Peer Review for 032120051
|
GREENER SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS |
|
gjournals.org |
REVIEW COMMENTS
SECTION I:
|
|
|
Manuscript Number: 032120051
Manuscript Title: Review of Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) invasion and lessons learned for sustainable food production in Nigeria
Reviewer’s Details: Deleted
|
SECTION II: Comments on the sections of Manuscript below.
|
Title:
|
The title is not complete. Please, include place of armyworm invasion. You have not presented how this pest has constituted a major threat to the food security situation in Africa especially in Nigeria. You may need to x-ray the hunger and food security situation in Africa and especially Nigeria to really find the place of crop pests in this discourse. you may find some important information about these issues in these links: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.08.001 https://premierpublishers.org/ajaerd/19120820382
|
|
Abstract: |
You may need to rewrite this section in a summarized manner incorporating the ingredients of a typical abstract (brief intro/objective of the study, methodology, your major findings, very brief conclusion and a recommendation enamating from the findings in your study). You may not need to give historical background of the subject but present a brief background information about it. |
|
Introduction: |
Author(s) needs to present more robust background information in this section. Please, can you provide historical background of armyworm before becoming a major pest of cereals in Africa? You need to give robust background information about armyworm and sustantiate the need to link it to the major crops. You may need to include the names of some crops belonging to these families (please, check the edited manuscript). |
|
Methodology: |
|
|
Results: |
|
|
Discussion/Conclusion: |
You may need to modify this section by incorporating some recommendations enamating from the findings in this study and present a more concise conclusion. You may check the edited manuscript for other comments. |
|
References:
|
Some other recent, relevant and highly retrievable references may be added in the introduction and results and discussion sections of this study. |
|
Tables, Figures, Graphs and additional files: |
|
|
Others:
|
|
Section III: Please answer YES or NO. Read carefully before answer. You can give further details to your answers to these questions in section VII below.
|
Is the title of the manuscript befitting for the manuscript? If no, please suggest in section II. |
Yes |
|
Have the experiments been properly performed and are they adequate? |
|
|
Do you think a wrong study method has been applied? |
|
|
Have you observed manipulation and forging of data to suit the result and conclusion of the study? |
No
|
|
Does the provided data adequately support the result and conclusion? |
Yes |
|
Should more data be provided to support the conclusion? |
|
|
Has the author cited relevant works by other scholars? |
Yes |
|
Do you consider the citations irrelevant to the study or inadequate? |
No |
|
Are there ethical issues or issues of competing interests you would like to raise? If yes, please give details in section VII. |
No |
|
Does the manuscript need further proofreading (English and grammatical corrections)? |
Yes |
SECTION IV: Please answer the questions below.
|
What is the type of manuscript (Research, review, short comm., technical note etc)? |
Review |
|
What subject area does the manuscript fit? |
Crop Production |
|
Will you like to be sent the revised manuscript? |
|
SECTION V: Please rate the following: (Kindly Mark X where related)
|
Novelty/originality: |
Technical correctness: |
Importance to the field: |
|||
|
Excellent |
|
Excellent |
|
Excellent |
|
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
Good |
x |
|
Fair |
x |
Fair |
x |
Fair |
|
|
Poor |
|
Poor |
|
Poor |
|
|
English/ Grammar |
Logic, clarity, structure & flow |
Presentation & Style |
|||
|
Excellent |
|
Excellent |
|
Excellent |
|
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
|
Fair |
x |
Fair |
X |
Fair |
x |
|
Poor |
|
Poor |
|
Poor |
|
SECTION VI: Overall Assessment/Score: (Kindly place your score where related)
|
Article Assessment |
Score Range |
Your Score |
|
Excellent |
81 -100 |
|
|
Very Good |
61 - 80 |
|
|
Good |
41 - 60 |
55 |
|
Fair |
21 - 40 |
|
|
Poor |
0 - 20 |
|
SECTION VII: Additional Comments
Please add any additional comments:
Call for Articles/Books
Call for Scholarly Articles
Authors from around the world are invited to send scholary articles that suits the scope of this journal. The journal is currently open to submissions and will process and publish articles daily, immediately they are ready.
The journal is centered on quality and goes about its processes in a very timely fashion. Seasoned editors/reviewers will be consulted to review each article(s), profer quality evaluations and polish the articles with expertise before publication.
Use our quick submit button to submit or simply send your article(s) as an e-mail attachment to manuscripts@acad.gjournals.org or manuscripts.igj@gmail.com.
Call for Books
You are also invited to submit your books for online or print publication. We publish books related to all academic subject areas. Submit as an e-mail attachment to books@acad.gjournals.org.



