive governance in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 18(3), 45–60.
Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNDP. (2020). Human development report 2020: Human development and the Anthropocene. United Nations Development Programme.
UNESCO. (2022). World social report: Building equitable societies through inclusive development. UNESCO Publishing.
World Bank. (2020). Inclusive governance and social cohesion report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2021). Governance and the law: Enhancing state effectiveness for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
|
Cite this Article: Danung, PD; Gyot, BD; Takbol, CT (2026). Roles of Government towards Enhancing a Balanced Society in Plateau State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2026.1.021626026. |